After saying he should resign 'immediately', President Trump changes his mind about Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan and calls his 'success and rise' an 'amazing story', looks forward to fixes for Intel's foundry
I suppose it's never a good idea to assume consistency with the Trump administration, given the record of flip flops. So shame on me for not seeing this particular flippy flop coming, as just one week after calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's resignation, the US President has called his "success and rise" an "amazing story", and has hinted at possible collaboration with Intel.
Speaking on Truth Social after meeting with the Intel CEO yesterday, Trump says: "The meeting was a very interesting one. His success and rise is an amazing story. Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
Intel also spoke positively about the meeting:
"Earlier today, Mr. Tan had the honor of meeting with President Trump for a candid and constructive discussion on Intel's commitment to strengthening U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership. We appreciate the President's strong leadership to advance these critical priorities and look forward to working closely with him and his Administration as we restore this great American company."
Talk of the president's "strong leadership" from Tan isn't exactly a surprise, given what we've seen previously from tech CEOs. I suppose it makes sense for these companies to stay on Trump's good side.
Recent pleasantries aside, last week, despite the president not having the ability to force Tan's resignation, Trump said, "The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!"
That "conflict" was in reference to Tan's alleged ties to China. He was previously CEO of Cadence Design Systems, and this company pleaded guilty this year and agreed to pay over $140 million for "unlawfully exporting semiconductor design tools to a restricted PRC Military University." It's also been reported by Reuters that the Intel CEO invested $200 million or more in hundreds of Chinese companies between 2012 and 2024.
It is worth noting that such investments in Chinese companies isn't necessarily strange, if you're running a diverse investment portfolio. It could very well be just business, as they say.
Perhaps Lip-Bu Tan relayed something similar to Trump, resulting in the flipped opinion. Y'know, appeal to the business mogul side of the ex-Apprentice host US president.
Or, perhaps it was the national importance of Intel, and Tan's commitment to the company as a bastion of US technology, that he laid on heavy. The CEO had previously mentioned the possibility of ditching its 14A process, and some interpreted this as a way to get the US gov to the table to help out, because it probably won't want to let the all-American tech company disappear entirely.
Trump's talk of "spending time together" and "bringing suggestions to me" certainly reinforces this idea. And with former Intel board members arguing for Intel fabs to be bought up by the likes of Nvidia, Qualcomm, Broadcom, et al, to create an "American Foundry", the president must be keenly aware of the national importance of the US chip giant and its future.
Still, that doesn't explain why the flip concerning Lip-Bu Tan specifically. Maybe it was just a way to get the Intel CEO to the table quicker and more ready to discuss US-first solutions. Whatever the case, he seems to be back in Trump's good books, for now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple (AAPL) Upgrading Siri with AI-Powered Apple Intent
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is one of the tech stocks with strong return on equity. On August 10, it was announced that the company is working on a significant upgrade to its AI voice control, which will change how people use iPhones. Reports indicate that the company is working on an upgraded version of App Intents that will make Siri the true hands-free controller for devices. App Intents will enable people to use their voice to instruct Siri to perform complex operations, such as finding a specific photo, editing it, and sending it off. Thanks to artificial intelligence integration, the digital assistant can comment on an Instagram photo or scroll through a shopping app and add items to a cart. With the new upgrades, Apple is exploring ways to make its voice control operate with precision inside interfaces. The upgrades would mark an important milestone and fulfillment of a promise that Siri made 15 years ago. It will also be a significant upgrade to the company's hardware. Without App Intents, Apple's products would be less compelling than those offered by Amazon and Google. Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is a technology company that designs, manufactures, and markets smartphones, personal computers, tablets, wearables, and accessories. It also sells a variety of related services, including software, digital content, and subscription-based services. The stock boasts of a high return on equity of 149.81%, affirming its ability to convert shareholder equity to profit. While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Best NYSE Penny Stocks to Invest in Now and 10 Best 52-Week High Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It's Time Investors Give Qualcomm Stock a Little 'Respect'
Qualcomm (QCOM) stock ticked lower yesterday after the bell despite delivering a solid fiscal third-quarter earnings beat. Despite since bouncing back today, this dip highlights what analysts say is a persistent lack of "respect" for the semiconductor giant that investors should reconsider. The wireless technology leader reported fiscal third-quarter revenue of $10.4 billion, topping analyst estimates of $10.34 billion with a 10% year-over-year increase. Non-GAAP earnings per share of $2.77 exceeded forecasts by 2.2%, yet the market's lukewarm response underscores ongoing skepticism about the company's prospects. More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Warns Investing At 'Too-High Purchase Price' Even for 'an Excellent Company' Can Undo a Decade of Smart Investing Why Archer Aviation's (ACHR) Post-Earnings Tailspin Looks Like a Favorably Mispriced Opportunity BitMine Immersion Now Holds 1.15 Million Ethereum Tokens. Should You Buy BMNR Stock Here? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! What investors may be missing is Qualcomm's successful pivot beyond smartphones. While handset chip revenue grew a modest 7% to $6.3 billion, the company's diversification strategy is gaining serious traction. Automotive revenue surged 21% to $984 million, hitting a quarterly record, while Internet of Things (IoT) revenue jumped 24% to $1.7 billion. The company's expansion into artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and PC processors, with its Snapdragon X platform, is expected to power over 100 PC models by 2026. The recent $2.4 billion acquisition of Alphawave Semi strengthens its data center capabilities as AI demand continues to surge. Qualcomm returned $3.8 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks while maintaining healthy margins. In fiscal 2025 (ending in September), Qualcomm is forecast to pay an annual dividend of $3.59 per share, up from $3.51 per share in fiscal 2024. Moreover, these payouts are forecast to increase to $3.91 per share in fiscal 2028. Is Qualcomm Stock a Good Buy Right Now? Qualcomm recently unveiled an ambitious road map to reach $22 billion in combined automotive and IoT revenues by fiscal 2029. Nakul Duggal, GM of Auto, IoT, and Cloud, highlighted Qualcomm's decade-long transformation of automotive architecture through its Snapdragon Digital Chassis platform. Qualcomm's safety-certified Advanced Driver-Assistance System (ADAS) stack will debut globally with BMW's Neue Klasse vehicles, marking a key milestone in autonomous driving technology. With 20 OEMs programmed for Autopilot solutions launching within 18 months, Qualcomm is positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for ADAS. The automotive segment's $45 billion design win pipeline includes substantial ADAS opportunities, with management noting that one-third of this backlog represents the next major growth driver beyond traditional infotainment systems. CEO Cristiano Amon also revealed advanced discussions with a leading hyperscaler for custom ARM-based solutions, targeting fiscal 2028 revenue generation. The $2.4 billion Alphawave IP acquisition provides critical connectivity IP to complement Qualcomm's Oryon CPU and Hexagon NPU processors. Management emphasized their focus on inference optimization, targeting efficiency metrics like tokens per dollar and tokens per watt as AI workloads scale. Moreover, the multi-year Xiaomi agreement ensures Snapdragon 8 Series platforms will power flagship devices with increasing volumes annually across China and global markets. This partnership will help Qualcomm strengthen its position in China, where the company has operated successfully for three decades. Qualcomm's diversification strategy appears well-positioned for sustained growth across multiple high-value markets. What is the Target Price for QCOM Stock? Analysts tracking QCOM stock expect sales to rise from $39 billion in fiscal 2024 to $47 billion in fiscal 2028. In this period, adjusted earnings are forecast to expand from $10.2 per share to $13.3 per share. QCOM stock trades at a forward price to earnings multiple of 13x, below its 10-year historical average of 15.4x. If the chip stock is priced at 14x forward earnings, it should trade around $187 in August 2027, indicating an upside potential of 20%. If we adjust for dividend reinvestments, cumulative returns could be over 25%. Out of the 32 analysts covering Qualcomm stock, 15 recommend 'Strong Buy', one recommends 'Moderate Buy', 15 recommend 'Hold', and one recommends 'Strong Sell'. The average QCOM stock price target is $179, above the current price of $154. With a fourth-quarter revenue guidance of $10.3 billion to $11.1 billion and the company trading at attractive valuations, despite its diversification progress, it is hard to see why QCOM stock dipped at all. Analysts may have a point that Qualcomm deserves more investor "respect" for its execution and growth potential beyond traditional mobile markets. On the date of publication, Aditya Raghunath did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump debanking order will have limited impact on crypto, experts say
Last week, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing bank regulators to rescind guidance that could lead to 'politicised or unlawful debanking.' Crypto businesses, and even some prominent conservatives — including the president himself — have alleged they were denied or lost access to bank accounts at the behest of politically-motivated, Biden-era regulators. But last week's executive order, entitled, 'Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans,' won't do much for crypto businesses that fear they've been locked out of the traditional financial system, according to experts who spoke to DL News. That's because the order does little to root out 'reputation risk.' The term refers to regulators' ability to dissuade banks from engaging supposedly controversial customers, such as pornographers, firearms manufacturers, payday lenders, and crypto companies. Critics of the practice say that banks should only consider objective criteria, such as a customer's financial risk, when deciding whether to offer someone a checking account. Guidance documents and manuals 'This is going to make people happy who have been asking for it, but it's not clear how much good it's going to do them,' Dru Stevenson, a professor at South Texas College of Law Houston, told DL News. The executive order directs bank regulators to remove the use of reputation risk 'or equivalent concepts' that could result in 'politicized or unlawful debanking' from their 'guidance documents, manuals, and other materials.' But it isn't clear that examples of debanking were motivated by politics, according to Stevenson. 'It's not clear to me that they couldn't still allow for reputational risk that would apply to, say, an AI company, because that's not exactly a political issue or something that's unlawful,' he said. And reputation risk can have a downstream effect on banks' profits. 'If you have risk averse investors at one of the gigantic pension funds, or mutual funds, and they find out that Wachovia has gone gung ho about crypto, that might be a reason for them to switch to a more conservative bank,' Stevenson said. Moreover, banks were always free to ignore guidance documents and manuals according to Stevenson. As such, removing references to reputation risk from such documents will likely have little practical effect. 'If you're an agency, you can't go into court and say, 'This person violated our guidance document,'' he said. 'You have to show that they violated the statute or that they violated a codified regulation that went through notice and comment rulemaking.' Management reports Julie Hill, the dean of the University of Wyoming's law school, noted that Trump-appointed bank regulators have already said they will stop using reputation risk. While the regulators have new leadership, they are largely staffed by the same people who served under the Biden administration, Hill added. And reputation risk isn't the only tool regulators can use to pressure banks to reject certain customers. Anti-money laundering laws are one reason banks often reject customers, according to Hill. 'The vast, vast majority of suspicious activity reports don't lead to any sort of follow up, let alone any sort of enforcement,' she told DL News. Moreover, banks are not allowed to tell customers that their account was flagged for suspicious activity. 'We have a situation where banks had to file one or more SARs, and they decided it's just not worth it, we should debank, because we don't want our regulators upset with us, and it's getting expensive to file all these SARs.' Another tool at regulators' disposal: management reports. 'If a regulator suggests to a bank, 'We think this is risky, maybe you want to stop doing it' [but] it's not really that risky, banks might do it anyway,' Hill said, 'because their management rating will get downgraded and then that impacts all sorts of things, including their capital requirements.' Those ratings are also secret, according to Hill. 'Anytime you see a really broad authority with very little limit, and then also a lot of secrecy or lack of transparency about how regulators or banks implement that, you're likely to set up claims for debanking,' she said. Banks' responsibility The executive order also directs the regulators to identify financial institutions that had any 'past or current, formal or informal, policies or practices that require, encourage, or otherwise influence … politicized or unlawful debanking.' Finding examples of politically-motivated debanking could be straightforward if the orders came from federal regulators, according to Hill. 'It's a much harder thing if what you think happened is the banks, for whatever reason, just decided to debank people for political reasons, unconnected with risk or profit or whatever,' she said. 'There's a real question about how we think regulators are going to figure that out and whether we think there's any duty on the bank to voluntarily disclose it.' Whatever the effect of the executive order, both professors agreed that a new administration could reinstate the use of reputation risk unilaterally. 'It kind of highlights how unsticky changes made by the executive branch are when it comes to discretionary enforcement,' Hill said. 'This is one of those things that can change from administration to administration.' Stevenson agreed. 'If we ever get to have other presidents, the next president can just do another executive order and put it all back, like, overnight,' Stevenson said. Aleks Gilbert is DL News' New York-based DeFi correspondent. You can contact him at aleks@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
