Forty graduates turn conservation training into economic opportunity
The training focused on agriculture, food preservation, leather and beauty product manufacturing, supported by the government and private sector partners. It aims to equip vulnerable community members with hands-on skills to start their own businesses and build self-sufficiency.
Seiso Mohai, deputy minister of agriculture, land reform and rural development, applauded the graduates for embracing an opportunity that links conservation with job creation.
'We must begin to see agriculture and biodiversity not only as tools for survival but as platforms for innovation and growth. What we are witnessing today is not just a graduation but a shift in how we build resilience in our rural communities,' said Mohai.
Skumsa Nthanga, SANParks head of socioeconomic transformation and Vision 2040 project lead, told TimesLIVE that the programme's purpose is to empower communities, especially those near biodiversity-rich landscapes, to reclaim their heritage through sustainable economic activity.
'We want to see beneficiaries establish and run their own enterprises. Our national parks are in remote areas with limited job opportunities. This programme is about closing that gap,' she added.
One of the graduates, Thulisa Mnqabisa from Nomathamsanqa, said she closed her beauty salon to join the training. 'I wanted to learn how to develop my own beauty products and eventually use them in my salon,' she said.
Mnqabisa told TimesLIVE that she now plans to manufacture and distribute her beauty products to BnB houses and hotels. 'The knowledge I got here will help me employ others in my community. That's the dream.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
an hour ago
- Mail & Guardian
Petrol price to fall by 28 cents from 6 August, diesel to rise
From Wednesday, 95-grade unleaded petrol will cost R21.59 per litre in Gauteng and R20.76 in coastal areas The The wholesale price of illuminating paraffin, which many poor households still use for cooking and lighting, will rise by 32 cents a litre, the department said in a statement. Liquified petroleum (LP) gas, another crucial energy source for many homes, will cost 69 cents less per kilogram. In the Western Cape, the decrease in the price of gas will be a heftier 78 cents per kilogram. From Wednesday, 95-grade unleaded petrol will cost R21.59 per litre in Gauteng, the country's economic hub, and R20.76 in coastal areas. The price of diesel will be R20 and R19.17 per litre, respectively, while paraffin will cost R13.48 and R12.46. LP gas will sell for R36.08 a kilogram in Gauteng and R32.92 in coastal areas. South Africa adjusts its fuel prices monthly — effective from the first Wednesday — based on the global oil price and the rand exchange rate. The country imports both crude oil and finished products at a price set at international level, including shipping costs. 'The average Brent Crude oil price decreased slightly from $69.36 to $69.06 during the period under review,' the mineral and petroleum resources department said. 'The main contributing factor to the lower crude oil price is the decision by Opec [Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries] to increase production and the uncertainty caused by looming could affect global economic growth and demand for crude oil.' South Africa is bracing for a The mineral and petroleum resources department said, during the period under review, the average international petrol prices decreased in line with the decrease in crude oil prices. The cost of diesel and paraffin, however, rose due to low stocks in the US, unplanned refinery shutdowns and closures of refineries in the EU, which resulted in tight supply. The rand appreciated on average against the US dollar from R17.84 to R17.76 when compared to the previous month. This led to lower contributions to the basic fuel prices of petrol by between four and five cents per litre on all products.
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
How Trump's tariffs exposed South Africa's strategic trade failures
The Trump' administration's trade tariffs have shaken the rand. Photo: File The United States' 30% tariff on South Africa — set to take effect on 1 August 2025 but pushed back seven days — is a grave blow for those diligently modelling costs, yet a distant abstraction for many South Africans who are yet to grasp its economic gravity. Regrettably, in South Africa global economic shocks typically register as background noise, their causes unexamined, their consequences only recognised when unavoidable. Before dissecting our strategic missteps, let's make these abstract forces tangible. Consider first how US President Donald Trump's threats of tariffs shook the rand's foundations in July alone. The currency exhibited heightened volatility, opening at R17.59 before plunging 2.6% to R18.04 by month-end, as markets priced in the impending tariffs. Three distinct phases can be identified: the initial 7 July drop to R17.74 (-1%) on Trump's Brics surcharge threat, a mid-month slump to R17.89 as exemption hopes faded and the final 1.5% 24 to 31 July drop when tariff implementation became certain. Let's also appreciate trade and industry in this context. The South African Revenue Service's Cumulative Trade Report for January to June 2025 revealed that SA exported R68.8 billion worth of goods to the US. Trump's tariffs will probably disproportionately target critical sectors like vehicles and transport equipment (R11.4 billion); machinery (R3.8 billion); iron and steel products (R10.9 billion); chemicals (R4.8 billion) and plastics (R644 million). Despite exempt categories, such as precious metals and iron ores, several mineral categories will suffer, including processed steel, machinery components and industrial chemicals, risking R31.5 billion in vulnerable exports. If these impacts remain abstract, consider the tangible consequences — currency depreciation and trade disruptions will send prices of basic goods soaring, devastate jobs in the auto and mining industries, deepen inequality, shutter factories at an alarming rate, fuel inflationary fires and ignite political instability as economic hardship erodes public trust. Clearly, these repercussions span economic, political and social spheres, raising pressing questions about whether the state could have taken stronger measures to mitigate the coming storm. The evidence suggests decisive action was both possible and necessary. While competent trade negotiation reflects able governance, truly strategic trade diplomacy remains an elusive art — one whose absence we feel acutely in these turbulent economic waters. A few months back, while Washington's theatrics over South Africa's land reform policies dominated headlines, the real tragedy unfolded quietly – that is, the country's mineral baiting approach to trade talks which ultimately ought to have been seen by our government as doomed from inception. Why so? Because Trump's global trade warfare primarily stems from geopolitical anxiety over dwindling US hegemony, not sound economic logic. In such a context, no mineral concessions could sway Washington. Rather than this futile approach, we should have been aggressively pursuing market diversification, accelerating regional industrial partnerships and building shock-absorbent trade architectures. Far from wishful thinking, this has been a deliberate strategic pivot by pragmatic emerging economies. For example, shortly after Trump announced reciprocal tariffs, Southeast Asian states like Cambodia aggressively diversified trade partners through South-South cooperation and the 'China+1' strategy, transforming tariff threats into opportunities. These nations retain their edge as export manufacturing hubs, where labour cost advantages outweigh protectionist headwinds. Regrettably, this was a storm we might have weathered — had we possessed the strategic foresight to act early. Instead, we'll spend the coming quarters, perhaps years, paying for missed opportunities, while our trade and diplomatic machinery scrambles merely to recover lost ground. Siseko Maposa is the director of Surgetower Associates Management Consultancy. The views expressed are his own.
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
Diesel price up, petrol price down from midnight
Mineral and petroleum resources minister Gwede Mantashe has announced a mixed bag for motorists in August, with big increases to diesel prices and decreased petrol prices. From Wednesday, fuel prices will be adjusted as follows: Petrol 93 and 95: 28c/ l decrease; decrease; Diesel (0.05% sulphur): 65c/ l increase; increase; Diesel (0.005% sulphur): 63c/ l increase; and increase; and Illuminating paraffin (wholesale): 32c/ l increase. The main reasons for the fuel price adjustments are due to the average Brent Crude oil price decreasing slightly from $69.36 to $69.06 during the period under review. The main contributing factor to the lower crude oil price is the decision by Opec to increase production and the uncertainty caused by looming US trade tariffs, including secondary tariffs, which could affect global economic growth and demand for crude oil. The average international petrol prices decreased in line with the decrease in crude oil prices. The prices of diesel and paraffin increased due to low stocks in the US, unplanned refinery shutdowns and closures of refineries in the EU, which have resulted in tight supply. The rand appreciated against the US dollar from 17.84 to 17.76 compared to the previous period. Fuel prices from midnight on Tuesday are as follows:
