Stocks to watch: RIL, HDFC Bank, Eternal, JSW Steel, Jio Financial among shares in focus today
Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) kicked off FY26 on a strong note, reporting a 76% year-on-year increase in consolidated net profit to ₹ 26,994 crore.
The bank posted a robust performance in the June quarter, with Net Interest Income increasing by 10.6% year-on-year to ₹ 21,635 crore, while net profit grew 15.4% YoY to ₹ 12,768 crore.
India's largest private bank reported a robust performance for the June quarter, with its Net Interest Income increasing by 5.4% year-on-year to ₹ 31,438 crore.
Jio Financial Services Limited (JFSL) and Allianz Group, via its fully owned subsidiary Allianz Europe B.V., have signed a binding agreement to establish a 50:50 domestic reinsurance joint venture aimed at catering to India's fast-growing and evolving insurance market.
Yes Bank posted a 59% year-on-year increase in its standalone net profit for Q1FY26, rising to ₹ 801 crore from ₹ 502 crore in the same quarter last year.
The company's net profit jumped to ₹ 2,184 crore, marking a sharp rise from ₹ 845 crore in the corresponding quarter a year ago.
The private sector lender reported a weak performance for the June quarter, with Net Interest Income falling 13% year-on-year to ₹ 1,480.6 crore and net profit dropping sharply by 46% to ₹ 200 crore.
The company posted an impressive performance in Q1 FY26, with net profit surging 75.5% year-on-year to ₹ 324.3 crore and revenue rising 19.4% to ₹ 3,352.5 crore.
Warburg Pincus (through Currant Sea Investments B.V) has secured approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to proceed with its planned 9.99% stake investment in IDFC First Bank.
Punjab and Sind Bank posted a 48% rise in net profit to ₹ 269 crore for the first quarter.
The USFDA has issued a Form 483 containing seven observations to Dr. Reddy's Laboratories after conducting a GMP and Pre-Approval Inspection at its FTO 11 formulations plant in Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh.
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Eternal shares fall 3% as Antfin Singapore sells 23 lakh shares via block deal
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Order execution details Trade and settlement timeline Expected Trade Date: August 7, 2025 (T) August 7, 2025 (T) Expected Settlement Date: August 8, 2025 (T+1) Shares of Eternal (formerly Zomato ) fell 2.6% to their day's low of Rs 291 on the BSE on Thursday after Antfin Singapore Holding sold about 23.10 lakh shares of the company via a block intended to offload approximately 1.9% stake in the company in a cleanup trade, as per the term to the term sheet, the transaction was about to be carried out on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and the BSE, and the offer size includes about 188.4 million shares, representing 1.9% of Eternal's total share outstanding (TSO).The floor price for the bulk sale has been set at Rs 285 per share, which represents a discount of approximately 4.63% to the stock's last closing price of Rs 298.85 on NSE as of August deal is being managed by Morgan Stanley India Company Private Ltd and BofA Securities India Ltd, who are acting as the placement agents for the is a 100% secondary share sale, meaning that no new shares are being issued and all proceeds will go to the selling shareholder, Antfin Singapore order books are scheduled to close around 7:00 AM IST on August 7, although there is an option to close earlier. Investors are required to issue execution instructions to either or both of the placement multiple orders are received from a single investor through both agents, the placement agents reserve the right to seek clarification and may choose to aggregate the orders. In the absence of such clarification, they may execute the orders at their discretion.: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Sensex falls over 250 pts, Nifty below 24,550 after Trump's 50% tariff on India
Indian benchmark indices Sensex and Nifty50 opened lower for the third straight session on Thursday, after the United States imposed an additional 25% tariff on exports, raising investor concerns over potential economic fallout and worsening global trade relations. At 9:21 am, the BSE Sensex was down 178 points, or 0.23%, at 80,359, while the Nifty50 declined 57 points, or 0.23%, to trade at 24,519. From the Sensex pack, Adani Ports, Tata Motors, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Eternal, M&M, and Tata Steel were the top laggards, falling up to 2%. On the other hand, Trent, ITC, Sun Pharma, Bajaj Finserv, and Titan opened with gains. The revised US tariff structure will be implemented in two phases — the first 25% hike takes effect from tonight (Eastern Time), followed by another 25% levy 21 days after the order is signed. Meanwhile, before the additional tariffs were announced on Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) retained its GDP growth forecast for the year at 6.5%, downplaying tariff-related uncertainties. On the sectoral front, Nifty Auto, Metal, and Oil & Gas indices opened 0.3% to 0.7% lower. In the broader market, the Nifty Midcap100 declined 0.2%, while the Nifty Smallcap100 slipped 0.3%. Among individual stocks, Eternal (formerly Zomato) fell 2.6% after Antfin Singapore Holding offloaded around 23.1 lakh shares via a block deal. BHEL shares dropped over 4% after the company posted a wider consolidated net loss of Rs 455.50 crore for Q1 FY26, compared to Rs 211.40 crore in the same period last year.


Mint
7 hours ago
- Mint
Promoter salaries in India show sharp divide—some earn crores, others take zero
Mumbai: Some of India's most prominent promoters are among the highest-paid executives in the country. Others take no salary at all. A Mint analysis of Nifty 50 companies reveals a stark divide in how promoters who actively run their firms pay themselves. While some draw hefty compensation packages, others forgo salaries entirely. Yet in both camps, most earn far more through dividends than through direct pay. At the top of the pay scale are three automotive industry veterans: Pawan Munjal of Hero MotoCorp, Rajiv Bajaj of Bajaj Auto, and Sidhartha Lal of Eicher Motors. Kalanithi Maran of Sun TV and KM Mammen of MRF Ltd also rank among the highest-paid promoters in India's listed space. On the opposite end are promoters such as Mukesh Ambani of Reliance Industries Ltd, Nandan Nilekani of Infosys Ltd, Deepinder Goyal of Eternal (formerly Zomato), Rahul Bhatia of InterGlobe Aviation, and Mohit Burman of Dabur. All have officially waived their salaries. TVS Motor managing director Venu Srinivasan draws a nominal remuneration of ₹1 crore. Promoter pay carry broader implications for corporate governance. In India, resolutions on promoter compensation are not classified as related-party transactions, allowing promoters to vote on their own pay. In companies with concentrated promoter ownership, this can lead to approval of high compensation packages with minimal resistance, raising potential conflicts of interest and concerns over transparency. Salaries, dividends, and governance Yet compensation in the form of salary tells only part of the story. Most of these individuals, whether or not they draw a salary, earn significantly more through dividends. Ambani, for instance, received ₹3,655 crore in dividend income from Reliance in FY24, while Infosys' Nilekani earned ₹429 crore. The exception is Eternal's Goyal, whose company has yet to declare any dividends. 'There are several traditional companies where promoter salaries are disproportionately high and much higher than peers. That has been a long-standing concern," said Shriram Subramanian, the managing director of proxy advisory firm InGovern and an expert on corporate governance. Subramanian said promoters should ideally draw compensation in line with the highest-paid executive in their company, or close to that level, with dividends forming the bulk of their income. He made an exception for new-age companies, where founders may hold relatively small stakes and lack sufficient dividend income. There, the founders may take market-driven salaries to support their lifestyles, he said. The salary of executive directors who are promoters or part of the promoter group at listed companies is governed by the Companies Act, 2013 and Sebi's listing regulations. If annual remuneration exceeds ₹5 crore or 2.5% of a company's net profits, whichever is higher, it requires shareholder approval via special resolution. Even with these checks in place, promoter executives continue to earn significantly more than professional managers. A 2024 Deloitte survey found that promoter CEOs earned a median ₹11.9 crore in FY24, compared to ₹8.9 crore for professional CEOs. The average for promoter CEOs was ₹16.7 crore, versus ₹13 crore for professionals. Shareholder pushback In some cases, shareholders have challenged excessive promoter compensation. In FY24, institutional shareholders opposed the reappointment of Bina Modi as managing director of Godfrey Phillips India, and Gautam Singhania as chairman and managing director of Raymond, after proxy firms flagged their compensation as excessive. Both resolutions passed due to the promoters' substantial shareholding. In FY21, shareholders rejected Eicher Motors' proposal to reappoint Sidhartha Lal as managing director with a 10% salary hike to ₹23.2 crore. At the time, the company's profits and revenues were falling, the median employee salary had increased just 1%, and Lal's pay was 340 times that figure. His compensation had risen at a compounded annual growth rate of 28% over three years. Eicher later revised Lal's pay, cutting the cap from 3% of company profits to 1.5%. That proposal was subsequently approved by shareholders. Independent governance expert Sharmila Gopinath said the concern isn't about promoters taking salaries, it's about scale and fairness. 'There's nothing wrong with a promoter taking a salary, but the concern arises when the quantum is significantly higher than what others in the sector are paid," Gopinath said. '(A)t some point, it starts to feel like exploitation, especially when the salary seems out of sync with the rest of the executive team." The disparities are stark. At Hero MotoCorp, the second-highest paid executive drew ₹14.1 crore, compared to promoter Pawan Munjal's remuneration of ₹109.4 crore. At Sun TV, the highest-paid non-family executive earned ₹1.8 crore, versus Maran's compensation. At Bajaj Auto, the non-family figure was ₹28.3 crore, at MRF ₹11.9 crore, and at Eicher Motors ₹19.5 crore. 'Promoter salaries should be performance-linked, benchmarked against peers, and evaluated in the context of long-term shareholder returns and not just short-term gains," Subramanian said. Some promoters have kept their salaries in line with professional management. These include Rishad Premji of Wipro, who drew ₹13.8 crore, and Abhishek Lodha of Lodha Developers, who was paid ₹4.9 crore, figures comparable to the highest-paid non-family executives at their respective firms.