logo
Letters: Op-ed writer ignores the brutal toll of Larry Hoover's time as a gang leader

Letters: Op-ed writer ignores the brutal toll of Larry Hoover's time as a gang leader

Chicago Tribune14 hours ago
My jaw dropped while reading Jeremy Busby's impassioned plea for Gov. JB Pritzker to free from prison post-haste the notorious 1970s gang leader Larry Hoover ('Pritzker should take page out of Trump's book, free Larry Hoover,' Aug. 7). Busby makes not a single allusion, nor even a hint, at the wholesale destruction, misery and pain of not hundreds, but thousands of African-American families attributable to Hoover's vicious stranglehold on the city's South and West sides in the name of drug warfare for untold years.
Has Hoover reformed? Today, is he truly committed to atoning for his past misdeeds in the name of, as Busby insists, improving 'the plight of those in the Black community'? I hope it is so. No person can say what is in another person's heart. But it does not undo the irreversible damage Hoover wrought in the very neighborhoods he now claims to care for.
The right call, the only call, is to let Hoover continue his acts for the common good from where he truly belongs — in his jail cell. That would demonstrate more than any other act how much he has changed and to further his campaign for love and inclusion.Regarding Jeremy Busby's op-ed, advocating for Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker to pardon Larry Hoover for his Illinois crimes: No. No. No. Hoover is a brutal murderer. He was still running the Gangster Disciples and its followers while incarcerated. He is cunning in renaming his criminal organization, leading people to believe it is legitimate.
Hoover should never be released from prison.What Jeremy Busby forgets to mention in his opinion piece about freeing Larry Hoover is that Hoover was convicted of murder in 1973 for the killing of a 19-year-old drug dealer.
For this, he was given 150 to 200 years in prison.In regards to the recent op-ed by Jeremy Busby suggesting Larry Hoover be freed by Gov. JB Pritzker because Hoover grew up in a tough environment and the 'organization' he created, the Gangster Disciples, was not only a symbol of empowerment but did good things for the community, I must be missing something. Killing, or ordering the killing of, people; terrorizing communities; and selling poisonous drugs to said communities are good things? How is freedom justified?Mayor Brandon Johnson made an alarming statement in saying that 'we have reached the point of no return' when it comes to Chicago's financial situation. While it's true that the city faces grave challenges — including the mayor's own decision to borrow $830 million for city operations and the mounting $35 billion in unfunded pension liabilities — I reject the notion that Chicago is beyond saving.
Chicago has always been a city of resilience. We don't give up when things get hard. We organize. We innovate. And we fight for a stronger future.
That's exactly why I launched Leading A Better Chicago — a civic engagement initiative dedicated to bringing transparency, accountability and bold action to the city's most pressing challenges. Our goal is to reimagine how we tackle long-standing issues, starting with the city's structural fiscal crisis.
Our first step has been to partner with Tusk Philanthropies to commission an in-depth analysis of Chicago's current fiscal state, laying out out a road map of realistic, impactful reforms by examining proven approaches from cities such as New York, Detroit and Philadelphia and adapting them to fit Chicago's unique landscape. It's not just a critique — it's a call to action, rooted in data and informed by what has worked elsewhere.
We don't just want to study the problem. We want to solve it. Leading A Better Chicago will pair this research with real-world input from people all across the city. We'll gather feedback from residents, engage with community and business leaders, and tap national policy experts to generate bold, actionable ideas for change.
Does the mayor believe that there are no feasible solutions to Chicago's issues, that its leaders have tried everything and failed? I believe we haven't tried enough.
What we need now isn't despair but determination. Chicago needs fresh thinking, a willingness to challenge the status quo and, most importantly, serious leadership.
Because despite what anyone says, Chicago hasn't reached the point of no return.
Chicago is always worth fighting for.I'm pleased to learn that the CTA is working to deal with the problem of ghost buses. I hope that it will now address another vexing issue: erratic bus arrivals. I have lost count of the number of times that I have waited for a bus, only to have two and sometimes three arrive simultaneously, and then I learn from the bus tracker that the next bus is 25 to 30 minutes away.
This is not a rare occurrence, and it is not limited to certain times of day. I have encountered this problem on Routes 22, 36, 66 and 151. To make matters more annoying, this bunching sometimes occurs within a mile of the route's starting point. I have read that there are supervisors in the field monitoring bus arrivals. Clearly, this approach is not working. Perhaps a centralized system that allows for direct communication with drivers would be more effective.
Trains sometimes bypass stops in order to get back on schedule. Why can't this be done with buses as well?I was sorry to hear about the horrible experience that a disabled traveler had at O'Hare International Airport ('O'Hare failed me,' Aug. 3). Mine was the complete opposite. I, too, require a wheelchair, and the redcap who greeted me at the United terminal entrance, and was told of my wheelchair request, sat me down, retrieved my boarding pass and arranged for a wheelchair. A nice young man came, wheeled me to the gate and informed the crew at the gate of my needs. I was the first to board.
Coming home, there was a delay to get my wheelchair, but when the young man arrived, he could not be more considerate. I advised him that I would be taking an Uber. As he wheeled me down toward the luggage pickup, he advised me when to order the car, and he proceeded to stay and wheel me the long distance to the Uber pickup and stay with me until the car arrived. He earned the large tip I gave him and my thanks for being so thoughtful and extending such courtesy.
All in all, a great experience at O'Hare.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US teen influencer pilot accused of unauthorized Antarctic landing reaches deal to leave Chile
US teen influencer pilot accused of unauthorized Antarctic landing reaches deal to leave Chile

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US teen influencer pilot accused of unauthorized Antarctic landing reaches deal to leave Chile

A judge in Chile has agreed to suspend proceedings against a teenage American pilot and social media influencer who has been stuck on a remote Antarctic island since late June after he was accused of landing there without permission. Ethan Guo was attempting to fly to all seven continents solo, raising funds for cancer research, when he landed on a part of Antarctica where the South American country maintains a territorial claim. Prosecutors accused him of providing false information to ground control about his landing point. On Monday, a judge approved an agreement between Guo's lawyers and prosecutors to suspend the proceedings on the condition that he donate $30,000 to a children's cancer foundation within 30 days. He must also leave the country and will be prohibited from reentering Chilean territory for three years. Chilean prosecutor Cristián Crisosto told CNN on Tuesday that if Guo does not meet the conditions, the agreement would become void and the court proceedings would continue. CNN is attempting to reach Guo for comment. Crisosto said Guo and his plane were still in Antarctic territory and that he would also have to pay the costs of 'aircraft security and personal maintenance.' In previous cases, he said, such costs have been roughly $600 a day. Guo has several options to leave the Antarctic, Crisosto added, including boarding a military ship or commercial plane. The next commercial flight is expected to take off from the southern Chilean city of Punta Arenas in early October. Chilean authorities said that Guo had submitted a false flight plan and took off from Carlos Ibáñez del Campo Airport in Punta Arenas as the sole passenger and crew member aboard a Cessna 182Q aircraft, registered as N182WT, in late June. At one point during that flight, authorities say he turned off course toward Antarctica. Guo's lawyer has previously said that the young pilot experienced 'complications' while flying. 'While already in the air, he began to experience a series of complications,' Karina Ulloa said, adding that Guo claims 'that he was conducting an exploratory flight to see if he could follow this route or not.' Guo, whose website states he was trying to raise $1 million for cancer research by becoming 'the first person ever to fly to all seven continents solo,' had broadcast his continent-hopping journey since last September to more than a million Instagram followers. Solve the daily Crossword

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang calls Trump 'America's unique advantage' because he's ramping up US energy
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang calls Trump 'America's unique advantage' because he's ramping up US energy

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang calls Trump 'America's unique advantage' because he's ramping up US energy

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Whether you see it as an advantage or a disadvantage, today of all days, one can't help but deny there's something… unique about the US thanks to President Trump. During this very AI-centric 24 hours for Trump—with his unveiling of the administration's AI action plan and his talk at the All-In Podcast's 'Winning the AI Race' summit—Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang also took to the summit stage and had some positive words to share about the US president (via RapidResponse47 on X). "America's unique advantage that no country could possibly have", Huang says, "is President Trump." Said without an air of hesitation, mind. The Nvidia CEO explains that this is primarily because the president has understood the importance of energy for AI: "On the first day of his administration, he realised the importance of AI, and he realised the importance of energy. For the last I don't know how many years, energy production was vilified, if you guys remember. We can't create new industries without energy. You can't reshore manufacturing without energy. You can't sustain a brand-new industry like artificial intelligence without energy. If we decide, as a country, the only thing we want is IP—to be an IP-only, a services-only country—then we don't need much energy. But if we want to produce things, something as vital as artificial intelligence, then we need energy." Huang is certainly right that Trump has pushed for more energy production. In April, for instance, he signed an Executive Order "requiring the automatic rescission of outdated regulations to unleash American innovation and energy production." And the president does, of course, seem to be set on pushing AI and ensuring America remains the king of that particular castle. That's surely at least part of what was discussed behind closed doors between Huang and Trump. And it is, of course, what the president is aiming for with his action plan, which looks to chart "a decisive course to cement US dominance in artificial intelligence", through, for instance, deregulation and AI exportation. This latter point is one that Huang was keen on emphasising after the Trump administration restricted the export of Nvidia's chips to China. Those restrictions have since been lifted somewhat, as Nvidia can now continue H20 exports to the eastern superpower. Given all this, it's not exactly surprising that Huang would be acting as hype man for the president, here. As it stands, Nvidia holds the (hardware) keys to the AI kingdom, and it's a kingdom that the president wants the US to lead the charge of. None of this is to call the headstrong push into all things AI-wise, mind you. That particular question is one we might not know the answer to until we're already there, in a completely AI-clad world. One would hope that fact might inspire a little caution, but alas. There are also many, I'm sure, who will be keen to point out that energy deregulation and ramped energy production for AI might not be the wisest decision, either. Though the retort would be that the AI arms race is one the US cannot afford to lose. Whichever side of that particular argument you come down on, it's a big bet to take. AI companies are borrowing and spending billions of dollars and have yet to see anywhere near break-even returns. Some might call that a bubble, others a necessary investment into the fourth industrial revolution. Whatever the case, it looks like the US president and Nvidia CEO are walking the same road, for now. Even if Trump does seem to want this hefty amount of power consumption explained to him. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

After saying he should resign 'immediately', President Trump changes his mind about Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan and calls his 'success and rise' an 'amazing story', looks forward to fixes for Intel's foundry
After saying he should resign 'immediately', President Trump changes his mind about Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan and calls his 'success and rise' an 'amazing story', looks forward to fixes for Intel's foundry

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

After saying he should resign 'immediately', President Trump changes his mind about Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan and calls his 'success and rise' an 'amazing story', looks forward to fixes for Intel's foundry

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. I suppose it's never a good idea to assume consistency with the Trump administration, given the record of flip flops. So shame on me for not seeing this particular flippy flop coming, as just one week after calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's resignation, the US President has called his "success and rise" an "amazing story", and has hinted at possible collaboration with Intel. Speaking on Truth Social after meeting with the Intel CEO yesterday, Trump says: "The meeting was a very interesting one. His success and rise is an amazing story. Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Intel also spoke positively about the meeting: "Earlier today, Mr. Tan had the honor of meeting with President Trump for a candid and constructive discussion on Intel's commitment to strengthening U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership. We appreciate the President's strong leadership to advance these critical priorities and look forward to working closely with him and his Administration as we restore this great American company." Talk of the president's "strong leadership" from Tan isn't exactly a surprise, given what we've seen previously from tech CEOs. I suppose it makes sense for these companies to stay on Trump's good side. Recent pleasantries aside, last week, despite the president not having the ability to force Tan's resignation, Trump said, "The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!" That "conflict" was in reference to Tan's alleged ties to China. He was previously CEO of Cadence Design Systems, and this company pleaded guilty this year and agreed to pay over $140 million for "unlawfully exporting semiconductor design tools to a restricted PRC Military University." It's also been reported by Reuters that the Intel CEO invested $200 million or more in hundreds of Chinese companies between 2012 and 2024. It is worth noting that such investments in Chinese companies isn't necessarily strange, if you're running a diverse investment portfolio. It could very well be just business, as they say. Perhaps Lip-Bu Tan relayed something similar to Trump, resulting in the flipped opinion. Y'know, appeal to the business mogul side of the ex-Apprentice host US president. Or, perhaps it was the national importance of Intel, and Tan's commitment to the company as a bastion of US technology, that he laid on heavy. The CEO had previously mentioned the possibility of ditching its 14A process, and some interpreted this as a way to get the US gov to the table to help out, because it probably won't want to let the all-American tech company disappear entirely. Trump's talk of "spending time together" and "bringing suggestions to me" certainly reinforces this idea. And with former Intel board members arguing for Intel fabs to be bought up by the likes of Nvidia, Qualcomm, Broadcom, et al, to create an "American Foundry", the president must be keenly aware of the national importance of the US chip giant and its future. Still, that doesn't explain why the flip concerning Lip-Bu Tan specifically. Maybe it was just a way to get the Intel CEO to the table quicker and more ready to discuss US-first solutions. Whatever the case, he seems to be back in Trump's good books, for now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store