Three men in court accused arson attacks on properties linked to Keir Starmer
Three Ukrainians who have been accused of setting fire to two properties and a car linked to Sir Keir Starmer's home have appeared in court.
Ukrainian Roman Lavrynovych, 21, has been charged with three counts of arson with intent to endanger life over fires at two properties and a car linked to the Prime Minister.
Petro Pochynok, 34, who is also Ukrainian and Romanian national Stanislav Carpiuc, 26, who was born in Ukraine, are accused of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life.
The trio were arrested after emergency services responded to a fire at the Kentish Town home where Sir Keir lived before becoming PM and moving into 10 Downing Street.
Damage was caused to the property's entrance, but nobody was hurt.
The PM is reportedly renting his Kentish Town home to his sister-in-law.
A car linked to Sir Keir was set alight in the early hours of May 8 in the same street.
Locals described hearing a 'loud bang' moments before the fire erupted.
And in the early hours of Sunday, firefighters dealt with a small fire at the front door of a house converted into flats in nearby Islington, which is also linked to the Prime Minister.
One person was assisted to safety via an internal staircase by crews wearing breathing apparatus, LFB said.
Sir Keir has described the fires as 'an attack on democracy'.
Lavrynovych and Carpiuc appeared at the hearing via videolink from HMP Belmarsh, and spoke only to confirm their identities and dates of birth via an interpreter.
Ms Justice Cheema Grubb told the court that Pochynok had refused to leave his cell for the preliminary hearing. More Trending
All three defendants were remanded in custody to next appear for a plea and trial preparation hearing at the same court on October 17.
A provisional trial date was set for April 27 next year in front of a High Court judge.
A fourth person, a 48-year-old man, was arrested by police at Stansted Airport on Monday on suspicion of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life in connection with the incidents.
The Metropolitan Police said he had been released on bail until next month.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Hot weather to finally return but not before we endure a drenching
MORE: 'Mushroom killer searched online for deadly mushrooms' before in-laws deaths
MORE: Soldier who raped stranger in 'harrowing' street attack jailed for nine years
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Government's anti-radicalisation programme says being worried about mass migration is 'terrorist ideology'
The government's anti-radicalisation programme has decided worries about mass migration are 'terrorist ideology'. Among the 'dangerous' beliefs flagged by Prevent's online training course are 'Cultural nationalism' and the idea 'Western culture is under threat'. A statement on the official website describes 'Extreme right-wing' ideology as terrorism, before going on to list three sub-categories. It says concerns around 'lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups' are also a threat. Critics have warned the definition of 'cultural nationalism' is too broad and could even encompass the likes of Sir Keir Starmer. Lord Young, the general secretary of the Free Speech Union (FSU) said: 'The definition in the training course expands the scope of suspicion to include individuals whose views are entirely lawful but politically controversial. 'Now that 'cultural nationalism' has been classified as a subcategory of extreme Right-wing terrorist ideology, even mainstream, Right-of-centre beliefs risk being treated as ideologically suspect, despite falling well within the bounds of lawful expression.' Lord Young added the definition could also capture Mr Jenrick, the former immigration minister, who warned 'excessive, uncontrolled migration threatens to cannibalise the compassion of the British public'. There are three categories of 'Extreme right-wing' terrorism. They are 'Cultural nationalism', 'white/ethno-nationalism' and 'white supremacism' Prevent is one part of the government's overall counter-terrorism strategy and is described as a multi-agency programme that 'aims to stop individuals becoming terrorists'. A Home Office spokesman said: 'Prevent is not about restricting debate or free speech, but about protecting those susceptible to radicalisation.' Each year, thousands of teachers, police officers, health workers and other staff undergo Prevent training. The programmes official 'refresher awareness' course states 'cultural nationalism' as one of the most common 'sub-categories of extreme Right-wing terrorist ideologies', alongside white supremacism and white/ethno-nationalism'. The row comes despite a report by Sir William Shawcross, a former independent reviewer of Prevent, warning that mainstream literature and even Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg had been described as 'cultural nationalists'. Sir William recommended Prevent must be 'consistent in the threshold that it applies across ideologies to ensure a proportionate and effective response'. Among the programme's other failures were its inability to identify people who went on to carry out terrorist attacks, according to Sir William. A former government adviser has now also described the 'cultural nationalism' definition as 'pretty shoddy'. It comes amid fears that despite a person being deemed to require 'no further action', their name could be smeared, with it remaining on police or other databases. Last month, retired police officer Julian Foulkes was arrested and detained for a social media post - with officials who searched his house describing his book collection as 'very Brexity'. Mr Foulkes subsequently received an apology and £20,000 compensation. The FSU has said it has already worked to support members of Prevent like a 24-year-old autistic man whose social worker reporter he had been viewing 'offensive and anti-trans' websites and 'focussing on lots of Right-wing dark comedy'.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Immigration concerns hit highest level since just before Brexit vote, poll finds
Concern over immigration has surged to become the public's most pressing issue, according to polling. Nearly half the public view immigration as one of the biggest problems in the country – the highest proportion since just before the historic Brexit vote – a survey by Ipsos found. It was mentioned by 49 per cent of people asked to list the 'most pressing issues facing Britain today', up 15 percentage points on the previous month. At the time of the EU referendum in June 2016, immigration was mentioned by 48 per cent of people, Ipsos said. The survey showed concern over the NHS and healthcare rose to second place – mentioned by 34 per cent – while the economy dropped two places to become the third most-mentioned topic, at 33 per cent. The findings came from an Ipsos telephone survey of just over 1,000 adults carried out in the seven days from May 7. Ipsos director Mike Clemence said: 'The May Index shows British public concern about immigration reaching its highest level in almost a decade, far ahead of the NHS and economy… We have seen concern about immigration rise among groups who are traditionally more positive about immigration, as well as those who tend to be more concerned.' During the polling period Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer warned the country risked becoming an 'island of strangers' without moves to address immigration. He said high migration numbers had caused 'incalculable damage' to public services, housing and the economy. But he was accused of 'taking the public for fools' as he proposed an immigration crackdown after years of backing open borders. During the 2020 Labour leadership contest Sir Keir said that 'free movement has been hugely beneficial' and 'our immigration system should be welcoming and compassionate'. He also backed 'more safe and legal routes' for people to join family members in the UK rather than risking crossing the Channel by small boat. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper unveiled her immigration White Paper on May 12 which said the Government would curb judges' power to block deportations and reduce immigration to Britain by 98,000 a year. A few days later official figures showed asylum claims hit a record 109,000 in a year, while the number of foreign nationals extending their visas to stay in Britain surged to almost 1 million.
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
By-election win a breather for Labour before spending review gloom
It was a brief moment of respite. At 3am on Friday the prime minister was woken by a call from an aide informing him that, against the odds, Labour had won the Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse Holyrood by-election. There may have been just 602 votes in it, but for Sir Keir Starmer at this stage of his premiership a win is a win. It was, he said, a 'fantastic' victory. For one local resident it mattered more than most. Morgan McSweeney, Starmer's chief of staff, lives nearby with his wife Imogen Walker — she is the MP for the overlapping constituency of Hamilton & Clyde Valley — and is said to have taken a close interest in the campaign. The Times has been told that Starmer's decision to announce a U-turn on winter fuel payments earlier this month, rather than waiting until the spending review next week, was made partly with Hamilton in mind. Those on the ground said it had almost immediate cut-through, with winter fuel payments going from being the biggest issue on the doorstep at the start of the campaign to being relatively marginal. 'People got that we had listened,' was how one MP put it. But the win was far from clean. Reform UK went from a standing start to winning 26 per cent of the vote, just three per cent behind the SNP and five per cent behind Labour. It also showed Nigel Farage's party could siphon off votes from the Conservatives in Scotland as well as England, as support for the Scottish Tories collapsed from 17 per cent at the 2021 Holyrood election to 6 per cent. Richard Tice, Reform's deputy leader, claimed the result was 'truly remarkable'. The spending review promises to be one of the most challenging moments of Sir Keir Starmer's premiership THOMAS KRYCH/STORY PICTURE AGENCY A cabinet minister insisted that Labour's victory showed that the party could come through the middle to win next year's elections to the Scottish parliament. The SNP's tactic of telling voters to back them to stop Reform backfired dramatically. But any sense of relief for Starmer will be short-lived. The spending review next week promises to be one of the most challenging moments of his premiership. The government will seek to frame it as being about 'investing in Britain's renewal', with money going into security, the NHS and the economy more broadly. In one sense Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, has a positive story to tell, with a £30 billion uplift in funding for the NHS, significant investment in the military and £113 billion worth of capital spending — including investment in local transport projects, nuclear power and other schemes. Reeves has been telling colleagues that the capital spending 'must be felt everywhere', with investment in shovel-ready projects across the country. But while the government would like to focus on the winners from the spending review process, many of the headlines are likely to be about the losers. The decision to increase spending on the NHS and the Ministry of Defence means that unprotected departments are facing real-terms cuts. Some of the negotiations between the Treasury and cabinet ministers have been brutal. Talks between Reeves and Angela Rayner, the local government and housing secretary, and Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, are going down to the wire. The discussions between Cooper and Reeves in particular are said to have been particularly robust, with one Treasury official describing them as 'explosive'. Cooper has been making the case that without additional funding the government will be unable to deliver on several of Starmer's flagship pledges, including halving knife crime and halving violence against women and girls. Her case has been made both publicly and privately by the police. Sir Mark Rowley, the head of the Metropolitan Police, has written to Starmer directly along with other police chiefs warning that without additional funding forces will face 'stark' choices about which crimes they investigate. When pressed on Rowley's intervention this week, Reeves's response was curt. 'We will be increasing spending on police,' she said. However she did not say whether she would meet the demands of police for a real-terms rise in spending, which lies at the heart of the row. JOSHUA BRATT FOR THE TIMES Rayner, who is seeking to protect local council budgets from cuts, is also said to have been 'forthright' in fighting her corner. One report claimed she had stormed out of a meeting with Darren Jones, the chief secretary to the Treasury, slamming the door on the way out. Rayner's allies denied this, saying that while she had been tough in the talks she could not have slammed that door because the meeting had been held virtually. They added that they were now 'making progress' but were happy to go down to the wire. 'The deadline is when the document has to go to the printers,' they said. Reeves's room for manoeuvre is inherently limited by the state of the public finances and global events, something she alluded to at a CBI dinner on Thursday night. 'To be able to make decisions is a huge privilege,' she said. 'However, there's a lot of things that are out of [my] control as well, whether that is tariffs or what's happening in the global economy. You've got to be very agile and respond to the world as it is.' Paul Johnson, the outgoing head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said that he has 'genuine sympathy' for Reeves and the difficult choices she has to make. • UK public borrowing tops £20bn in blow for Rachel Reeves Speaking at his leaving drinks in Westminster he said: 'We had an almost 20-year period of continual growth, a sense of real optimism I think, and that's really been sort of beaten out of the economy, and I think probably to some extent beaten out of the electorate. 'Not only have we had, up till the late 2010s, a period of really serious cuts to public services, but no increase in people's incomes either. There's just really hard trade-offs.' The question hanging over the spending review will be that of tax rises. The government's U-turn on the winter fuel allowance — which will cost about £700 million — will only add to the pressure on the public finances. Plans to reverse the two-child cap on benefits could cost as much as £3.5 billion a year. All of this against the backdrop of a growing hole in the public finances, and the estimate of some economists that Reeves could be as much as £60 billion in the red by the time of the autumn budget. Reeves did little to calm nerves at the CBI dinner, when she highlighted the huge tax rises of her inaugural budget and said she was 'never going to repeat anything of that scale' — which is not the same thing as ruling out any further rises. In the Treasury there are concerns that for all the fireworks surrounding the spending review the broader economic outlook is bleak. 'Everyone is talking about who gets what at the spending review but the bigger picture is that no one is really talking about the unsustainable path government debt is on,' one official said. 'We need politicians to start thinking about how we get on top of it. We don't have long before there is a serious risk of a debt spiral.'
