logo
What to Do If Your Doctor Doesn't Take Medicare

What to Do If Your Doctor Doesn't Take Medicare

Health Line4 days ago

If a doctor doesn't accept Medicare, you can choose to see them and pay more, or you can find a different provider. Medicare has an online directory of participating providers.
When you're enrolled in Medicare and looking to get medical care, it's important to check whether the healthcare professional you want to see is willing to work with the insurance program.
Many doctors work with Medicare. Those who do not may be nonparticipating providers or opt-out providers. Nonparticipating providers may sometimes accept assignment, but they may not at other times. Opt-out providers never accept Medicare.
Read on to learn what to expect and what to do when your doctor will not take Medicare.
What happens if a doctor doesn't accept Medicare?
A doctor who works with Medicare is referred to as accepting assignment. This means the provider is willing to accept Medicare reimbursement.
If you see a doctor who does not accept assignment, you'll have higher out-of-pocket costs than with a participating provider. In this case, your choices are as follows:
See a different doctor: Switch to a different doctor who works with Medicare.
Go to urgent care: Depending on your medical needs, you could schedule an immediate care or walk-in visit with a doctor who accepts Medicare. This may be easier and faster than scheduling a regular appointment. Most urgent care centers should accept Medicare. You can speak with the care center staff to learn whether the facility accepts Medicare.
Proceed and pay extra: You might make this decision, for example, if you need to see a specific specialist and no similar specialist is accepting assignment. In this case, you can consider asking the staff if there are any discounts or payment plans that you might be eligible for.
Submit claim: If you do proceed with seeing a nonparticipating doctor who does not accept assignment, they will submit a claim for any portion of the service they will directly bill to Medicare. In some cases, you may be asked to pay upfront and submit the claim yourself.
How much does it cost to see a doctor who doesn't accept Medicare?
Medicare nonparticipating providers can choose individually whether to accept the Medicare-approved rate for covered services. This amount is what Medicare reimburses them for services under Medicare Part B.
If they do not accept this rate, they can charge you up to 15% more than the approved rate. The exact percentage varies by state and is called the 'limiting charge.'
Note that this surcharge rule does not apply to durable medical equipment (DME), which means DME suppliers can charge more than the limiting charge.
When it comes to opt-out providers, since they do not accept Medicare at all for any service, they will bill you directly for all costs unless you have a secondary health insurance plan that they do accept.
Is it hard to find doctors who accept Medicare?
It's not difficult to determine whether a doctor works with Medicare. To find out if a doctor accepts Medicare assignment, consider asking your current doctor's office for a referral to someone who does accept assignment.
You can also use the Medicare provider directory on the Medicare.gov website. Alternatively, you can call 800-MEDICARE (800-633-4227) or the specific doctor's office and ask before you schedule the appointment.
In addition, representatives from the State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) may be able to assist you in the search.
Why would a physician opt out of Medicare?
Whether to accept an assignment depends on each doctor or clinic. Doctors who opt out of Medicare can set their own fees and avoid Medicare billing rules, audits, prior authorizations, and documentation requirements, gaining greater flexibility and reducing their administrative responsibilities.
Nonparticipating providers, in particular, can decide on a case-by-case basis whether to accept Medicare rates or bill you directly at higher rates for certain services.
In high cost areas or when their patients indicate that they can pay out of pocket, nonparticipating providers may earn more than participating providers when they don't accept assignment.
On the other hand, when nonparticipating providers file a Medicare claim, they receive a payment that is 5% lower than the amount permitted by the Medicare physician fee schedule. This means they earn less than participating providers when they consent to accept assignment.
Frequently asked questions
What percentage of doctors do not accept Medicare?
As of 2024, only about 1% of non-pediatric physicians had opted out of Medicare altogether, with psychiatrists leading at 8.1%. Opt-out rates are notably low for emergency medicine, oncology, radiology, and pathology, all at 0.1% or less. Psychiatrists, on the other hand, make up the largest portion of those opting out, followed by family and internal medicine physicians.
As of 2024, only about 1% of non-pediatric physicians had opted out of Medicare altogether, with psychiatrists leading at 8.1%. Opt-out rates are notably low for emergency medicine, oncology, radiology, and pathology, all at 0.1% or less. Psychiatrists, on the other hand, make up the largest portion of those opting out, followed by family and internal medicine physicians.
Do doctors have to accept Medicare Advantage plans?
When considering nonparticipating versus opt-out providers, remember that these terms refer to doctors who may or may not accept Original Medicare (parts A and B).
In addition, you have the option to enroll in a Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage) plan instead, which would give you the same benefits. However, these are private insurance plans with their own network of providers. Depending on the type of plan, you may have to see an in-network provider.
When considering nonparticipating versus opt-out providers, remember that these terms refer to doctors who may or may not accept Original Medicare (parts A and B).
In addition, you have the option to enroll in a Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage) plan instead, which would give you the same benefits. However, these are private insurance plans with their own network of providers. Depending on the type of plan, you may have to see an in-network provider.
Why does Medicare pay less than the Medicare-approved amount?
Every year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) sets the rates for all physician services for the following year using a range of complex data sets and formulas intended to represent physician costs associated with practicing medicine, among other factors.
That said, according to the American Medical Association, this formula does not adjust these rates for inflation, which may be another reason a doctor could decide to opt out of Medicare.
Every year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) sets the rates for all physician services for the following year using a range of complex data sets and formulas intended to represent physician costs associated with practicing medicine, among other factors.
That said, according to the American Medical Association, this formula does not adjust these rates for inflation, which may be another reason a doctor could decide to opt out of Medicare.
Do all doctors accept Medicare Supplement plans?
Medicare supplement plans, also called Medigap, can be easily confused with Medicare Advantage. Doctors do not accept Medigap simply because it is not a medical insurance plan. Instead, Medigap helps cover remaining costs after Original Medicare coverage kicks in.
Medicare supplement plans, also called Medigap, can be easily confused with Medicare Advantage. Doctors do not accept Medigap simply because it is not a medical insurance plan. Instead, Medigap helps cover remaining costs after Original Medicare coverage kicks in.
Takeaway
When you are enrolled in Original Medicare and need medical attention, it's crucial to verify whether the healthcare professional you wish to visit collaborates with the insurance program.
Numerous doctors partner with Medicare, but some may not. Per Medicare guidelines, they are referred to as nonparticipating providers or opt-out providers. Nonparticipating providers might occasionally accept Medicare assignment, while opt-out providers never do.
If a doctor does not accept Medicare, you have the option to still see them, but you will likely incur higher costs. You can also see a different provider. Medicare provides an online directory listing participating providers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Medicare Physician GI Procedure Pay Fell; Facility Pay Rose
Medicare Physician GI Procedure Pay Fell; Facility Pay Rose

Medscape

time37 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Medicare Physician GI Procedure Pay Fell; Facility Pay Rose

Medicare payments to physicians for common gastrointestinal procedures have declined in recent years, while reimbursement to ambulatory surgical centers and hospital outpatient departments has increased or held steady, according to a new analysis. These trends may exacerbate concerns that current federal payment policies are favoring consolidation in healthcare, while putting more financial pressure on clinicians in small and individual practices. Dipen Patel, MD In a recent American Journal of Gastroenterology paper, Dipen Patel, MD, of Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, and coauthors analyzed trends in Medicare reimbursement from 2018 to 2023 for colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) procedures. They compared changes in Medicare's physician compensation to changes in facility reimbursements for the same procedures. The results of their analysis are summarized below. Physician Fee Schedule (Adjusted for Inflation): Colonoscopy: Reimbursement dropped 22.6%. Nominal (unadjusted): 6.12% decline. Reimbursement dropped 22.6%. Nominal (unadjusted): 6.12% decline. EGD: Reimbursement dropped 22.7%. Nominal: 6.2% decline. Ambulatory Surgical Centers (Adjusted for Inflation): Colonoscopy: Reimbursement changed slightly (0.27% increase). Nominal (unadjusted): 21.7% increase. Reimbursement changed slightly (0.27% increase). Nominal (unadjusted): 21.7% increase. EGD: Reimbursement rose 6.23%. Nominal: 28.9% increase. Hospital Outpatient Departments (Adjusted for Inflation): Colonoscopy: Reimbursement changed slightly (0.65% decrease). Nominal (unadjusted): 20.6% increase. Reimbursement changed slightly (0.65% decrease). Nominal (unadjusted): 20.6% increase. EGD: Reimbursement changed slightly (0.82% increase). Nominal: 22.3% increase. The researchers examined 31 current procedural terminology codes for colonoscopy and 26 for EGD procedures. Patel, who graduated from the University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas, in 2019, said part of the motivation behind the study was to raise awareness among younger physicians who may not track Medicare policy closely. 'For my generation of physicians who are coming out of training, we don't really know much about these trends,' Patel told Medscape Medical News . 'We don't really know what the policies are or how they are playing out.' Other recent studies have identified similar patterns — where professional fees have declined while facility reimbursement either rose or declined to a lesser degree for common orthopedic procedures such as shoulder surgeries and knee and hip arthroplasty. Policy Ripple Effects Patel and coauthors noted that Medicare has significant influence over US healthcare. It's the largest purchaser of healthcare services, with total annual spending exceeding $1 trillion. Commercial insurers also factor in Medicare's payment rates while setting their own reimbursement for services. The American Medical Association (AMA) has linked physician fee schedule cuts to a shift away from independent practice ownership. In May, the AMA released results from its biennial Physician Practice Benchmark Survey (administered with WebMD/Medscape). Among the findings: An estimated 58% of physicians worked as employees in 2024, up from 42% in 2012, the survey's first year. Push for Inflation-based Updates Members of both parties of Congress have backed proposals to create automatic updates in the base rate for the Medicare physician fee schedule to reflect rising costs. For example, more than 170 members of the House supported a 2023 bipartisan bill that would have created automatic annual updates for the base rate of the physician fee schedule to keep up with inflation. The bill sought increases that would fully reflect the Medicare Economic Index (MEI) , a measure used to estimate changes in costs for clinicians in practice. That bill stalled when the 119th session of Congress began in January. A Republican-led budget package contains a similar ─ but more limited ─ proposal. It would increase the Medicare physician fee schedule's base rate, but by less than the full expected gain in inflation. The House-passed version of this bill would create an initial annual bump equal to 75% of the expected MEI change, with subsequent annual increases would be 10% of that index. The Senate will work this month on the budget package, known as a reconciliation bill, likely making changes to the House-passed measure. In a May letter to top House officials. AMA described the House's MEI proposal as 'a foundational step toward comprehensive Medicare physician payment reform in the 119th Congress,' meaning the current session which ends in January 2027. Consolidations and Consequences Gary Young, PhD, director of the Northeastern University Center for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, told Medscape Medical News that debates about consolidation in healthcare have persisted for decades. 'As far back as the 1970s, some people advocated for uniting hospitals and physician practices, seeing this as a way to reduce fragmentation and create more efficient care,' said Young, who has studied both Medicare's variation in pay for services and the effect on patients of hospital acquisition of practices. 'There are people who say they never really understood why hospitals and physicians were separate to begin with,' Young said. 'Others really lament the idea that the independent physician sector may go away. They ask: 'Do we really want all of our physicians to be under the control of healthcare systems and corporate entities?'' Young also noted that in many cases, physicians initiate buyout discussions with healthcare systems due to financial pressures. 'Many physician practices are struggling, and they approach hospitals sort of as a white knight,' he said. The American Hospital Association (AHA) has made a similar argument, telling lawmakers that its members have offered 'a lifeline' to struggling physician practices ─ especially in rural areas. Last year, the AHA submitted ideas for aiding physicians to the health panel of the Ways and Means Committee. The Ways and Means health committee held a May hearing titled 'The Collapse of Private Practice: Examining the Challenges Facing Independent Medicine.' The AHA recommended: Increasing physician reimbursement through the Medicare fee schedule Reducing insurer-imposed administrative burdens, such as prior authorization. Examining the growing role of commercial health conglomerates, in acquiring physician practices. 'While a disproportionate amount of attention has been placed on hospitals' acquisition of physician practices, the reality is that large commercial insurers including CVS Health and UnitedHealth Group have recently spent billions of dollars to acquire physician practices,' AHA said in its statement. Patel and coauthors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Will Trump's Order on Prescription Drug Prices Be Enough To Offset Tariffs?
Will Trump's Order on Prescription Drug Prices Be Enough To Offset Tariffs?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Will Trump's Order on Prescription Drug Prices Be Enough To Offset Tariffs?

President Trump recently issued an executive order, aiming to lower prescription costs down for Americans by aligning prices with those paid in other wealthy nations. The policy introduces a most-favored-nation pricing model, expands Medicare's ability to negotiate costs and pushes for more domestic drug manufacturing. Trending Now: Read Next: However, while the order aims to achieve price relief, rising tariffs on pharmaceutical ingredients and equipment, particularly those sourced from China, could drive production costs higher. Will Trump's order on prescription drug prices be enough to offset tariffs? Since the U.S. is the largest buyer of prescription drugs in the world, the goal of the executive order is to ensure it gets the best deal. It instructs U.S. trade officials to prevent foreign countries from maintaining low prices through practices that ultimately lead to higher American prices. The government will also set clear price targets and inform drug companies of its expectations. Check Out: If drug companies won't offer those lower prices, the government is prepared to step in with new rules and strong actions to stop price-gouging and break up unfair practices. To help lower prices, the plan also includes a new option: patients may be able to buy medication directly from manufacturers at the lowest price those companies offer in any country (known as the 'most-favored-nation' price), thereby skipping the middlemen. Dr. Gary Mangiofico, executive professor of management and leadership at Pepperdine University's Graziadio Business School, said that while the executive order aims to cut costs, not every American will feel the impact equally. For example, the savings depend on whether a person takes prescription drugs and how their prices are currently negotiated. In addition, Mangiofico said the entire pricing system is already clouded by discounts, pharmacy benefit managers and international pricing models, making comparisons and predicted savings hard to quantify. While the executive order aims to lower drug prices, tariffs may drive them back up. That's because many active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and key raw materials used to make medications are sourced from countries like China and India. Even drugs manufactured in the United States often rely on imported components to complete their supply chain. If tariffs are imposed on these chemicals, materials or medical equipment, the production cost can rise. This will leave manufacturers to decide whether to absorb the costs or pass them on to consumers. 'A potential 25% tariff on drugs could raise U.S. prices by as much as 12.9%, depending on how much of the cost gets passed on to consumers,' said George Carrillo, former director of social determinants of health for the state of Oregon and current CEO of the Hispanic Construction Council. 'This move could also complicate availability if companies decide to reduce exports to the U.S. in response. While the administration aims to boost domestic production of drugs, it's a slow process that may not offset the immediate effects of a tariff-heavy strategy,' Carrillo added. It's unclear whether President Trump's tariffs will take effect. According to Reuters, a federal court recently blocked the administration's tariff plan, ruling that it exceeded presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. In addition, drugmakers and investors have pushed back against both the pricing reforms and the tariffs, raising concerns about market volatility and supply chain disruption. 'If the administration experiences significant blowback due to increased volatility in the stock market, then they may be slower to implement them, if at all,' Mangiofico said. 'And, given enough time, pharma companies could build and ramp up their production in this country, bypassing tariff issues altogether.' Experts said most consumers won't see immediate savings from the executive order. 'Even if drug companies cut prices they charge wholesalers, it won't reduce the co-pays and deductibles that patients pay,' said David Williams, healthcare business and policy expert. 'So, consumers will have to look elsewhere to make up for rising overall costs.' In addition, Williams said over-the-counter medications sold at retailers like Walmart could get more expensive, especially those using imported ingredients. Finally, legal challenges could slow implementation, while pharmaceutical companies may find alternative ways to shift the costs; therefore, it's too early to expect lower prices. 'These developments could significantly influence both the affordability and availability of treatments, making it a crucial time for anyone managing the cost of necessary medicines,' Carrillo said. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Every State? I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money This article originally appeared on Will Trump's Order on Prescription Drug Prices Be Enough To Offset Tariffs? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's new budget bill hides an assault on hospice
Trump's new budget bill hides an assault on hospice

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's new budget bill hides an assault on hospice

President Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' which passed the House with almost unanimous Republican support on May 22, mandates $500 billion in cuts to Medicare. This is a cruel assault on some of the most vulnerable Americans that will strip them of vital health care services. It will also take an axe to hospice, which relies on Medicare reimbursement to function. Since 1982, when Medicare first began covering hospice, Americans have turned to it for essential end-of-life services that address the specialized needs of the dying and allow for death with dignity. Our current system doesn't always run perfectly and would benefit from greater funding and support. I know this because when my mother was 99.5 years of age and less than six months away from her death, medical staff at our local hospice agency determined she was not, in fact, dying soon enough. Presumably adhering to Medicare guidelines, they callously discontinued our hospice services. The abrupt cessation of care prompted my debilitated mom's eviction from an assisted living facility. The chaotic aftermath necessitated medicine, schedule and equipment adjustments for her and delivered a massive blow to me, her primary caregiver. Fewer resources means this financially draining and emotionally wrenching situation will become more common — perhaps even the norm. The shifting demographics make the picture even bleaker. The U.S. is a rapidly aging population, with the number of Americans ages 65 and older expected to more than double over the next 40 years. At a time when we should be buttressing hospice services, our government is threatening to starve them. According to the Office of the Inspector General, 'About 1.7 million Medicare beneficiaries receive hospice care each year, and Medicare pays about $23 billion annually for this care.' Hospice is an interdisciplinary service that provides everything from pain relief to spiritual support to medication management to dietary consulting to mobility equipment to bereavement counseling. While the price tag may sound hefty and our current administration would like us to believe that public services are an unbearable financial burden, an investigation published in the Journal of American Medical Association Health Forum found that hospice saves Medicare money. Research shows that hospice significantly benefits dementia and cancer patients at the end of their lives. On May 19, 2025, the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published a study of 51,300 assisted living residents that concluded, 'Higher frequency of hospice staff visits was associated with better perceived hospice quality. Policies supporting greater hospice staff engagement, including nonclinical staff, may enhance end-of-life care experiences for assisted living residents.' The report matters because the findings illuminate the humane need for both clinical and nonclinical treatment that provides for medical and emotional support as life ends. We all heard President Trump campaign on promises to protect Medicare, but Richard Fiesta, executive director of the advocacy group Alliance for Retired Americans, describes the ongoing national budget scene as 'an all-out assault on Medicare and Medicaid that will hurt older Americans in every community across the country.' And Shannon Benton, the executive director of the Senior Citizens League, another advocacy group, now warns that the potential Medicare cuts could lead to lower reimbursement rates. This would be disastrous for millions of Americans and would threaten to eradicate end-of-life care as we know common belief, hospices are not run by volunteers. Volunteers might become part-time visitors or assistants for a variety of tasks, but hospice administrations are led by professionals who are evaluated on financial performance and organizational viability. Palliative care is free to recipients and families and available at all income levels, but hospices are businesses, and they must raise sufficient funds through donations, gifts, bequests and reimbursements to compensate employees, repay loans, cover operating costs, and plan for exigencies. Simply put, much of that money comes from Medicare. Specialized care for the dying was introduced to the U.S. in 1963, when Yale University's then dean Florence Wald invited Dame Cicely Saunders of the U.K. to participate in a visiting lecture at Yale. At that time Saunders said, 'We will do all we can not only to help you die peacefully, but also to live until you die.' Four years later, in 1967, Saunders created St. Christopher's Hospice in the U.K. Later, in 1974, Florence Wald founded Connecticut Hospice in Branford, Connecticut — America's first hospice. Within five years and after several national conferences, the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare acknowledged that hospices provided alternative care programs for Americans losing their lives to terminal illnesses. Federal hospice regulations were drafted. In 1982, Medicare added hospice care to its benefits, and in 1985, Medicare hospice coverage became permanent. With that, the U.S. recognized the right of its citizens to die with dignity. Forty years later, our government has signaled that a rollback of that right may be on the horizon. Eventually, my mother died in a highly regarded long-term care complex without hospice support and with no prescribed opioids. It was an unnecessarily excruciating death that exacerbated my and my family's grief. The trauma we suffered was destabilizing and healing from it was slow and difficult. If Trump's Orwellian-named 'big beautiful bill' passes the Senate, I fear our experience will have been an ugly preview of what is to come.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store