logo
Anna University sexual assault convict jailed for 30 years

Anna University sexual assault convict jailed for 30 years

Hindustan Times3 days ago

A local court in Chennai on Monday sentenced a 37-year-old man, convicted for sexually assaulting a 19-year-old student of Anna University last year, to 30 years in prison without remission.
Mahila court judge M Rajalakshmi pronounced the sentence in respect of each of the 11 charges proved by the prosecution and said the sentences will run concurrently.
'He will not be entitled to any privileges or early release,' public prosecutor Mary Jeyanthi told reporters after the verdict.
'His phone is the weapon of this case,' Jeyanthi said. 'We submitted to the court a report from the forensic science lab which had analysed his phone activities on the day of the crime and concluded that he put his phone on flight mode. An official from his network provider testified in court that he received no calls post 6.29pm on December 23 until he received an SMS at 8.58pm clearly stating his phone was in airplane mode during this time.'
Earlier on Wednesday, she convicted Gnanasekaran finding him guilty of charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Information Technology Act, and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act.
In December 2024, Gnanasekaran, who worked as a vendor near the university, broke into the campus and assaulted the student.
The First Information Report in the case said that Gnanasekaran forced the student to perform 'sexual acts'.
The student told police that Gnanasekaran emerged from behind after having recorded a video of her with her friend on his mobile phone. He threatened to leak the video and send it to her father and the college authorities. Gnanasekaran threatened and first physically assaulted the student's friend, a third-year student. The student urged Gnanasekaran not to leak the video. Gnanasekaran took her friend away, asking her to wait at the same place. He then took the 19-year-old to a secluded spot about 200 metres away and sexually assaulted her. Gnanasekaran also took photos of her ID card and father's number and asked her to keep meeting him, failing which he said he would release her videos.
Gnanasekaran was arrested on December 24 last year.
However, the FIR of the case was downloaded from the CCTNS website of Tamil Nadu police and broadcast by certain sections of the media which created a furore.
Later, the Madras high court transferred the investigation of the case to a special investigation team, which also probed the FIR leak.
The SIT filed a charge sheet in February before a magistrate court. Thereafter, the case was transferred to the Mahila Court.
The judge, while convicting Gnanasekaran, said that he sought a lenient sentence claiming he was the sole bread-winner of the family and prosecution objected to it and sought maximum punishment.
The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), which was under fire over Gnanasekaran's alleged links with it, hailed the speedy verdict within five months, saying it showed the government's commitment to protecting women. DMK leader RS Bharathi said Gnanasekaran was arrested within 24 hours after the crime was reported, a charge sheet was filed within 60 days on February 24 and the police gathered strong evidence and the court found the accused guilty within five months. He said the government will not tolerate crimes against women.
Opposition All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) leader Edappadi Palaniswami said its state-wide protests led to the speedy conviction in the case. He added that some important questions remained unanswered and vowed to ensure that others involved in the crime were also punished.
The AIADMK campaigned for justice in the case, asking: 'Who is that, Sir?' In her complaint to the police, the student said that Gnanasekaran spoke to someone over the phone, addressing him as 'sir' and pretending to take instructions from him.
Chennai police chief, A Arun, clarified that Gnanasekaran had put his phone on airplane mode and pretended to speak to someone, referring to him as 'sir' to intimidate the student. He said there was no other suspect in the case.
The AIADMK continued the 'sir campaign' and brought placards to the state assembly asking: 'Who is that, sir?' The AIADMK maintained Gnanasekaran was linked with the DMK, citing his photos posing with DMK ministers. Chief minister MK Stalin clarified that Gnanasekaran was a DMK supporter but not a member and promised justice in the case.
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader K Annamalai, who whipped himself six times to protest against the assault, accused the Tamil Nadu police of leaking the student's identity. He released pictures of the accused posing with deputy chief minister Udhayanidhi Stalin and minister M Subramanian. He called Gnanasekaran a repeat offender and a DMK functionary. The DMK denied the claim, saying anyone can click a picture with government functionaries.
AIADMK and BJP workers, including former Telangana governor Tamilisai Soundararajan, protested outside the campus and district collectorates.
The assault forced Anna University to deploy more security personnel and CCTVs on campus to strengthen security. The police and the university also conducted a joint security audit.
The Madras high court took a suo motu cognisance of the case and directed the state government to pay ₹25 lakh compensation to the 19-year-old student and Anna University to sponsor her education for failing to ensure her safety. It also appointed an all-women Special Investigation Team to probe the assault.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bengaluru Police pinning blame of stampede on RCB, organiser, reveal FIR details
Bengaluru Police pinning blame of stampede on RCB, organiser, reveal FIR details

India Today

time30 minutes ago

  • India Today

Bengaluru Police pinning blame of stampede on RCB, organiser, reveal FIR details

An FIR filed by the Bengaluru police names Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) as the prime accused in the June 4 stampede that left 11 people dead and many injured during a celebratory event at M Chinnaswamy DNA Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) were named as second and third FIR SAYS ABOUT CROWD SURGEAs per details of the FIR accessed by India Today, crowds began gathering on June 3, the day RCB won the final, near East Chinnaswamy Stand, MG Road, and Vittal Mallya Road to celebrate the victory. A high-level coordination meeting was held with senior police officials, including the Additional Commissioner of Police (ACP), Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP Traffic), and other relevant officials. Guidelines were issued regarding traffic, public safety, and crowd control, the FIR next day, despite police coordination and planning, the turnout for the felicitation event swelled beyond control as fans surged toward the stadium between 4 pm and 5.30 PLANNING, MISMANAGEMENT ALLEGEDThe police report alleges that organisers failed to set up adequate barricades or crowd-control measures, both inside and outside the stadium. This led to a stampede-like situation at multiple AND INJURIESadvertisementThe FIR confirms that 11 people died in the chaos and 64 others, including police personnel, were injured. It blames the organisers for negligence, despite prior warnings from the police about crowd control FILED BY POLICE INSPECTORThe complaint was filed by Girish AK, an inspector from the Cubbon Park Police Station. He submitted the report on June 5 at 11.15 am, stating that the organisers' actions violated public safety protocols and resulted in serious CHARGES IN FIRThe FIR lists sections of the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Section 105 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), Section 125 (acts that endanger human life or personal safety), Section 118 (1,2) (causing hurt or grievous hurt with dangerous weapons or means), Section 190 (liability of members of an unlawful assembly for offences committed in pursuit of a common object), among Karnataka government said that the case has now been transferred to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). A Special Investigation Team (SIT) will be constituted within the CID to ensure a robust probe into the stampede took place during a public event on Wednesday to felicitate the RCB team following their maiden Indian Premier League title win. As per top sources who spoke to India Today, the Karnataka government went ahead with the felicitation ceremony the day after RCB's victory, despite Bengaluru Police recommending it be held on Sunday for logistical and security Watch IN THIS STORY#Karnataka

Delhi Police arrest Maharashtra Home Guard who conned women on matrimonial website
Delhi Police arrest Maharashtra Home Guard who conned women on matrimonial website

Indian Express

time3 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Delhi Police arrest Maharashtra Home Guard who conned women on matrimonial website

An employee with the Home Guard Department in Maharashtra, who allegedly deceived innocent women on the pretext of marriage through a matrimonial website, was arrested by the Delhi Police on Wednesday. The accused, Nagesh Arjun Pawar, a 29-year-old resident of Mumbai, was found siphoning off money from unsuspecting victims by promising them marriage, according to police reports. Six complaints registered on various cybercrime portals have been linked to the same modus operandi. Investigations are ongoing to identify other victims and ascertain the full extent of his cyber crimes, the police said. The case came to light after a woman filed a complaint on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal alleging that she was defrauded of Rs 20 lakh by a man posing as Vishal Bhosle. The complainant had created a profile on the matrimonial website and was contacted by Bhosle, who claimed to work at Morgan Stanley, a multinational financial services company, in Worli, Mumbai. He also convinced her that he owned a 50 per cent stake in Adventure Water Sports and Mansion Sahara Star Club. According to the Delhi Police, Bhosle would ask the woman for money under the guise of various emergencies, including hospital admissions, car accidents, and mobile phone purchases, as their relationship progressed. The transactions eventually amounted to Rs 20 lakh, the woman stated to the police. Upon realising that the woman had been deceived, she reported the matter online, which led to the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) and a subsequent investigation. 'During the investigation, the details of the accounts of the complainant were obtained from the bank. On the basis of information obtained from the bank and technical analysis, we located the accused at Kandivali East in Mumbai. Accordingly, a raid was conducted at the hideout and one accused, namely Nagesh Arjun Pawar, was arrested,' said Rajiv Ranjan, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Rohini. According to the police, Pawar allegedly confessed to creating a fake identity using fabricated photos and details under the name Vishal Bhosle on the matrimonial site. He admitted to coercing the complainant into transferring funds and even acquiring a credit card in her name, which he used for his luxuries. He revealed that the money received was used to sustain a lavish lifestyle.

‘Scolding Or Workload Alone Not Abetment To Suicide': Allahabad HC Grants Bail To MLA
‘Scolding Or Workload Alone Not Abetment To Suicide': Allahabad HC Grants Bail To MLA

News18

time3 hours ago

  • News18

‘Scolding Or Workload Alone Not Abetment To Suicide': Allahabad HC Grants Bail To MLA

Last Updated: The court gave bail to Jahid Baig, a Samajwadi Party MLA from Uttar Pradesh's Bhadohi, in a case involving the suicide of an 18-year-old domestic help The Allahabad High Court has granted bail to Jahid Baig (aka Jahid Jamal Beg), a Samajwadi Party MLA from Uttar Pradesh's Bhadohi constituency, in a case involving the suicide of an 18-year-old domestic help, Nazia, who had been working in his home for nearly a decade. The bench of Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh, while allowing the bail plea, held that there was no prima facie evidence to establish abetment of suicide under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, by the legislator or his family members. The incident occurred on the night of September 8-9, 2024, when Nazia was found hanging in a storeroom on the third floor of the MLA's residence. Her death sparked concerns of child labour and alleged harassment in a politically sensitive setting. Another minor girl, Moni alias Sania, was rescued from the same household the next day during a joint raid ordered by the district magistrate. According to Moni's statement, both girls were often overburdened and scolded, sometimes even slapped. However, the court observed that such statements, while concerning, did not amount to instigation under the law. Nazia's father Imran and cousin Zubair initially refrained from making any accusations against the applicant. Later, Nazia's mother submitted an application under Section 173(4) BNSS against a young man named Abhishek Saroj, claiming that Nazia had been in a relationship with him and was being blackmailed over intimate photographs, which allegedly led to her suicide. The single-judge bench placed weight on Nazia's call records, which showed extended conversations with Abhishek in the hours leading up to her death. It noted that these details, combined with the mother's complaint, 'supported and corroborated" the theory that the alleged blackmail may have triggered her suicide. Further undermining the prosecution's case was the unexplained five-day delay in lodging the FIR, despite the police and district officials visiting the scene on September 10, a day after the suicide. 'As per statement of Moni with whom deceased-Nazia was working in the house of the applicant, that sometimes applicant scolded the deceased for work. Even assuming the same as correct at this stage, the same cannot be categorised as instigation or abetment to commit suicide," the court held, adding that there was no suicide note, no direct incitement by the applicant, and no allegations of abetment from the deceased's parents. However, the court emphasised that its findings were restricted to bail and should not influence the merits of the ongoing trial. Jahid Baig, who had been in custody since September 19, 2024, was directed to cooperate with the proceedings and barred from leaving the country. First Published:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store