ALEX BRUMMER: Pound's mixed blessing in a world with higher trade barriers
Gone should be the days when money changers at Heathrow and other airports would offer sterling and dollar parity at best.
In recent trading the pound stood at a healthy $1.34 and had also perked up against the euro.
This might seem odd. After all, there have been days of dire headlines highlighting Britain's fiscal weakness and the likelihood of further tax increases this autumn, after last October's £40billion bombshell.
Moreover, the Bank of England's reluctant cut in interest rates to 4 per cent last week came with a sting.
The pace of further cuts will be slower because UK inflation is heading towards 4 per cent. That's almost twice the pace in the EU. The Bank is finding it hard to tame inflation due to a poorly designed energy policy, the rising cost of services and demands for ever higher pay despite a weakening jobs market.
Historically, the City and political establishment regarded the valuation of the pound, especially against our single biggest trading partner the US, as a barometer of performance. It was the collapse of sterling which forced the UK into the hands of the International Monetary Fund way back in 1976.
The pound tumbled to frighteningly low levels as markets absorbed the impact of Liz Truss's mini-Budget in 2022. So why has the pound risen in recent months?
Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff mayhem in April sent investors scuttling out of the dollar. The result has been gold prices at a record and a rally for crypto. More serious investors diversified into the euro, the Swiss franc and even the pound.
This trend was accentuated by Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill which is estimated eventually to add $2.4trillion (£1.78trillion) to the US gross national debt. It already stands at a hefty 120 per cent of total output. Investors in sterling will also enjoy higher returns than in Europe, with the bank rate expected to stay at 4 per cent until at least November.
The official rate for deposits at the European Central Bank in Frankfurt is 2 per cent and there are expectations that America's borrowing costs also are heading down. The economic impact of the stronger pound is two-fold.
The Bank of England's August monetary policy report shows a benefit. The stronger the pound, the bigger the barrier it offers against inflation brought in from overseas. Import prices are projected to fall 1.25 per cent this year, with some smaller decreases in future years. Dollar-priced energy costs should also decline.
In the past, when the UK has been in trouble governments have reached for the tool of devaluation. Arguably the last period of robust growth for Britain came when the pound fell out of the exchange rate mechanism in 1992, triggering a stronger export performance.
But a stronger pound makes the UK less competitive. That is not a great place to be in a more fragmented world with higher trade barriers. Visitors to London will find it more expensive than ever. More reason for Rachel Reeves to stop penalising tourists (and British retail) by failing to refund VAT on goods purchased here. It is driving deep-pocketed shoppers overseas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Euromillions: National Lottery numbers revealed for huge £185m jackpot
The National Lottery numbers have been revealed, offering the chance for one person to grab a 'jaw-dropping' jackpot of £185m. If a UK-based ticket holder matches the five numbers and the two lucky stars, it will be the second biggest win in history. The numbers are 18, 28, 42, 46, and 48 while tonight's lucky stars were 3 and 9. If no one manages to secure the EuroMillions jackpot, the money is rolled over to the next draw. Last Friday, nobody bought the lucky ticket with the winning numbers, meaning it has been rolled over to today. Speaking before the draw, Andy Carter, senior winners' adviser at Allwyn – operator of The National Lottery, said : 'Wow, what incredible news! Tuesday's EuroMillions draw will be an enormous one, as a life-changing £185m estimated jackpot is up for grabs. 'A single UK winner of this jaw-dropping prize would make National Lottery history as the second biggest winner ever. ' It would also be the 20th win of over £100m since The National Lottery began!' In June, a single ticket-holder from Ireland won the 250 million euro EuroMillions jackpot, making it the biggest lottery prize in UK history. The prize money is capped once it reaches 250 million euros – or £208 million - and can roll over several times before it must be won in the fifth draw.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
What would Trump's reclassifying of cannabis mean?
Donald Trump is reportedly re-evaluating the federal classification of marijuana, a move that could significantly alter its legal status across the United States and bring federal policy closer to the approach already adopted by numerous states. Mr Trump indicated on Monday that he hopes to make a decision in the coming weeks regarding potential changes to how marijuana is regulated. This renewed focus comes over a year after the Biden administration formally proposed reclassifying the drug, though no decision was reached before Mr Biden left office. Meanwhile, many states have already gone further than the federal government by legalizing the recreational use of marijuana for adults or allowing it for medical purposes. Current policy Under current federal policy, possessing marijuana remains a federal crime punishable by fines and prison time. Selling or cultivating marijuana is considered a more serious offence, carrying potential prison sentences of five years to life, depending on the quantity. Last year, the Justice Department proposed reclassifying marijuana from a Schedule I drug, a category that includes substances like heroin and LSD, to a less dangerous Schedule III substance, which encompasses drugs such as ketamine and certain anabolic steroids. This proposed switch initiated a lengthy bureaucratic process. Nearly 43,000 public comments were submitted to the federal government regarding the suggested change. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) was still in the review process when Mr Trump succeeded Mr Biden in January, prompting a re-examination of policies across the federal government. Reclassifying marijuana would not, however, equate to nationwide legalization for recreational use by adults. Instead, it would primarily alter how the substance is regulated and taxed. Currently, federal income tax deductions for business expenses are unavailable to enterprises involved in "trafficking" any Schedule I or II drug. Changing marijuana to a Schedule III drug could therefore result in significant tax savings for businesses licensed to sell marijuana in states where it is legal. Furthermore, it could facilitate research into marijuana, as conducting authorized clinical studies on Schedule I substances is exceptionally difficult. Despite these potential changes, a Congressional Research Service report suggests that the reluctance of many banks and financial institutions to provide services to marijuana businesses, due to the potential for federal penalties, is unlikely to change merely by rescheduling marijuana under the federal Controlled Substances Act. What could Trump do? Mr Trump is currently weighing the pros and cons of such a policy change, acknowledging it as a "very complicated subject." He stated on Monday: "I've heard great things having to do with medical" use of marijuana and "bad things having to do with just about everything else." As a candidate, Mr Trump appeared open to relaxed regulation, having posted on his social media platform last year that he would "focus on research to unlock the medical uses of marijuana to a Schedule 3 drug." However, reclassification faces resistance from some conservatives and law enforcement groups. The National Sheriffs' Association, for instance, submitted written opposition, citing prior determinations that marijuana has a "high abuse potential" and highlighting cases of "extreme intoxication" and fatal vehicle crashes. At the state level, the medical use of marijuana is already permitted in 40 states and the District of Columbia. Over the past dozen years, the number of jurisdictions legalizing recreational marijuana for adults has rapidly increased to 24 states and the District of Columbia. However, the movement has experienced some recent setbacks. Last autumn, ballot measures to legalise recreational marijuana failed in Florida, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Florida's measure, while receiving a majority vote, fell short of the 60 per cent threshold required to approve amendments to the state constitution. This year, Idaho lawmakers referred a proposed constitutional amendment to the ballot that would forbid citizen initiatives to legalise marijuana, instead reserving such decisions solely for the Legislature. Initiatives continue elsewhere to try and place recreational marijuana on the ballot, including in Oklahoma, where voters defeated a similar measure in 2023. Public opinion data indicates significant support for legalization. Approximately six in 10 voters across the country favour legalising recreational use nationwide, according to AP VoteCast, a survey of over 120,000 US voters conducted during last year's election. Polling from Gallup shows support for marijuana legalization has grown substantially, from just 36 per cent support in 2005 to 68 per cent last year. Marijuana use has also increased. More than 64 million Americans aged 12 and older – or 22.3 per cent of people – reported using marijuana during the past year, according to a 2024 national survey released recently by the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. This marks an increase from 19 per cent of people in 2021. The growth in marijuana use was primarily driven by adults aged 26 and older, although people aged 18-25 remained the most likely to partake, with 35 per cent reporting use during the past year.
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump hits out at Goldman Sachs chief over ‘bad' tariff prediction
Donald Trump hit out at Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon on Tuesday, saying the bank had been wrong to predict tariffs would hurt the economy and questioning whether Solomon should lead the Wall Street institution. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said it was mostly foreign companies and governments absorbing the cost of his tariffs. 'But David Solomon and Goldman Sachs refuse to give credit where credit is due. They made a bad both the Market repercussion and the Tariffs themselves,' he wrote. Trump said Solomon should maybe focus on being a DJ, a hobby Solomon abandoned some time ago, 'and not bother running a major Financial Institution'. The bank CEO is the latest corporate boss to become the target of Trump's ire. A Goldman Sachs spokesperson declined to comment. A spokesperson for the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Since 1 February, when Trump kicked off trade wars by slapping levies on imports from Mexico, Canada and China, at least 333 companies worldwide have reacted to the tariffs in some manner, as of Tuesday, according to a Reuters tracker. While Trump did not specify which Goldman research he was referring to, the Wall Street bank – like many of its peers – has taken a bearish stance on Trump's tariffs. In a note published on Sunday, Goldman Sachs analysts, led by chief economist Jan Hatzius, said US consumers had absorbed 22% of tariff costs through June and that figure could rise to 67% if recent tariffs continue on the same trajectory. 'I think that David should go out and get himself a new economist,' Trump wrote. Hatzius declined to comment. In April, Goldman also warned sweeping US tariffs would weigh on global growth and prompt the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates more aggressively than previously expected. Last week, the president demanded Intel chief Lip Bu-Tan resign due to his ties to Chinese firms, and has repeatedly targeted Apple boss Tim Cook for making US-sold iPhones outside the country. Trump has also taken aim at other Wall Street banks, alleging, without providing evidence, that JP Morgan and Bank of America discriminated against him by refusing his deposits after his first term. As the second quarter earnings season progresses, companies have reported a combined financial hit of $13.6bn to $15.2bn between 16 July and 8 August for the full year from Trump's tariffs, according to Reuters' global tariff tracker.
