logo
BBC pulls radio segment after guest calls Robert Jenrick 'xenophobic'

BBC pulls radio segment after guest calls Robert Jenrick 'xenophobic'

The Nationala day ago
It comes after the Tory shadow minister said in an article last week that he didn't want his children 'to share a neighbourhood with men from backward countries who broke into Britain illegally'.
Dr Krish Kandiah, a refugee charity founder, said Jenrick's words echoed 'a fear many have absorbed. Fear of the stranger. The technical name for this is xenophobia'.
READ MORE: JD Vance panned for 'lies about Scotland' ahead of luxury Ayrshire holiday
He added: 'It is understandable that many people are scared by the unknown, especially if they've been told illegality and unfairness are part of the story.
'However, over the past year, xenophobia has fuelled angry protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers, deepening divisions in our communities.'
Reacting to the segment, Jenrick said: 'On BBC Radio 4 this morning listeners were told that if you're concerned about the threat of illegal migrants to your kids, you're racist. Wrong. You're a good parent.'
The BBC apologised in the aftermath and pulled the segment.
A spokesperson said: 'Today's episode of Thought for the Day contained reflections from a faith perspective on fear in society but has been edited to remove some of the language used and we apologise for its inclusion.'
Here are the words of Dr Krish Kandiah's full Thought of the Day on BBC Radio 4:
'We are not born. Psychologists and neuroscientists explain that babies arrive in this world with only two natural start responses. One to falling and the other to loud noises. Most other fears, whether of heights, failures, spiders or strangers are learned. Picked up through experience and the influence of others. When my children were born I felt afraid leaving them alone in their cots, I hesitated to let others hold them, I felt my stomach twist when they walked through the school gates for the first time. Even now as I count down the days to my daughter's wedding, I feel butterflies in my stomach. Across the country many parents, carers and grandparents will be feeling a similar nervousness ahead of tomorrow's A-level results. They seem so important, shaping our children's next steps towards university, a job, a career, but in truth our fears are misplaced. A grade on a piece of paper does not define who our children are, nor does it dictate their future success or happiness.
'A front page story in the Mail on Sunday quoted shadow justice minister Robert Jenrick talking about his fears for his young daughters. He said: 'I certainly don't want my children to share a neighborhood with men from backward countries who broke into Britain illegally and about whom we know next to nothing.' These words echo a fear many have absorbed. Fear of the stranger. The technical name for this is xenophobia. All phobias are by definition irrational. Nevertheless, they have a huge impact. It is understandable that many people are scared by the unknown, especially if they've been told illegality and unfairness are part of the story. However, over the past year, xenophobia has fueled angry protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers, deepening divisions in our communities.
'After rigorous Home Office assessment, the majority of people arriving in small boats are found to be genuinely fleeing war, persecution, and famine – circumstances we would never wish on our own families. The idea that they pose a greater risk to our children than those already within our communities isn't supported by evidence. Most crimes against children are committed not by strangers, but by people they know, often from within their own families or neighborhoods.
"Fear, when it makes us cautious, can keep us safe but when it makes us unnecessarily suspicious it can be dangerous, making society more fractured and fragile and eroding the very values we want our children to experience - kindness, fairness and open heartedness. Martin Luther King Jnr, standing on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, spoke not of fear but of hope. He wanted his children to share a neighbourhood with those others considered a risk. Children from all races walking hand in hand in peace. His words rooted in his Christian faith echo what Jesus taught - to love thy neighbour and to welcome the stranger. Just as fear may be learned, I believe it is possible for us to learn to hope. By choosing empathy over suspicion, by listening before judging and by building bridges instead of walls.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thought for the Day and the elite empathy problem
Thought for the Day and the elite empathy problem

Spectator

time10 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Thought for the Day and the elite empathy problem

Like much of Radio 4's output, Thought for the Day is something of a curate's egg – sometimes enlightening and a source of inspiration or comfort. Often, however, it's sanctimonious; auricular masturbation for the comfortable. The BBC has been heavily criticised for its segment on Wednesday morning, featuring Dr Krish Kandiah, a theologian and author, discussing 'fear' in relation to the migrant crisis. His reflections amount to a series of boilerplate platitudes beloved by open borders advocates. He calls for 'empathy over suspicion', 'listening before judging', 'building bridges not walls'. While the Church's managerial class will have nodded sagely along to all this, I wonder how representative this sort of intellectually diluted, unexamined rehashing of comfortable tropes about 'nasty xenophobia' really is among the ordinary people in the pews. After all, plenty of churchgoers will know what the less rose-tinted practical realities of mass migration actually look like. Dr Kandiah speaks with total conviction, and a striking curiosity as to why so many British people feel as they do. 'Our fears are misplaced', he insists, citing 'xenophobia'. All this reflects a widely held belief on the liberal-left, that people only believe what has been fed to them (or, better yet, 'weaponised') by the tabloid press and social media algorithms. Accordingly, no fear can be rational or informed by actual experiences. This argument is becoming harder to maintain as we record more data on, for instance, migrant crime (something the government has been reluctant to do). Indeed, listening to Dr Kandiah yesterday, it already felt outmoded. As a sidenote, it's very apparent that people are only ever accused of 'disinformation' when expressing a 'low-status' viewpoint. Treasury Minister Darren Jones confidently told a Question Time audience recently that the 'majority of people' arriving in migrant boats were 'children, babies and women'. According to the Migration Observatory, around 76 per cent of those arriving in small boats in 2024 were men over the age of 18. Dr Kandiah likewise does his best to waft away such concerns. 'Most crimes against children are committed, not by strangers, but by people they know' he insists; a truism which crucially ignores the important point about likelihood of offending. According to data from the MoJ, foreign nationals make up around 9 per cent of the UK population but are responsible for between 15 and 23 per cent of sexual offences. Certain nationalities are dramatically over-represented in the available statistics. Even expressing these points remains controversial; Sky News recently attempted to 'fact-check' Nigel Farage for citing data on nationality and sexual violence, curiously arguing that he should have compared statistics from two separate metrics rather than using like-for-like data. People like Dr Kandiah seem to possess an apparently boundless empathy for migrants, less when it comes to their fellow citizens. There are echoes of the 'telescopic philanthropy' of Mrs Jellyby from Bleak House, so busy directing her good works towards Tockahoopo Indians and tribes of Borrioboola-Gha in Africa that she doesn't notice or care that her own children are suffering. Comfortable England has an empathy problem; it is willing to contort itself into paroxysms of emotion for migrants yet remains incapable of listening to concerns of the communities affected by mass migration. Yesterday's Thought for the Day epitomised this; by throwing out a slur of 'xenophobia' the speaker thought he could shut down these concerns and proceed to moralise on his terms. That simply isn't going to cut it anymore. Meanwhile, there are obvious theological counterpoints to express. Yes, Christ tells us to love our neighbours, to welcome the stranger. But he doesn't say to do so when they are putting others at risk and undermining the rule of law, nor when the poor, the vulnerable, the un-listened-to are begging you to do otherwise. He also tells sinners to repent, to 'go your way and sin no more', he encourages adults to 'suffer the little children' (i.e. nurture and protect them). He also speaks of sorting 'sheep from the goats', that 'by their fruits shall ye know them' and – in an intensely patriarchal society – he calls for the prayers and worries of women to be heeded. All these would be quite convincing starting points for rebuttals to Mr Kandiah's sanctimony. It is time the Church starts expressing them if it wants to be taken seriously, if and when its appeals for calm become necessary. Frankly, theologians owe the public a better explanation than endlessly rehashing #BeKind platitudes. To dismiss the genuine concerns of a not-inconsiderable number of people as simply wicked and stupid, as Dr Kandiah did, not only shows an arrogance which undermines his cause, but a lack of curiosity about the many potential counterarguments to his view. That these don't appear to him to be worth engaging with suggests that his theological nous is not quite as sharp as he thinks it is. Appealing for calm and seeking to avoid violence is obviously a key part of the Church's mission in the wider context of society, but to be able to do that it must have some credibility – it needs to have listened in the first place. Dismissing public concern with cant will not work, indeed it will almost certainly make people angrier.

Robert Jenrick claims migrants threw bottles at him at France camp
Robert Jenrick claims migrants threw bottles at him at France camp

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Robert Jenrick claims migrants threw bottles at him at France camp

Robert Jenrick said that he had bottles thrown at him during a visit to a migrant camp near Calais. The former Tory leadership hopeful posted footage of himself spotting a group of what he said was '60 or 70 migrants holding life jackets' at around 8:30pm on Sunday, 11 August. He said the group boarded a bus without tickets and was filmed following the bus to Dunkirk with his team. Mr Jenrick said there was no sign of the group by 4am, and called police to report that he had seen "a large group of maybe 40 or 50 illegal migrants in the cemetery off the main road by the beach.' Mr Jenrick added: "We've given £800 million to France and we didn't see a police officer the whole day, and now we just phoned them and it doesn't sound like they'll even bother to come out.'

BBC Radio 2 host cuts off caller over 'complicit in genocide' comments
BBC Radio 2 host cuts off caller over 'complicit in genocide' comments

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

BBC Radio 2 host cuts off caller over 'complicit in genocide' comments

On Thursday afternoon, BBC Radio 2 ran a segment where listeners were asked to give their tips on giving wedding speeches. Host Tina Daheely – stepping in for Jeremy Vine – introduced a caller from Manchester, called Mary. READ MORE: Israeli minister announces settlement plans 'to prevent Palestinian state' Mary said: "Hi there, I'm just calling, thank you so much for putting me on. "The BBC and the UK Government are complicit in the Palestinian genoc–" Mary's line was promptly cut off before she could say the end of the word "genocide". Daheely went on to say: "Oh, okay, not about wedding speeches at all. Cut that one off there because I've no idea what else they were going to say." She added: "We are talking about wedding speeches here." READ MORE: Serious nuclear incident took place at Faslane naval base this year The BBC has previously been accused of showing "a pattern of bias, double standards and silencing of Palestinian voices" in its coverage of Israel's assault on Gaza. A report from the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), published in June, found that the BBC gave Israeli deaths 33 times more coverage per fatality, despite Gaza suffering 34 times more casualties than Israel. The broadcaster was also found to have interrupted or dismissed claims of genocide more than 100 times – while only 3% of articles analysed by the CfMM used the terms "war crimes" in relation to Israeli violence against Palestinians. On Monday, protesters gathered outside the BBC's headquarters in Glasgow where they accused the corporation of "building consent for genocide". The protest came in response to the news that Israel targeted and killed six journalists in Gaza, including a prominent Al Jazeera reporter who had previously been threatened by Israel. The BBC has been contacted for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store