Fast-tracking approvals to raise city rooftops a climate-friendly, space-effective way for Labor to remedy Australia's worsening housing crisis
Land is scarce, builders are folding, and approvals are still crawling through council inboxes.
Yet ministers keep prescribing more of the same, rezonings here, grants there, while ignoring the cheapest, quickest real estate Australia owns: the air sitting idle on top of city rooftops. The case for looking up
Walk any CBD and count the flat roofs dotted with nothing more than air-conditioning units and pigeons.
In a conventional project, those few hundred square metres of land would cost millions.
In the sky, they cost nothing.
Add factory-made timber or light-gauge steel modules, quietly craned into place while the shops or offices below keep trading and you've slashed both the budget and the build time in half.
There is a climate dividend, too.
Re-using an existing concrete frame avoids as much as three-quarters of the embodied carbon baked into a new tower.
And at a time when suburban sprawl devours paddocks and infrastructure dollars, rooftop residents piggyback on pipes, rails and fibre that are already there.
This isn't guesswork.
London and Manchester have waved through more than 180,000 'airspace homes' under a fast-track code introduced in the past couple of years.
Rotterdam's RoofScape program is stuffing housing, solar panels and rain-capture systems onto 18 square kilometres of flat roofs.
Property giant CBRE, which crunched the numbers for Australia, puts the local rooftop market in the 'tens of billions'. How big could it be here?
NSW's Low and Mid-Rise Housing Policy is forecast to unlock 112,000 dwellings around 171 train stations in five years.
Copy that uplift to the other capitals, modestly discounting for lower densities, and you arrive at about 150,000 ready-made apartments hovering in the sky.
That's one-eighth of the Accord target without touching a single greenfield hectare. A two-year plan: no white papers required
If governments are serious, the roadmap is brutally simple.
First, map the opportunity.
A national LiDAR/Drone-based scan could, within six months, produce a searchable atlas of every flat roof built after 1950, tagged with ownership, zoning and structural capacity. The tech has already been developed; it just needs a green light.
Second, cut the red tape.
England's rule is blunt: if your lightweight addition meets height, daylight and fire parameters, you skip the planning quagmire.
Australia should mirror that 'if-it-fits-it-passes' test for rooftops and let certifiers sign off within weeks, not years.
Third, prove it works on the government's own buildings.
State asset corporations could pre-approve the airspace above twenty car parks, TAFEs and depots, tendering them exclusively to modular builders.
Those sites alone would pump at least 2,500 units into the pipeline and give lenders the confidence they crave.
Fourth, make the numbers irresistible for existing owners.
A simple strata-sharing rule, half of any air-rights windfall must fund lifts, solar and façade upgrades, turns objections into applause.
Leaky roofs fixed, bills fall, asset value climbs: who votes against free money?
Finally, back the early movers with concessional debt.
Housing Australia could open a $500 million window for rooftop projects that cut embodied carbon by 40 per cent and set aside at least 20 per cent of apartments for sub-market rents.
Super funds chasing green income streams would do the rest.
Put the whole package in motion by the end of 2025, and the first cranes could be swinging over Sydney and Melbourne pilot sites eighteen months later, well before the 2028 federal poll.
Ministers love ribbon cuttings; here's a batch ready-made. The politics write themselves
Rooftop housing is a rare policy unicorn: it saves governments money, pleases environmentalists, delights the construction unions hungry for factory work and offers landlords a windfall to renovate the tired offices Australians no longer need five days a week.
Every module lifted onto a CBD roof refreshes stamp duty revenue without bulldozing a single paddock on the city fringe.
For critics who fear 'ugly boxes in the sky', Australia already has a poster child: 55 Southbank Boulevard in Melbourne, where 10 storeys of cross-laminated timber were added above an existing concrete hotel.
The extension banked 4,000 tonnes of CO2-e, generated almost no street disruption and delivered 220 new rooms in under a year. Time to stop staring at paddocks
Canberra keeps telling voters it will 'unlock new land' while tip-toeing around the fact that good land inside city boundaries is tapped out.
The cheapest block in the country is the one we already own: the thin slice of air above every flat roof from Perth to Parramatta.
Map it, recode it, finance it and share the dividends and we could plug the Accord shortfall, revive hollowed-out CBDs and prove that bold promises don't have to die in committee.
The sky is no longer the limit; it is the fastest housing pipeline Australia has ever had.
All we have to do is look up and get on with it.
Dr Ehsan Noroozinejad is a senior researcher at Western Sydney University who writes about innovative housing policy, modular construction, and urban resilience. He advises governments and industry on affordable-housing strategy and has appeared on ABC News, The Guardian, The Policymaker, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Conversation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The Sydney suburbs failing to meet housing targets
The NSW government's push to encourage more intensive residential development near train stations has failed to deliver a swift uptick in fresh applications for major housing projects, according to industry analysis that shows Sydney and surrounds are falling more than 30,000 homes behind its five-year target. The shortfall was driven by 65 per cent of councils tracking behind the level of development activity needed to meet their housing targets for the next five years. Ku-ring-gai, Burwood, Strathfield, North Sydney, Hornsby and the City of Sydney were among the worst performers, the report published by the Urban Development Institute of Australia developer lobby group on Friday showed. NSW is required to deliver 322,000 new dwellings by mid-2029 under the National Housing Accord. NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said the figures suggested Labor's key planning reforms had been 'a complete failure' in many Sydney areas, but Planning Minister Paul Scully countered: 'We have undertaken the largest reforms to planning in NSW history, and they will take time to have full impact.' The UDIA report coincided with the release of Australian Bureau of Statistics' monthly building approval data, which showed a 16 per cent jump in new dwelling approvals in NSW in 2024-25 – the first year of the accord – compared to the previous year, against a national increase of 13.9 per cent. Despite the bump, the July housing accord progress report showed the Greater Sydney 'mega-region' – which includes areas north of Newcastle and the Hunter Valley – was 30,777 development application (DA) approvals behind what was required by this stage to reach the state's supply goal. Loading The report noted there was reason for 'cautious optimism' as the gap between the target and delivery figures had not widened significantly since the shortfall of 30,035 dwellings in March. However, it said the market stability suggested by those figures had largely been driven by modifications to previously determined development applications that sought approval for more dwellings rather than an increase in the number of new applications in the system.

The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
The Sydney suburbs failing to meet housing targets
The NSW government's push to encourage more intensive residential development near train stations has failed to deliver a swift uptick in fresh applications for major housing projects, according to industry analysis that shows Sydney and surrounds are falling more than 30,000 homes behind its five-year target. The shortfall was driven by 65 per cent of councils tracking behind the level of development activity needed to meet their housing targets for the next five years. Ku-ring-gai, Burwood, Strathfield, North Sydney, Hornsby and the City of Sydney were among the worst performers, the report published by the Urban Development Institute of Australia developer lobby group on Friday showed. NSW is required to deliver 322,000 new dwellings by mid-2029 under the National Housing Accord. NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said the figures suggested Labor's key planning reforms had been 'a complete failure' in many Sydney areas, but Planning Minister Paul Scully countered: 'We have undertaken the largest reforms to planning in NSW history, and they will take time to have full impact.' The UDIA report coincided with the release of Australian Bureau of Statistics' monthly building approval data, which showed a 16 per cent jump in new dwelling approvals in NSW in 2024-25 – the first year of the accord – compared to the previous year, against a national increase of 13.9 per cent. Despite the bump, the July housing accord progress report showed the Greater Sydney 'mega-region' – which includes areas north of Newcastle and the Hunter Valley – was 30,777 development application (DA) approvals behind what was required by this stage to reach the state's supply goal. Loading The report noted there was reason for 'cautious optimism' as the gap between the target and delivery figures had not widened significantly since the shortfall of 30,035 dwellings in March. However, it said the market stability suggested by those figures had largely been driven by modifications to previously determined development applications that sought approval for more dwellings rather than an increase in the number of new applications in the system.


West Australian
8 hours ago
- West Australian
Business tax overhaul on wishlist of productivity tsar
Australia should cut taxes for small businesses and implement a new tax that allows immediate investment deductions, the Productivity Commission says, laying the groundwork for the government's economic roundtable. The proposal to cut the corporate income tax rate for business earning less than $1 billion to 20 per cent and introduce a five per cent cashflow tax would boost Australia's economy by $14 billion without worsening budget sustainability, the commission said in a report. This would help lift the nation's floundering labour productivity by 0.4 per cent. Combined, the measures would incentivise investment in the economy by $8 billion. Declining business investment has caused productivity growth to fall to less than a quarter of its 60-year average over the past decade, the commission's deputy chair Alex Robson said. "If we don't get our economy moving again, today's children could be the first generation to not be better off than their parents," he warned. "We need to spark growth through investment and competition - the best way to do that is to reform our company tax system." Businesses with annual revenue under $50 million pay a 25 per cent corporate tax rate while larger firms pay the full 30 per cent tax rate. Under the commission's proposal, businesses over $1 billion in revenue would continue to be taxed at 30 per cent. A net cashflow tax of five per cent would also allow companies to instantly depreciate the full value of investments, incentivising companies to invest in more productivity-boosting capital. The commission said it could be expanded over time if successful. A cashflow tax has previously been championed by Labor-aligned economists including Ross Garnaut and Craig Emerson. At a tax roundtable hosted by Independent MP Allegra Spender last week, former Treasury secretary Ken Henry said Australia would eventually have to move to a cashflow tax, but it would be a very big step. ANU tax policy expert Viva Hammer said implementing a comprehensive cash flow tax had one huge problem - transitioning from the current system. "The people who are going to invest will have a completely different treatment for the people who've already invested. What do you do with the existing investments?" she told the roundtable. "It's a tremendous change in the way you tax the country. So any tremendous change is going to have tremendous winners and tremendous losers." The commission also urged Treasurer Jim Chalmers to make a clear commitment to reduce the regulatory burden on businesses, while forcing regulators to consider the impact of their actions on economic growth. "You need so many licences and approvals from different levels of government to start a cafe in Brisbane that the City Council introduced a check list with up to 31 steps to guide people through the process," commissioner Barry Sterland said. The report's release came as the treasurer released a schedule for his economic roundtable, which kicks off on August 19. Day one of the three-day summit will open with addresses by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Dr Chalmers and Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock. Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood, Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson and Grattan Institute chief executive Aruna Sathanapally will also present to the roundtable. Among the topics to be discussed are better regulation, tax reform, artificial intelligence, boosting business investment and attracting skills.