Namibia taps Ghana's gold model to fortify national economy
Namibia plans to implement Ghana's Gold Purchase Programme to strengthen its monetary policy and economy.
The initiative aims to boost national reserves, stabilize inflation, and support the Namibian dollar's value.
The adoption reflects a trend among African nations developing strategies to counter global financial instability.
The initiative aims to boost Namibia's national reserves, stabilize inflation, and reinforce the value of the Namibian dollar by accumulating gold as a key financial asset.
With a well-established mining industry and a stable political environment, Namibia is one of Africa's leading gold producers, and the sector remains a vital contributor to its GDP.
The Namibia Economist reports that Bank of Namibia (BoN) Governor Johannes !Gawaxab confirmed the decision during a statutory engagement with President Dr. Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah last week.
According to the central bank, Namibia's foreign reserves declined by 5.2% in the first quarter of 2025 to N$59.7 billion.
The move to include gold—targeting 3% of net foreign exchange reserves—aligns with a growing global trend among central banks.
Gold is increasingly seen as a strategic asset for hedging against inflation and strengthening economic resilience during times of financial stress.
According to the Bank of Namibia, the country's gold earnings surged in the fourth quarter of 2024, rising by 20.1% year-on-year and 13.4% quarter-on-quarter to reach N$4.3 billion.
Despite this progress, Namibia, like many African countries, continues to face economic challenges, including inflation, currency depreciation, and exposure to volatile commodity prices.
The decision to adopt Ghana's model is part of a broader economic diversification strategy aimed at improving long-term resilience and reducing dependency on foreign currencies, particularly the US dollar.
By strategically increasing its gold reserves, the Bank of Namibia hopes to strengthen its foreign exchange position and create a more stable foundation for future economic growth. This move reflects a growing trend among African nations seeking homegrown solutions to navigate global financial uncertainty.
Ghana's gold purchase deal
Ghana, one of Africa's leading gold producers, launched the Gold Purchase Programme in the early 2020s as a proactive measure to address the economic challenges posed by fluctuating commodity prices, inflationary pressures, and the volatility of the global financial system.
The programme, initiated by the Bank of Ghana (BoG), allows the central bank to purchase gold directly from domestic producers and incorporate it into the country's foreign exchange reserves.
This move is seen as a direct response to global financial volatility, as well as a proactive step to enhance Namibia's economic sovereignty and resilience.
By accumulating gold, the Bank of Namibia (BoN) aims to reduce its reliance on foreign currencies, particularly the US dollar, and bolster its foreign exchange reserves.
This will enable the country to maintain a more stable currency and provide a stronger foundation for economic growth in the years to come.
However, Ghana has halted its gold purchase program, further casting doubt on the efficacy of such strategies in stabilizing foreign reserves or shielding economies from external shocks. The move raises important questions about the practicality and long-term sustainability of using gold as a buffer in times of economic volatility, particularly for developing countries with limited fiscal space.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Chinese and Indian automakers race to Africa's richest nation amid US trade barriers
South Africa is rapidly cementing its role as a gateway for international automakers, particularly from China and India, with several major brands preparing to launch or expand operations in the country in the coming months. South Africa is emerging as a strategic hub for international automakers, gaining prominence as an entry point to African markets. Prominent brands like Leapmotor, LDV, and Tata Motors are committing to expanding their presence in South Africa in the near future. These developments highlight South Africa's growing influence within the BRICS trade network and as a leader in the continent's EV market. South Africa has recently witnessed a wave of announcements from carmakers such as Leapmotor, LDV, and Tata Motors, all signaling plans to expand into Africa's richest nation. The flurry of activity reflects growing momentum in the continent's automotive sector, as manufacturers seek to capture new markets amid shifting global trade dynamics. The development comes against the backdrop of South Africa's strained relations with the United States, where recent tariff measures have unsettled trade flows. Pretoria has responded by accelerating efforts to diversify its partnerships, turning to Asian and emerging-market players to reduce reliance on Washington. The moves underscore the country's growing influence in the African auto sector and its strategic role within BRICS trade dynamics. Leapmotor, LDV and Tata Motors eye African expansion Chinese new-energy vehicle (NEV) brand Leapmotor is preparing to enter the South African market in September 2025, marking a significant milestone for the Stellantis-backed company. The company will debut the C10 extended-range electric vehicle (EREV) at select Stellantis NV dealerships, with additional models expected next year. Stellantis, Europe's second-largest automaker, holds a 20% stake in Leapmotor and will provide its established sales infrastructure to support the brand's regional rollout. The C10 follows Leapmotor's successful debut in Mauritius, with the company reporting record-breaking deliveries of 48,006 vehicles in June, marking its second consecutive month of record sales. With its focus on electric vehicles, Leapmotor will cater to South Africa's growing demand for sustainable mobility. Mike Whitfield, managing director of Stellantis South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa noted, 'South Africa offers the right combination of infrastructure, consumer demand, and regional connectivity to grow EV adoption,' Meanwhile, LDV, a sub-brand of China's SAIC Motor Corporation, is preparing to launch its new Terron 9 bakkie at the Festival of Motoring at the Kyalami Grand Prix Circuit from August 28 to 31, 2025. The large pickup aims to compete in South Africa's premium segment alongside models like the Ford Ranger Wildtrak and GWM P500. Since its South African debut last year, LDV has primarily focused on the T60 midsize bakkie for private households. Bevan Nel, CEO of LDV South Africa, described the Terron 9 as the brand's flagship vehicle for the market, 'Exciting times are near as we prepare to launch the Terron 9 at the end of August, starting off with an exclusive sneak peek, we are excited to bring this powerhouse to the South African market.' He said. India's Tata Motors is also making a strategic return to South Africa's passenger vehicle market, targeting SUVs, crossovers, and hatchbacks. According to CarMag, The automaker had stopped exporting cars to the African market in 2017-18, but has now partnered with Motus Holdings Ltd, South Africa's leading passenger vehicle retailer, to distribute its vehicles. The company plans a launch event on August 19, 2025, highlighting both sales and local value creation, including employment across service, parts distribution, and technician training. 'South Africa is an important market in our global expansion journey, ' Yash Khandelwal, head of International Business at Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles said. ' With our class-leading products and a reputed partner in Motus, we are here to offer our South African customers a choice of vehicles that are safe, stylish, and innovation-driven. ' He added. The convergence of these launches underscores South Africa's growing role as Africa's automotive and EV hub, bolstered by BRICS partnerships with China and India. The country's established dealership networks, manufacturing capabilities, and consumer base make it a launchpad for new-energy and mass-market vehicles across the continent. Analysts suggest that South Africa's influence in automotive trade will only increase as more BRICS-based manufacturers view the country as a gateway to Sub-Saharan markets.
Business Insider
7 hours ago
- Business Insider
US faces $9.4bn tourism loss from new $250 visa fee targeting African countries
The United States could forfeit an estimated $9.4 billion in visitor spending over the next three years following the introduction of a new $250 'visa integrity fee,' according to industry groups, who warn the policy risks undermining tourism and costing thousands of jobs. The U.S. government recently introduced a $250 'visa integrity fee,' provoking concerns about negative impacts on tourism and economic activity. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the fee could generate $27 billion over ten years Industry experts however, claim the fee may lead to a loss of $9.4 billion in visitor spending and 15,000 travel industry jobs The United States' decision to introduce a $250 'visa integrity fee' on international visitors has triggered sharp criticism from the global tourism industry, with officials warning that the measure could deter millions of travellers and cost the U.S. economy billions. The $250 'visa integrity fee, ' part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed on July 4, 2025, will take effect later this year. According to immigration law firm Envoy Global, it applies to all nonimmigrant visa holders which include students, tourists, temporary workers, and business visitors particularly from African countries. The fee is non-waivable, non-reducible, and charged on top of existing MRV, anti-fraud, and reciprocity fees. The policy has drawn particular concern across Africa, where high travel costs, tariff barriers, and strict visa regimes already limit access to the American market. For many middle-class travellers from Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, and Ghana, an additional $250 charge could turn U.S. tourism into a privilege reserved for the ultra-wealthy. Economic Fallout According to the U.S. Travel Association, the fee is expected to reduce visitor spending by $9.4 billion and tax revenue by $1.3 billion over the next three years. The group also estimates that about 15,000 U.S. travel jobs could be lost as a result of fewer international arrivals. Forbes reports that these projections stand in sharp contrast to calculations by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which expects the fee to generate $27 billion over ten years, roughly $2.7 billion annually, for the U.S. Treasury. However, industry economists argue the CBO analysis focused only on revenue collection, excluding the wider economic fallout of reduced travel demand. 'By longstanding tradition, the Congressional Budget Office does not incorporate macroeconomic feedback effects into its traditional cost estimates, ' a CBO spokesperson told Forbes. 'We didn't specifically do a dynamic analysis of this provision.' Similarly, Tourism Economics, a division of Oxford Economics, estimates the $250 fee could discourage 5.4% of international visitors, almost one million trips annually. Fewer visitors mean reduced spending on hotels, restaurants, retail, and cultural attractions, which in turn lowers tax income and weakens job creation. Erik Hansen, senior vice president of government relations at the U.S. Travel Association, said: 'Congress made the mistake of assuming that this worldwide visa integrity fee would not have a big impact on visitors from countries like India or Brazil. This is the exact type of armchair public policymaking that is going to get us into a big mess.' While Hansen highlighted India as a 'bright spot' for inbound travel, with Indian tourists spending $13.3 billion in the U.S. in 2024, similar growth has been recorded across Africa. Demand from students, entrepreneurs, and leisure travellers has been rising since the pandemic, with airlines such as Ethiopian Airlines, South African Airways, and Royal Air Maroc expanding U.S. bound capacity. However, a new supercharge from Washington could halt this trajectory. For African students in particular, the cost comes on top of visa application charges, SEVIS fees, and proof-of-funds requirements. Analysts warn that the fee risks slowing down people-to-people exchanges, business travel, and academic opportunities that have traditionally linked the U.S. and Africa. And could redirect African families to more accessible destinations such as Canada, the UK, and China. Refund Controversy Congress has described the fee as refundable once a visa expires, provided all conditions are met. But with most U.S. visitor visas valid for ten years, the refund process appears impractical. ' The idea that you're going to give the government money and then wait around 10 years and remember to ask for it back, even if you followed the rules, is just absolutely crazy,' Hansen told Forbes. The CBO itself acknowledged that only 'a small number of people would seek reimbursement' and noted that the State Department would require years to create a refund system. Tourism Competitiveness at Risk The timing of the new fee raises further questions about U.S. tourism competitiveness and openness, especially as the country prepares to host global sporting events like the Olympics and the FIFA World Cup. A World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) report in June forecast that international visitor spending in the U.S. could fall by as much as $29 billion in 2025, the only major economy projected to see a decline. 'While other nations are rolling out the welcome mat, the U.S. government is putting up the 'closed' sign,' Julia Simpson, president and CEO of WTTC, said. Outlook Unlike travellers from over 40 countries, including Japan, South Korea, most of Western Europe, and Australia, who enjoy visa-free entry to the U.S. under the Visa Waiver Program, no African country is included. This means African travellers, already burdened with strict visa requirements, will be disproportionately affected by the additional $250 fee. Fewer Africans travelling to the U.S. could mean reduced cultural, academic, and professional exchanges, weakening U.S.–Africa ties at a time when China, Europe, and the Gulf states are aggressively courting African travellers. The fee could also discourage family visits, cutting remittance-linked travel flows, and make it harder for African SMEs and startups to access U.S. markets.
NBC News
9 hours ago
- NBC News
Even at 1%, new tax will burden African immigrants who send money back home
A new remittance tax set to begin in the new year has one university student reeling from the implications it will have for her family in Nigeria. Edidiong Chrys, a second-generation Nigerian American, said she thinks the 1% tax passed as part of President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill ' would directly affect the financial lifeline she sends overseas. This tax will be applied to anyone in the U.S. who sends money abroad. 'We regularly send money home to support loved ones, including our elders, children in school, newborns and others in need,' she said. Chrys, 38, said some of the funds sent home have gone to new parents in her family, helping ease the cost of food and traveling to doctors' appointments. The funds also help her uncle, who has a job but also must pay for his five daughters, who are all in school. He and his wife work, but it's still not enough 'to accommodate all the things that need to hold the household down,' Chrys said. And then there's Chrys' 80-year-old grandmother, who was weathering back pain when Chrys visited in January. 'We are paying for the live-in nurse to help her during the week,' she said. 'That's an additional expense that we need to have for her so that she's not bending over.' The tax applies to anyone in the U.S. who sends remittances to their home countries. In 2023, remittances from the U.S. totaled $98 billion, according to the World Bank. Chrys contributes to the $56 billion in remittances sub-Saharan Africa received from people around the world last year. In fact, she said she regularly remits cash — more than 50 times a year — to family and friends. The Center for Global Development, a nonpartisan think tank that focuses on reducing global poverty through economic research, published an analysis last month that listed the tax as yet another financial setback for many nations, given the recent reduction in American aid. Liberia is highly dependent on foreign aid as well as remittances. In 2023, the U.S. accounted for a quarter of the country's foreign aid, and remittances surpassed Liberia's bilateral foreign aid by three times, according to the report. The African Union's outgoing ambassador to the United States, Hilda Suka-Mafudze, said hindering such funding 'threatens to reverse gains in financial inclusion and development across the continent of Africa.' Witney Schneidman, a nonresident senior fellow with the Africa Growth Initiative at the Brookings Institution's Global Economy and Development program, said, 'To put this tax on is just a further constraint on the U.S. effort to work with our partners on the continent.' 'It's not transformational. ... It's just another obstacle to partnership, and it's another obstacle to development,' he said. Schneidman, who also served as deputy assistant secretary of state for African affairs in the Clinton administration, condemned the Trump administration for building barriers and not bridges. 'When you add it up with the visa blockages, with the end of the [African Growth and Opportunity Act] AGOA, with the end of USAID, it's just building a wall,' he said. 'The U.S. is building a wall between itself and the world and certainly between itself and Africa.' Suka-Mafudze, whose focus will turn toward the Southern African Development Community region, said that beyond hurting diplomatic ties, blocking remittances is also 'a human issue, because diaspora remittances are lifelines for millions of African families and these remittances often cover essentials, which are food, school fees, medical care and a lot of things. And to impose a tax on that is deeply unjust.' Chrys said the financial burden of sending money home is already heavy, with some stretching limited resources to make ends meet. 'Some people are not making as much to be able to try to support their family back home,' Chrys said. 'When I do get a chance to send money home, sometimes I'm spending it from my refund check.' Democratic Reps. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick of Florida and Jonathan L. Jackson of Illinois introduced new legislation called the African Diaspora Investment and Development Act, or AIDA, aimed at reversing the tax's impact. It would also create more transparency in money transfers, among other things. Suka-Mafudze backs the legislation, warning the new tax 'could push people toward informal or unregulated channels, making transactions riskier and less transparent.' Cherfilus-McCormick, the only Haitian American member of Congress right now, warns that a remittance tax would unfairly burden families already struggling to support their loved ones overseas. 'I strongly oppose any effort to tax remittances and will continue fighting for policies that protect immigrant and diaspora communities,' she said in a statement. 'H.R.4586 — AIDA intends to reverse course and instead focus on incentivizing and leveraging on the nearly 100 billion of dollars that Haitian, African and Caribbean Americans send home each year to build sustainable partnerships and strengthen economic development.' Schneidman said the tax has the potential to impact education, health care and families because the bulk of the remittances are family-to-family. That reality is felt most by those sending the money, who see firsthand how even small amounts can make a big difference. 'In the U.S., it might feel like, 'Oh, that's nothing.'' Chrys said. But in Nigeria, 'It's everything because every little money counts.'
