A federal program helped student-parents thrive. Now it's on life support
Soon something more important came up: a son, Landin. Once Haywood, now 31, gave birth, she needed child care to attend class. When she couldn't find any that she could afford, she dropped out.
It's a story as common as it is little known across American higher education. More than 1 in 5 American undergraduates is a parent. For many of them, kids come first and school falls by the wayside.
Colleges and policymakers alike need students with children to finish their degrees and fill jobs, including jobs in high-demand fields such as nursing. Providing more on-campus child care is one way to help them do that, but despite a growing recognition of the challenges faced by students with children, the opposite is happening.
The number of colleges offering on-campus child care fell by 24 percent between 2012 and 2021, according to the left-leaning think tank New America. Now, the Trump administration's budget proposal calls for eliminating the only federal program that specifically helps student-parents with child care.
Related: Interested in innovations in higher education? Subscribe to our free biweekly higher education newsletter.
"We've seen many parenting students stop out of their degrees because they did not have consistent, adequate, accessible, high-quality child care," said Brittani Williams, director of advocacy, policy and research at the nonprofit Generation Hope, who was a student-parent herself. "Even from my own personal experience, the ability to have child care was absolutely a centering pillar" for students to be able to complete degrees.
The federal program is called CCAMPIS. Pronounced "see-campus," it stands for Child Care Access Means Parents in School.
Created in 1998, CCAMPIS provides grants to colleges to create on-campus child care centers, subsidize access for low-income students and partner with nearby child care facilities. Students who take part in CCAMPIS have higher persistence rates than students overall, according to the federal government's own research.
CCAMPIS support allowed Haywood to go back to college. She started attending her current institution, Southern Connecticut State University, because she heard about the drop-in child care center the institution had opened with the help of a CCAMPIS grant in 2023.
Related: See which colleges and universities offer child care
The $159,000 the university gets annually from CCAMPIS not only helped launch the child care center, its director said; it subsidizes access for lower-income students like Haywood, who is now working toward becoming a social worker. She pays only about $1 a day and can drop her son off for three-and-a-half-hour blocks when she has class or other commitments.
"I am two semesters away from graduating, which I never thought I would be able to do having a baby and deciding I wanted to go back to school," she said. "If Southern didn't have this child care program, I wouldn't be able to do it."
Now, as with many federal government initiatives, the fate of CCAMPIS is uncertain. President Donald Trump's administration has effectively halved the number of employees at the Department of Education, which oversees the program, and issued an executive order to dismantle the agency. The department didn't respond to questions for this story.
The number of institutions receiving CCAMPIS money declined from 327 in 2021 to 264 in 2023, federal data show. They received an average of $317,108.
Many colleges have CCAMPIS waitlists, and higher education advocates had been hoping that funding for the program would be increased from $75 million a year to $500 million. But in the current environment, they're not optimistic. For now, they say, they hope to simply prevent its outright elimination.
"You play the long game in federal policy," said Edward Conroy, a senior policy manager at New America. "Protecting the program's existence is likely to be where we're at in the near future."
Related:Parents are quitting jobs, passing on raises - to qualify for child care
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have taken an interest in the program. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, and Rep. Katherine Clark, D-Massachusetts, introduced a bill last fall that would have increased funding for CCAMPIS to $500 million and raised the maximum grant award to $2 million. Rep. Nathaniel Moran, R-Texas, had similarly introduced a bill that would add flexibility to the program.
"Not only is there bipartisan support in funding the program, but also in actually changing it to make it better," said Richard Davis Jr., a policy analyst at New America.
This support from both the left and right gives advocates some optimism that CCAMPIS will survive the administration's spending cuts.
"We would hope that Congress protects this program and funds this program so that student-parents can have the support they need," said Justin Nalley, a senior policy analyst at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, which focuses on Black Americans.
Helping adult students get degrees is increasingly a focus of politicians and colleges.
Parents who use their degrees to get better jobs pay more in taxes and are less likely to need government assistance, research shows. Many states now have educational attainment goals that parenting students who graduate can help them meet.
Many universities are facing enrollment challenges among traditional-aged students, brought on by demographic changes and questions about the return on the investment in tuition. In response, they're looking to bring in more adult students.
But older students are more likely to have kids in tow.
Related: As colleges lose enrollment, some turn to one market that's growing: Hispanic students
"Schools are recognizing the need to serve and recruit and retain and support this new learner," said Jody Gordon, a consultant at the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers who works with colleges on enrollment.
Some states are focusing more on student-parents. New laws in California require public colleges to collect data on these students, give them priority registration and consider child care expenses in financial aid calculations. Illinois and Texas have passed bills requiring the collection of data about and provision of resources to students with children.
"A lot of students are not just a student anymore," said AJ Johnson, policy director at California Competes. "We need this type of information to start to innovate and design for our modern students and their needs, which include parenting and working."
But making child care affordable and accessible is still one of the most critical ways to help student-parents finish their degrees. Students who take part in CCAMPIS have higher persistence rates than students overall, according to the federal government's own research.
On-campus child care for student-parents offers a payback to taxpayers, even if it's expensive to provide, a study by the Urban Institute found. Researchers concluded that a subsidized program in Virginia would lead to 8,700 more graduates through 2035 and offer a 24 percent return on every dollar spent. That's before looking at benefits down the line, such as making it more likely that the children of student-parents will pursue a higher education themselves once they've grown up.
Related: Universities and colleges that need to fill seats start offering a helping hand to student-parents
"The fact that it paid for itself at all was honestly a little bit surprising because child care can be so costly," said Theresa Anderson, a research associate at the Urban Institute and coauthor of the analysis. "But that's because it's really effective and important."
At Southern Connecticut State, the existing CCAMPIS grant expires at the end of September. The center is helping about 66 parenting students this semester, and serves infants up to 12-year-olds.
"We realized that we were always supporting parenting students, but the level of our support just was not enough," said Michele Vancour, who directs the center. Opening the center "was a great opportunity for us to demonstrate that there was a significant need and to find ways to make this part of the fabric of who we are."
The university is looking for ways to maintain services after the grant expires, Vancour said. She said she speaks regularly with administrators at other institutions that are part of CCAMPIS.
"The uncertainty, not knowing what to expect next, has been the most stressful for people," she said.
Haywood said she wishes she could use the university's child care center even more than she does now. After working jobs at Lowe's and Stop & Shop, she plans to finish her social work degree and then pursue a master's degree. By the time she starts, Landin will be 5, and old enough to attend evening sessions at the drop-in center where he's already a regular.
"It's been a year here now and he doesn't even say bye to me," she said. "He just walks in and goes and lives his best life."
Contact editor Jon Marcus at 212-678-7556 or jmarcus@hechingerreport.org.
This story about student-parents was produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for our higher education newsletter. Listen to our higher education podcast.
The post A federal program helped student-parents thrive. Now it's on life support appeared first on The Hechinger Report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
5 minutes ago
- CNBC
Why a new UK internet safety law is causing an outcry on both sides of the Atlantic
It was well intentioned but a U.K. law mandating age verification on adult sites and a number of other platforms has sparked a backlash from both internet users in the country, and U.S. politicians and tech giants. Last month, new provisions in the Online Safety Act requiring large online platforms to implement age checks to prevent children from accessing pornographic and appropriate material came into force. The measures have led PornHub, RedTube and other porn sites to force U.K. visitors to sign up and verify their age to gain access to their services. Broadly, the Online Safety Act is a law that imposes a duty of care on social media firms and other user-generated content sites to ensure they take responsibility for harmful content uploaded and spread on their platforms. In particular, the legislation aims to prevent children from being exposed to pornographic content and material that promotes suicide, self-harm, eating disorders or abusive and hateful behaviour. The regulation has been years in the making and faced numerous delays in its development — not least due to concerns that it may infringe internet users' right to privacy and result in censorship. The latest measures have been imposed with the aim of ensuring children aren't able to view harmful and inappropriate content. However, they have led to complaints from internet users due to the requirement of having to share personal information such as their ID, credit card details and selfies — in some cases for platforms that don't even qualify as porn sites. Spotify, Reddit, X and a number of other platforms have introduced their own respective age verification systems to stop users under the age of 18 from consuming explicit content. These moves have subsequently led to providers of virtual private networks (VPNs) to report that their services, which allow users to mask their location, are surging in the U.K. Meanwhile, on Monday, Wikipedia was dealt a legal blow in the U.K. as a High Court judge ruled the platform should be treated as a "category one" service, which would subject to certain user verification requirements. The Online Safety Act requires category one platforms to offer users the ability to verify their identity and access tools that reduce their exposure to content from non-verified users. Wikimedia, the parent company of Wikipedia, has said previously that it could limit visitor numbers from the U.K. in order to exempt it from category one status. A number of U.S. politicians have blasted the new rules in recent days. Last week, Vice President JD Vance — who has previously criticized the U.K.'s internet safety rules — again raised concerns with the law, fearing it could unfairly restrict American tech companies. "I just don't want other countries to follow us down what I think was a very dark path under the Biden administration," Vance told reporters during a trip to the country last week. House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who also visited the U.K. recently, said in a statement after his return that sweeping online safety laws in Europe are having "a serious chilling effect on free expression and threaten the First Amendment rights of American citizens and companies." There has been speculation over whether the U.S. may press Britain to relax the regulations during trade talks — however, U.K. officials say the issue is not open to debate. Other countries are already adopting their own respective internet age verification laws. Australia and Ireland have both passed similar age verification measures, while Denmark, Greece, Spain, France and Italy have started testing a common age verification app to protect users online. In the U.S., Louisiana passed a law in 2022 requiring age verification on websites where at least a third of the content is of an adult nature, while several other states are seeking to pass similar legislation.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump hiked Canada's tariff rate to 35%, but just who's paying it remains a mystery
When U.S. President Donald Trump published an open letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney in late July, declaring his intention to impose a 35 per cent tariff on Canadian goods in the absence of a trade deal by Aug. 1, there was a brief moment of panic. But it quickly became clear that the 35 per cent tariff, later formalized in an executive order, wasn't a new blanket levy on all goods — it was an increase to the 25 per cent that already applied to items that were not compliant with the existing North American trade pact, the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). That CUSMA exemption meant the increase was more a glancing than crushing blow and the muted reaction when the Aug. 1 deadline passed without a deal seemed to confirm it. While the trade war has roiled the auto, steel and aluminum sectors and others targeted by specific sectoral tariffs, the impact of the broader tariffs has been harder to pinpoint. Few companies have stepped forward to acknowledge their products fall outside of CUSMA and are being hit by the now 35 per cent tariff, leaving exactly who is affected and how big an impact the tariffs are having something of a mystery. Even Canada's big banks and the Bank of Canada have struggled to put a precise number on it. In the scenario planning that it updated after its most recent interest rate announcement, the central bank estimated that 100 per cent of energy and 95 per cent of all other goods should be covered by CUSMA, while bank estimates of actual CUSMA compliance have climbed to anywhere from 50 per cent to 90 per cent. Customs brokers and other trade specialists say those who are falling outside the shield of CUSMA fall into several buckets, including smaller firms that are unwilling or unable to pay the costs associated with compliance and firms of all sizes with complex manufacturing and production supply chains that may put their goods offside with CUSMA's 'rules of origin,' which require qualifying exports to contain a fixed amount of North American components and production. And unlike sectoral tariffs, which delivered a direct blow to many companies, in many cases the broader tariffs only hit selected products and a small percentage of a company's sales. Steve Bozicevic, chief executive of A&A Customers Brokers, gave the example of a client who stopped shipping its skincare products to the United States altogether over concerns that shea butter sourced from Ghana could raise flags at the U.S. border. 'They have paused Canada to U.S. shipping until they figure it out because they do not want to be on the hook for retroactive (duty and taxes) at 25 per cent or 35 per cent if they cannot transform their supply chain,' Bozicevic said, noting the company was scrambling to find ways to add more Canadian content to their brands. This type of situation is not unique, said Clifford Sosnow, a partner in the trade group at law firm Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, especially for companies with complex manufacturing and production supply chains that use inputs from countries outside the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade pact whose place of origin is not clear or difficult to document. 'At 35 per cent (tariffs), some of our clients are likely to cut loses if their contracts permit them, and try to find alternative markets, if they can,' he said. 'Some clients we are advising are struggling with managing the 25 (per cent), particularly if they can't cost share with their buyers.' In the past, these goods could be exported to the U.S. without attracting tariffs because the sellers could count on Canada's 'most favoured nation' status under other international cooperative agreements or other exemptions, such as small value shipments. Even when things are in order these days, the new and fast-changing rules can make exporting to the U.S. difficult and potentially costly. Another of Bozicevic's clients recently faced an audit of exports to the U.S. even though it uses only North American-sourced materials. He said this was a worrying event for the Quebec-based home goods company that designs and manufactures pillows and throw blankets. It was flagged, he said, simply because raw hemp textiles often come from China. 'U.S. Customs wanted proof that their hemp was North American origin,' he said, pointing out the kind of scrutiny that puts companies in a vulnerable position if they don't have the proper documentation to prove the country of origin of all their components. 'Thanks to clean documentation and verified supply chains, (the client) passed the audit, but it underscores how even compliant businesses need to keep supply chain transparency and paperwork in top shape,' he said. Aggregate trade figures for June show tariffs paid on goods that tend to use a lot of foreign components — such as aerospace parts, electrical equipment and machinery — saw increases that were in the small single digits, said Erik Johnson, a senior economist at Bank of Montreal. That was up from zero or extremely low payments in January, before the trade war began. 'The (new tariff) that applies to non-USMCA (CUSMA) compliant goods isn't having a noticeable impact on the aggregate trade data,' he said. Johnson said the most obvious reason for the lower than expected tariff numbers would be that more companies had done the work necessary to receive preference under CUSMA. Other contributors could include exporters holding off on shipping in hopes the tariffs would be short-lived and border officials not being ready to impose the new levies. Exports were down around 14 per cent, he said, but that's the same level of decline seen since April. 'Without a surge in (trade pact) compliance, the calculated tariff rate would be much higher right now,' he said. Carl Gomez, chief economist at Costar Group, estimates that Trump's latest levy on raised the overall effective tariff rate on Canadian goods and services from 5.5 per cent to slightly above six per cent. The overall blended U.S. tariff rate on Canadian goods thus remains below the low double-digit base tariff rates negotiated by some outside the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade pact, such as the European Union, United Kingdom and Japan. More concerning for Canadian exporters is the chance that CUSMA protections may be altered or even disappear altogether. The trade pact comes up for review and possible renegotiation by the three countries next year, but some have expressed concerns it won't last even that long. After meeting with Carney on Thursday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford warned that Trump may try to reopen negotiations early, possibly as soon as this fall. Canadian steelmakers need to focus on domestic market as tariffs lock them out of U.S.: Algoma CEO Trump put a tariff on gold — or did he? What you need to know about the bullion confusion 'Losing (the trade pact's) preferential treatment for Canadian-origin goods would have severe and devastating consequences for broad segments of the Canadian economy,' said William Pellerin, a partner in the international trade practice at law firm McMillan LLP. 'That is a worst-case scenario.' • Email: bshecter@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: Op-ed writer ignores the brutal toll of Larry Hoover's time as a gang leader
My jaw dropped while reading Jeremy Busby's impassioned plea for Gov. JB Pritzker to free from prison post-haste the notorious 1970s gang leader Larry Hoover ('Pritzker should take page out of Trump's book, free Larry Hoover,' Aug. 7). Busby makes not a single allusion, nor even a hint, at the wholesale destruction, misery and pain of not hundreds, but thousands of African-American families attributable to Hoover's vicious stranglehold on the city's South and West sides in the name of drug warfare for untold years. Has Hoover reformed? Today, is he truly committed to atoning for his past misdeeds in the name of, as Busby insists, improving 'the plight of those in the Black community'? I hope it is so. No person can say what is in another person's heart. But it does not undo the irreversible damage Hoover wrought in the very neighborhoods he now claims to care for. The right call, the only call, is to let Hoover continue his acts for the common good from where he truly belongs — in his jail cell. That would demonstrate more than any other act how much he has changed and to further his campaign for love and Jeremy Busby's op-ed, advocating for Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker to pardon Larry Hoover for his Illinois crimes: No. No. No. Hoover is a brutal murderer. He was still running the Gangster Disciples and its followers while incarcerated. He is cunning in renaming his criminal organization, leading people to believe it is legitimate. Hoover should never be released from Jeremy Busby forgets to mention in his opinion piece about freeing Larry Hoover is that Hoover was convicted of murder in 1973 for the killing of a 19-year-old drug dealer. For this, he was given 150 to 200 years in regards to the recent op-ed by Jeremy Busby suggesting Larry Hoover be freed by Gov. JB Pritzker because Hoover grew up in a tough environment and the 'organization' he created, the Gangster Disciples, was not only a symbol of empowerment but did good things for the community, I must be missing something. Killing, or ordering the killing of, people; terrorizing communities; and selling poisonous drugs to said communities are good things? How is freedom justified?Mayor Brandon Johnson made an alarming statement in saying that 'we have reached the point of no return' when it comes to Chicago's financial situation. While it's true that the city faces grave challenges — including the mayor's own decision to borrow $830 million for city operations and the mounting $35 billion in unfunded pension liabilities — I reject the notion that Chicago is beyond saving. Chicago has always been a city of resilience. We don't give up when things get hard. We organize. We innovate. And we fight for a stronger future. That's exactly why I launched Leading A Better Chicago — a civic engagement initiative dedicated to bringing transparency, accountability and bold action to the city's most pressing challenges. Our goal is to reimagine how we tackle long-standing issues, starting with the city's structural fiscal crisis. Our first step has been to partner with Tusk Philanthropies to commission an in-depth analysis of Chicago's current fiscal state, laying out out a road map of realistic, impactful reforms by examining proven approaches from cities such as New York, Detroit and Philadelphia and adapting them to fit Chicago's unique landscape. It's not just a critique — it's a call to action, rooted in data and informed by what has worked elsewhere. We don't just want to study the problem. We want to solve it. Leading A Better Chicago will pair this research with real-world input from people all across the city. We'll gather feedback from residents, engage with community and business leaders, and tap national policy experts to generate bold, actionable ideas for change. Does the mayor believe that there are no feasible solutions to Chicago's issues, that its leaders have tried everything and failed? I believe we haven't tried enough. What we need now isn't despair but determination. Chicago needs fresh thinking, a willingness to challenge the status quo and, most importantly, serious leadership. Because despite what anyone says, Chicago hasn't reached the point of no return. Chicago is always worth fighting for.I'm pleased to learn that the CTA is working to deal with the problem of ghost buses. I hope that it will now address another vexing issue: erratic bus arrivals. I have lost count of the number of times that I have waited for a bus, only to have two and sometimes three arrive simultaneously, and then I learn from the bus tracker that the next bus is 25 to 30 minutes away. This is not a rare occurrence, and it is not limited to certain times of day. I have encountered this problem on Routes 22, 36, 66 and 151. To make matters more annoying, this bunching sometimes occurs within a mile of the route's starting point. I have read that there are supervisors in the field monitoring bus arrivals. Clearly, this approach is not working. Perhaps a centralized system that allows for direct communication with drivers would be more effective. Trains sometimes bypass stops in order to get back on schedule. Why can't this be done with buses as well?I was sorry to hear about the horrible experience that a disabled traveler had at O'Hare International Airport ('O'Hare failed me,' Aug. 3). Mine was the complete opposite. I, too, require a wheelchair, and the redcap who greeted me at the United terminal entrance, and was told of my wheelchair request, sat me down, retrieved my boarding pass and arranged for a wheelchair. A nice young man came, wheeled me to the gate and informed the crew at the gate of my needs. I was the first to board. Coming home, there was a delay to get my wheelchair, but when the young man arrived, he could not be more considerate. I advised him that I would be taking an Uber. As he wheeled me down toward the luggage pickup, he advised me when to order the car, and he proceeded to stay and wheel me the long distance to the Uber pickup and stay with me until the car arrived. He earned the large tip I gave him and my thanks for being so thoughtful and extending such courtesy. All in all, a great experience at O'Hare.
