Bengaluru man sold land for daughter's marriage in 2006, now she wants money from buyer, says 'I wasn't asked'; Internet reacts
The Sale That Sparked a Dispute
Daughter Claims She Was Not Consulted
Shifting Statements and Legal Pressure
Live Events
Legal Advice and Online Reactions
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A land sale that took place nearly two decades ago in Bengaluru has now led to a legal dispute. The daughter of the man who sold the land in 2006 has sent a legal notice to the current owners, claiming that the property was sold without her consent.The property, located under BBMP limits, was sold by the father of the woman who is now demanding compensation. According to the buyer, who shared their experience on Reddit, the sale was done directly by the seller, and no Power of Attorney (POA) was involved. The buyer also stated that they have been paying property taxes regularly since then, and the Khata certificate is in the name of their father, who bought the land.Now, 19 years later, the seller's daughter claims she was not asked or informed before the sale. She is demanding compensation even though she was not a minor at the time. In fact, the buyer claims the seller himself had said the land was sold to arrange his daughter's marriage.The seller's son initially said it was a family matter and would be sorted amicably. But months later, he told the buyers that they would be taking legal action and advised them to get a lawyer.However, more recently, the tone changed again. The seller's son is now pushing for an out-of-court settlement and is allegedly using mild threats, saying things like, 'What if the judge rules in her favour?'The buyer said they felt pressured to settle and mentioned that the seller's son cited other cases where buyers had paid to resolve similar issues privately.Lawyers have assured the buyer that they are on strong legal ground, as they hold proper sale deeds and documents. Many users on Reddit supported the buyer, with one saying, 'If all papers are in place and records match government data, you should be fine.'Another user warned that this might be part of a family inheritance issue, where the daughter, possibly left out of the property share, is trying to claim her part through the buyers.Inputs from agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
House price index rises 3.1 pc in Q4 FY25: RBI data
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Mumbai: All-India House Price Index (HPI) increased by 3.1 per cent annually in the January-March quarter of 2024-25 compared to 3.1 per cent growth in the previous quarter and 4.1 per cent a year ago, the Reserve Bank said on Reserve Bank has released its quarterly house price index (HPI) for Q4 2024-25, based on transaction-level data received from the registration authorities in ten major annual HPI growth varied widely across the cities - ranging from high growth of 8.8 per cent (Kolkata) to a contraction of 2.3 per cent (Kochi).On a sequential (q-o-q) basis, all-India HPI increased by 0.9 per cent in Q4 Jaipur, Kolkata and Chennai are the major cities recording a sequential rise in house prices during the latest ten cities are Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi, Jaipur, Kanpur, Kochi, Kolkata, Lucknow, and Mumbai.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tata Motors to accelerate EV push; JLR tariff impact mitigated
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Mumbai: Tata Motors chairman N. Chandrasekaran on Friday told shareholders that the company is accelerating its electric vehicle (EV) strategy, even as it closely monitors supply chain and geopolitical risks that could affect at the company's 80th annual general meeting, Chandrasekaran said, 'We expect to reach 30% EV penetration well before 2030. We already have a strong portfolio—with Nexon EV , Punch EV, Tiago and Tigor—and we have several more models in the pipeline.' EVs accounted for 15% of Tata Motors' passenger vehicle sales in the last fiscal the auto maker continues to lead India's EV market with a more than 50% share, it has fallen more than more than 85% two years ago, as rivals such as Mahindra & Mahindra, Hyundai Motor India , and MG Motor India step up their offerings.'Yes, competition has increased, but we remain fully committed and have a strong runway,' Chandrasekaran said, without also addressed concerns around sourcing rare earth magnets used in EVs amid prevailing trade tensions globally. 'We are not facing any issues. We are able to source the magnets we need and have the right level of inventory,' he said. 'We're also working with the government on alternative resources. This is something we are watching very carefully.'On the proposed increase in US tariffs on UK-manufactured cars, which would impact unit Jaguar Land Rover , Chandrasekaran said, 'If the tariffs had gone to 27.5%, the impact would have been £1.6 billion. With the UK-US trade deal , that's coming down to 10%, and JLR's mitigation steps will reduce the impact to around £600 million.'He confirmed Tata Motors' participation in the government's EV bus programmes through its dedicated mobility business, and said the automaker is also testing 12 hydrogen buses and trucks. However, he cautioned, 'The cost of production and operations for hydrogen is still very high. This won't scale in the near term.'Chandrasekaran reaffirmed that the demerger of Tata Motors' passenger vehicle and commercial vehicle businesses remains on track, with both units expected to list separately in the December quarter. 'All three businesses have strong balance sheets and cash flows. There is no need for large-scale debt unless a strategic opportunity arises,' he said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Beneath the Iron Dome, Iran tests Israel's deterrence
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The intensifying conflict between Iran and Israel has exposed both the strengths and vulnerabilities of Israel's military posture, particularly its dependence on air defense systems to shield its territory from a sustained ballistic missile campaign. While Israel's technologically advanced missile defence architecture has proven capable of intercepting the vast majority of Iranian missiles so far, it faces a reckoning now: Can Israel maintain its missile shield in a long-term war of attrition?Since Iran initiated missile attacks last week, Israel's multi-layered air defense system -- a complex integration of Iron Dome (short-range), David's Sling (medium-range), and the Arrow system (long-range) -- has been operating at near-full capacity. The Arrow system, in particular, designed to intercept high-altitude ballistic missiles outside the atmosphere, has become the lynchpin of Israel's strategic defense against Iran's increasingly precise, long-range performance of these systems has been stellar. According to various media reports quoting Israeli authorities, most of the incoming missiles have been successfully intercepted, preventing significant infrastructure damage or civilian casualties. However, success comes at a cost, and that cost is becoming a pressing concern in military and political circles in from The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal indicate a growing concern among Israeli defence officials about the pace at which interceptors are being used. A senior US official confirmed that Israel's supply of Arrow interceptors, costing roughly $3 million each, is running low. If Iran maintains its current tempo of missile launches, Israel may only have enough interceptors left for 10 to 12 more days, according to intelligence sources quoted by the WSJ. Moreover, Israeli financial daily The Marker estimates that nightly missile defense operations could cost as much as 1 billion shekels (approximately $285 million). This extraordinary financial burden is compounded by the logistical limits of replenishing high-tech interceptors that require months to manufacture and the context of attritional warfare , where endurance and resupply become as important as battlefield success, Israel's heavy reliance on missile defence may become a strategic liability. Iran's ballistic missile arsenal, one of the largest in the world, allows it to absorb higher losses and maintain pressure without necessarily achieving direct military victories. For Iran, the cost of launching a missile is significantly lower than the cost for Israel to intercept one. This imbalance introduces a dangerous asymmetry. Even if each Iranian missile is intercepted, the financial and logistical strain on Israel could grow unsustainable over time. Attrition, in this case, becomes a tool of strategic leverage for Iran, by forcing Israel into a prolonged and expensive this vulnerability, Israel's ability to sustain its current operational tempo may hinge not only on its domestic industrial capacity but also on rapid US resupply. The US has historically supported Israel with missile defence funding and technological cooperation. US strategic planners are reportedly considering ways to boost production and provide emergency shipments, but even under optimal conditions, these efforts may not keep pace with operational demands if the war drags on for weeks or months. The chance of a missile shortage, especially for critical systems like Arrow, raises the possibility that Israel may have to prioritise targets, ration interceptors or rely more heavily on offensive operations to degrade Iran's launch an attritional scenario, Israel may be compelled to shift its operational doctrine. Rather than absorb waves of missile attacks, Israeli forces could increase the scale and intensity of air strikes inside Iran in an attempt to preempt or degrade its missile capabilities at the source. This shift would, however, raise the stakes dramatically and could lead to a broader regional escalation involving Iranian proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. This would also carry political and humanitarian costs, particularly if Iranian counterstrikes increase civilian air defense system has performed with impressive precision and effectiveness, maintaining the country's security during the initial days of conflict. However, the sustainability of this defence is now in question. US President Donald Trump has given a two-week deadline for making a decision whether to enter conflict. With missile interceptor supplies dwindling and resupply timelines uncertain, Israel faces a narrowing window in which to recalibrate its the war continues at its current pace, Israel will soon be forced to decide between escalating offensively to reduce the missile threat or adjusting its defense doctrine to prioritize critical assets. Either choice will pose significant risks. Israel, a country renowned for its military innovation, may now face its most severe test -- not in defeating its enemies outright, but in sustaining its defence long enough to shape the endgame.
