
Iran's Jews caught in crossfire of regime's propaganda war
On state-run television, a chilling propaganda campaign aired. Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei appeared flanked by Revolutionary Guard officers while a narrator declared, "We are all proud soldiers…we will uproot the Jews with our power."
The message was clear, projecting defiance after the regime's military and nuclear apparatus were dealt a humiliating blow by Israel, while also carrying a more ominous signal to Iran's Jewish population.
In the days following the 12-day war, regime forces launched a wave of arrests. Hundreds of Iranians were detained on espionage charges, including at least 35 Jews in Tehran and Shiraz. Many were interrogated and harassed. Their social media activity was reportedly scrutinized, and they were pressured to sever contact with relatives abroad, particularly those in Israel.
This was not just a crackdown, but a calculated move to isolate and intimidate an already vulnerable community.
Jews have lived in Iran for nearly 3,000 years. Their roots predate Islam and Christianity. Shaped by the legacy of Queen Esther, whose story is retold each year during Purim, Iran's Jews have survived persecution, war and revolution not through confrontation, but through careful adaptation and, often, silence.
Iran's Jews are regularly used as pawns by the regime to fan anti-Israel sentiment, as was seen on Oct. 30, 2023, when reports showed Iranian authorities "coerced Iranian Jewish leaders and their communities" to engage in anti-Israel protests across five cities just weeks after the Iran-backed October 7 terror attacks.
Today, roughly 10,000 Jews remain in Iran, constituting the largest Jewish population in the Middle East outside of Israel. They are recognized in Iran's constitution as a "people of the book," and are permitted to pray in synagogues and run kosher restaurants, butcheries and schools — all under the watchful eye of the regime. This limited freedom comes not out of religious tolerance, but because it has served a strategic purpose and helps the regime deflect accusations of antisemitism.
That same political calculus explains why Iran's parliament, or Majles, reserves one seat for a Jewish representative, and why Jewish representatives have occasionally joined the Islamic Republic's delegation to the United Nations General Assembly's high-level week held every September in New York.
As Iranian American writer Roya Hakakian observes in The Atlantic, "the existence of Jewish Iranians inside the country became an important symbol [to the mullahs], especially in contrast with the absence of Jewish life in other Muslim countries in the region…Iran's Jews became the regime's principal defense against accusations of anti-Semitism, even as some leaders notoriously questioned the veracity of the Holocaust."
Indeed, in 2005, then-President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad hosted an international Holocaust cartoon competition — a grotesque display of Jew-hatred and Holocaust denialism that continues today with state backing.
Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when a theocratic, anti-American and anti-Israeli regime seized power, Iran's Jewish population has plummeted by 90% — from approximately 100,000 under the country's last monarch, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The shocking execution of Habib Elghanian, a Jewish Iranian businessman, philanthropist and community leader, in 1979 accelerated the exodus.
Yet unlike other Jewish communities across the Middle East, Iran's Jews were never forcibly expelled en masse. Their presence has been continuous, but their safety has always been fragile.
The recent arrests of Jews in Iran are just the latest reminder that the Islamic Republic sees loyalty to the regime as absolute – and any perceived deviation, whether through protest or even having a relative abroad, can be construed as a threat. The same regime that censors journalists, jails artists and musicians, and punishes schoolgirls for removing their hijab now targets Jews for having family ties abroad.
This is one of the central themes of my forthcoming book, Unveiled: Inside Iran's #WomanLifeFreedom Revolt, which explores how the 2022-2023 uprising sparked by the death of Mahsa Amini revealed a growing rift between the Iranian people and the regime. The enemy of the Islamic Republic isn't just Zionism or the West—it's autonomy and dissent.
Iran's Jews are once again caught in a geopolitical storm. Their silence is not complicity, but survival. And their endurance is not a reflection of the regime's tolerance, but of the Jewish people's resilience.
They must not be forgotten by global Jewry nor by those who still believe in a future for Iran that is free and just.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
Josh Shapiro joins Mamdani pile-on, saying candidate failed to condemn antisemitic rhetoric
The remarks from Shapiro, who is considered a likely Democratic candidate for president in 2028, are the latest sign that Mamdani still has work to do to win over some of the prominent figures in the party as he runs to unseat New York Mayor Eric Adams. Some Democrats have been hesitant to fully embrace the nominee, with elected officials from battleground districts distancing themselves from his campaign's anti-Israel rhetoric. He met with Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on Friday but has still yet to secure his endorsement. Mamdani faces opposition for his advocacy of economic plans he describes as socialist, including free buses and city-run grocery stores. He's also faced attacks for his refusal to condemn use of the phrase 'gloablize the intifada' by anti-Israel protesters — a Palestinian resistance slogan regarded by some as a call to violence against Jews. Shapiro had some faint words of praise for Mamdani: 'He seemed to run a campaign that excited New Yorkers,' the governor said, before discussing his criticism of the candidate's refusal to condemn inflammatory rhetoric about Israel and the ongoing war in Gaza. 'He also seemed to run a campaign where he left open far too much space for extremists to either use his words or for him to not condemn the words of extremists that said some blatantly antisemitic things,' Shapiro said. Republicans have sought to brand the mayoral candidate as their new Democratic boogeyman while members of his own party are still weighing what lessons to take away from the 33-year-old democratic socialist's upset primary win. The New York race is also rippling through next year's midterm elections and the lead-up to the presidential campaign, with figures like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear — both seen as likely 2028 contenders — saying the party should consider Mamdani's affordability-focused messaging.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The start of the post-war game: Iran has five weeks to create new nuclear deal
Could Europe's August deadline be the most important date in the decades-long nuclear standoff, or will Iran face more sanctions? Israel's and the US's historic attack on Iran between June 13 and June 24 set back the Islamic Republic's nuclear program by around two years, but the long-term direction of the nuclear standoff will be decided by diplomacy, with the next big meeting between Tehran and the E3 (UK, France, and Germany) set for Friday. After this summit, the Islamic Republic will have approximately five weeks until the E3 deadline – the end of August – before these countries start the process of 'snapping back' the global sanctions against Iran. While the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal had many holes, one of its positives was the ability it gave any of the E3 countries to activate the global sanctions snapback mechanism with no possibility for Russia or China to veto it. That ability to snapback sanctions expires on October 18. Hence, the E3 wants to start the UN's bureaucratic process several weeks before. America is out of this round of talks as Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, does not trust it after US President Donald Trump paraded around his accomplishments of 'obliterating' Iran's nuclear program. Also, Khamenei does not want to agree to zero nuclear enrichment, something which his Foreign Ministry and Atomic Energy spokespeople continue to declare as loudly as they can. What does Iran want with new deal? So what is Khamenei's game? Having been bludgeoned the worst in his 36-year history as Iran's ayatollah, is he really aching for more Israeli and US airstrikes? That is a possibility, as Khamenei misjudged how much leverage he had over Israel and the US last month, and as Iranian pride could blind it to what would be its most rational course at this moment. But there is another alternative; in this latest nuclear dance, there is far more than meets the eye. The truth is that after Israel's and the US's airstrikes on Iran's nuclear program, the snapback conflict is much less decisive than it once was. Let's say that Iran sticks to refusing to make concessions on nuclear enrichment, the E3 then invokes the global sanctions snapback, and in response, Tehran pulls out of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The main question would still be: Is Iran, in fact, moving again toward a nuclear program or not? And if it is, is it moving at a pace that could reduce the countdown to a nuclear weapon to under a year or shorter? Or, rather, is its rebuilding happening much more gradually, in a way that puts the danger far off into the future? So far, a month after the attacks, it appears that Iran is still digging through the substantial rubble left over from the Israeli and American attacks and still does not know where its nuclear program stands, other than embarrassingly admitting serious damage. If it takes even several months to dig through all the debris, then the nuclear threat remains around two years away. If, after those several months, Iran starts to rebuild some centrifuges and to enrich some uranium, but does not start rebuilding any of the weapons group activities, then it will still remain at least a year away, according to most estimates. That estimate will not shrink until it begins restoring weapons group activities. The West may be worried that it is blind regarding Iran's nuclear program in terms of IAEA inspector coverage, but it has been blind at various levels since 2021, and this did not stop the Mossad and IDF intelligence from accurately targeting dozens of nuclear sites and over a dozen nuclear scientists. If Israel could carry out that kind of surveillance before, it can do it again. Khamenei might be just fine with such a situation. The Islamic Republic would take a hit economically, but its economy is already in very bad shape. And Russia, China, and some others would still find ways to circumvent sanctions to keep Iran afloat. Back in the 2010-2015 era, when Russia and China supported sanctions in a more real way, they were both angry at Iran for various bilateral insults, and they were also weaker and more dependent on the US and the West than they are today. So it is possible that diplomacy will fail, both sides will exercise their worst diplomatic threats, and yet Israel and the US may refrain from attacking because Iran could quietly stay away from a nuclear red line, which might force the hands of Jerusalem and Washington again. Alternatively, right before the August 29 deadline, or right before the real deadline of October 18, Iran may agree to a new historic deal with real restrictions on nuclear enrichment and some kind of face-saving gestures toward it. In that case, all of the current Iranian statements will be subsequently exposed as posturing to try to get the best deal it can before settling for a deal that avoids global sanctions. So August 29 could turn out to be the most important turning point of the decades-long nuclear standoff, or it could be an overblown deadline with much less impact than it might have had if Israel's and the US's June strikes had not altered the reality that all of the sides are looking at.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says that he 'will not convince or beg' Iran to enter nuclear negotiations
Sources told The Jerusalem Post that Trump said that Iran was still welcome at the table, but that the US would not convince them to negotiate. US President Donald Trump has recently stated in private conversations that the United States has decided to stop trying to persuade Iran to engage in talks over its nuclear program. 'If they want to come—they are welcome. But we are not going to try and convince or beg them to do so,' the president said in several discussions, according to two sources who spoke with The Jeursalem Post. Trump's remarks come after a prolonged effort by his administration to convince Tehran to hold negotiations, insisting that any deal must prohibit Iran from enriching uranium. Iran refuses to give up uranium enrichment Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated Iran's stance in an interview with Fox News, saying, 'We cannot give up our right to enrich uranium.' He also noted that the attacks by Israel and the US had caused significant damage to Iran's nuclear facilities. In response, President Trump posted on Truth Social: 'If necessary—we will strike the nuclear sites again.' On Friday, a meeting is set to take place in Istanbul between Iran's deputy foreign minister and the deputy foreign ministers of Britain, France, and Germany. European countries have warned Iran that if a new nuclear agreement is not reached by August, the UN Security Council will trigger the snapback mechanism, reimposing significant sanctions on Iran. Solve the daily Crossword