
Two leaders met in the bathroom to stop Pakistan from dividing, why was there a need to create Bangladesh?
Violence has erupted once again in our neighbouring country Bangladesh. People have come out on the streets. The ancestral house of India's great filmmaker Satyajit Ray was also vandalised. Last year too, riots started in Bangladesh in July which soon turned into severe violence. Due to which Sheikh Hasina not only had to leave the post of PM, but also had to leave the country to save her life and had to take refuge in India. Did you know Dhaka Television had clearly refused to play the Pakistani national anthem?
That is when the Pak Army considered the Awami League a separatist organization.
In fact, on March 23, 'Lahore Resolution Day' was being celebrated, the idea of an independent Muslim country was announced for the first time.
However, this time the scene is a little different from the last time, this time there are clashes between the workers of two parties. On the other hand, after the Pakistani army and intelligence agency, now Pakistani terrorist groups have also entered Bangladesh. In such a situation, should it be believed that Bangladesh is once again on the path of becoming Pakistan?
Why there was a need to create Bangladesh, what was going on in Pakistan a few months before the creation of Bangladesh?
Why did Bangladesh become a separate country?
When India got independence from the British in 1947, it was divided into two parts. On the basis of religion, a new country Pakistan was created on the map. The newly-formed nation Pakistan was divided into eastern and western provinces. People of East Pakistan spoke Bengali. Women wore colorful saris. On the contrary, Urdu and Punjabi were dominant in West Pakistan. There was a culture of burqa and hijab.
55 percent of Pakistan's population lived in East Pakistan and 45 percent in West Pakistan. Out of the total 313 seats in the Parliament of Pakistan i.e. the National Assembly, 169 were in East Pakistan (present Bangladesh) and 144 in West Pakistan (present Pakistan).
Despite this, 80 percent of the budget was spent on only 45 percent of the people. That is, it was spent on West Pakistan. The leaders who ran the government were also from the West and they considered the people of East Pakistan as second class citizens and for the Pak Army they were nothing more than insects.
When the people of East Pakistan raised their voice against inequality and economic discrimination, the Pak Army suppressed their voice. Abusive words were used against East Pakistanis. They were considered weak and inferior. If they went to the police to tell their plight, the police also blamed them. In 1952, there was a movement in Pakistan regarding the Bengali language, in which many students lost their lives. This was just the beginning.
Why did Bangabandhu file a case?
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman alias 'Bangabandhu', the head of East Pakistan's political party Awami League, raised his voice against political inequality and economic discrimination towards his province. After the Indo-Pak war of 1965, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman said in Lahore, 'Provincial autonomy is also necessary to bring uniformity in the economic development of both the provinces.'
This suggestion of Awami League leader Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was not only ignored, but a case was lodged against him in 1968 under the 'Agartala Conspiracy'. It was alleged that he was conspiring with India to break East Pakistan.
1970 elections added fuel to the fire of Partition
Neither the government considered the East Pakistanis important nor the administration listened to them. The people were growing angry with the attitude of the people in the government and the misbehavior of the police and the army. While demanding their rights, the East Pakistanis started demanding an independent nation. The general elections held in December 1970 added fuel to the fire of partition in Pakistan.
Before the 1970 general elections, Pakistan was under President's rule and dictator General Yahya Khan was the President. In the general elections, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's Awami League had fielded candidates on 169 seats including East Pakistan, out of which it won 167 seats, while the Pakistan People's Party won only 81 seats out of 138 seats in West Pakistan. The majority figure to form a government in Pakistan was 157 seats.
Sheikh Mujiburahman had the majority to form the government, but the leaders of West Pakistan did not want Bengalis to rule them. Pakistan's military dictator General Yahya Khan refused to make Sheikh Mujiburahman the Prime Minister.
On March 7, 1971, Sheikh Mujiburahman gave a historic speech at the Race Course Ground in Dhaka. He declared East Pakistan independent and named the country Bangladesh.
'Let western leaders form the government', the conversation that took place in bathroom
After this, on March 15, 1971, when Yahya Khan reached Dhaka to talk about the transfer of power, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman came to meet him in a white car. There was also a black flag on the car. When Yahya Khan took Sheikh Mujibur Rahman to the drawing room of the Government House for talks, Sheikh protested.
John Sisson and Leo Rose, while referring to this meeting in their book 'War and Secession: Pakistan, India and Creation of Bangladesh', wrote- Sheikh Mujiburahman wanted to talk in private. Yahya Khan ordered two chairs to be placed in the bathroom. After this, the talks to save Pakistan started in the bathroom. The talks lasted for about two and a half hours.
On 19 March, Yahya invited Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, leader of the Pakistan People's Party, to Dhaka to join the talks. Once again the three – Sheikh, Yahya and Bhutto – met. Yahya tried to mediate between Bhutto and Sheikh, but the two were not on speaking terms.
Then Yahya joked to lighten the atmosphere and said- 'You both are behaving like a newly married couple.' Yahya held their hands and asked them to talk, then Bhutto and Sheikh Mujibur started talking to each other.
After this discussion, it was agreed that Bangladesh would exist within a united Pakistan, but on 23 March, all plans were ruined. In fact, on 23 March, 'Lahore Resolution Day' was being celebrated all over Pakistan. On this day in 1940, the idea of an independent Muslim country was announced for the first time.
On 3 December 1971, Indian soldiers jumped into the battlefield to stop the brutality of the Pakistani army. The war between India and Pakistan took place on all three fronts. Within 13 days, the Pakistani army had to surrender. In this war, more than 93 thousand Pakistani soldiers surrendered to the Indian army and a new nation was born in the form of Bangladesh.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
15 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Xenophobic persecution of Bengali migrant workers
The Indian government's actions are creating a new deportation and detention policy that will disproportionately impact its own citizens who speak Bengali. Samata Biswas


Scroll.in
15 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Linguistic terror': Mamata Banerjee alleges Bengali migrant's family beaten up by Delhi Police
Reiterating her accusation that the Bharatiya Janata Party has unleashed ' linguistic terrorism ' against Bengali speakers, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Sunday alleged that a Bengali migrant worker's family was harassed and tortured by the police in Delhi. The chief minister shared a video on social media in which a man can be heard accusing the Delhi Police of beating his wife and infant son. 'Atrocious!! Terrible!! See how Delhi Police brutally beat up a kid and his mother, members of a migrant family from Malda's Chanchal,' Banerjee wrote. 'Even a child is not spared from the cruelty of violence in the regime of linguistic terror unleashed by the BJP in the country against the Bengalis!' It is unclear when the purported video was recorded. Banerjee's statement came on the day that the Trinamool Congress launched the 'Bhasha Andolan', a campaign against the alleged harassment of Bengali-speaking persons in BJP-ruled states. The Trinamool Congress chief had announced the protest on July 21 at the party's annual Martyrs' Day rally in Kolkata, saying that the fight to protect the Bengali language and identity would continue until the BJP was voted out. Assembly elections in West Bengal are expected to take place in March or April 2026. Her remarks also come amid Indian authorities pursuing a policy over the past month to 'push' individuals claimed to be undocumented migrants into Bangladesh. Many of those forced out of the country claim that they are Indian citizens. Reports of migrant workers from West Bengal living in BJP-ruled states, including Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh and Delhi, being detained and deported under allegations that they were Bangladeshi citizens have also emerged. India has forced more than 2,000 persons, alleged to be undocumented migrants, into Bangladesh since the country launched ' Operation Sindoor ', a military operation against terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The legality of the 'push back' policy has been debated in India and internationally. Experts have told Scroll that the policy violated India's obligations under international law and customary international law. In June, four men from West Bengal, who had been picked up by the Maharashtra Police and forced into Bangladesh, were brought back on June 15. The Murshidabad Police in West Bengal had presented proof of them being Indian citizens. On July 16, the Calcutta High Court asked the Union government if there was truth to the claims that Bengali-speaking persons were being deported to Bangladesh.


Fibre2Fashion
18 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
Indian industry leaders weigh in on CETA with UK
During the recent London visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India and the United Kingdom officially signed a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), marking a significant advancement in strengthening bilateral economic relations. The deal signed by Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal and his British counterpart Jonathan Reynold in the presence of Prime Minister Modi and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is designed to reduce tariffs on a wide range of goods—including textiles, whisky, and automobiles—while also enhancing market opportunities for businesses in both countries. According to the agreement, 99 per cent of Indian exports to the UKâ€' encompassing over 1,143 crucial textile and clothing itemsâ€'will now enjoy zero-duty access. Stakeholders confident the deal between the world's sixth- and fifth-largest economies will significantly benefit the Indian textile and apparel sector. The zero-duty regime is expected to take at least a year to come into effect. The trade talks, which spanned over three years with intermittent progress, reached a conclusion in May. Negotiators on both sides accelerated efforts to finalise the deal against the backdrop of global tariff disruptions set in motion by the Trump administration. Bringing together two of the world's top economies —ranked sixth and fifth globally—the deal sets an ambitious goal of increasing bilateral trade by $34 billion by 2040. For the United Kingdom, this is its most substantial trade pact since its departure from the European Union in 2020. For India, it marks a major strategic breakthrough, establishing a comprehensive economic partnership with an advanced economy and potentially laying the groundwork for similar agreements with the European Union and other global partners. According to the agreement, 99 per cent of Indian exports to the UK— encompassing over 1,143 crucial textile and clothing items, as per reports—will now enjoy zero-duty access, providing Indian exporters with a stronger foothold in the British market. Reacting on the development. Sudhir Sekhri, Chairman AEPC , said, 'The signing of the landmark India-UK bilateral trade agreement, marks a significant milestone in strengthening the strategic and economic ties between the two nations. This deal will usher a new era of garment trade with the UK. This agreement will enhance market access, spur investment and job creation in the garment sector, besides creating new opportunities for businesses and consumers on both sides.' He further added: 'The India-UK CETA will not only give competitive market access to the Indian apparel products in the UK market but also increase the trust and reliability factor by streamlining customs procedures and mutual recognition of standards, thereby, reducing the compliance burdens for the Indian apparel exporters. With duty-free access, the apparel exports to the UK will witness a renewed thrust and moment in the coming years.' Dr. A. Sakthivel, Honorary Chairman of Tiruppur Exporters' Association (TEA) and Vice Chairman of AEPC , hailed the signing of the agreement and commended both the Prime Minister and the Ministry of Commerce & Industry for what he called a transformative deal for India's textile and apparel industry. He maintained: 'This agreement paves the way for a historic leap forward for our industry,' adding, 'It resonates strongly with our national vision to place India among the top three global economies.' Dr. Sakthivel further shared with Fibre2Fashion the deal's benefits for regional textile hubs, citing improved access for key manufacturing centres including Tiruppur, Surat, Ludhiana, Pune, Chennai, West Bengal, and Assam. He also pointed out that Indian exporters are now in a much stronger position to compete with counterparts from Bangladesh, Vietnam, and China in the UK's textile and apparel market. Reflecting on the potential boost to India's readymade garment (RMG) sector, Dr. Sakthivel said: 'We anticipate that exports of RMG to the UK will more than double—from $1.45 billion to approximately $3.25 billion. Within this, knitwear alone is expected to grow from $0.8 billion to around $2 billion, accounting for nearly 70 per cent of total RMG exports to the UK.' Speaking to Fibre2Fashion, N Thirukkumaran, chairman of Esstee Exports and General Secretary of TEA said India's apparel exports is expected to double in the next 2-3 years, thanks to the India-UK CETA. He also noted that this agreement could serve as a model for future successful FTAs, including with the European Union. Thirukkumaran further emphasised the positive impact of the India-UK CETA on job creation in the textile sector, which remains the second-largest source of employment in India after agriculture. Meanwhile, interacting with Fibre2Fashion, Rahul Mehta, the chief mentor of the Clothing Manufacturers Association of India (CMAI) underlined that 'the India-UK CETA is obviously going to have huge impact on textiles and apparel exports from India, with prices being reduced by close to 10 per cent.' 'While I may not share the euphoria of some of my peers, I do see our apparel exports rising from the current $1.3 billion to probably around $2.0 to $2.2 billion over the next few years,' said Mehta. 'That said, we must remember the zero-duty regime will likely take at least a year, if not longer, to come into effect. Plus, UK buyers have stringent compliance and sustainability requirements. Indian exporters will need to significantly upgrade their operations to meet these growing expectations—particularly around sustainability,' he added. Though not overly concerned about the potential impact of the FTA on India's domestic market, the CMAI chief mentor nevertheless expressed surprise that this issue has largely gone unnoticed in media discussions. 'It is zero per cent on both sides, remember!' Mehta concluded with a note of caution. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DR)