logo
Chabria: Elon Musk learns that bullies aren't your friends. Now what?

Chabria: Elon Musk learns that bullies aren't your friends. Now what?

Yahoo2 days ago
The thing about bullies is they don't have real friends.
They have lieutenants, followers and victims — sometimes all three rolled into one.
Most of us learn this by about third grade, when parents and hard knocks teach us how to figure out whom you can trust, and who will eat you for lunch.
Elon Musk, at age 54 with $400 billion in the bank, just learned it this week — when his feud with our bully-in-chief devolved into threats that the president will have the South African native deported.
Speaking about Musk losing government support for electric cars, Trump this week warned that Musk "could lose a lot more than that."
"We might have had to put DOGE on Elon," Trump said, referencing Musk's cost-cutting effort called the Department of Government Efficiency. "DOGE is the monster that ... might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible?"
Yes, I know. Schadenfreude is real. It's hard not to sit back with a bit of "told ya" satisfaction as we watch Musk — who has nearly single-handedly demolished everything from hurricane tracking to international aid for starving children — realize that Trump doesn't love him.
Read more: Trump threatens to sic DOGE on Musk as feud over megabill escalates
But because Musk is the richest man in the world, who also now understands he has the power to buy votes if not elections, and Trump is grabbing power at every opportunity, there's too much at stake to ignore the pitiful interpersonal dynamics of these two tantrumming titans.
What does it have to do with you and me, you ask? Well, there's a potential fallout that is worrisome: The use of denaturalization against political enemies.
In case you've been blessedly ignorant of the Trump-Musk meltdown, let me recap.
Once upon a time, nine months ago, Musk and Trump were so tight, it literally had Musk jumping for joy. During a surprise appearance at a Butler, Pa., political rally (the same place where Trump was nearly assassinated), Musk leaped into the air, arms raised, belly exposed, with the pure delight of simply being included as a follower, albeit one who funneled $290 million into election coffers. Back then, Musk had no concern that it wasn't his own dazzling presence that got him invited places.
By January, Musk had transitioned to lieutenant, making up DOGE, complete with cringey swag, like a lonely preteen dreaming up a secret club in his tree house. Only this club had the power to dismantle the federal government as we know it and create a level of social destruction whose effects won't be fully understood for generations. Serious villain energy.
But then he got too full of himself, the No. 1 sin for a lieutenant. Somewhere along the line, Trump noticed (or perhaps someone whispered in the president's ear) that Musk was just as powerful as he is — maybe more.
Cue the fallout, the big "see ya" from the White House (complete with a shoving match with another Trump lieutenant) and Musk's sad realization that, like everyone else in a bully's orbit, he was being used like a Kleenex and was never going to wind up anyplace but the trash.
So Musk took to his social media platform to start bashing on Trump and the "Big Beautiful Bill," which passed in the Senate on Tuesday, clearing the way for our national debt to skyrocket while the poor and middle class suffer.
"If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day. Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE," Musk threatened, conjuring up a new political party the same way he ginned up DOGE.
Musk even promised to bankroll more elections to back candidates to oust Trumpians who voted for the bill.
"And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," Musk wrote. Presumably before he leaves for Mars.
It was those direct — and plausible — threats to Trump's power that caused the president to turn his eye of Sauron on Musk, flexing that he might consider deportation for this transgression of defiance. It might seem entertaining if Musk, who the Washington Post reported may have violated immigration rules, were booted from our borders, but it would set a chilling precedent that standing up to this president was punishable by a loss of citizenship.
Because the threat of deporting political enemies didn't start with Musk, and surely would not end with him.
For days, Trumpians have suggested that New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, who was born in Uganda and became a U.S. citizen in 2018, should be deported as well, for the crime of backing policies that range in description from progressive to socialist to communist (pretty sure the ones labeling them communism don't actually know what communism is).
On Tuesday, Trump weighed in on Mamdani.
Read more: Chabria: Zohran Mamdani and Donald Trump have a lot in common. California should pay attention
'A lot of people are saying he's here illegally,' Trump said, which of course, no one is except for Trump's attack dogs. 'We're going to look at everything."
Denaturalization for immigration fraud — basically lying or misrepresenting stuff on your official application — is nothing new. Obama did it, as did Trump in his first term, and it has a long history before that.
But combing the documents of political enemies looking for pretexts to call fraud is chilling.
"This culture of weaponizing the law to go after enemies, it's something that is against our founding principles," Ben Radd told me. He's a professor of law and an expert in political science at UCLA.
"It is very much an abuse of executive power, but [Trump] gets away with it until there's a legal challenge," Radd said.
While Musk and Mamdani have the power to fight Trump in a court of law, if it comes to it, other naturalized citizens may not.
There are about 25 million such citizens in the United States — people who immigrated in the "right" way, whatever that means, jumped through the hoops, said their pledge of fealty to this country and now are Americans. Or so they thought.
In reality, under Trump, they are mostly Americans, as long as they don't make him mad. The threat of having citizenship stripped for opposing the administration is powerful enough to silence many, in a moment when many immigrants feel a personal duty and impetus to speak out to protect family and friends.
Aiming that threat at Musk may be the opportunistic anger of a bully, and even seem amusing.
But it's an intimidation meant to show that no one is too powerful to be punished by this bully, and therefore, no one is safe.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After settling with Trump, CBS News staffers fear what comes next
After settling with Trump, CBS News staffers fear what comes next

CNN

time7 minutes ago

  • CNN

After settling with Trump, CBS News staffers fear what comes next

Paramount Global is being hammered for bowing to presidential pressure and settling a lawsuit that it likely could have beaten in court. But this convoluted episode is really more about the plaintiff, President Trump, than about Paramount. 'It is odd to call this a 'settlement' when the result of it is so unsettling,' veteran journalism professor Al Tompkins remarked. Employees at CBS News, which produces '60 Minutes,' feel the same way. 'There is great fear about what comes next,' a CBS News staffer told CNN on condition of anonymity. Even though Trump's '60 Minutes' lawsuit is now history, his bullying tactics will continue to challenge media companies for the foreseeable future. Get Reliable Sources newsletter Sign up here to receive Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter in your inbox. 'Behavior that gets rewarded gets repeated,' the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression said Wednesday. 'This settlement will only embolden the president to continue his flurry of baseless lawsuits against the press — and against the American people's ability to hear the news free from government intrusion.' For newsrooms and other organizations targeted by Trump, the question becomes, fight or fold? One follow-up question might be: How do audiences react to outlets that fold? When Trump first sued CBS last fall, Rebecca Tushnet, the Frank Stanton professor of First Amendment law at Harvard Law School, told CNN the suit was 'ridiculous junk and should be mocked.' Tushnet – whose professional home is under multifaceted assault by the Trump administration – said in a follow-up exchange on Wednesday that Paramount's decision to settle was disappointing. 'The individual incentive in a budding authoritarian state is always to capitulate; that's the point of imposing costs on speech,' she said. 'It's disappointing that so many of our institutions are folding especially when individual citizens can see very clearly the dangers of this path.' Some CBS staffers have expressed similar views. Former CBS News correspondent Armen Keteyian echoed current staffers when he wrote on X, 'This Paramount settlement is the nadir for the network — a breach of the public trust Murrow, Cronkite, Hewitt and thousands of us worked decades to build.' Democratic lawmakers also heaped criticism on Paramount for settling; Sen. Elizabeth Warren said 'this looks like bribery in plain sight,' and Sen. Ron Wyden condemned the 'corporate execs who sold out our democracy,' promising action 'when Democrats retake power.' The bribery allegation stems from the fact that Paramount is trying to get the Trump administration to approve its pending merger with Skydance Media. Paramount insists that the settlement is not related to the FCC merger review process. Trump, however, recently spoke about the '60 Minutes' lawsuit and the merger hold-up as if they were self-evidently connected. When a reporter asked Trump what was holding up the merger on June 18, Trump answered by praising Skydance CEO David Ellison, then immediately repeated his talking points about the lawsuit. 'They're working on a settlement now,' he said. According to the terms of the settlement, which were announced late Tuesday night, Trump will drop the suit in exchange for $16 million toward his presidential library. The financial terms mirror the deal that Disney's ABC struck with Trump last December. 'Trump's presidential library will be a permanent monument to Paramount's surrender,' remarked Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Other press freedom advocates called the CBS parent's decision a 'spineless' and 'shameful' capitulation. Veteran media reporter Paul Farhi said on X that it was 'fascinating how Paramount has borne the bulk of the criticism for agreeing to this payoff. As if Trump is a passive bystander who played no role.' The conservative editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, controlled by Rupert Murdoch, focused on Trump's conduct in a sharply critical piece on Wednesday night. 'The President is using government to intimidate news outlets that publish stories he doesn't like,' the Journal wrote. 'It's a low move in a free country with a free press.' Trump, who on Wednesday was focused on his sweeping agenda bill, has yet to personally weigh in on the Paramount settlement. But a spokesman for his legal team cast the deal as an example of him holding 'the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit.' The supposed 'wrongdoing' in this case, however, was just an edit to a '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris last fall. Trump seized on the clunky editing of one particular question and answer, but TV networks edit interviews all the time, and those editorial decisions are protected under the First Amendment. One takeaway for journalists is to be 'transparent about how you do what you do,' Tompkins said. CBS resisted calls to release the full transcript of the Harris interview last fall, but eventually shared the transcript and tapes amid mounting political pressure. The tapes reaffirmed that Trump had a weak legal case. But the lawsuit gave him leverage over Paramount — and potentially Skydance, the CBS-owner-in-waiting, as well. David Ellison, son of the billionaire Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, was seen schmoozing near Trump at two different UFC matches earlier this year, stoking speculation that he was leaning on personal relationships to help get the merger approved. On Wednesday, Paramount pushed back on a New York Post report about a 'side deal' between Ellison and Trump involving TV airtime for public service announcements promoting Trump-aligned causes. 'Paramount has no knowledge of any promises or commitments made to President Trump other than those set forth in the settlement proposed by the mediator and accepted by the parties,' the company said. A spokesperson for Ellison had no comment on the matter, and there is no evidence of any such deal. But the report only intensified questions inside CBS News about how Ellison might approach owning the news division in the future. While journalists at '60 Minutes' and across CBS News are concerned about the situation, they ultimately want to move on and continue doing their jobs. 'This settlement is not a reflection on the essential and bold work of 60 Minutes of CBS,' Tompkins told CNN. 'It is a reflection of a vindictive president and corporate heads who did not value one of the fundamental principles that underpin the ownership of a news organization.' 'That principle,' he said, 'is stated as the second tenant of the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics: Act Independently.'

A Lifeline Cut—Ending LGBTQ Youth Suicide Support Puts Lives at Risk
A Lifeline Cut—Ending LGBTQ Youth Suicide Support Puts Lives at Risk

Newsweek

time16 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

A Lifeline Cut—Ending LGBTQ Youth Suicide Support Puts Lives at Risk

The Trump administration recently announced it would cut the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline's LGBTQ youth specialized services program, ending a project that provides specific, culturally competent counseling services for LGBTQ youth. As a psychiatrist and the CEO of Mindful Care, a psychiatric urgent care provider, I am shocked and deeply concerned about the impact this decision will have on both LGBTQ kids and the nation's mental health crisis response infrastructure. Since its launch in 2022, the national LGBTQ youth suicide lifeline has been an option available to all young people who call the national suicide prevention lifeline. If a young person reaches out to the 988 Lifeline, they are offered the option to speak with a counselor specifically trained to support LGBTQ youth in crisis. Pride flags are placed on the fence of the Stonewall Monument during the 2025 New York City Pride March on June 29, 2025, in New York City. Pride flags are placed on the fence of the Stonewall Monument during the 2025 New York City Pride March on June 29, 2025, in New York the project's launch in 2022, the LGBTQ youth suicide lifeline has responded to more than 1.3 million crisis calls and texts. In 2024, the Trevor Project, which was contracted to manage much of 988's LGBTQ specific call volume, reported that they responded to more than 231,000 crisis contacts. That's 231,000 kids in crisis in one year alone. At Mindful Care, we provide same-day and next-day mental health appointments, a service that is desperately needed in a country where patients often face average waitlists of three months or longer. Our urgent care model provides quick access to care, meaning we see high volumes of patients in crisis. Like emergency rooms and crisis services across the country, we already struggle to handle the inflow of patients in crisis that come through our doors. We need more mental health crisis services, not cuts to an already strained system. And the national LGBTQ youth suicide lifeline has become a critical part of our system. With a quick call or text, kids across the country can easily and anonymously reach an affirming source of support and a path to help. For kids growing up in homes where they can't be themselves or in communities with few LGBTQ affirming resources, this support can be the difference between life and death. Terminating the national LGBTQ youth suicide lifeline rolls back a vital lifeline for a group of young people who already experience mental health distress at alarming and disproportionate rates. Public health data has consistently shown that LGBTQ kids are at elevated risk for mental health issues, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. In 2023, the Trevor Project's U.S. National Survey on the Mental Health of LGBTQ Young People found that 41 percent of LGBTQ youth had seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year. Specialized services work because they meet high‑risk individuals on their own terms. Just as veterans and disaster survivors benefit from counselors who speak their language, LGBTQ youth need crisis support that affirms their identities. LGBTQ youth are far more likely to shut down, hang up, or avoid help altogether when they don't feel seen or understood. Despite the obvious need for and apparent success of the LGBTQ suicide lifeline, this critical support for LGBTQ kids will be shut down in less than a month. The rationale? A politically fueled claim that crisis counselors promote "radical gender ideology." In a statement, a Trump administration spokesperson dismissively called the lifeline service, "a chat service where children are encouraged to embrace radical gender ideology by 'counselors' without consent or knowledge of their parents." According to a recent poll from Data for Progress, a strong, bipartisan majority of Americans support continued funding for the LGBTQ Youth Suicide Lifeline Service. Sixty-nine percent of voters, including 56 percent of Republicans, and 70 percent of independents said that the U.S. government should keep these crisis services in place. Less than one in four voters (23 percent) said the government should eliminate them. It is not surprising that this program is popular with a majority of Americans. The LGBTQ youth suicide lifeline service is simply good public health policy. It's a proven, effective program that supports vulnerable kids and saves lives. We know these services are needed. Over a million young people used them in under three years. Stripping away this valuable service puts thousands of LGBTQ kids in crisis at risk—all in an attempt to score a few political points. Health policy should be rooted in facts not prejudice. Congress can and should step in to defend these essential crisis services and reinstate funding for the LGBTQ youth suicide lifeline service. If you or someone you know is considering suicide, contact the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by dialing 988, text "988" to the Crisis Text Line at 741741 or go to Dr. Tamir Aldad is a fellowship trained addiction psychiatrist and the founder and CEO of Mindful Care—the award winning first-ever psychiatric urgent care in the United States. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Why Syria plays a key role in Trump's plans for Middle East peace
Why Syria plays a key role in Trump's plans for Middle East peace

Fox News

time22 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Why Syria plays a key role in Trump's plans for Middle East peace

Earlier this week, President Donald Trump signed an executive order lifting most U.S. sanctions on Syria, in a move experts say reflects growing recognition inside the administration that Syria, long a battleground for Iranian influence and Islamist terror, may now offer the U.S. a rare opportunity to reclaim regional leverage, counter enemies, and support allies like Israel and Jordan. At a White House press briefing Monday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters, "This is another promise made and promise kept by this president," she said, referring to Trump's recent meeting with Syria's new transitional leader Ahmed al-Sharaa during a trip to Saudi Arabia. "He's committed to supporting a Syria that is stable, unified, and at peace with itself and its neighbors." "The sanctions did their job," David Schenker, former assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs and now a senior fellow at the Washington Institute, told Fox News Digital. "They were crippling by and large. There's zero economic life in the country. But Trump is giving Syria a chance to succeed." Javed Ali, former senior official at the National Security Council and professor at the University of Michigan, told Fox News Digital, "It's a strategic calculation. A Syria that no longer hosts Iranian proxies, cooperates on counterterrorism, and integrates with Arab neighbors serves U.S. interests on every front." According to Schenker, Syria has taken steps the U.S. has long demanded: allowing inspections by the IAEA and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, sharing intelligence on ISIS, and cooperating with American liaison officers on counterterrorism. "These groups have declared al-Sharaa an infidel. They themselves are being attacked by ISIS," he noted. For the U.S., the stakes extend far beyond sanctions relief. Schenker said a stable Syria focused on education and social services, rather than military buildup, would be far less fertile ground for ISIS or Iranian influence. Ali described the current moment as part of a broader Trump strategy: "Now with Assad gone, it's another blow to the Islamic Republic of Iran. This creates an opportunity to coalesce the Sunni Arab states – either around the Abraham Accords or a growing anti-Iran coalition." The U.S. military still maintains a small but critical footprint in Syria – approximately 1,000 troops across three to four bases in the northeast – providing vital intelligence and rapid strike capability. "That footprint has been one of our most important counterterrorism outposts," Ali said. "We've seen multiple targeted operations this year alone." He said, however, that deeper U.S.-Syrian cooperation could bring new complications. "There's always a risk that as ties deepen, either the U.S. could reduce its presence – or al-Sharaa might ask us to scale back," Ali said. "That could impact our ability to monitor jihadist activity or manage the tens of thousands of ISIS detainees still in camps guarded by SDF forces." Meanwhile, the diplomatic implications of Trump's move are drawing global attention. Syria's new leadership has publicly distanced itself from Iran, reportedly blocked Hezbollah weapon shipments, and dismantled multiple Iranian military posts across the country. "The president is genuinely focused on expanding the Abraham Accords," said Schenker. "He sees Syria as the next possible candidate." NSC spokesman Taylor Rogers told Fox News Digital. "President Trump is working towards lasting peace in the Middle East, which includes supporting a Syria that is stable, unified, and at peace with itself and its neighbors. The President is empowering Syria's success by lifting sanctions on export controls while maintaining sanctions on terrorists and all other potential threats to the United States. The President made a promise to give Syria a chance to rebuild and thrive by lifting sanctions, and this President keeps his promises." Still, normalization with Israel remains politically fraught. Syria remains officially at war with the Jewish state, and while Sharaa has hinted at accepting the pre-1974 ceasefire lines, jihadist factions and Islamist groups within Syria remain staunchly opposed. "There have already been reported assassination attempts on Sharaa," Schenker said. "It's going to get harder if he moves from non-belligerency to full normalization." Charles Lister, director of the Syria program at the Middle East Institute, told Fox News Digital, "Syria has always been an open wound in the center of the region – an engine of instability… But if it stabilizes now, it unlocks a path for broader regional integration. It connects Israel and Jordan to a more secure arc and reduces the need for heavy U.S. military involvement." Despite encouraging signs on the diplomatic track – such as reported back-channel talks and reduced rhetoric – Israeli airstrikes on Syrian territory have continued, with hundreds launched this year alone. Syria's new leadership has not responded militarily, but tensions remain high. "The facts on the ground don't yet reflect the progress being made behind closed doors," Lister said. "We just have to hope that those two dynamics meet in the middle, and things calm down on the ground as well."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store