Chancellor's Leeds Reforms to put money in people's pockets
In the Chancellor's Leeds Reforms, Rachel Reeves has unveiled a package of reforms to the UK's financial system set to be the biggest in a decade, aimed at delivering economic growth and spurring on retail investing.
The Chancellor said the 'Leeds reforms', unveiled in the West Yorkshire city, 'represent the widest set of reforms to financial services for more than a decade'.
New measures are intended to help drive increased levels of investment among both financial firms and individuals.
The Treasury said the ring-fencing regime – which was brought in after the 2008 financial crisis to separate banks' retail and investment banking activities – will be reformed.
Economic Secretary Emma Reynolds will lead a review into how changes can strike the right balance between growth and stability, including protecting consumers' deposits, it said.
Britain is a global outlier in enforcing ring-fencing, and major banks have been divided over whether the system is necessary to protect savers or is overly burdensome.
The Treasury said it was backing regulatory reforms for mid-sized banks to free up money for lending and investment.
Furthermore, the plans include cutting layers of red tape for businesses in the City.
This will see the UK's Financial Ombudsman Service – which settles complaints between consumers and businesses – modernised and simplified to help create a more predictable system and prevent consumer compensation being delayed.
It will also speed up changes to the senior managers regime, which was also brought in after the 2008 crisis to vet individuals before they are appointed and hold them accountable for problems and risk-taking.
The Government said it will radically streamline the current regime and cut the burden on firms in half.
The Leeds Reforms - named after one of our financial services' hubs and a city I'm proud to represent - will deliver the biggest package of reforms to financial services regulation in a decade.
Kickstarting economic growth and putting more pounds in people's pockets. pic.twitter.com/efN8YEHLPZ — Rachel Reeves (@RachelReevesMP) July 15, 2025
Cuts to City red tape sit alongside efforts to boost the level of investment among individuals.
This includes rolling out 'targeted support' from April next year, whereby banks can alert customers with cash sitting in low-return current accounts about investment opportunities.
Major banks and financial firms including Barclays, Lloyds, Vanguard and Hargreaves Lansdown are backing a new advertising campaign highlighting the benefits of investing.
Risk warnings on investment products could also potentially be watered down as part of a review into possible barriers to investing.
The Government also said it will continue to consider reforms to ISAs and savings to strike the right balance between cash savings and investment.
Ms Reeves was widely expected to leave cash ISAs untouched in the measures announced on Tuesday (July 15), following speculation that she was planning to cut the annual tax-free allowance in a bid to spark more investment instead.
'We are fundamentally reforming the regulatory system, freeing up firms to take risks and to drive growth,' Ms Reeves told finance chiefs when setting out the reforms in Leeds.
Recommended reading:
Adam French, consumer expert at Moneyfactscompare.co.uk, says: 'It is encouraging to see steps being taken to make retail investing a less daunting proposition by plugging the advice gap and empowering firms to give more targeted support while maintaining appropriate safeguards. But it is only part of the puzzle.
'It is also essential that we avoid a return to the low interest rates of the past decade which had a significant and often overlooked side effect: skewing investment priorities by driving capital into property instead of more productive areas of the economy. For the Leeds Reforms to work it must be the case that backing the next generation of British businesses looks safer and more rewarding than property speculation.'
Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at Moneybox, adds: "It is encouraging to see steps being taken to support first-time buyers. Enabling people to borrow more is not a silver bullet. What first-time buyers truly need is not just the ability to take on more debt, but meaningful, long-term support to help them start saving and investing earlier in life so they can build up that all-important deposit."
Sarah Coles, head of personal finance for Hargreaves Lansdown, also comments: 'It's incredibly positive to see Rachel Reeves take some key steps towards closing the UK's yawning retail investment gap.
'There will be a new era of investment with the advent of new rules allowing companies to offer targeted support to their clients, alongside changes to risk warnings so they actively help retail investors understand their options rather than standing in their way of harnessing the incredible power of investment.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revenge of the Taliban: Ex-UK interpreter warns data leak will mean 'more executions' as warlords murder three Afghans linked to foreign forces in a week
Taliban warlords are on a vengeful killing spree against hundreds of Afghans after the British Government lost a top secret database. One man was shot by a gunman who stepped from an alley on Monday and fired four bullets at close range into his chest – one of three assassinations in the past seven days. Panic has been spreading since Tuesday when Afghans were officially informed their personal details had been lost in the UK's worst ever data blunder, putting 100,000 'at risk of death'. Thousands received 'notifications' from His Majesty's Government saying sorry, and adding: 'We understand this news may be concerning.' It is not known if the Taliban actually has the database, which includes names of Afghans who helped the UK, as well as members of the British intelligence community, it is understood. But one Afghan soldier, who fled to Britain for fear of retribution, believes his brother was gunned down in the street this week because the militant group was aware of his affiliation to the UK. He said: 'If or when the Taliban have this list, then killings will increase – and it will be Britain's fault. There will be many more executions like the one on Monday.' The Mail has seen a dossier of more than 300 murders that include those who worked with the UK and some who had applied for the UK scheme, the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP). The murdered include Colonel Shafiq Ahmad Khan, a senior Afghan intelligence officer who had worked alongside British forces. The 61-year-old grandfather was lured into a trap and shot twice in the heart on his doorstep in May 2022. Others include commando Ahjmadzai, who applied for sanctuary in the UK, and soldier Qassim, both killed in April 2023. News of the killings comes after the media, public and MPs were kept in the dark while ministers launched evacuation mission Operation Rubific. The Mail discovered the data breach in August 2023. Since then, 18,500 Afghans have been airlifted to Britain in secret, with 23,900 expected overall. Yet some 75,000 Afghans will be left to fend for themselves – and were instead offered 'advice' on how to stay safe when the UK informed them it had lost their details. Afghans now know that the missing dossier contains their names, phone numbers, their family's details and other facts which could help Taliban revenge squads hunt them down. The Mail's revelations about the data leak and the unprecedented super-injunction to cover it up – which we spent two years fighting in secret courts – has triggered political and security storms. So far, three parliamentary probes have been launched, with MPs expressing outrage that the Government kept them in the dark for so long. Last October ministers agreed to spend £7billion without any parliamentary debate. Ahjmadzai (above, left) and Qassim (above, right) were both murdered in April 2023 The missing database contains the names of 18,800 people who had applied to the ARAP scheme for loyal Afghans who had worked alongside British forces. Military interpreters saved countless British lives by being their 'eyes and ears' on the frontline. In May 2024, when the High Court initially tried to lift the super-injunction, Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'The one thing that can be said with confidence is that affected persons would be better off learning of the data breach by notification from the UK Government than from a knock on the door by the Taliban.' There has been fury this week as the deadly implications of the 'double betrayal' by Britain sunk in, with one angry former interpreter telling the Mail: 'We risked our lives for the UK standing beside them day after day. Now they are risking our lives again.' While the methods may change, Monday's assassination on a quiet dust-caked street in the capital Kabul has now become a weekly occurrence. The victim's brother was a soldier with the Afghan special forces known as the Triples who was given sanctuary in Britain. Within an hour, news of the murder had reached the brother in Britain, who is convinced his sibling was executed because the Taliban, having been unable to kill the Triple himself, sought revenge on his family instead. Elsewhere in the city, a day later, Taliban fighters dragged a woman from her home, beating her on the street and dumping her for neighbours to take to hospital. A former British military interpreter who witnessed it told the Mail: 'The woman's husband worked for the West and it was punishment for that work. He is hiding in Iran and they told her it was because he worked with "infidels".' The murder of the soldier's brother and the beating of the woman took place in the hours before the lifting of the super-injunction, and it is unknown if any of the victims featured on the lost list. The Taliban boasted this week that they had obtained the leaked data, although this could not be verified. Mohammed, a former interpreter who once translated for former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, is now in Britain. He said news of the lost database had spread like wildfire since Tuesday, striking the 'fear of god' into former interpreters like him. Mohammed, 38, who was pictured with Mr Brown in Afghanistan, said: 'This has changed everything. In the past the Taliban did not often have confirmation that an Afghan worked for the UK, or what his role was, but now we know it is on the dataset together with our family members. It is a gift that leads to death.' Last night the MoD referred the Mail to a statement made by Defence Secretary John Healy in the Commons on Tuesday. He said: 'My first concern has been to notify as many people as possible who are affected by the data incident and to provide them with further advice. 'The MoD has done that this morning. Anyone who may be concerned can head to our new dedicated website, where they will find more information about the data loss, further security advice, a self-checker tool, which will inform them whether their application has been affected, and contact steps for the detailed information services centre that the MoD has established.
Times
26 minutes ago
- Times
‘First-time buyers want cheaper homes — not bigger mortgages'
After years of nursing training, Emma Restall decided to carry on her studies to become a doctor, so that her dream of becoming a homeowner might actually become a reality. 'I will be buying by myself and I wouldn't have been able to get a big enough mortgage on a nurse's salary,' said Restall, 28, from Chippenham in Wiltshire. She finished her nursing degree last year and began studying medicine at Newcastle University, working 12 hours a week as a nurse to fund her studies. She is among the first-time buyers who have been locked out of the housing market by high prices and tough mortgage requirements — exactly the sort of people who the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, and regulators are hoping to help by relaxing lending rules. Last week the Bank of England gave banks and building societies dispensation to lend more to borrowers with lower salaries — which the chancellor says will mean 36,000 more mortgages a year for first-time buyers. Banks started offering bigger loans from this week, but critics fear that relaxing the limits could see a return to the high-risk lending that triggered the 2008 financial crisis, while some first-time buyers say they would prefer more affordable housing, rather than government tinkering with the lending rules. Some 42 per cent of first-time buyers asked by the financial services firm Moneybox what the government could do to help said it should build more affordable homes. About 18 per cent said they would like to see looser mortgage affordability rules. Restall said: 'What always seems to be avoided in all these discussions is the gap between the average salary and the average house price. Borrowing more than 4.5 times your salary is nice, but the average house is about eight times salary. And no bank is going to give you that much.' She hopes to have enough saved to finally buy when she finishes medical school in 2029. She will be priced out of buying in Chippenham, so expects to buy in Newcastle instead. Restall has saved about £15,000 into a Lifetime Isa (which pays a 25 per cent government bonus on savings for a first home worth up to £450,000) and hopes to transfer another £4,000 from savings at the start of the next tax year in April. 'It feels like the government and regulators are just patching gaps by tinkering with mortgage rules rather than fixing the real problem — that the housing market is just getting more expensive compared with people's salaries,' she said. Restrictions from 2016 meant that no more than 15 per cent of each bank or building society's new lending could be at more than 4.5 times a borrower's income. This has now been made an industry-wide limit, meaning that lenders have more wiggle room, and can apply to the Bank of England to go beyond the 15 per cent limit — it will keep an eye on the big picture. Nationwide Building Society will now allow a single applicant to borrow up to six times their income if they earn £30,000 (it was £35,000 last week), while joint applicants can borrow up to six times income if they earn a total of £50,000, down from £55,000. Yorkshire Building Society this week cut the minimum salary needed to borrow up to five times your income from £75,000 to £50,000. Last week someone earning £50,000 could have borrowed a maximum of £224,500 whereas now they could get a loan of £250,000. Pressure from Reeves and the Treasury this year have also led almost all high street banks to reduce the interest rate at which they 'stress test' whether borrowers could afford higher payments. Mortgages at 100 per cent loan-to-value, where no deposit is required, have also made a comeback, having largely disappeared under a crackdown on risky lending after the financial crisis. • Thousands of lower earners to be eligible for mortgages in shake-up The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) — the City regulator — and lenders are also discussing ways to make it easier for first-time buyers to get interest-only loans and for tenants to be able to use their rent track record as proof that they can afford a mortgage. Nikhil Rathi, the FCA chief executive, has called for the government to set out how much risk it is happy for regulators and lenders to take. James Daley from the consumer group Fairer Finance said: 'We have spent the past 17 years tightening up the rules after people borrowed too much, or too many people borrowed interest-only mortgages with no way to repay them. What exactly are we going to achieve by unwinding them now?' The average property sale price in England was 7.7 times the average salary last year, up from 6.6 times in 2004, and it has risen from 5.4 to 5.9 times in Wales over the same period. In March the average first-time buyer borrowed 3.58 times their income, at 77.5 per cent of the average sale price, with an average loan term of 31 years, according to UK Finance, the industry body. Average repayments on first-time buyer mortgages were 22.6 per cent of the average first-time buyer's income in March, the highest share since November 2008, raising concerns that borrowers are already stretching themselves to be able to afford a home. Martin Stewart from the broker London Money said: 'Because of the cost of living and the higher levels of tax households are paying, we are more at risk of borrowers getting into difficulty rather than a 2008-style banking crisis. You're seeing lenders chasing market share, the rules being thrown out of the window and more debt than you can shake a stick at.' Making it easier to borrow does nothing to make house prices more affordable, something lenders have acknowledged by calling for the government to build more homes. The government's planning reforms are expected to help, and the Office for Budget Responsibility expects more housebuilding to reduce the average house price by about 0.8 per cent by 2029. But a big loosening in mortgage lending could undo that. Daley said: 'I'm just disappointed that the conversation on the housing market has come back to affordability and the availability of mortgages, while dancing around the massive elephant in the room, which is the issue of supply. 'Everybody knows that there aren't enough houses and wages haven't kept up with rising prices.' • House prices in expensive areas fall as buyers drive hard bargain Before the financial crisis it was easy to borrow without your income being verified or any checks that you could afford repayments if mortgage rates went up. The banking industry insists it is not on a slippery slope back to those bad old days — stress test rates have been lowered, but not ditched altogether. Bank of England data shows that about 8 per cent of mortgages in the year to March were lent at 4.5 times income or higher, far below the 15 per cent limit. Buyers will be able to borrow larger loans if they can afford them, but will still have to pass affordability checks. Ben Merritt from Yorkshire Building Society said: 'There are customers, including first-time buyers, who can afford to borrow more than 4.5 times their income, who have been shut out of the market. We can now offer them a lifeline to borrow what they need for their dream home in line with our commitment to responsible lending. 'This is crucial in an economic environment where house prices in many parts of the UK continue to rise at a faster rate than incomes.'
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd to dissolve covid committee after members quit
At least 13,000 people died in Wales during the pandemic, but more than five years later, Senedd scrutiny of the decisions made in Cardiff Bay has stalled – if it ever got going. Elin Jones, the Senedd's speaker or Llywydd, announced the end of the 'Wales covid-19 inquiry special purpose committee,' which was set up to look at gaps in the UK inquiry. In March, Tom Giffard, its co-chair, and his Conservative colleague Sam Rowlands quit the committee after Labour blocked calls for witnesses to swear an oath. He said he had no confidence in the committee, saying he would no longer associate himself with a process 'seemingly designed to protect those it is supposed to hold to account.' The Welsh Government refused to set up a judge-led Wales-specific inquiry in the wake of the pandemic like in Scotland where a public inquiry was established to learn lessons. Ms Jones announced the committee would be dissolved in autumn after months of wrangling behind closed doors, with the Senedd's public accounts committee picking up the baton. In a statement on July 16, she said: 'Due to the breakdown of the co-chair model that was adopted, it hasn't been possible for the committee to proceed with its work. 'It's been evident through discussions… that a different model will be required to move forward with the committee's scrutiny of this vital work.' Mark Isherwood chairs the public accounts committee which will now lead scrutiny of gaps identified by the covid committee in its report on module one. The Conservative expressed concerns about the committee's capacity and the limited time left in this Senedd term, with an election on the horizon in May 2026. Mr Giffard said resigning from the committee he co-chaired was never his preferred outcome but it was better than the alternative: 'Presiding over a kangaroo court that would never have got to the bottom of the issues that the families deserve.' Julie James, for the Welsh Government, urged Mr Giffard, a public accounts committee member, to reflect on his 'disgraceful' depiction of the covid committee as a kangaroo court.
