A federal program helped student-parents thrive. Now it's on life support
NEW HAVEN, Conn. - When Cai-Lonni Haywood left the Navy, she wanted to go back to school to become a nurse. She tried a for-profit college, but it shut down suddenly. So she started attending community college in her hometown of New Haven, Connecticut.
Soon something more important came up: a son, Landin. Once Haywood, now 31, gave birth, she needed child care to attend class. When she couldn't find any that she could afford, she dropped out.
It's a story as common as it is little known across American higher education. More than 1 in 5 American undergraduates is a parent. For many of them, kids come first and school falls by the wayside.
Colleges and policymakers alike need students with children to finish their degrees and fill jobs, including jobs in high-demand fields such as nursing. Providing more on-campus child care is one way to help them do that, but despite a growing recognition of the challenges faced by students with children, the opposite is happening.
The number of colleges offering on-campus child care fell by 24 percent between 2012 and 2021, according to the left-leaning think tank New America. Now, the Trump administration's budget proposal calls for eliminating the only federal program that specifically helps student-parents with child care.
Related: Interested in innovations in higher education? Subscribe to our free biweekly higher education newsletter.
"We've seen many parenting students stop out of their degrees because they did not have consistent, adequate, accessible, high-quality child care," said Brittani Williams, director of advocacy, policy and research at the nonprofit Generation Hope, who was a student-parent herself. "Even from my own personal experience, the ability to have child care was absolutely a centering pillar" for students to be able to complete degrees.
The federal program is called CCAMPIS. Pronounced "see-campus," it stands for Child Care Access Means Parents in School.
Created in 1998, CCAMPIS provides grants to colleges to create on-campus child care centers, subsidize access for low-income students and partner with nearby child care facilities. Students who take part in CCAMPIS have higher persistence rates than students overall, according to the federal government's own research.
CCAMPIS support allowed Haywood to go back to college. She started attending her current institution, Southern Connecticut State University, because she heard about the drop-in child care center the institution had opened with the help of a CCAMPIS grant in 2023.
Related: See which colleges and universities offer child care
The $159,000 the university gets annually from CCAMPIS not only helped launch the child care center, its director said; it subsidizes access for lower-income students like Haywood, who is now working toward becoming a social worker. She pays only about $1 a day and can drop her son off for three-and-a-half-hour blocks when she has class or other commitments.
"I am two semesters away from graduating, which I never thought I would be able to do having a baby and deciding I wanted to go back to school," she said. "If Southern didn't have this child care program, I wouldn't be able to do it."
Now, as with many federal government initiatives, the fate of CCAMPIS is uncertain. President Donald Trump's administration has effectively halved the number of employees at the Department of Education, which oversees the program, and issued an executive order to dismantle the agency. The department didn't respond to questions for this story.
The number of institutions receiving CCAMPIS money declined from 327 in 2021 to 264 in 2023, federal data show. They received an average of $317,108.
Many colleges have CCAMPIS waitlists, and higher education advocates had been hoping that funding for the program would be increased from $75 million a year to $500 million. But in the current environment, they're not optimistic. For now, they say, they hope to simply prevent its outright elimination.
"You play the long game in federal policy," said Edward Conroy, a senior policy manager at New America. "Protecting the program's existence is likely to be where we're at in the near future."
Related:Parents are quitting jobs, passing on raises - to qualify for child care
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have taken an interest in the program. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, and Rep. Katherine Clark, D-Massachusetts, introduced a bill last fall that would have increased funding for CCAMPIS to $500 million and raised the maximum grant award to $2 million. Rep. Nathaniel Moran, R-Texas, had similarly introduced a bill that would add flexibility to the program.
"Not only is there bipartisan support in funding the program, but also in actually changing it to make it better," said Richard Davis Jr., a policy analyst at New America.
This support from both the left and right gives advocates some optimism that CCAMPIS will survive the administration's spending cuts.
"We would hope that Congress protects this program and funds this program so that student-parents can have the support they need," said Justin Nalley, a senior policy analyst at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, which focuses on Black Americans.
Helping adult students get degrees is increasingly a focus of politicians and colleges.
Parents who use their degrees to get better jobs pay more in taxes and are less likely to need government assistance, research shows. Many states now have educational attainment goals that parenting students who graduate can help them meet.
Many universities are facing enrollment challenges among traditional-aged students, brought on by demographic changes and questions about the return on the investment in tuition. In response, they're looking to bring in more adult students.
But older students are more likely to have kids in tow.
Related: As colleges lose enrollment, some turn to one market that's growing: Hispanic students
"Schools are recognizing the need to serve and recruit and retain and support this new learner," said Jody Gordon, a consultant at the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers who works with colleges on enrollment.
Some states are focusing more on student-parents. New laws in California require public colleges to collect data on these students, give them priority registration and consider child care expenses in financial aid calculations. Illinois and Texas have passed bills requiring the collection of data about and provision of resources to students with children.
"A lot of students are not just a student anymore," said AJ Johnson, policy director at California Competes. "We need this type of information to start to innovate and design for our modern students and their needs, which include parenting and working."
But making child care affordable and accessible is still one of the most critical ways to help student-parents finish their degrees. Students who take part in CCAMPIS have higher persistence rates than students overall, according to the federal government's own research.
On-campus child care for student-parents offers a payback to taxpayers, even if it's expensive to provide, a study by the Urban Institute found. Researchers concluded that a subsidized program in Virginia would lead to 8,700 more graduates through 2035 and offer a 24 percent return on every dollar spent. That's before looking at benefits down the line, such as making it more likely that the children of student-parents will pursue a higher education themselves once they've grown up.
Related: Universities and colleges that need to fill seats start offering a helping hand to student-parents
"The fact that it paid for itself at all was honestly a little bit surprising because child care can be so costly," said Theresa Anderson, a research associate at the Urban Institute and coauthor of the analysis. "But that's because it's really effective and important."
At Southern Connecticut State, the existing CCAMPIS grant expires at the end of September. The center is helping about 66 parenting students this semester, and serves infants up to 12-year-olds.
"We realized that we were always supporting parenting students, but the level of our support just was not enough," said Michele Vancour, who directs the center. Opening the center "was a great opportunity for us to demonstrate that there was a significant need and to find ways to make this part of the fabric of who we are."
The university is looking for ways to maintain services after the grant expires, Vancour said. She said she speaks regularly with administrators at other institutions that are part of CCAMPIS.
"The uncertainty, not knowing what to expect next, has been the most stressful for people," she said.
Haywood said she wishes she could use the university's child care center even more than she does now. After working jobs at Lowe's and Stop & Shop, she plans to finish her social work degree and then pursue a master's degree. By the time she starts, Landin will be 5, and old enough to attend evening sessions at the drop-in center where he's already a regular.
"It's been a year here now and he doesn't even say bye to me," she said. "He just walks in and goes and lives his best life."
Contact editor Jon Marcus at 212-678-7556 or jmarcus@hechingerreport.org.
This story about student-parents was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for our higher education newsletter. Listen to our higher education podcast.
The post A federal program helped student-parents thrive. Now it's on life support appeared first on The Hechinger Report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What to know about Karol Nawrocki, Poland's newly elected conservative president
WARSAW, Poland (AP) — The final result of Poland's presidential election only became clear after a long, nail-gripping night of counting as both candidates were locked in a near dead heat in the first exit polls after voting ended. Poles awakened Monday to a clear albeit close result that returns a nationalist politician to the presidency who has pledged to hinder the centrist, pro-EU government for the remainder of its term. Here's what to know about Karol Nawrocki, Poland's newly elected conservative president: Trump backed him Nawrocki is a 42-year-old historian who had no political experience prior to the campaign and who was not even a party member until he was tapped by the conservative Law and Justice party that governed Poland from 2015 to 2023. Nawrocki heads the Institute of National Remembrance, which embraces nationalist historical narratives. He led efforts to topple monuments to the Soviet Red Army in Poland. Russia responded by putting him on a wanted list, according to Polish media reports. Nawrocki's supporters describe him as the embodiment of traditional, patriotic values. Many of them oppose abortion and LGBTQ+ visibility and say Nawrocki reflects the traditional values they grew up with. He was also the preferred favorite of U.S. President Donald Trump, with the American conservative group CPAC holding its first meeting in Poland last week during the campaign to give him a boost. Kristi Noem, the U.S. Homeland Security Secretary and a prominent Trump ally, strongly praised him and urged Poles to vote for him. His campaign echoed themes popular on the American right. A common refrain from his supporters is that Nawrocki will restore 'normality,' as they believe Trump has done. U.S. flags appeared at his rallies. Nawrocki performed better in the first round than expected, an indication he was underestimated in the polling. Nawrocki was linked to scandals Nawrocki's quick political rise has not been without controversy, with reports linking him to underworld figures whom he met while boxing or working as a hotel security guard in the past. Nawrocki has also been linked to a scandal involving the acquisition of a Gdansk apartment from an elderly pensioner named Jerzy. Allegations suggest Nawrocki promised to care for Jerzy in return but failed to fulfill the commitment, leading the man to end up in a publicly funded retirement home. His shifting explanations raised questions about his transparency and credibility. After the scandal erupted he donated the apartment to a charity. It recently emerged that Nawrocki took part in a 2009 Gdansk brawl involving about 140 rival soccer fans, some later convicted of crimes. Nawrocki described the fight as a form of 'noble' combat. Polish media have also reported on his connections to gangsters and the world of prostitution. His critics say all of these things make him unfit to represent Poland as the head of state but many right-wing voters don't believe the allegations and accuse the media of using its power to hurt him, creating what appears to be a rallying effect around him. It's unclear what effect, if any, these scandals had on the outcome of Sunday's result.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans roast Democrats in trying to ban ‘Chiefs,' Native-American mascots in NY schools
Republicans are planning to attack their Democratic opponents over New York's effort to force Massapequa to drop its Chiefs mascot as part of a ban on Native-American imagery in school logos. The GOP sees the mascot controversy as another example of Democratic-run Albany pushing fringe issues, and wants them to pay a political price for it. 'We have a lot of chiefs in volunteer fire departments in New York,' said John McLaughlin, a pollster for New York Republicans and President President Trump — also known as the commander-in-chief. 'Hochul and the Democrats should focus on improving reading and math and not indoctrinating our students,' he said. McLaughlin noted that Hochul is already unpopular on Long Island — she has a 55% unfavorable rating in the New York suburbs compared to 36% favorable in a recent Siena College poll. She is up for reelection next year. The comments come after US Secretary of Education Linda McMahon visited Massapequa on Friday and threatened to bring a civil rights case against the Empire State for forcing the high school to ditch its mascot. The event was coordinated by Nassau County Executive and Trump pal Bruce Blakeman, who is up for re-election this fall. 'Denigrating whole communities like Massapequa and Wantagh is not a good look for Governor Hochul, who seems hell bent on making as many enemies as she can on Long Island,' Blakeman, who also is also eying a run for governor next year, told The Post Sunday. Blakeman's Democratic opponent for county executive, Seth Koslow said, 'School pride matters, but it's hard to believe this is the top concern of the federal government right now.' The New York Board of Regents' and state Education ordered schools to ban Native American mascots back in 2023. The members of the education policy-making board are appointed by the Democratic-controlled state legislature. The National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee is using the controversy to tar Democratic incumbents up for re-election next year on Long Island and elsewhere, including Reps. Tom Suozzi and Laura Gillen. 'It's another day that ends in 'y,' so obviously Tom Suozzi and Laura Gillen's Democrat Party is more concerned with demonizing a high school mascot than lowering taxes and costs for Long Island families,' said NRCC spokeswoman Maurenn O'Toole. 'Democrats are completely missing the plot, and voters will hold Suozzi and Gillen accountable for their utterly foolish, destructive, and out of touch agenda next fall.' But Suozzi told The Post Sunday, 'I support the Massapequa Chiefs.' Suozzi said Republicans are engaging in cheap politics to change the subject. 'This is nonsense, and just another distraction from national Republicans. Congressman Suozzi supports the Massapequa Chiefs, but not the petty partisan politics that people can't stand,' said Suozzi senior campaign adviser Kim Devlin. 'National Republicans should spend their time reducing prices, negotiating a bipartisan fix on immigration, lowering their own proposed record-breaking deficits, and protecting people's healthcare—not cutting it. Congressman Suozzi has always stood with our communities, and no amount of desperate distortion will change that.' State Democratic Party chairman Jay Jacobs, a close ally of Hochul who also is the Nassau County Democratic leader, said Trump and the GOP are trying to deflect from their unpopular policies in DC by focusing on mascots. 'This is a Republican distraction. The Democrats have not made this an issue,' Jacobs insisted. 'The Republicans are trying to distract from all the damage they're doing in Washington. They want to talk about mascots instead of tariffs, cuts to Medicaid, SNAP benefits and education programs,' Jacobs said. 'This is what Republicans do every election — they try to scare and anger people.' Hochul, through a rep, sought to distance herself from the mascot controversy. 'The decision being discussed was made by the independent State Education Department, which is not under our Administration's jurisdiction,' said Hochul spokesman Gordon Tepper. 'While Secretary McMahon focuses on WWE-style distractions, Governor Hochul is focused on what matters: fully funding Long Island's public schools and making sure every kid gets a high-quality education.' Last year, Trump and the GOP successfully slammed Democrats for supporting the unpopular policy of allowing transgender athletes to compete against biological females in sports. Republicans said they are pleasantly surprised — even baffled — at state officials going after local school districts on Long Island, of all places. Numerous Long Island towns have native American names — honoring tribal history — Massapequa, Wyandanch, Manhasset, Mineola, Quogue, Amagansett, Patchogue, Hauppauge, Patchogue, among others.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
North Texan jailed in Thailand on monarch insult accusations reunited with family
The Brief American scholar Paul Chambers, jailed in Thailand for allegedly insulting the monarchy, has been released. Chambers was reunited with his family in Italy after the case against him was dropped. He plans to advocate for changes to Thailand's law that makes insulting the monarchy a crime. ITALY - A reunion took place in Italy on Sunday for an American scholar who was recently jailed in Thailand. Paul Chambers, a U.S. political science professor, was arrested in April while teaching at a university in Thailand, when he was accused of insulting the Thai monarchy. Now, the case has been dropped, and he is on his way home. The Latest Chambers was elated to see his family. He maintains his innocence, and now that his case has been dropped, he wants to work to change the law in Thailand that put him in prison. A hug between brothers that had been months in the making finally happened when Chambers was reunited with his loved ones. Chambers described the moment as a dream come true. The backstory Insulting the Thai monarchy is a crime punishable by up to 15 years in prison within the country. Chambers had help from people in Thailand. He says the Thai Lawyers for Human Rights Group and global reach were instrumental in his release. The pressure from all sides made its way to the country's attorney general, who decided to drop the case against Chambers. He got his passport back at the airport to board a flight to Italy, where his family was waiting. What they're saying "I wasn't found guilty, put in prison on that accusation, which I continue to deny, taken to prison where I suffered some indignities," the professor said. From the start, Chambers' wife and family overseas worked hard to clear his name. They contacted state leaders, the U.S. Embassy, and even the president. "President Trump is going to be so glad not to get another letter from me," said Chambers' mother, Peggy. "This extended all the way, this travesty of justice extended all the way to when I was getting on the plane to leave Thailand," Chambers said. Chambers maintains that he did not insult the monarchy, and he says hundreds are sitting in prison for allegedly committing the same crime. "And it is a law that can easily be manipulated for political reasons. And so many people are in jail wrongfully because of this law," Chambers said. "And I think there needs to be attention focused upon changing this law for sure, and ending it to create justice in Thailand." Chambers and his family believe someone else was behind the accusation. "This case has proven to all at the global level that Paul has suffered, and also the families and friends and loved ones really suffered the mistreatment, and this should not happen in the first place," Chambers' wife, Napisa, said. "And we really would like to see whoever did this, the security sector, or whoever, to be held accountable." "I mean, it was just a huge effort on everyone's part," said Chambers' sister, Rhonda. "It really was. And yes, the Chambers, we're a force to be reckoned with." What's next And the family plans to see that justice is served, because if this case has proven anything else, it's that you don't mess with the Chambers family. Chambers has lived in Thailand for 15 years. He and his wife hope to return someday, but for now, they plan to soak in the family time together in Italy. The Source Information in this story came from the Chambers family and previous FOX 4 coverage.