No legal mandate to publish list of excluded voters: ECI to Supreme Court
Election Commission of India
(ECI) has told the Supreme Court that the law does not mandate it to "prepare or share" any "separate list" of names of electors not included in the
draft electoral rolls
.
Also, ECI has argued that the law does not require it to "publish" the "reasons" for non-inclusion of an individual in the draft electoral rolls. "The statutory framework does not require the commission to prepare or share any separate list of names of people not included in the draft electoral rolls, or publish the reasons for non-inclusion of anyone in the draft electoral rolls for any reason," the affidavit reads. This has been submitted by ECI in response to an application filed by Association for
Democratic Reforms
(ADR) seeking details of 65 lakh names dropped from the recently published Bihar draft electoral roll as part of an ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR).
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
Pertinently at the outset, ECI, in its affidavit, has submitted that the list of approximately 65 lakh electors whose names have not been included in the draft roll has been shared with political parties. It has further submitted that since "neither the law nor guidelines provide for preparation or sharing" of any such list of previous electors whose enumeration form is not received for any reason during the enumeration phase, "no such list can be sought by the petitioner as a matter of right."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
25 Best Cities for Living
www.tripminutes.com
Undo
The poll body has said that the petitioner (ADR) "can reach out" to political parties to "gather" the said list. Noteworthily, ECI has said that "exclusion of a name from the draft electoral roll does not amount to deletion of an individual from the electoral rolls". It added, "The draft roll simply shows that the duly filled enumeration form of existing electors has been received during the enumeration phase."
Elaborating, the poll body has submitted that "but, on account of human involvement in execution of this exercise of scale, there is always a possibility that an exclusion or inclusion might surface due to inadvertence or error. It is for this reason that the law provides a remedy that if the Electoral Registration officer (ERO) is of the view that owing to inadvertence or error during preparation, the names of any electors have been left out of the draft roll, the ERO has the power to take remedial action."It added, "It is for this reason that issuance of reasons for exclusion of names from the draft rolls is not contemplated in the statutory framework governing the preparation of electoral rolls."
Live Events
Giving reasons for not preparing or sharing reasons for exclusion of electors in the draft rolls, ECI has submitted that "no inquiry is done for the inclusion of anyone's name in the draft rolls, and each and every individual whose, enumeration form, has been received, has been included in the draft rolls, without any reservation or exception."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 minutes ago
- Business Standard
SC asks ECI to detail docs considered in 2003 Bihar electoral roll revision
The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Election Commission of India (ECI) to inform about the documents considered during the 2003 intensive electoral roll revision in Bihar. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, which resumed the hearing on a pleas challenging the June 24 ECI decision to conduct the special intensive revision (SIR) in the state said, "We would like ECI to state what documents were taken in 2003 exercise". The remarks came after advocate Nizam Pasha, appearing for one of the parties, said referred to the court reportedly saying "if the date of January 1, 2003 (the date of earlier SIR) goes then everything goes". "I must submit that nothing was there to show why this date is there The impression sought to be conveyed is that it is the earlier date when the intensive exercise for revision of the electoral roll was held. It is stated that the EPIC (voter) card issued then is more reliable than issued during summary exercises conducted from time to time, is incorrect," Pasha said. Pasha asked if the process of enrolling under intensive and summary revisions was the same then how could EPIC cards issued under summary exercises be discarded. The lawyer, therefore, said the date of 2003 was invalid and not based on intelligible differentia (basis of distinguishing the two situations). "No receipt of my enumeration form is being given or any documents acknowledging the receipt is given and therefore the booth level officers have an upper hand and these lower level officers have too much discretion on whether the form has to be taken or not," he said. Senior advocate Shoeb Alam, appearing for another petitioner, pointed out insufficient reasons in the ECI notification saying the process invented was neither "summary" nor "intensive" but just a creation of the notification. "This is a process of voter registration and cannot be a process of disqualification. This is a process to welcome and not turn this into a process to unwelcome," he said. The top court on August 13 observed electoral rolls cannot remain "static" and there is bound to be a revision, the top court said the expanded list of acceptable documents of identity from seven to 11 for Bihar's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voters' list was in fact "voter-friendly and not exclusionary." As the row over the SIR escalated, the bench said the EC had the residual power to conduct such an exercise as it deemed fit. The bench also disagreed with a submission by a petitioner that the SIR of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar had no basis in law and ought to be quashed. Leaders of opposition parties including the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and the Congress and the NGO Association of Democratic Reforms (ADR) have challenged the electoral roll revision drive in Bihar.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 minutes ago
- Business Standard
EC notice to NDA MP, her MLC husband for possessing two voter cards
The Election Commission on Thursday served notices to LJP (Ram Vilas) MP from Bihar's Vaishali Veena Devi and her husband Dinesh Singh, a JD(U) MLC, for allegedly possessing two voter ID cards each, an official said. The EC's action came hours after RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav alleged that the couple possessed two voter ID cards each. "The Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) for Muzaffarpur assembly constituency has sent notices to the MP and her husband asking them to submit their replies to the EC over the issue of possessing two voter ID cards by August 16," the official said. Yadav, the leader of opposition in the assembly, shared purported screenshots of draft electoral rolls published following the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), claiming that the NDA MP and the MLC have two voter cards each. "Is it not a case of fraud, manipulation, and collusion by the Election Commission to ensure a victory for BJP-NDA?" he asked. Speaking to reporters, Veena Devi claimed, "I don't know how my name has appeared in the electoral rolls of the Muzaffarpur assembly seat. I am a registered voter of the Sahebganj assembly seat only. I came to know about it through the press." Alleging that the anomaly has happened due to irregularities committed by election officials, she said she has submitted a form for deletion of her name from the rolls in Muzaffarpur. "Let Tejashwi Yadav say whatever he wants... Since he is in the opposition, he will say all such things against the leaders of the ruling parties," she said.
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Voter Adhikar Yatra: Rahul Gandhi to hit the streets again, this time over Bihar ‘SIR'
Congress MP Rahul Gandhi hit the roads in Bihar for a 13-day yatra against alleged vote theft and the Special Intensive Review (SIR) of the voter list carried out by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the poll-bound state. Congress MP Rahul Gandhi during a protest march in New Delhi on August 11. (PTI) Announced the schedule of Gandhi's 'Voter Adhikar Yatra', Congress general secretary (organization) KC Venugopal said, 'To save our vote, our Constitution, our democracy, Rahul Gandhi, former deputy chief minister of Bihar Tejashwi Yadav and other Mahagadbandhan leaders will embark on the Voter Adhikar Yatra across Bihar.' 'The yatra will kick off with a mega launch rally in Sasaram on August 17, going through Gaya, Munger, Bhagalpur, Katihar, Purnia, Madhubani, Darbhanga, Pashchim Champaran, and ending in Arrah on August 30,' Venugopal said. The proposed 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' will be focused on the Opposition's ongoing tirade against the ECI. 'Those who have conspired to steal our vote and destroy our hard-fought democratic system will be punished by the people. We will always fight to ensure that power stays with the ordinary people and is not snatched by those working for divisive forces, cronies, and the powerful,' Venugopal said. Late on Thursday, the Congress will organise a 'Save Democracy Torch Procession' in all district headquarters across the country. On September 1, the Opposition will hold a 'Mega Voter Adhikar Rally' at Patna's Gandhi Maidan 'where the whole of Bihar will send a clear message to drive away the Vote Chors (thieves)', Venugopal said. This will be Gandhi's second yatra in as many years after he took out Phase 2 of the Bharat Jodo Yatra in February 2024, which saw the Congress revive its organisation, and in some parts of the country, and also translated in some electoral gains during last year's general elections. Among other planned events, the party will take out rallies with the theme 'Vote Thief-Leave the Throne' in all state headquarters from August 22 to September 7. From September 15 to October 15, a 'signature campaign' will be conducted across the country to protect the right to vote. On August 7, Gandhi produced data of alleged dubious voters in Mahadevapura segment of Bangalore (Central) Lok Sabha constituency and claimed that 1,00,250 lakh 'stolen' votes helped the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) win the seat in 2024, as the Wayanad MP accused the ECI of 'colluding' with the BJP. Gandhi claimed that in Mahadevapura, there were 11,965 duplicate voters, 40,009 voters with fake and invalid addresses, 10,452 bulk voters who had a single address and 4,132 voters with invalid photos.
