MK Party to introduce private member's bill to clarify what self-determination means
The MK Party said it suspects the settlement was abusing section 235 of the Constitution, which allows for self-determination for communities of shared common cultural and language heritage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Analyst calls Zuma and MK Party's legal challenge over Cachalia's appointment a waste of time
Analysts argues that Former President Jacob Zuma and the MK Party's move to file an urgent application in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, challenging President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to appoint Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting Police Minister is a waste of time. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspaper A political analyst says Former President Jacob Zuma and the MK Party's move to file an urgent application in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, challenging President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to appoint Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting Police Minister, is a waste of time, for both Zuma and the courts. The legal bid comes after a defeat in the Constitutional Court on July 31, 2025, when the MK Party's earlier application was dismissed because it failed to engage the court's exclusive jurisdiction. The dispute centres on President Ramaphosa's appointment of Cachalia as acting Minister of Police after placing incumbent Minister Senzo Mchunu on leave. Zuma and the MK Party argue that the appointment is unconstitutional, citing alleged legal and procedural violations. The challenge also extends to the establishment of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry, chaired by Judge Mbuyiseli Madlanga, set up to investigate explosive allegations levelled against Mchunu. These allegations were made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who accused Mchunu and other senior police officials of being part of criminal syndicates and interfering in politically sensitive investigations. Mkhwanazi claimed elite anti-corruption units had been disbanded under their watch. Ramaphosa has since established a Judicial Commission of Inquiry in response to the allegations, while Parliament continued its investigations. Speaking to IOL News, Independent political analyst Goodenough Mashego argued that Zuma and the MK Party were wasting judicial time. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'I think it's a waste of time on the part of the MK Party, but it's also a waste of time for the courts. South Africa's judiciary should be focusing on real cases, not this kind of civil litigation that goes nowhere,' he said. Mashego said that Ramaphosa's decision to appoint Cachalia was legally sound. 'Ramaphosa's appointment of Cachalia is based on what the Constitution allows the President to do. The MK Party was right to approach the Constitutional Court previously on the issue of having two ministers of police, which was a valid concern at the time. In fact, Ramaphosa had earlier appointed Minister Gwede Mantashe as acting police minister - likely recognising that deputy ministers lack executive powers to act in such a role,' he said. 'However, this latest challenge against Cachalia's appointment is a waste of time and resources.' Mashego also believes the MK Party's repeated legal actions are politically motivated attempts to gain visibility. 'You must remember, after the May 2024 elections, the MK Party challenged the voter turnout, then the swearing-in of Parliamentarians, and several other matters. They've realised that despite their significant electoral support, their brand is not being heard like an official opposition party. These legal challenges are part of a broader strategy to stay in the public eye.' However, another analyst, Solly Rashilo, also chipped in, saying that the perception of whether the legal battle is a waste of time depends on one's perspective. 'From a legal standpoint, it's not necessarily a waste of time if there's a legitimate constitutional issue at hand. Section 91(3) of the Constitution allows the President to appoint no more than two ministers from outside the National Assembly,' Rashilo said. 'This challenge may hinge on interpreting whether the appointment of an acting minister in these circumstances is constitutional. It's the role of the courts to answer such questions.' Rashilo added that from a political perspective, the move could be seen as part of a broader campaign to keep Ramaphosa's administration under pressure and to assert the MK Party's relevance. 'This is political posturing, regardless of the court's final decision. It's a strategy to present themselves as defenders of the Constitution and critics of executive overreach,' he said. 'From a public perception standpoint, though, many see these repeated court battles as distractions from the country's pressing problems. There's definitely a fatigue factor, particularly given Zuma's long history with the courts.' However, for Zuma supporters, Rashilo said, the legal challenge might be seen as a principled stand. 'For those who back Zuma and the MK Party, this is about holding the President accountable and challenging what they see as a misuse of executive power. That narrative, whether or not it holds up legally, can still be politically powerful.' IOL Politics
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla to face the music for role in July 2021 unrest
Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla will face the music for her role in the July civil unrest when her terrorism trial begins in November. Zuma-Sambudla, 42, daughter of former president and MK Party leader Jacob Zuma, is facing charges under the Protection of Constitutional Democracy against Terrorist and Related Activities Act and incitement to commit violence during the July 2021 riots. She handed herself over at the Durban Central police station in January, where she was arrested and processed. She was released on warning. On Thursday Zuma-Sambudla appeared briefly as judge Mluleki Martin Chithi certified the matter trial-ready. National Prosecuting Authority regional spokesperson Natasha Ramkisson-Kara said the case was postponed for the trial, which will be held in the Durban high court from November 10 to 21. TimesLIVE
The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla smiles in court as unrest trial set
Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla's July 2021 unrest case has been declared trial-ready. The matter has been postponed for trial, which is scheduled to take place from 10 to 21 November. She appeared in the Durban High Court on Thursday, 14 August in connection with unrest and public violence that occurred across the country in July 2021. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) KwaZulu-Natal spokesperson Natasha Ramkisson-Kara said Zuma-Sambudla faces multiple charges, including incitement to commit terrorism and incitement to commit public violence. The looting and unrest left over 300 dead and numerous others injured. The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) Member of Parliament appeared all smiles as she met supporters in the courtroom. In July 2021, chaos erupted across South Africa following the arrest of former President Jacob Zuma, MK Party leader. Zuma's daughter, Zuma-Sambudla, is believed to have shared social media posts that fueled the unrest. At the time, the controversial politician shared posts on X saying, 'KZN, we see you.' In reference to this, the MK Party also shared the hashtag #WeSeeYou alongside a picture of Zuma-Sambudla. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
