
Reeves pledges mortgage shake-up despite risk of surge in repossessions
As part of her Mansion House announcement, the Chancellor will hail the biggest mortgage shake-up in a decade to boost homeownership and cut red tape.
She is pressing ahead with the changes despite the head of the City watchdog warning just months ago that the push could 'go wrong' by resulting in a surge of repossessions.
Under the plans, renters who have a good track record of monthly payments will be able to use this to prove to lenders how much they can afford to borrow, sometimes without the need for a deposit.
Ms Reeves will also launch a permanent mortgage guarantee scheme to help more people get on the housing ladder.
The proposals will be announced on Tuesday in front of an audience of bankers and City officials, including Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey.
It comes just days after Threadneedle Street announced it would relax lending rules for first-time buyers by changing a cap on the amount people can borrow.
The Bank said this would allow 36,000 more mortgages to be issued at high loan-to-income (LTI) levels per year.
Nationwide, Britain's biggest building society, has also cut the salary requirements for first-time buyers from £35,000 to £30,000, in a move it hopes will enable 10,000 more people to become homeowners.
While the plans promise to bolster homeownership, regulators have argued they are in direct contrast with a pledge by banks to help borrowers meet monthly mortgage payments.
Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), warned in January that 'things are going to go wrong' by relaxing regulation.
This was on the basis that 'not everybody is going to play completely by the rulebook', adding that more risk would ultimately increase the likelihood of repossessions.
'When the mortgage charter came in last year, pretty much every major party said keep repossessions down, and we did,' Mr Rathi said.
'That is not consistent with relaxing the lending standards.'
Ms Reeves, who is widely expected to launch another tax raid in the autumn, will insist on Tuesday that Labour is creating a country that is 'active and more confident' and a 'better-off' economy.
She will also claim that financial services is 'at the heart of the Government's growth mission ... recognising that Britain cannot succeed and meet its growth ambitions without a financial services sector that is fighting fit and thriving'.
However, Ms Reeves's annual Mansion House speech will not include details of a highly anticipated review of private sector pensions, which could result in workers and companies being forced to put aside more of their wages for retirement.
The review will instead be launched next week, alongside an assessment of the state pension age.
A series of reforms will also see the Bank of England review capital rules, while the senior managers regime that has for a decade forced senior executives to take personal responsibility for wrongdoing will also be made less onerous.
In addition, the FCA's flagship consumer duty rules will also be reviewed to ensure they are not hampering growth in investment banks and pension funds.
The City watchdog will also pare back rules to help companies list more quickly on the stock exchange amid an alarming exodus from the Square Mile.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
OBR boss denies forecast drove welfare cut proposals
The Chancellor could have met her fiscal rules without proposing £5 billion worth of welfare cuts, the head of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has said. Richard Hughes rejected the suggestion that the OBR's forecast was now driving policy, saying it was up to chancellors to decide how much headroom they wanted against their targets. In March 2025, it was reported that Rachel Reeves had expanded planned cuts to welfare shortly before her spring statement after the OBR forecast the Government's previous proposals would not save as much money as thought. That enabled her to maintain the £9.9 billion of headroom against her debt target that she set out in her October 2024 budget. But it also prompted an outcry from Labour backbenchers, leading to the Government dropping most of the proposals in order to avoid its first Commons defeat. Appearing before the Commons Treasury Committee on Tuesday ahead of his proposed reappointment as the OBR's chairman, Mr Hughes denied that changes in the OBR forecast had driven the proposed welfare changes. He said: 'I don't really accept the characterisation that it was changes in our forecast that forced the Government to make any particular sort of policy decision. 'Back in March, the Government decided to make £5 billion worth of welfare savings. They had £10 billion worth of headroom against their fiscal rule. They could have settled for five.' Mr Hughes went on to characterise the decision on welfare, which has now been largely reversed, as 'an entirely political choice' and added Ms Reeves could also have decided to break or change her fiscal rules. Asked about a perception that the forecast was now driving policy, he said: 'Chancellors can make a point about how much headroom they want against their fiscal rules. Recently they have left themselves very little.' Mr Hughes also pushed back against criticism from the Prime Minister, who had complained to the Commons Liaison Committee in April that the OBR's forecast had not included the effect of the Government's welfare reforms on employment. He said the Government had failed to provide enough detail on the employment support programme for it to be included, saying: 'There were no specifics. 'They couldn't tell us who was going to benefit from this programme, which groups, what kind of support they were going to get. 'There was no policy for us to score in our forecast.' A series of U-turns on the Government's welfare proposals at the start of July have left the Chancellor looking for another £5 billion in savings or tax rises if she wishes to maintain the headroom against her debt target she had last year. Ms Reeves is also likely to face a further squeeze thanks to a weakening economy and a commitment to partially reverse cuts to the winter fuel allowance.


Daily Mirror
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Millions of 'zombie' saving accounts leaking £560 a year for savers but it can be stopped
Many people are unknowingly losing money from their savings because they don't ever touch their accounts, one money expert explains how to stop the leak A huge 31 million Brits are unwittingly letting their hard-earned cash dwindle in 'zombie' savings accounts, which could be costing the average saver a hefty £560 due to subpar interest rates when compared to more lucrative options. Personal finance guru Aaron Peake is raising the alarm on the perils of leaving savings in these dormant accounts, which often fail to keep pace with inflation due to their low interest rates, leaving you paying the price without even realising. Aaron said: 'Far too many people keep their savings tied up with their current bank without questioning the poor rates. These linked accounts often offer low interest, withdrawal limits, or tiered rates that punish you if you move money around. "If your savings rate is below inflation, which is currently 3.4%, your money is losing value. It pays to shop around and scour price comparison websites. 'You don't have to lock your money away or sacrifice access to get better returns. Many accounts offer competitive rates with no strings attached. 'With the Bank of England expected to cut its base rate soon, savers should act quickly. Lower base rates usually mean lower savings rates.' In the battle against inflation, interest is the only way for cash savings to maintain their purchasing power. However, with CredAbility data revealing a whopping £186 billion sitting in UK accounts earning just 1.5% interest, it's clear that many are missing out on maximising their savings' potential. In the 12 months leading up to May 2025, the inflation rate stood at 3.4%. Given that the average saver has approximately £16,000 in their savings, this could signify a significant value being lost annually. For instance, if you have £10,000 in an easy-access account yielding 1.5% interest. This would generate £240 in interest each year. However, if you were to use a top-rated easy-access account with a 5% interest rate, you could have earned £800 instead. This equates to an additional £560 per year simply by choosing the right account. Essentially, sticking passively with your existing accounts rather than actively seeking out the best deals could be shaving hundreds off your savings. Different accounts also offer varying ranges of interest rates. Typically, easy-access accounts provide the lowest interest rates as they allow constant access to your funds without penalties. However, accounts with more restrictions on when you can withdraw your money usually offer higher interest rates. These include fixed-rate accounts, notice accounts, and regular savings accounts and are generally better used for long-term savings goals when you won't have to access the money for months or years. Depending on what you're saving for, other accounts might be a better option and could come with a substantial boost in interest rate. MoneyFacts has outlined the average interest rates currently available across different accounts. Average interest rates for July 2025: Easy access - 2.68% Notice account - 3.62% Easy access ISA - 2.92% Notice ISA - 3.49% One-year fixed bond - 4.03% Long-term fixed bond - 3.91% Currently, Aaron's top accounts offering market-leading interest rates are:


Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
New 'Tell Sid'-style drive to get people investing revealed by Rachel Reeves in 'Leeds reforms'
The Government has launched a drive to encourage more ordinary people to start investing in a package of reforms to boost economic growth. A new consumer campaign will lay out the long term benefits of investing for better returns, rather than keeping savings in cash. Banks will nudge customers with large cash balances to consider investing instead. Rachel Reeves revealed the plan today ahead of her Mansion House speech, in an echo of the 1980s 'Tell Sid' campaign around the privatisation of British Gas that is held up as a successful drive to engage the public with the stock market. A much feared cut to the £20,000 annual cash Isa limit was not announced, though the Government says it will continue to consider ways to strike the right balance between cash savings and investment. The 'Leeds reforms', unveiled in the West Yorkshire city by the Chancellor include reforming the bank ring-fencing regime and reducing burdensome regulation in the City. The changes will reintroduce 'informed risk-taking' into the financial system, and 'represent the widest set of reforms to financial services for more than a decade', says the Government. The new measures are intended to help drive increased levels of investment among both financial firms and individuals. The Treasury said the ring-fencing regime - which was brought in after the 2008 financial crisis to separate banks' retail and investment banking activities - will be reformed. Economic Secretary Emma Reynolds will lead a review into balancing between growth and stability - including protecting customers' deposits. The UK is a global outlier in enforcing ring-fencing, and major banks have been divided over whether the system is necessary to protect savers or is overly burdensome. The Treasury said it was backing regulatory reforms for mid-sized banks to free up money for lending and investment. It also plans to cut layers of red tape for businesses in the City. This will see the UK's Financial Ombudsman Service - which settles complaints between consumers and businesses - watered down and simplified to address backlogs in the system. There will also be an accelaration of changes to the senior managers regime, which was also brought in after the 2008 crisis to vet individuals before they are appointed and hold them accountable for problems and risk-taking. Meanwhile, efforts to encourage more individuals to invest rather than keep savings in cash include rolling out 'targeted support' from April next year. This will involve banks alerting customers with cash sitting in low-return current accounts about investment opportunities. Major banks and financial firms including Barclays, Lloyds, Vanguard and Hargreaves Lansdown are backing a new advertising campaign highlighting the benefits of investing. Reeves told finance chiefs, when setting out the reforms in Leeds: 'We are fundamentally reforming the regulatory system, freeing up firms to take risks and to drive growth. The 'much-needed' measures are intended to 'really invigorate our financial services sector, but with the core purpose of therefore reinvigorating the whole economy,' she said. Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown, said the planned retail investor campaign would act as a loudspeaker to amplify the message about the opportunity investing can offer. 'It will be important to stress the value that investing can bring to support crucial life events and retirement planning. 'A reinvented 'Tell Sid' campaign, which shows how investment is helping people with their long-term needs like retirement, will build confidence and pave the way for greater participation in financial markets.' The famous 'Tell Sid' adverts encouraged people to buy shares in British Gas when it was privatised in the 1980s.