logo
‘When will enough be enough?' Ohio House Democrats introduce common sense gun legislation

‘When will enough be enough?' Ohio House Democrats introduce common sense gun legislation

Yahooa day ago

Stock photo of guns. (Photo by Aristide Economopoulos for New Jersey Monitor/States Newsroom.)
Ohio House Democrats say they are trying to enact common sense gun laws, but face an uphill battle in the Republican supermajority-controlled Ohio Statehouse.
Democratic lawmakers have introduced a series of gun-related bills so far this General Assembly that have seen little, if any movement. The one bill that has had a hearing so far is a bipartisan bill.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'Republicans are focused on passing laws that they hope will distract you from their failures, while at the same time trying to divide us on common sense issues like gun reform,' Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo, D-Upper Arlington, said Tuesday during a press conference. 'Ohio Democrats will not stand idly by while Republicans in power refuse to do something about gun violence.'
Ohio had 571 gun-related deaths and over 1,700 incidents of gun violence in 2024, said state Rep. Darnell T. Brewer, D-Cleveland.
Ohio ranks 21st in the nation for gun violence and gun deaths rose 42% in Ohio from 2013 to 2022, said state Rep. Cecil Thomas, D-Cincinnati.
More than 1,000 Ohioans aged 19 and younger died as a result of gun violence in the last decade, according to the Children's Defense Fund.
'When will enough be enough?' Thomas asked. 'How many children have to die before you act? How many women have to be shot by their partners? How many funerals will it take before this legislation does its job? How many other officers have to be shot before we do something?'
Gun-related bills introduced so far by Democratic lawmakers include —
House Bill 45 — Prohibit certain firearm transfers without a background check was introduced by Thomas and state Rep. Rachel Baker, D-Cincinnati, in February, but has had no committee hearings in the House Public Safety Committee.
House Bill 46 — Enact the Extreme Risk Protection Order Act was introduced by Thomas and state Rep. Michele Grim, D-Toledo, in February, but it has had no hearings so far in the House Public Safety Committee.
House Bill 120 — Exempt from sales and use tax sales of firearm safety devices was introduced by Brewer and state Rep. Jennifer Gross, R-West Chester, in February and has had sponsor testimony in the Ohio House Ways and Means Committee.
House Bill 235, Authorize tax credit for handgun training and firearms storage was introduced by Brewer and state Rep. Meredith R. Lawson-Rowe, D-Reynoldsburg, in April, but it has had no hearings so far in the House Ways and Means Committee.
Brewer said he is introducing the community safety solution agenda which includes:
A resolution to encourage responsible gun ownership by promoting safe storage practices to prevent children from accessing guns.
A resolution on safe firearm storage education.
The safe play act that would create a grant program through the state's unclaimed funds to help communities build safe playgrounds.
Close the boyfriend loophole act which prevents individuals convicted of dating violence or under protection order from possessing firearms.
An act that would create comprehensive grants for cities that declare gun violence a public health crisis.
'We do not seek to outlaw guns, rather, we want to offer common sense regulations and publicize safe responsible ownership of guns,' Lawson-Rowe said.
This summer will mark six years since a mass shooting in Dayton killed nine people and more pro-gun laws have since taken effect in the state.
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine signed a bill into law in 2022 that got rid of all training, background check and permitting requirements to carry a concealed weapon. A 2021 law no longer requires people to retreat before they can justifiably hurt or kill someone with a gun in self-defense.
'What we need now is the political will, something that unfortunately continues to be absent from the Republican-controlled legislature,' said state Rep. Michele Grim, D-Toledo.
Russo said she wouldn't be surprised if Ohioans try to pass a ballot initiative addressing gun violence and common sense reforms.
'I'm not aware of current efforts to do that, but you know, given how out of line this legislature is the public on this issue, and the lack of action on this issue, it wouldn't be surprising to see that perhaps in the next couple of years,' she said.
Ohioans did that in 2023 by voting to enshrine abortion and reproductive rights in the state's constitution.
'Gun violence has no place in our state and in our communities,' Russo said. 'People deserve better. Our children deserve better.'
State Rep. Karen Brownlee, D-Symmes Twp., shared stories of gun violence she heard from children when she worked as a mental health therapist.
'A sibling group aged six to 13 running home from the bus stop to avoid a shooting in the middle of their residential neighborhood,' she said. 'A six-year-old accidentally shooting his three-year-old brother to death with a gun left on the coffee table.'
These kids would ask her how to stay safe around guns.
'Sadly, the conversations ended with me explaining that Ohio laws protect guns more than they protect people,' Brownlee said. '… We are fighting against a powerful gun lobby which is more interested in sales than citizens.'
A new study from George Washington University showed more than 7,000 children died from firearm related injuries since the 2010 Supreme Court ruling that allowed states to set their own gun laws.
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump revokes California's nation-leading electric vehicle mandate
Trump revokes California's nation-leading electric vehicle mandate

Politico

time24 minutes ago

  • Politico

Trump revokes California's nation-leading electric vehicle mandate

President Donald Trump moved Thursday to eliminate California's nation-leading vehicle emissions standards, upending strict rules that had become a template for states across the nation to realize their greenhouse gas ambitions. Trump signed three Congressional Review Act resolutions rolling back a trio of California's rules at a White House signing ceremony, delivering on his Day 1 executive order to quickly roll back electric vehicle mandates around the country. 'We officially rescue the US auto industry from destruction by terminating California's electric vehicle mandate, once and for all,' Trump said at a Oval Office signing alongside House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. The president, in a wide-ranging speech before the signing, used the moment to hit on a range of issues, including inflation, his disdain for windmills and his recent fallout with Tesla CEO Elon Musk. 'Now we know why Elon doesn't like me so much,' Trump quipped, before saying that Musk never asked him to save EV rules and that their break was over other 'smaller things.' While the Trump administration has also gone on the offensive against federal vehicle standards, California's regulations aimed at phasing out gas-powered passenger vehicles and heavy-duty diesel trucks — which are followed by a dozen other states — have drawn the stiffest opposition from the auto and fossil fuel industries. 'Worse than unachievable, these EV mandates were going to be harmful,' said John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation. 'Harmful to auto affordability, to consumer choice, to industry competitiveness and to economic activity.' The move takes place against the backdrop of worsening relations between Trump and Gov, Gavin Newsom, with the president ordering the military to quell unrest in Los Angeles over immigration raids. It also comes as Tesla CEO and former White House adviser Elon Musk clashed with Trump last week over electric vehicle policies. Trump's signature revokes the Golden State's unique permission to exceed federal vehicle pollution standards, which it's used for decades to set nation-leading rules. A dozen other Democrat-led states have opted to follow California's rules, representing one-third of the U.S. auto market. California's regulations aim to require automakers to sell increasing percentages of zero-emission vehicles, culminating in a 2035 target of all new-car sales being electric or otherwise carbon-free. Trump had targeted California's rules in his first term and on the campaign trail for his second term. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin asked Congress to revoke them using the Congressional Review Act, which allows Congress to overturn rules passed in the waning days of the previous administration. The request triggered a debate among Republicans about whether to stretch congressional norms by using the CRA to roll back California's rules, which Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough and the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office have said aren't subject to the law. In addition to the rules for passenger vehicles, Thursday's signings roll back California's authority to enforce zero-emission sales targets for commercial trucks and higher standards for heavy-duty diesel engines. The fight over whether Congress acted lawfully will now head to the courts. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta said last month they would sue immediately after Trump signs the resolutions. The outcome of that court case will have widespread implications, as Democratic leaders seek to wean drivers and industry off fossil fuels and hit lofty greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals. But the question is especially acute for California, which has struggled for decades to reduce the nation's worst smog in the Los Angeles area and Central Valley and comply with federal air quality standards under the Clean Air Act. Failure to reach those standards could result in sanctions and withholding of federal highway funds, which both Republican and Democratic administrations have floated in the past. Trump's EPA threatened sanctions against the state in 2019, just days after the agency revoked an earlier version of its electric vehicle rules. 'It is hard to imagine that they will not threaten sanctions,' said Ann Carlson, who was head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration under former President Joe Biden. 'The president clearly has it out for California, and Los Angeles is obviously in his sights.' EPA said in a statement when asked about the possibility of sanctions that it will enforce the Clean Air Act. 'EPA will continue to implement the Clean Air Act as provided in law and will continue to hope that California can get into attainment after decades of nonattainment,' the agency said. EPA could develop its own plan for California to meet federal standards, though air quality experts say that's unlikely because the agency would have to take unpopular steps like restricting driving. California Air Resources Board spokesperson Lindsay Buckley said in a statement that without the waivers, the state will need to find an alternative to reach compliance. CARB chair Liane Randolph told state lawmakers during a hearing last month that she's 'confident California will prevail in litigation,' but that could take years, during which the rules are not enforceable. Randolph suggested that the state could consider approaches like district emissions rules for 'indirect sources' like warehouses that attract commercial trucks, incentives to encourage EV purchases and putting more funding towards public transit.

Hegseth won't commit to following court rulings on troops in LA
Hegseth won't commit to following court rulings on troops in LA

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Hegseth won't commit to following court rulings on troops in LA

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth refused to commit to following federal court or Supreme Court rulings regarding the Pentagon's extraordinary deployment of National Guard members and Marines into Los Angeles. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pressed Hegseth on the question, which he repeatedly dodged. 'What I will tell you is my job right now is to ensure the troops that we have in Los Angeles are capable of supporting law enforcement,' Hegseth told Khanna. After another effort, Hegseth said the U.S. should not have 'local judges determining foreign policy or national security policy for the country.' Khanna pointed to signals from others in the Trump administration, specifically Vice President Vance, that it could ignore court orders it disagrees with. 'If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal,' Vance said in February on the social media platform X. 'If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that's also illegal.' 'Judges aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power,' he added. Hegseth's reference to limits on the judiciary's power over foreign policy harkens to the administration's legal argument against returning Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a Salvadoran prison. Abrego Garcia was returned to the U.S. on June 6 and now faces charges over alleged smuggling crimes. California quickly sued the Trump administration over the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops — and mobilization of hundreds of Marines. A federal judge declined to issue an immediate order removing the troops from Los Angeles, pending further consideration of the case. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) has also engaged in a war of words with Trump and Hegseth throughout the week, warning their overreach in California will spread to other cities and states — particularly those run by Democrats. Hegseth, who is testifying in Congress for the third straight day, has sparred with Democrats over the deployments. He has said the troops are carrying out a constitutional duty to protect law enforcement agents carrying out Trump's immigration policies. Protests in Los Angeles were spurred by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) carrying out workplace raids to arrest illegal immigrants in a heavily Hispanic part of the city. Khanna on Thursday also grilled Hegseth over the U.S. military posture with Israel reportedly threatening an imminent attack on Iran. Khanna repeatedly asked Hegseth whether he could commit to not directly attacking Iran unless the Islamic Republic first fired on the U.S. Hegseth would make no such assurance. He said Trump is 'giving Iran every opportunity, with talks ongoing, but he also fully recognizes the threat that Iran, with a nuclear blow up, would exist,' Hegseth said. 'Will you commit to us not bombing them?' Khanna repeated, noting some prominent MAGA figures have spoken out against the risk of war with Iran. 'It wouldn't be prudent for me to commit or not to commit. My job is to be postured and prepared,' Hegseth said.

Democrats tested immigration messaging in battleground districts. Here's what they found.
Democrats tested immigration messaging in battleground districts. Here's what they found.

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats tested immigration messaging in battleground districts. Here's what they found.

A survey of likely voters seeks to offer Democrats a blueprint for how to punch back on an issue that's vexed them in recent elections: immigration. The poll, conducted in key 2026 battleground districts by Democratic-leaning groups Way to Win and Impact Research and shared first with POLITICO, argues that Democrats — with the right messaging — can drive down President Donald Trump's strength on immigration by a net 10 percentage points. The poll does not shy away from Democrats' overall poor standing on the issue. Republicans overall have an 11-percentage-point net negative job rating on immigration (43 percent approve versus 54 percent disapprove), but Democrats have a 58-percentage-point net negative rating on the issue (19 percent approve versus 77 disapprove). Democrats can turn the tide, the message testing found, by playing up Trump's overreach and disregard for the rule of law that they say threatens citizens and noncitizens alike as he carries out his mass deportations. But many Democrats would rather avoid the topic. 'Coming into and out of the 2024 cycle, Democrats were silent — completely — on immigration,' said Tory Gavito, president of Way to Win. 'There was just no response at all. This poll is to show Democrats that when they point out how enforcement has failed, they can attack Trump on one of his most favorable policies.' The survey, conducted in more than 70 key congressional districts, including the 26 'frontline' member list of top House Democratic-held seats the party hopes to defend next cycle, found a weakness for Trump. His initial job rating, which started with 50 percent positive versus 49 percent negative on immigration, dropped to 45 percent positive and 54 percent negative after emphasizing overreach messaging. The survey used specific examples, like the deportation of a person in the country legally 'but deported and sent to a prison in El Salvador because of their autism awareness tattoowas wrongly identified as a gang tattoo' — or a 10-year-old U.S. citizen deported because her parents were undocumented. Researchers say Democrats have plenty ammunition on the issue. They found policies that separate families and impact children among the most salient issues among respondents. A large majority, 74 percent, of respondents who oppose revoking visa and green cards from people without proof of committing a crime. And nearly eight in 10 respondents do not support sending U.S. citizens to foreign prisons. 'Voters view Trump's policies on immigration and his enforcement of immigration differently — there's a gap,' said Molly Murphy, president of Impact Research. 'They are more supportive of what Trump wants to do on immigration … from a policy standpoint, than how he's actually going about it.' Of course, getting voters engaged on the specifics of Trump's immigration policies can be a challenge. Public polling shows voters who haven't heard much about the high-profile cases are more likely to approve of the president. The poll, conducted May 6-11 with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percent, does not capture reactions to the widespread protests in Los Angeles. The showdown between California Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Trump administration's deployment of the state's National Guard has also centered on the president's overreach. 'Democrats shouldn't be focused on protesters right now,' Murphy said. "We should be talking about the people he's deporting: people here legally, people here with no criminal records, people who have proof of citizenship and not make this a fight about protesters, because that's what he wants.' Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) said the party needs to " keep those stories in the news.' and plans to hold a briefing on the survey findings for members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus early next week on Capitol Hill. 'Trump wants to highlight the chaos that he is helping stoke in LA," Cesar added. "Democrats should be making sure that more of the focus is on the immigration overreach that has everyday people … deeply upset and deeply troubled.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store