
North Korea BANS foreign tourists from its glitzy new beach resort - just weeks after hailing it as a 'world-class' holiday haven
The abrupt reversal comes only days after Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov visited the site on July 12, where he was hosted by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, who described Lavrov as the resort's 'first foreign guest.'
North Korea's official tourism website, DRP Korea Tour, announced on Wednesday that foreign visitors are 'temporarily not accepted,' at the Wonsan-Kalma Coastal Tourist Area, without providing a reason for the restriction.
The resort, located on the country's east coast near an airport in Kangwon Region, officially opened its doors on June 24 following years of delays caused by international sanctions and the Covid-19 pandemic.
Initially slated to open in April 2019 to coincide with the birthday of North Korea's founding leader Kim Il Sung, the resort was envisioned as a major boost to the nation's struggling tourism industry.
North Korean state media has described the development as a 'national treasure-level city' and one of the regime's greatest accomplishments of the year.
Stretching along 2.5miles of white-sand coastline, the complex is reportedly capable of accommodating up to 20,000 visitors and features over 40 hotels, guesthouses, and leisure facilities modeled after those found in international beach destinations.
When the resort was first opened, Kim was photographed standing on a sandy beach alongside his daughter and presumed heir Kim Ju Ae.
But despite the fanfare surrounding the launch, and initial reports of domestic visitors enjoying the amenities, analysts and satellite imagery suggest the resort may not yet be fully operational.
The US-based 38 North programme reported that several buildings, including a major hotel near the Kalmaegi Hotel, appear to be unfinished or inactive, with one rooftop pool still empty and unnamed buildings missing from official maps.
The temporary closure to foreign guests raises questions about the resorts readiness and Pyongyang's strategy for promoting international tourism.
Russia remains the only country whose citizens have been permitted entry since North Korea relaxed its pandemic-era border restrictions. A Russian travel agency had reportedly scheduled two additional group tours for August.
During Lavrov's visit, Russian media praised the resort's facilities, though a reporter from Kommersant observed that the beach appeared largely deserted.
A separate Russian media report claimed that local North Koreans were used to simulate tourist activity during the visit.
Tourism represents a rare and vulnerable source of foreign currency for North Korea, which remains under heavy international sanctions.
Experts suggest the current ban on foreign visitors is likely to last if Pyogyang hopes to recoup the costs of the high-profile project.
'If foreign tourists aren't allowed to the site, Russian rubles, Chinese yuans and dollars won't come in. Then, North Korea can't break even and it has to shut down the resort,' said Ahn Chan Il, head of the World Institute for North Korean Studies think tank in Seoul.
The North Korean government has provided no official explanation for the sudden policy shift.
However, some analysts believe the move reflects lingering construction issues or concerns about appearances should foreign visitors witness conditions that fall short of state media's portrayal.
Rachel Minyoung Lee, a non-resident fellow at 38 North, said the opening of the Wonsan-Kalma resort serves to support state messaging around Kim Jong Un's 'people-first' policy while balancing his continued focus on military development.
'Wonsan-Kalma is open to just North Koreans for now, but we should not be surprised to see Russians at the resort in the not-too-distant future,' she told CNN.
Meanwhile, the regime has unveiled a new railway station at Kalma to support access to the tourist zone, touting its role in providing 'a high level of convenience' for travellers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
12-08-2025
- The Sun
Heartbreak as couple miss their £1,200 TUI honeymoon due to tiny passport mistake that could happen to anyone
A NEWLYWED couple were left feeling heartbroken when they missed out on their TUI honeymoon in Cyprus. The couple were banned from going due to a tiny passport mistake that could have happened to anyone. 6 6 6 6 Staff insisted they could not travel Joe and Beccy Barnes had booked a last-minute honeymoon to Ayia Napa, Cyprus, after tying the knot on Saturday August 2nd. The pair, who have been together for five years, had collected all the money given to them as wedding presents to pay for a five-day, all-inclusive TUI package holiday. However, when the couple arrived at East Midlands Airport on Wednesday [August 6th], they were shocked when TUI check-in staff discovered a 1cm rip on the upper right-hand corner of Joe's photo page in his passport. TUI said the passport was 'very badly damaged', including suspected water damage, a small tear in the photo page, as well as the cover being ripped and repaired with tape. The 35-year-old forklift driver said he'd flown with Jet2 on his stag do three weeks before with no issues, but said TUI staff insisted he could not travel. The dad-of-two and his new wife remained in the airport for two hours trying to come up with a solution before heading home. 'The decision was pathetic' Joe and Beccy, a 38-year-old civil servant, were 'devastated' after losing out on their £1,200 honeymoon, describing TUI's decision to bar them from the flight as 'pathetic'. Joe, who lives near Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, said: "The wedding was the best day of my life. "We just wanted to get away and chill out for a bit so used the cash from all the guests to book the honeymoon. "We got to the front check-in desk and the woman said you've got a slight rip in your passport page. I need to go talk to my manager. "She said 'yeah there's a rip in it'. I'd actually flown with Jet2 three weeks before for my stag do and that was absolutely fine. "I didn't know about the rip until then. There was no compassion at all. "I told them it was my honeymoon. But TUI headquarters got back to say 'do not let this man travel'. "I thought this can't be happening. It was horrible. We sat around the airport for a good two hours trying to think of solutions. "We thought we could catch a flight with a different airline, but Jet2 said they wouldn't let us fly either." Fundraising for another honeymoon The couple were left 'devastated' after returning home from the airport, and said they've complained to TUI about the 'pathetic' decision to ban them from flying. Joe said: "I just couldn't believe it. Me and my Mrs were mortified. I felt like crying my eyes out. "We'd had an amazing weekend with the wedding and everything just went downhill. "My wife was absolutely devastated. It was a horrible feeling. I wouldn't want my worst enemy to go through this. "I think it's pathetic I got denied boarding for that tiny rip. I could understand it if it was a massive rip over my photo or my personal details and you couldn't read them. "It's looking doubtful that insurance will cover it. It's quite unlikely. We're just going to try and book something later on ."The worst bit is that it's other people's money. I would warn people to get their passport checked, even if there's a slight mark on it." A spokeswoman for TUI confirmed that Mr Barnes was refused travel by check-in staff at East Midlands Airport due to his passport being 'very badly damaged', including suspected water damage, a small tear in the photo page, as well as the cover being ripped and repaired with tape. The holiday giant said that staff recommended that Mr Barnes liaised directly with his insurance provider regarding compensation and to contact the passport office to get a replacement. The Sun has approached TUI and Jet2 for a comment. fundraising page has been launched to help pay for another honeymoon for Joe and Becci. 6 6


Daily Mail
12-08-2025
- Daily Mail
Aussie is refused flight into the US over huge error - and he claims it wasn't his fault: 'It ruined my holiday'
An Australian shared his disbelief after he was stopped from flying into the United States after customs officials falsely accused him of illegally living there for 14 years. Aaron Drooger had previously visited Hawaii back in 2011, before returning home to Lismore, in NSW. In April this year, he took a cruise ship to Vancouver, Canada, and attempted to then fly from Vancouver into the States. He was stopped from boarding his flight to Las Vegas at the airport, meaning he had to change his travel plans and book a direct flight to Brisbane. Immigration officers told Mr Drooger he had been staying illegally in the US for more than ten years and they could not allow him to return. Mr Drooger had visited Hawaii on an Electronic System for Travel Authorisation (ESTA) and believes his departure wasn't correctly logged, so it appeared he had been living in the United States for 4,000 days. 'All of these errors forced me to spend thousands of dollars extra and ruined my holiday,' he told Nine News. Despite having the appropriate evidence to prove he never overstayed his ESTA, he has yet to receive answers from US immigration. Several Aussies claim they have faced similar issues. Queensland couple Phil and Julie Lawton left the US on May 21. Weeks after they touched back down in Brisbane, they were bombarded with emails from US immigration officers. 'On the 10th of July, we got the first notice that we've got 19 days to leave the country,' Ms Lawton said. She said the emails were nearly filed as junk. The couple were made to jump through numerous hoops to try to convince officials they had actually left the US. They also contacted Home Affairs in Australia to try to confirm their record of return. As yet, the pair have been unsuccessful in their bid. Both Mr and Ms Lawton have been to the States about ten times, but doubt they will be able to go back. 'I have no confidence, and I don't think Julie has either, that unless we actually got written confirmation from US Border Protection they have made a mistake and we did leave the US on the 21st (of May), we could ever return to the US,' Mr Lawton said. The pair are still receiving regular communications warning them about their supposed visa breach. Travel insurers will rarely reimburse travellers for such problems, as they see the errors as avoidable visa issues. An immigration lawyer said the ESTA issue can affect non-citizens who try to re-enter the US. Sherwin Noorian said the various data sources which supply the system, including flight manifests, can occasionally fail. That failure can result in an 'overstay' being recorded against the travellers in question.


The Sun
08-08-2025
- The Sun
One of the world's biggest airlines introduces strict new travel item ban for all passengers
A MAJOR airline has become the latest to ban a popular travel item. Emirates - one of the world's biggest airlines - has banned the use of portable power banks on all its flights. 4 4 Win one of 8 incredible holidays to the Caribbean, Mexico and Greece by voting in The Sun's Travel Awards - enter to win here The new ban comes after fears that the devices could possibly explode whilst in the air. The airline's ban on power banks is the latest in a string of airlines to restrict the use of power banks on flights. Yet, Emirates' new rule goes a step further. The ban will be introduced on October 1 and from this date any passenger travelling with Emirates will be unable to use a power bank onboard the flight. This will include charging their devices or using an in-seat power supply to charge a portable charging bank. Additionally, each passenger will only be allowed one power bank. They then must be kept in the seat pocket, or in a bag that is under the seat in front of the passenger. Passengers will not be able to store them in the overhead bins, nor can the power banks exceed 100 Watt Hours. The airline has shared that the new rule to ban all passengers from using power banks comes after a "comprehensive safety review". The Sun's Travel Editor Lisa Minot shares her top tips when flying Recently, a power bank caught fire on an Airbus A321, in South Korea. The portable bank overheated in the overhead locker as passengers were still boarding the plane. Flight staff were then unable to put out the fire and had to conduct an emergency evacuation of the aircraft. The reason why so many airlines are adding restrictions on power banks is because they use lithium-ion batteries, which can be prone to overheating. When they do overheat, they can create a fire which is difficult to extinguish. The airline said in a statement: "Emirates' new regulations will significantly reduce risks associated with power banks by prohibiting their use while onboard the aircraft. "Storing power banks in accessible locations within the cabin ensures that in the rare event of a fire, trained cabin crew can quickly respond and extinguish the fire." Other airlines that already have power bank restrictions in place include Lufthansa. 4 Lufthansa's restrictions mean that passengers cannot charge a power bank using the in-seat power supply. The airline insists that power banks must also be kept within easy reach and sight, if being used to charge another device. Just last week, Turkish Airlines also became the latest to enforce a ban on smart luggage with non-removable lithium batteries in the hold. On its website, the policy on smart bags now states: "Smart luggage with non-removable lithium batteries cannot be transported as cabin baggage or checked baggage. "The lithium battery has to be detached from the smart baggage, carried as cabin baggage and cannot be reinserted until the destination is reached. "To protect the detached lithium battery from short-circuiting, the battery should be placed in its original packaging, or its terminals should be insulated, or the battery should be placed in secure plastic bags." And back in July, Japan 's transport ministry also enforced rules that passengers need to keep power banks in sight at all times whilst travelling. B rits also face being banned from their flights when the new Europe visa launches due to confusing new rules. Plus, the full list of banned food and drinks passengers cannot bring onboard on TUI, easyJet, Ryanair and Jet2 flights. 4