Hacking and Decoding Hidden Wireless Signals with a Raspberry Pi and SDR Tools
Jeff Geerling explains how SDR tools combined with a Raspberry Pi and GNU Radio can be used to decode and analyze the Meshtastic network. You'll gain insights into the technical challenges of working with LoRa modulation, from configuring GNU Radio workflows to fine-tuning antenna placement for optimal signal reception. Along the way, we'll touch on the broader applications of SDR, from airplane tracking to wireless traffic optimization, showcasing its versatility. Whether you're a seasoned tinkerer or a curious beginner, this journey into the world of SDR promises to be as rewarding as it is challenging. What hidden signals will you uncover? Exploring SDR Applications Understanding Software-Defined Radio
Software-defined radio is a highly adaptable technology that processes and analyzes radio signals using software rather than traditional hardware components. This flexibility allows users to explore and decode a variety of wireless communication systems. For example: ADSB (Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast): Enables tracking of airplanes by decoding their broadcast signals, providing real-time flight data.
Enables tracking of airplanes by decoding their broadcast signals, providing real-time flight data. Wireless Traffic Analysis: Identifies interference in crowded environments, such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth congestion, to optimize network performance.
GNU Radio, a modular and open source software framework, plays a critical role in processing these signals. Its versatility allows users to design custom workflows tailored to specific tasks, such as decoding the LoRa protocol used by Meshtastic devices. However, mastering GNU Radio requires a strong foundation in both its architecture and the principles of radio communication. Meshtastic and the LoRa Protocol
Meshtastic is an innovative off-grid text messaging system that uses the LoRa protocol for long-range communication. It is particularly valuable in remote areas or during events where cellular networks are unavailable. By using SDR tools, you can analyze the signals transmitted by Meshtastic devices to better understand their operation and functionality.
At the OpenSauce event, Meshtastic activity provided a unique opportunity to experiment with SDR in a real-world setting. Observing the network's signals enabled attempts to decode messages and identify protocol variations, such as LongFast versus ShortTurbo frequencies. However, decoding these signals presents significant challenges. LoRa's modulation techniques are complex, requiring precise SDR configuration to accurately interpret the data. Meshtastic Hacking with a Raspberry Pi in 2025
Watch this video on YouTube.
Here is a selection of other guides from our extensive library of content you may find of interest on Raspberry Pi. Addressing Technical Challenges
Working with SDR tools to decode wireless signals involves overcoming several technical obstacles. Key challenges include: Antenna Placement: Proper positioning of the antenna is essential for optimal signal reception. In environments like convention centers, interference from Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and other devices can complicate signal analysis.
Proper positioning of the antenna is essential for optimal signal reception. In environments like convention centers, interference from Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and other devices can complicate signal analysis. Signal Processing: Configuring GNU Radio to decode LoRa signals demands a deep understanding of radio protocols. Parameters such as bandwidth, spreading factor, and coding rate must be carefully adjusted to match the specific protocol used by the Meshtastic network.
Experimentation is crucial to overcoming these challenges. Adjusting antenna configurations, testing signal attenuation techniques, and refining GNU Radio workflows can significantly improve signal decoding accuracy. Patience and persistence are key to mastering these technical aspects. Expanding the Applications of SDR
The versatility of SDR extends far beyond decoding Meshtastic signals. It opens up a wide array of practical applications, including: Airplane Tracking: Decoding ADSB data provides valuable insights into flight paths, air traffic patterns, and aviation safety.
Decoding ADSB data provides valuable insights into flight paths, air traffic patterns, and aviation safety. Wireless Traffic Monitoring: SDR can analyze crowded wireless environments to identify sources of interference or explore long-range communication systems.
SDR can analyze crowded wireless environments to identify sources of interference or explore long-range communication systems. Hobbyist Projects: From decoding satellite signals to experimenting with amateur radio, SDR offers countless opportunities for enthusiasts and professionals to innovate and explore.
While the technical learning curve can be steep, the potential rewards are substantial. Combining tools like GNU Radio with hardware such as the HackRF One and Raspberry Pi enables users to push the boundaries of wireless signal analysis and uncover new possibilities. The Future of SDR Exploration
The potential of SDR technology is vast, offering endless opportunities for exploration and innovation. Future projects could include: Exploring advanced features of GNU Radio to enhance signal processing capabilities.
Experimenting with other SDR applications, such as satellite communication or advanced ADSB decoders.
Developing new techniques to decode increasingly complex wireless protocols.
By continuing to learn and experiment, you can deepen your understanding of wireless communication and unlock new insights into the world of radio signals. The combination of SDR tools and creative problem-solving has the potential to drive significant advancements in this field. Unlocking the Potential of SDR
Using SDR to explore Meshtastic with a Raspberry Pi and GNU Radio highlights both the challenges and rewards of this technology. While the learning curve may be steep, the knowledge and skills gained are invaluable. Whether you are tracking airplanes, decoding off-grid messages, or analyzing wireless traffic, SDR provides a powerful platform for exploring the complexities of wireless communication. With dedication and curiosity, you can harness its full potential and uncover a fascinating world of possibilities.
Media Credit: Jeff Geerling Filed Under: Guides, Hardware
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
37 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
iOS 26 & Apple News This Week
Apple's iOS 26 beta 5 introduces a series of updates that underscore the company's dedication to enhancing both functionality and user experience. With improvements spanning software, hardware integration, and artificial intelligence, this release offers a glimpse into the future of Apple's ecosystem. Whether you're a developer, a tech enthusiast, or a casual user, these updates aim to refine your interaction with Apple devices while setting the stage for upcoming innovations. The video below from Brandon Butch gives us more details on iOS 26 and the latest Apple News. Watch this video on YouTube. Key Features and Enhancements in iOS 26 Beta 5 The latest beta version of iOS 26 brings several noteworthy features designed to improve usability, aesthetics, and overall functionality. Among the most striking updates is the liquid glass effect for the home screen and control center, which introduces a sleek, modern visual design. Additionally, Dynamic Island now includes a low power mode indicator with animations and a quick toggle, seamlessly combining functionality with visual appeal. Other updates include: An improved placement of the 'Select' button in the Mail app, making it more accessible for users. A toggle in the Camera app to revert to the classic scroll direction, addressing feedback from users who preferred the previous functionality. Enhanced screen-lock animations, particularly for devices with Always-On Display, adding a polished touch to the user experience. A new AirPods splash screen that explains the meaning of charging case light indicators, improving clarity for users. While these updates enhance the overall experience, some features, such as low power mode, still exhibit minor performance inconsistencies. These issues highlight areas where further refinement is needed before the final release. Performance and Battery Life: Incremental Improvements iOS 26 beta 5 demonstrates noticeable progress in terms of performance and stability compared to earlier beta versions. System crashes and bugs have been significantly reduced, resulting in a smoother and more reliable user experience. Battery life has also seen improvements, though it remains slightly below the levels achieved in stable iOS releases. These advancements suggest that Apple is prioritizing both reliability and efficiency as the final release date approaches. For users testing the beta, the improved stability and performance provide a more seamless experience, though further optimizations are expected in subsequent updates. Apple's AI Initiatives: Expanding the Ecosystem Apple is making strides in artificial intelligence alongside its iOS updates, signaling a broader strategic focus on this rapidly evolving field. Reports indicate that Apple has formed an internal team, reportedly named 'AKI,' to develop a ChatGPT-like chatbot. This initiative could result in a standalone AI app, separate from Siri, offering advanced conversational capabilities and potentially transforming how users interact with Apple devices. In addition to this, Apple is actively recruiting engineers with expertise in search algorithms and machine learning, further emphasizing its commitment to strengthening its AI infrastructure. These efforts suggest that Apple is positioning itself to compete more aggressively in the AI space, with potential implications for both software and hardware integration across its ecosystem. iPhone 17 Rumors and Anticipated Features As excitement builds for the iPhone 17 lineup, rumors suggest that Apple is preparing to introduce innovative technologies that will redefine user expectations. The lineup, expected to launch on September 9, 2025, may include several innovative features aimed at enhancing both design and functionality. Rumored features include: Liquid silicone cases with integrated lanyard straps, offering improved durability and convenience for users. A 2.49mm thin battery with a 2800mAh capacity in the iPhone 17 Air, showcasing advancements in battery technology for longer-lasting performance. A custom image sensor capable of dynamic range performance approaching that of the human eye, promising unparalleled photography and videography capabilities. These potential features highlight Apple's focus on blending innovative design with practical functionality, further solidifying its position as a leader in the smartphone market. Broader Ecosystem Updates and Industry Context Beyond iOS and hardware, Apple's ecosystem continues to evolve in ways that demonstrate its versatility and utility. For example, a recent success story involving AirTag showcased its practical applications when the device helped recover $5,000 worth of stolen roofing supplies in Florida. This incident highlights the real-world value of Apple's ecosystem in everyday scenarios. Meanwhile, competitors like Google have taken the opportunity to critique Apple's slower rollout of certain features. A recent Pixel 10 advertisement, for instance, highlighted some of these delays, underscoring the competitive dynamics within the tech industry. As the iOS 26 beta program progresses, weekly updates are expected to address performance issues, refine features, and further optimize the user experience. The final release, anticipated in mid-September 2025, is expected to deliver a polished and feature-rich operating system. Looking Ahead iOS 26 beta 5 represents a significant step forward in Apple's software development, combining aesthetic enhancements, functional improvements, and a glimpse into the company's broader strategic goals. From the liquid glass effect to the development of AI chatbot initiatives, these updates reflect Apple's commitment to delivering a seamless and forward-thinking user experience. As the final release approaches, the tech community eagerly anticipates the culmination of these efforts, alongside the debut of the highly anticipated iPhone 17 lineup. Here is a selection of other guides from our extensive library of content you may find of interest on iOS 26 beta features. Source & Image Credit: Brandon Butch Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPhone, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Digital resurrection: fascination and fear over the rise of the deathbot
Rod Stewart had a few surprise guests at a recent concert in Charlotte, North Carolina. His old friend Ozzy Osbourne, the lead singer of Black Sabbath who died last month, was apparently beamed in from some kind of rock heaven, where he was reunited with other departed stars including Michael Jackson, Tina Turner and Bob Marley. The AI-generated images divided Stewart's fans. Some denounced them as disrespectful and distasteful; others found the tribute beautiful. At about the same time, another AI controversy erupted when Jim Acosta, a former CNN White House correspondent, interviewed a digital recreation of Joaquin Oliver, who was killed at the age of 17 in a 2018 high school shooting in Florida. The avatar of the teenager was created by his parents, who said it was a blessing to hear his voice again. In June, Alexis Ohanian, a co-founder of Reddit, posted on X an animation of his late mother hugging him when he was a child, created from a photograph. 'Damn, I wasn't ready for how this would feel. We didn't have a camcorder, so there's no video of me with my mom … This is how she hugged me. I've rewatched it 50 times,' he wrote. These are just three illustrations of a growing phenomenon of 'digital resurrection' – creating images and bots of people who have died using photographs, videos, voice messages and other material. Companies offering to create 'griefbots' or 'deathbots' abound, and questions about exploitation, privacy and their impact on the grieving process are multiplying. 'It's vastly more technologically possible now because of large language models such as ChatGPT being easily available to the general public and very straightforward to use,' said Elaine Kasket, a London-based cyberpsychologist. 'And these large language models enable the creation of something that feels really plausible and realistic. When someone dies, if there are enough digital remains – texts, emails, voice notes, images – it's possible to create something that feels very recognisable.' Only a few years ago, the idea of 'virtual immortality' was futuristic, a techno-dream beyond the reach of ordinary people. Now, interactive avatars can be created relatively easily and cheaply, and demand looks set to grow. A poll commissioned by the Christian thinktank Theos and carried out by YouGov in 2023 found that 14% of respondents agreed they would find comfort in interacting with a digital version of a loved one who had died. The younger the respondent, the more likely they were to be open to the idea of a deathbot. The desire to preserve connections with dead loved ones is not new. In the past, bereaved people have retained precious personal items that help them feel close to the person they have lost. People pore over photos, watch videos, replay voice messages and listen to music that reminds them of the person. They often dream of the dead, or imagine they glimpse them across a room or in the street. A few even seek contact via seances. 'Human beings have been trying to relate to the dead ever since there were humans,' said Michael Cholbi, a professor of philosophy at the University of Edinburgh and the author of Grief: A Philosophical Guide. 'We have created monuments and memorials, preserved locks of hair, reread letters. Now the question is: does AI have anything to add?' Louise Richardson, of York university's philosophy department and a co-investigator on a four-year project on grief, said bereaved people often sought to 'maintain a sense of connection and closeness' with a dead loved one by visiting their grave, talking to them or touching items that belonged to them. 'Deathbots can serve the same purpose, but they can also be disruptive to the grieving process,' she said. 'They can get in the way of recognising and accommodating what has been lost, because you can interact with a deathbot in an ongoing way.' For example, people often wonder what a dead loved one might have done or said in a specific situation. 'Now it feels like you are able to ask them.' But deathbots may also provide 'sanitised, rosy' representations of a person, said Cholbi. For example, someone creating a deathbot of their late granny may choose not to include her casual racism or other unappealing aspects of her personality in material fed into an AI generator. There is also a risk of creating a dependency in the living person, said Nathan Mladin, the author of AI and the Afterlife, a Theos report published last year. 'Digital necromancy is a deceptive experience. You think you're talking to a person when you're actually talking to a machine. Bereaved people can become dependent on a bot, rather than accepting and healing.' The boom in digital clones of the dead began in the far east. In China, it can cost as little as 20 yuan (£2.20) to create a digital avatar of a loved one, but according to one estimate the market was worth 12bn yuan (£1.2bn) in 2022 and was expected to quadruple by 2025. More advanced, interactive avatars that move and converse with a client can cost thousands of pounds. Fu Shou Yuan International Group, a major funeral operator, has said it is 'possible for the dead to 'come back to life' in the virtual world'. According to the China Funeral Association, the cost is about 50,000 yuan per deceased person. The exploitation of grief for private profit is a risk, according to Cholbi, although he pointed to a long history of mis-selling and upselling in the funeral business. Kasket said another pitfall was privacy and rights to digital remains. 'A person who's dead has no opportunity to consent, no right of reply and no control.' The fraudulent use of digital material to create convincing avatars for financial gain was another concern, she added. Some people have already begun stipulating in their wills that they do not want their digital material to be used after their death. Interactive avatars are not just for the dead. Abba Voyage, a show that features digital versions of the four members of the Swedish pop group performing in their heyday, has been a runaway success, making about £1.6m each week. Audiences thrill – and sing along – to the exhilarating experience while the band's members, now aged between 75 and 80, put their feet up at home. More soberly, the UK's National Holocaust Centre and Museum launched a project in 2016 to capture the voices and images of Holocaust survivors to create interactive avatars capable of answering questions about their experiences in the Nazi death camps long into the future. According to Cholbi, there is an element of 'AI hype' around deathbots. 'I don't doubt that some people are interested in this, and I think it could have some interesting therapeutic applications. It could be something that people haul out periodically – I can imagine they bring out the posthumous avatar of a deceased relative at Christmas dinner or on their birthday. 'But I doubt that people will try to sustain their relationships with the dead through this technology for very long. At some point, I think most of us reconcile ourselves with the fact of death, the fact that the person is dead. 'This isn't to say that some people might really dive into this, but it does seem to be a case where maybe the prospects are not as promising as some of the commercial investors might hope.' For Mladin, the deathbot industry raises profound questions for ethicists and theologians. The interest in digital resurrection may be a consequence of 'traditional religious belief fading, but those deeper longings for transcendence, for life after death, for the permanence of love are redirected towards technological solutions,' he said. 'This is an expression of peak modernity, a belief that technology will conquer death and will give us life everlasting. It's symptomatic of the kind of culture we inhabit now.' Kasket said: 'There's no question in my mind that some people create these kinds of phenomena and utilise them in ways that they find helpful. But what I'm concerned about is the way various services selling these kinds of things are pathologising grief. 'If we lose the ability to cope with grief, or convince ourselves that we're unable to deal with it, we are rendered truly psychologically brittle. It is not a pathology or a disease or a problem for technology to solve. Grief and loss are part of normal human experience.'
Auto Blog
3 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Chevrolet Isn't Going to Like the Nissan Armada Pro-4X's Capability
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Same goal, different approaches Right out of the box, the Nissan Armada Pro-4X is not only vastly improved over the previous Armada but also extremely capable off-road. Nissan gave this latest Pro-4X a big boost in tech, comfort, and powertrain performance, and it shows in every part of the driving experience. In fact, it impressed me so much during testing that I ranked it above the Toyota Sequoia TRD Pro — a tough competitor in this segment. The Chevrolet Tahoe Z71 is a closer, more natural rival. It's built with a similarly rugged body-on-frame setup, offers real off-road hardware, and provides a wide range of factory upgrades. Where Nissan focuses on making the off-road package fully loaded right from the factory, Chevy gives buyers a lot of choice in terms of powertrains, suspension tech, and packages — which can be a blessing or a budget-breaker, depending on how you spec it. By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. We may receive compensation. As a former owner of a Chevrolet Blazer and GMC Jimmy, I know how tough these traditional SUVs can be. The world may have moved toward crossovers and EVs, but the DNA of these big, body-on-frame rigs hasn't changed: they're still built for towing, hauling, and handling bad roads without complaint. The difference now is that they come packed with far more comfort and tech than the square-bodied trucks of old. Nissan Armada Pro-4X – MSRP: $75,750 2025 Nissan Armada PRO-4X — Source: Nissan Powertrain: 425 hp, twin-turbo 3.5L V6 (516 lb-ft torque) Transmission/Drivetrain: 9-speed automatic, traditional 4×4 with two-speed transfer case Off-Road Hardware: Standard electronic locking rear differential, full-length skid plates, all-terrain tires, and active air suspension with up to 9.6″ of ground clearance Interior Features: 12.3″ fully digital driver display, 14.3″ touchscreen, ProPILOT Assist driver aid suite, premium Klipsch audio system, ambient interior lighting Fuel Economy (EPA est.): 15 mpg city / 18 mpg highway Towing Capacity: Up to 8,500 lbs Cargo Space: 97.1 cu-ft max Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The Pro-4X trim is more than just a cosmetic package — it's the most capable Armada you can buy from the factory. The new twin-turbo V6 is a big leap over the old naturally aspirated V8, with more torque across the rev range and noticeably stronger acceleration. The cabin is a high point too: seating comfort is excellent in all rows, with high-quality materials and better fit-and-finish than before. The trade-off? It's slightly smaller inside than the Tahoe, especially behind the third row, though it makes up for it with richer standard equipment. Chevrolet Tahoe Z71 – MSRP: $72,095 2025 Chevrolet Tahoe — Source: Chevrolet Standard Engine: 355 hp 5.3L V8 (383 lb-ft torque) Optional Engines: 305 hp 3.0L inline-6 turbo-diesel (495 lb-ft) or 420 hp 6.2L V8 (460 lb-ft) Transmission/Drivetrain: 10-speed automatic, off-road tuned suspension, skid plates, recovery hooks Available Hardware: Electronic limited-slip differential, adaptive air suspension, Magnetic Ride Control (requires Off-Road Capable Package +$2,845) Fuel Economy (EPA est.): 15/20 mpg (5.3L V8), 14/18 mpg (6.2L V8), 20/26 mpg (diesel) Towing Capacity: Up to 8,400 lbs Cargo Space: 122.9 cu-ft max Chevy's Z71 package is more modular — buyers can start with a base off-road-ready Tahoe and add options as needed. The available diesel is a standout for those who tow long distances, thanks to its excellent torque and 600-mile range. While the Tahoe's cabin isn't quite as plush as the Nissan's in base form, it's roomy, functional, and easy to configure. Where the Chevy really pulls ahead is in total cargo space — it simply has more room for gear, especially behind the third row. On-road performance The Armada's twin-turbo V6 delivers its power with a strong mid-range surge, making highway passing and steep climbs effortless. It also does a good job balancing performance and refinement, with less vibration and noise than you might expect from a big truck-based SUV. The Tahoe's standard 5.3L V8 is adequate for most needs, but the 6.2L V8 or diesel is the better choice if you're regularly hauling or want more punch. On the road, Chevy's adaptive suspension makes for a smoother, more composed ride, and the availability of Super Cruise — GM's excellent hands-free driving system — gives the Tahoe a big advantage for long-distance cruising. Off-road performance Both SUVs can take a beating off-pavement, but they approach it differently. The Tahoe Z71 with air suspension can reach up to 10″ of ground clearance, slightly edging out the Armada's 9.6″. However, Nissan's suspension feels more flexible over uneven terrain, and the Pro-4X comes with more trail-ready gear standard — including the locking rear diff, which is optional on the Chevy. Chevy's off-road tuning filters out more harshness and feels more composed on rough fire roads, while the Armada's stronger standard engine makes it livelier when powering through loose sand or climbing steep grades. Final thoughts If you want the biggest interior and the most customization options, the Tahoe Z71 is hard to beat — especially with the diesel, which delivers class-leading range and strong towing performance. If you want the best value in standard off-road equipment, richer interior appointments without ticking a lot of option boxes, and a powertrain that outguns most of the competition right out of the gate, the Armada Pro-4X gets my nod. When comparably equipped, the Tahoe's price climbs into the mid-$80Ks, while the Armada stays noticeably lower while offering more included features. Both are strong, capable full-size SUVs, but Nissan's more complete Pro-4X package means you're ready for both the daily commute and the weekend trail run without an extra trip to the options list.
