Yusuf Salaam owes six figures in taxes, despite speaking fees
The anti-cop councilman owes between $100,000 and $250,000 to the IRS, his 2024 annual financial disclosure to the city Conflicts of Interest Board shows.
Salaam, 51, insisted in the forms he is 'in the process of repaying all taxes' for the past two years.
5 Salaam owes big money to the IRS, financial disclosures reveal.
Gregory P. Mango
The Harlem pol won his seat in 2023, then took office at the start of 2024 — so it's not clear when the taxes owed date back to.
His office declined to comment, and the IRS is barred from disclosing tax return information.
Salaam maintains his mountain of debt despite making a killing in speaking fees since his surprise victory in 2023.
He charges around $31,000 a pop for a virtual event — and closer to $40,000 to come talk about criminal justice in person.
He's had at least 36 speaking engagements since announcing his run in 2023.
5 Salaam was 16 when the court proceedings took place in 1990.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Since taking office last year, he raked in up to $250,000 in fees alone, records show — on top of the $148,500 salary he gets for his Council gig.
The father of 10 also declared getting '$500,000 or more' annually from a trust, estate or other beneficial interest, likely the terms of his 2014 settlement with the city.
NYC ended up paying $40.75 million to the members of the Central Park Five to settle a civil rights suit. Salaam's share was $7.125 million.
5 Salaam was arrested along with four other Black and Latino teenagers in the Central Park case in 1989.
Andrew Savulich
5 Salaam served nearly seven years in prison on the since overturned conviction.
NY Post File Photo
This isn't the first controversy for the councilman, who's also chairman of the Public Safety Committee overseeing the NYPD.
Last year he was caught motoring around the Big Apple with out-of-state license plates and alleged illegally tinted windows. He was living in Georgia for six years before running for office in the Big Apple and still had his Peach State plates.
5 Salaam says he's been in the process of repaying all taxes for the past two years.
Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post
Salaam has been a vocal critic of the NYPD since being elected and among the lawmakers who pushed the controversial 'How Many Stops Act' that buries cops in paperwork.
He was one of five Black and Latino teenagers wrongly accused, convicted and imprisoned for the assault and rape of a woman jogging in Central Park in 1989.
After his arrest at age 15, Salaam served nearly seven years behind bars, before a re-examination of the case led to his conviction being tossed in 2002 — after career criminal Matias Reyes confessed to the attack and DNA evidence confirmed Reyes' involvement.
Reyes had confessed during interrogation to being at the Central Park crime scene, but the admission was later determined to be coerced.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
6 minutes ago
- USA Today
Elina Svitolina ripped bettors for crossing line after Naomi Osaka loss
In case it wasn't already clear, bets you make on any sporting event are your responsibility and YOUR responsibility alone. An athlete is not obligated to follow through and will not tailor their performance based on whatever transaction a complete stranger agreed to behind the scenes (not to mention the ethical and legal concerns). And the moment you start venting out your frustrations to an athlete who "let you down," you've lost the plot entirely. That seems to be what's happened with Elina Svitolina. After losing to Naomi Osaka in the National Bank Open quarterfinals on Tuesday, the No. 13-ranked tennis player in the world took to her Instagram story to share screenshots of a handful of "shameful" messages from bettors filled with vitriol and anger over her failure at the hands of Osaka. Svitolina included messages that invoked death threats. Some mocked Svitolina's Ukrainian heritage amid the country's ongoing war with Russia. Others made racist comments about her husband, Gaël Monfils, a Black fellow professional tennis player. For obvious sensitivity reasons, I will not link out any of the images here. You can find them in Svitolina's story if you're so inclined. To say the least, this is not OK. Not at all. 'To all the bettors: I'm a mom before I'm an athlete,' Svitolina wrote in her Instagram story. 'The way you talk to women – to mothers – is SHAMEFUL. If your moms saw your messages, they'd be disgusted.' Friends, please remember what I'm about to say. Just because you lost a bet over a sports outcome does not mean you get to start harassing the person you think cost you money. Athletes are still, and stay with me here, human beings who deserve common decency like any of us. They're not props. The only person who costs you money in these kinds of situations is you. The betting buck starts and stops with you. Always.
New York Post
6 minutes ago
- New York Post
Voting rights protected by the historic Voting Rights Act threatened as law has its 60th anniversary
WASHINGTON (AP) — Wednesday is the 60th anniversary of the day President Lyndon Johnson made his way to the U.S. Capitol and, with Martin Luther King Jr. standing behind him, signed the Voting Rights Act into law. The act protected the right to vote and ensured the government would fight efforts to suppress it, especially those aimed at Black voters. For many Americans, it was the day U.S. democracy fully began. That was then. 7 President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 60 years ago. AP The law has been slowly eroding for more than a decade, starting with the 2013 Supreme Court decision ending the requirement that all or parts of 15 states with a history of discrimination in voting get federal approval before changing the way they hold elections. Within hours of the ruling, some states that had been under the preclearance provision began announcing plans for stricter voting laws. Those changes have continued, especially since the 2020 presidential election and President Donald Trump's false claims that widespread fraud cost him reelection. The Supreme Court upheld a key part of the Voting Rights Act in 2023, but in its upcoming term it's scheduled to hear a case that could roll back that decision and another that would effectively neuter the law. Voting rights experts say those cases will largely determine whether a landmark law passed during a turbulent era decades ago will have future anniversaries to mark. 'We're at a critical juncture right now,' said Demetria McCain, director of policy at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. 'And, let's be clear, our democracy is only about to turn 60 when the Voting Rights Act anniversary gets here. I say that because there are so many attacks on voting rights, particularly as it relates to Black communities and communities of color.' Native Americans celebrate a win that could be temporary The reservation of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians is about 10 miles (16 kilometers) from the Canadian border, a region of forests, small lakes and vast prairie land. Its main highway is a mix of small houses, mobile homes and businesses. A gleaming casino and hotel stand out, not far from grazing bison. In 2024, the tribe and another in North Dakota, the Spirit Lake Tribe, formed a joint political district for the first time. They had filed a lawsuit arguing that the way lines were drawn for state legislative seats denied them the right to elect candidates of their choice. U.S. District Court Chief Judge Peter Welte agreed and put a new map in place. 7 The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians and another tribe in North Dakota, the Spirit Lake Tribe, formed a joint political district for the first time in 2024. AP State Rep. Collette Brown ran for the legislature because she wanted to see more Native American representation, and she won under the new map. 'It felt surreal. I felt accomplished, I felt recognized,' said Brown, a plaintiff in the lawsuit and the Spirit Lake Tribe's Gaming Commission executive director. 'I felt, OK, it's time for us to really start making change and really start educating from within so that we're not silenced.' Brown, a Democrat, co-sponsored several bills on Native American issues that became law, including aid for repatriation of remains and artifacts and alerts for missing Indigenous people. 7 The future of the tribes' district is in the hands of the Supreme Court. AP This year's anniversary of the Voting Rights Act 'forces you to look at how far we've come,' from Native Americans to women, said Jamie Azure, chairman of the Turtle Mountain tribe. Now the future of their district is in the hands of the Supreme Court. Will individuals be allowed to file voting rights challenges? The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers North Dakota and six other states, overturned Welte's decision 2-1, saying the tribes and entities such as the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the ACLU do not have a right to sue over potential violations of voters' constitutional rights. That ruling expanded on an earlier 8th Circuit opinion out of Arkansas that rejected a different challenge on the same grounds. Late last month, a 3rd Circuit court panel ruled in a separate case out of Arkansas that only the U.S. attorney general can file such cases — not private individuals or groups. 7 The University of Michigan Law School Voting Rights Initiative found that since 1982 nearly 87% of claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act were from private individuals and organizations. AP Those decisions upended decades of precedent. The Supreme Court has stayed the ruling for the tribes while it decides whether it will take the North Dakota case. The University of Michigan Law School Voting Rights Initiative found that since 1982 nearly 87% of claims under that part of the Voting Rights Act, known as Section 2, were from private individuals and organizations. Leaving individuals without the ability to file challenges is especially troublesome now because the Justice Department under Trump, a Republican, seems focused on other priorities, said Sophia Lin Lakin, who heads the ACLU's Voting Rights Project. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! 7 Voters waiting in line to cast their ballots in Fort Defiance, Ariz., on Election Day in 2024. AP The government's voting rights unit has been dismantled and given new priorities that, she said, have turned enforcement 'against the very people it was created to protect.' The Justice Department declined to answer questions about its voting rights priorities, cases it is pursuing or whether it would be involved in the voting rights cases coming before the nation's highest court. Supreme Court weighs another case on race and congressional districts Two years ago, voting rights activists celebrated when the Supreme Court preserved Section 2 in a case out of Alabama that required the state to draw an addition congressional district to benefit Black voters. Now it's poised to rehear a similar case out of Louisiana that could modify or undo that decision. 7 The Justice Department declined to answer questions about its voting rights priorities, cases it is pursuing or whether it would be involved in the voting rights cases coming before the nation's highest court. AP The court heard the case in March but did not make a decision during the term. In an order on Friday, the court asked the lawyers to supply briefs explaining 'whether the State's intentional creation of a second majority-minority congressional district violates the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments to the U. S. Constitution.' Robert Weiner, the director of voting rights for the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said while it is a 'matter of concern' that the court is asking the question, the fact the nine justices did not reach a decision during the last term suggests there weren't five votes already. 'They wouldn't need re-argument if the sides had already been chosen,' he said. Trump's Justice Department shifts focus on voting issues At a time when the remaining protections of the Voting Rights Act are under threat, the Justice Department has shifted its election-related priorities. Under Attorney General Pam Bondi, it has dropped or withdrawn from several election- and voting-related cases. The department instead has focused on concerns of voter fraud raised by conservative activists following years of false claims surrounding elections. 7 Under Attorney General Pam Bondi, the Justice Department has dropped or withdrawn from several election- and voting-related cases. AP The department also has sent requests for voter registration information as well as data on election fraud and warnings of election violations to at least 19 states. In addition to the shift in focus at the Justice Department, federal legislation to protect voting rights has gone nowhere. Democrats have reintroduced the John Lewis voting rights bill, but it's legislation they failed to pass in 2022 when they held both houses of Congress and the White House and needed some Republican support in the Senate. Earlier this year, Trump signed an executive order seeking to overhaul voting in the states, which includes a documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement on the federal voting form, though much of it has been blocked in the courts. The GOP-controlled House passed a bill that would require proof of citizenship to register to vote. And gerrymandering state legislative and congressional districts remains prevalent. The slow chipping away at the 60-year-old law has created a nation with an unequal distribution of voting rights, said Sean Morales-Doyle, director of the voting rights center at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University. Some states have been active in expanding access to voting while others have been focused on restricting the vote. 'The last five to 10 years,' he said, 'the experiences of voters increasingly depend on where they live.'
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Google quietly doubles down on a controversial workplace trend
Google (GOOGL) , operated by Alphabet, raised eyebrows earlier this year when it sent a memo to employees notifying them that it was scaling back its diversity, equity, and inclusion goals. In the memo, sent to employees in February, Google Chief People Officer Fiona Cicconi said that "recent court decisions and U.S. Executive Orders" prompted the company to make this change, since it is a federal contractor. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter "In 2020, we set aspirational hiring goals and focused on growing our offices outside California and New York to improve representation," said Cicconi. "We'll continue to invest in states across the U.S. - and in many countries globally - but in the future we will no longer have aspirational goals." Related: Google sends a harsh message to employees after layoffs Google's decision came after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2023 to end affirmative action in college admissions, raising legal questions about DEI programs in workplaces nationwide. Then, on Jan. 20, President Donald Trump issued an executive order dismantling the federal government's diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. In the order, he claims that the programs enforce "illegal and immoral discrimination." In addition to scaling back its DEI goals, Google also scrubbed 58 DEI-related groups from its list of nonprofit organizations that receive the company's "most substantial contributions," according to a recent report from the Tech Transparency Project. The report indicates that the change took place around February, and the groups that were removed had mission statements that contained the words "diversity," "equity," and "inclusion," and other terms the Trump administration advised federal agencies to purge. Related: Intel announces a drastic decision to fix its struggling business Some of the organizations that were removed from the list include the African American Community Service Agency, which aims to "empower all Black and historically excluded communities;" the Latino Leadership Alliance, which is dedicated to "race equity affecting the Latino community;" and the National Network to End Domestic Violence, which spreads awareness about violence against women. The revelation comes after Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said in an interview with The Verge in May that diversity is still "a foundational value" for the company, despite recent cuts. "What we are doing in the company is constantly at our scale," said Pichai. "We look at that first - see what works, what we can scale up better. All I can say is we probably have more resources invested in diversity now than at any point in our history as a company, in terms of the scale and the resources we put in." Many companies in corporate America committed to implementing DEI policies in their workplaces in 2020 after George Floyd was murdered by a white police officer who assisted in his arrest. The incident brought to light many inequities Black people face in America. These policies aimed to advance workplace opportunities for people of various backgrounds. However, when the U.S. Supreme Court ended affirmative action in college admissions, which aimed to improve educational opportunities for minorities, companies began questioning the legality of these policies. More Labor: Amazon CEO warns employees of a harsh new reality IRS sends stern warning to employees after layoffsGoogle sends a harsh message to employees after layoffs Also, DEI policies later became the source of backlash from conservative consumers who began boycotting companies that adopted them. Large companies such as Walmart, McDonald's, Amazon, and Lowe's have either scaled back or completely axed their DEI policies over the past few months. Despite recent cuts to DEI across corporate America, a recent survey from culture and inclusion platform Paradigm found that only 19% of companies/organizations plan to decrease their DEI funding in 2025, while 23% plan to increase their funding, and 58% plan to make no changes. Related: Meta quietly plans rude awakening for employees after layoffs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
