
Think moving seats after your plane takes off is harmless? Here's why you're wrong
We've all done it. Having dodged the costly charge to choose your own plane seat, and been assigned a spot squeezed between two strangers, you spy an empty row. Surely trading your cramped quarters for somewhere more spacious won't cause any harm? Don't be so certain.
Airlines are reluctant to condone the practice, in part because of their emergency protocols. If, for example, a passenger was to collapse or become otherwise unwell, airline staff need to be able to access as much information as possible about them – and quickly. If the person in 15A is now in 27D, those vital, life-saving details could be hard to ascertain. It's especially important if that person is travelling alone.
Swapping seats might also throw a spanner into the works when it comes to the balance of the plane. It might seem unlikely, but the centre of gravity on every flight is a carefully calibrated thing – even on those quick, short-haul trips to Europe. It's especially important on smaller aircraft, where the weight of each section is a finely measured thing. Disrupt the balance, and the safety of the flight could be compromised.
While weighing passengers ahead of boarding has been mooted, the approximate distribution of mass does have to be calculated before each flight. Airlines are keen to emphasise that if one side, or section, of the plane is heavier than another part, flying the aircraft can become difficult. Any extra 'drag' – when air resistance becomes noticeable – is something the pilot must consider. And it can increase fuel costs, too, which can in turn affect ticket prices – something none of us want.
Vital calculations
In fact, the impact on fuel is particularly significant. That all-important centre of gravity is calculated before a plane takes off, and is used – most crucially – at landing. As planes are considerably lighter at landing due to fuel depletion, these calculations are a vital part of getting onto the runway safely. It's based on the allocation of human weight, so if a party has shifted to another side of the cabin, that information is no longer accurate (and makes getting onto the runway that bit more difficult).
A guidebook released by the Federal Aviation Administration, the American government agency that operates civil aviation, emphasises the importance of these calculations. Its introduction states that 'the weight and balance system commonly employed among aircraft consists of three equally important elements: the weighing of the aircraft, the maintaining of the weight and balance records, and the proper loading of the aircraft.'
The information goes on: 'An inaccuracy in any of these elements defeats the purpose of the system… Improper loading decreases the efficiency and performance of an aircraft from the standpoint of altitude, manoeuvrability, rate of climb and speed. It may even be the cause of failure to complete the flight or, for that matter, failure to start the flight.' It's not a great idea, then, to take that empty seat a few rows ahead (unless you're expressly asked to by airline staff, who might want to balance the cabin).
Financial reasons
Of course, airlines are also keen to discourage seat-swapping because ancillary payments (for snacks, luggage and a preferable location) are a valuable part of their business model. Ryanair reportedly netted some £3.5 billion from additional fees in 2023, for example, and a recent survey by financial site TradingPedia found that customers who tried to book 'rock bottom' tickets at budget airlines often ended paying up to £200 more than the advertised initial price, with providers like Wizz Air, Ryanair and EasyJet among the worst offenders.
The best way to ensure good seats is, unfortunately, to pay for them. But there are a few tricks that may help to bag your ideal spot in the cabin. Some airline staff suggest that parties of two should book the aisle and the window seat in the hope that no one nabs the one in the middle. While being able to see in advance where children are sitting in the cabin has proven controversial, taking a look at the seat map is a good way to work out where larger groups might be situated (and decide whether or not you would prefer to steer clear).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour's 'war-ready' plans will be blown apart by Nato's demand for 3.5% spending on defence and cause £40billion funding shortfall... and tax hikes might be the only way to plug the gap
Voters were warned last night to brace for further tax rises after Nato spending demands blew a £40billion hole in Labour 's plans. Nato chief Mark Rutte has told Keir Starmer and other leaders that the alliance later this month will raise its minimum spending target from 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent by 2035 to deter Russia 's Vladimir Putin and placate US President Donald Trump. Military sources said it would be 'unthinkable' for Britain to refuse the demand given its leading role in Nato. But experts claimed the bill could eventually run to £40billion a year – the same amount raised by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her controversial Budget last year and equal to 5p on the basic rate of income tax. Defence Secretary John Healey refused to rule out tax increases to help fund the push to move Britain to a position of 'war-fighting readiness' but said ministers would 'set out how we'll pay for future increases in the future'. The Prime Minister has committed to raising defence spending from 2.3 per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent by 2027. And he has said the Government will move to 3 per cent at some point in the early 2030s 'subject to economic and fiscal conditions'. But he repeatedly refused to set an 'arbitrary date' for meeting it or set out how it would be funded. Sir Keir was holding emergency talks with advisers in Downing Street about how to respond to the demand. He said this week there were 'discussions about what the contribution should be going into the Nato conference'. This week's Strategic Defence Review said Britain must be ready 'to step up, to lead in Nato and take greater responsibility for our collective self-defence'. Whitehall sources cautioned the Nato target may not have to be met in full for a decade, although intermediate goals could be set along the way. The increased spending demand comes at a time when Ms Reeves is already struggling to meet her own fiscal rules and ministers are in retreat over welfare cuts. The Institute for Fiscal Studies warned 'chunky' tax rises would be needed even to hit 3 per cent spending on defence. Professor Malcolm Chalmers, of the Royal United Services Institute, claimed meeting 3.5 per cent by 2035 would cost an extra £40billion a year and said this was equivalent to raising overall income tax receipts 'by 10 per cent'. Former Army chief Lord Dannatt said: 'I would make the case that we have got to tighten our belt. And if we can't borrow more, which we can't, if we can't grow the economy, which we're struggling to, then we've got to put some taxes up.' Official figures show Labour's current plans would see spending on sickness benefits rise faster than that on defence. Despite planned cuts to disability benefits, spending on sickness and disability is forecast to rise from 2.4 per cent of GDP to 3.1 per cent by the end of the decade, reaching almost £100billion a year by 2030. Former Tory chancellor Jeremy Hunt said yesterday that welfare reform was the 'only way' to square the circle. Mr Rutte is expected to set the minimum defence spending target when Nato leaders gather in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 24. The target will be supplemented with an additional goal of spending 1.5 per cent on security- related activity, taking the total to the five per cent demanded by Mr Trump. But former Nato chief Lord Robertson warned that many countries would struggle if the aims are set too high. The Labour peer, who led the Government's review, said: 'I can see why Nato is giving targets but whether they are realisable is a different question altogether.'


BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Oxtoby sees NI's 'growth' after securing play-off
Northern Ireland boss Tanya Oxtoby believes their 1-1 draw with Bosnia-Herzegovina in the Nations League in Zenica shows the "growth" of her Simone Magill's composed finish was cancelled out by Sofija Krajsumovic's equaliser for Bosnia, but NI saw out the draw which secured second place in the group and a promotion is an improvement on their third-place finish in the last edition of the Nations League, and despite the nervy nature of the draw, Oxtoby praised the application of her players to grind out a result."It's always a difficult place to come with the travel, I thought we should have scored a few more in the first half and we conceded a sloppy one, but to show the character to see the game out that's all that matters at this point," she said."In international football there are no easy games, I said all along every game was going to be competitive in this group and you have to show the character and resilience."You have to win when it's not pretty and get results when it's not pretty and we've certainly done that when there have been times previously when we haven't, so for me, that is growth." NI success 'takes everyone' Northern Ireland will now face one of Austria, Belgium, Denmark or Iceland in the play-offs in October after those four sides finished third in their respective League A groups, with the draw taking place on was keen to stress that NI being in a position to reach League A for the first time takes a whole squad effort, particularly after a difficult trip to get to Bosnia."When you talk about the culture of the group, everyone adds value and contributes to what we're doing," she added."I said to the players whether you played or not you have contributed to the success of the group, it takes everyone."The travel day wasn't exactly smooth but to see the way the group look after each other in the airport that pleases me no end because that is the foundation you build team character and resilience on."


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Liverpool star will NOT be part of potential Florian Wirtz deal as Reds prepare record bid with negotiations with Bayer Leverkusen ongoing
A Liverpool star will not be part of any potential deal for Florian Wirtz as the Reds prepare a record bid for the midfielder. Liverpool remain in negotiations with Bayer Leverkusen over a deal for Wirtz. Bayer want £120million and Liverpool are at £109m but Wirtz has made it clear he wants the move. The Germany star has been convinced by Arne Slot 's clear plan of where he will play in Liverpool's set-up as a No 10. Should the Reds accede to Bayer's demands, Wirtz would become the most expensive signing in British football, overtaking the £115m Chelsea paid Brighton for Moises Caicedo. Some reports had suggested that a Reds star would be part of the deal, but that won't be happening, with a cash-only deal on the table. That player is Harvey Elliott, who has suggested his future could lay away from Anfield. If that is to happen, however, the destination won't be Leverkusen. Richard Hughes, Liverpool's Sporting Director, has proposed a package to his Leverkusen counterpart Simon Rolfes with easily attainable performance-related bonuses, such as Champions League qualification but the clubs are yet to agree a final fee. Former Manchester United boss Erik ten Hag was appointed Leverkusen's new head coach last week after Xabi Alonso departed to take charge of Real Madrid. Ten Hag has been out of work since being sacked by United in October but has wasted little time in looking to the Premier League to reshape his new squad. It's widely been accepted that Wirtz won't be part of that squad, but a deal with Liverpool is yet to be agreed after the player himself made it clear he wanted the Reds instead of Manchester City or Bayern Munich. 'I think it's been a lot more difficult for me because I obviously had that injury at the start,' Elliott told Liverpool Echo in April. 'But at the same time, you need to be here for the team, work as hard as you can and when the opportunities come on the pitch. 'A lot of times this season it's almost been [coming on] when we've been losing or drawing, so it is about trying to change the game, try and turn it around and have a positive impact. But, you know, any minutes for Liverpool are amazing.' 'I hope that I can push on. This is my team, I am committed to them and it's just a situation that is always going to have a lot of talk, I just need to think about what is best for my future, my career and as much as I want it to be here.' If Elliott is to leave, though, it will be in a separate deal to the one involving Wirtz. Arne Slot has also spoken to Rayan Cherki but the midfielder was viewed as a back-up option to Wirtz. Liverpool are also aware of interest from Al Nassr for winger Luis Diaz but have yet to receive an official approach. Wirtz, meanwhile, has taken to social media to hit out at the German press after one reporter suggested the forward would be looking to take Alexis Mac Allister's No 10 shirt should the move go through. 'Who says I want the 10,' Wirtz posted to his 3.3million Instagram followers. 'I respect players.' He added: 'Don't believe everything what's written,' accompanied by a clown emoji.