Canada tariffs could add US$14,000 to the cost of building a U.S. home by 2027, report warns
U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs could have an unintended side effect: making homeownership even less affordable for many Americans.
A new report from the Canadian Chamber of Commerce estimates that the average cost of building a U.S. home could rise by an additional US$14,000 by the end of 2027 if tariffs on Canadian imports remain in place, even as many experts estimate that America needs millions more affordable homes.
In 2023 alone, Canada accounted for 69 per cent of U.S. lumber imports, 25 per cent of imported iron and steel and 18 per cent of copper imports, all key construction materials, the report said.
In a statement, the White House pushed back on the assertion that tariffs would increase costs for Americans.
'The Administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will not be borne by American consumers, but by foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world's biggest and best consumer market,' White House spokesperson Kush Desai said. 'A new CEA (Council of Economic Advisors) analysis proves just that: prices of imported goods have actually fallen this year despite President Trump's historic tariffs.'
Canada is the third-largest source of imports used in U.S. home construction, behind China and Mexico, according to the National Association of Home Builders, a U.S.-based trade group. Though the Canadian Chamber of Commerce report doesn't estimate the impact of duties on imports from China or Mexico, it underscores that Trump's tariff policy, intended to support American industry, may instead worsen housing affordability at a time when home prices hover near record highs and mortgage rates remain stubbornly elevated.
Taking into account tariffs first imposed during Trump's first term, the total added cost from tariffs could reach US$20,000 per home by 2027, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce found.
U.S.-Canada trade tensions
Trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have lately reached a fever pitch, with some Canadians threatening to boycott US-made goods and others selling their stateside vacation homes.
Trump has announced new tariffs on Canada since taking office in January, including additional tariffs on imported Canadian softwood lumber, a key component used in the framing and remodeling of homes.
Nearly US$13 billion — or roughly 7 per cent — of the estimated US$184 billion of goods that went into new single-family and multifamily construction in 2023 were imported, according to the NAHB.
Lumber made up the majority of those imports at US$8.5 billion, the NAHB said — and 70 per cent of lumber imported specifically for US home construction came from Canada.
Trump has changed the tariff rate he plans to impose on Canadian imports several times since taking office. Most recently, Trump announced plans to impose a 35 per cent tariff on Canadian goods that are not compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) starting August 1.
Trump has also imposed a 50 per cent tax on all imported steel and aluminum and has threatened a 50 per cent tariff on all copper imports.
Those tariff announcements have already hit the construction industry. According to an NAHB survey from April, 60 per cent of home builders were already seeing tariff-related price increases.
However, not all home builders use imported materials, NAHB's chief economist, Rob Dietz, told CNN.
'It's important to note that about 40 per cent of the builders in our survey noted no cost effect,' he added.
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce's report highlighted Texas, Florida and California as states that would likely feel price shocks most acutely, due to being heavily reliant on imported construction goods.
Still, Dietz said many home builders have indicated that they're having difficulty pricing construction projects accurately due to tariff uncertainty.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
29 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Free trade carveouts key in potential deal between U.S. and Canada: business groups
Business leaders and academics say they hope to see Canada and the U.S. maintain free trade protections for most goods once an agreement is reached, even if the negotiations can't stave off certain sectoral tariffs. It's unclear if the two countries will stick to the Aug. 1 deadline for wrapping up talks, as Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday negotiations were in an 'intense phase' but U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters last week that Canada wasn't a priority for his administration. Whether a deal is announced Friday or later, Canadian Federation of Independent Business president Dan Kelly says his organization's members feel 'a good chunk' of trade must remain tariff-free in order for talks to be considered successful. He says it wouldn't be a win for Canada if the trade agreement ends up looking similar to the deal struck by the U.S. with the European Union on Sunday. That framework imposes a 15 per cent tariff on most goods imported into the U.S., including European automobiles, and no carveouts for key products like pharmaceuticals and steel. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Kelly says Canadian business leaders will also be watching to find out what levies will remain on imports from the U.S., noting Canada's ongoing retaliatory tariffs 'are really crippling small businesses even more than the U.S. tariffs.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 29, 2025.
Globe and Mail
29 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
2 Top Dividend Stocks Yielding 5% or More to Buy Right Now for Passive Income
Key Points Realty Income is a high dividend payer with a long track record. Vici Properties is perhaps the safest way to bet on Las Vegas. 10 stocks we like better than Realty Income › Over time, dividends have become a smaller and smaller part of the stock market's total return, with the S&P 500 boasting an average yield of just 1.22% today, compared to 7.44% in 1950. That said, some companies still offer fat, consistently growing payouts, just like the good old days. Let's explore some reasons why Realty Income (NYSE: O) and Vici Properties (NYSE: VICI) could make fantastic long-term picks. Realty Income Corporation Real estate investment trusts (REITs) are a special type of investment that allows retail investors to benefit from the income generated from commercial real estate. But they aren't all the same. Realty Income stands out from the alternatives because of its track record of success, monthly payouts, and unique, risk-minimizing business model. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Since going public in 1994, Realty Income has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. The company funds the payout with the cash generated from its portfolio of 15,600 properties spread across North America and Europe. Realty Income's business model is relatively safe because of its use of triple-net leases, which mean the tenant is responsible for building-level operating costs like tax and insurance. It also tends to focus on recession-proof tenants like grocery stores, dollar stores, and auto repair shops, although many flashier clients like casinos and IT data centers have been sprinkled into the mix to help power growth. While macroeconomic threats like high interest rates have caused Realty Income's shares to underperform in recent years, they give investors an opportunity to buy the stock for cheap and lock in a relatively high yield of 5.55% at the time of writing, which is far above the market average. Vici Properties While Realty Income features a long track record and diversification into many different industries, Vici Properties offers more concentrated exposure. The company was formed in 2017 from the spinoff of real estate assets formerly owned by Caesars Entertainment Company during its bankruptcy restructuring. It has since evolved to become a leading entertainment-focused REIT, with 93 properties across North America. While entertainment is a consumer discretionary expenditure that may drop during economic downturns, Vici manages this risk with triple-net leases and high-quality tenants like Caesars and MGM Resorts, which have stable businesses and are deeply tied to their locations. The company has often relied on leaseback sales, which are when it buys an asset (such as a Casino) from a client who needs liquidity or to free up capital for elsewhere, only to rent it back to them, giving Vici access to stable, growing revenue. Vici also offers excellent growth potential as it expands into different asset types, such as golf courses, and potentially redevelops its 33 acres of undeveloped land located near the Las Vegas Strip. With a dividend yield of 5.15%, Vici is an excellent pick for investors who prioritize passive income. But don't overlook its stock price growth potential. Shares have risen around 60% over the last five years, with a 16% rally so far in 2025. The company probably won't stay this cheap for long. Which dividend stock is right for you? Realty Income and Vici Properties are both great picks for investors who prioritize sustainable passive income for the long term. If you could only pick one, the best choice will depend on your investment goals. Realty Income is better for investors who are willing to sacrifice a little growth potential for stability. But while Vici Properties doesn't have as long a track record, it offers more room for capital appreciation. Should you invest $1,000 in Realty Income right now? Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Realty Income wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 28, 2025
CBC
30 minutes ago
- CBC
Peace activists lament unravelling of landmine pact named after Ottawa
Social Sharing Paul Hannon remembers being in Ottawa in 1997 when representatives from across the globe came to the city to sign an agreement banning the production and use of landmines. At the time, Hannon was volunteering for Mines Action Canada, a coalition of groups advocating against the use of mines in armed conflicts. "It was a pretty magical moment in December, the first week of December 1997, when 122 countries from around the world came here to sign the treaty," he told CBC News. But 28 years later, the agreement is being challenged. Ukraine and five other countries, some of which are members of NATO, have either moved to withdraw from the convention or have indicated they would do so, citing growing military threats from Russia. Hannon and others who pushed for the treaty are lamenting how its being undone. They're also arguing that Canada, the country that brokered it, should play a more active part in keeping countries from withdrawing. "Once they've gone through that process and they've left, then people are going to start thinking, 'Where are those countries that were calling for this treaty, where were the countries that were the big leaders?'" Hannon said. 'We were where the landmines got banned' Lloyd Axworthy, who served as foreign affairs minister from 1996 to 2000, was the driving force behind the treaty in 1997. He said the inspiration for the initiative came after he and his 11-year-old son visited an exhibit on landmines. "He said, 'Well, aren't you the foreign minister, dad?' I said, 'Yeah.' He said, 'Why can't you do something about it?'" he told CBC. The way Axworthy went about forging the treaty, by including civic groups that typically weren't included in such agreements, would also come to be known as the "Ottawa process." Alex Neve, a human rights lawyer and former secretary-general of Amnesty International Canada, said the treaty — and Ottawa by association — became widely known in international circles. "The degree to which other states have come to regularly call it the Ottawa Treaty or the Ottawa Convention — you hear both — is a real sign that the rest of the world recognizes Canada's leadership as well," Neve said. 'We're not playing that role anymore' Last month, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed a decree on withdrawing from the convention, though it still needs parliamentary approval to take effect. The country's foreign affairs ministry said that Russia's use of anti-personnel mines "has created an asymmetric advantage for the aggressor." Neve said the move sets a bad precedent. "Anytime a nation shows the rest of the world that you can back away from your international obligations, you can retreat from your international obligations, it risks encouraging other governments to do the same thing," he said. Neve and Axworthy also said that Canada ought to engage more with countries to ensure they stay signed on to the convention. "We were one of the leaders in non-proliferation of weaponry," Axworthy said. "And we're not playing that role anymore." For Hannon, the crumbling of the treaty also stings on a local level, as it's something that everyone in Ottawa — and Canada — should be proud of. "Everybody thinks that the world knows about us because of hockey or Wayne Gretzky. And I would say now most of the world knows about us because we were where landmines got banned. That was a really significant thing," he said. "I would certainly like people to remember [the treaty] much more than this is the city where the convoy took over ... for two weeks. I think that's a much better memory to have and a much better claim to fame."
