Recognising informal & experiential learning key to boost India's skill landscape: Minister
Unveiling a report titled 'Skills for the Future: Transforming India's Workforce Landscape', developed by the Institute for Competitiveness, Chaudhary noted that the skill landscape must address the evolving needs of industry and workforce.
The report, based on the data available in the public domain, presents a detailed examination of the skills landscape in India. It focuses on educational attainment, occupational distribution, and attainment of technical and vocational education and training of the workforce (TVET).
'Skilling is to be understood not merely as a supply-side intervention, but as a demand-driven, market-aligned, and outcome-oriented ecosystem that addresses the evolving needs of industry and the workforce. We must deepen pathways between education, vocational training and industry this includes recognise informal and experiential learning,' Chaudhary said.
Chaudhary also suggested that a robust employability index will help in monitoring the impact of education and skilling on the employment prospects of youth in the evolving economic and technological environment.
Atul Kumar Tiwari, Secretary, MSDE, said that skilling is an area of academic inquiry.
He also stressed the need for creating a corpus of literature around skilling with data and evidence and also urged further deep diving into structural changes around skilling, education, and work continuum.
Meanwhile, the report analysed India's skills landscape against the backdrop of the emerging knowledge-driven global economy.
Data analysis based on Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) shows that in 2023-24, 88 per cent of India's workforce is in low-competency occupations, while only 10-12 per cent are in high-competency roles.
Further, using PLFS (2023-24) data the report identified five sectors -- IT and ITeS, textile and apparel, electronics, healthcare and life sciences, and beauty and wellness -- which accounted for over 66 per cent of vocational training in India.
The report also recommended multifaceted and targeted interventions to develop a resilient and future-ready workforce.
It urged for a dedicated, standardised data collection system to generate estimates about skill requirements and enable targeted evidence-based reforms and policies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
11 hours ago
- NDTV
Only 8.25% Indian Graduates In Jobs Matching Their Qualifications: Report
A new report by the Institute for Competitiveness has revealed a stark disconnect between higher education and employment outcomes in India, showing that just 8.25% of Indian graduates are employed in roles that match their educational qualifications. Based on data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) and aligned with the National Classification of Occupations (NCO) framework, the report outlines how over half of Indian graduates are engaged in lower-skill roles-such as clerical work, machine operation, and sales-classified as Skill Level 2 occupations. Overqualification Widely Prevalent The findings show that even among workers with qualifications suitable for Skill Level 4 jobs (the highest classification), nearly 28.12% are stuck in lower-tier roles, suggesting widespread overqualification and underemployment. This trend of mismatch is further visible in Skill Level 3 occupations, where only 8.25% of appropriately qualified individuals are in roles that match their educational level. Underqualification Also A Challenge The report also flags underqualification as a problem. Roughly 8.56% of workers in Skill Level 2 jobs lack the necessary educational background, possibly due to informal training or on-the-job learning. This highlights the need to strengthen vocational and technical education (TVET), which currently lacks widespread accessibility and robust infrastructure. Regional Disparities Worsen the Problem States with dense youth populations such as Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, and West Bengal are especially vulnerable to the growing skills mismatch. These regions face risks of chronic underemployment, increased migration to urban centers, and a weakening local economy due to skill redundancy. In 2023-24, states like Bihar and Meghalaya still had over 60% of their workforce with only Skill Level 1 education-the lowest category-while states like Goa and Kerala reported significantly lower shares in this bracket. Education Access Still Uneven India has achieved near-universal enrolment at the primary level, but the transition to higher education remains inconsistent across states. For instance, while West Bengal and Kerala have shown impressive gains in female enrolment in higher education, Lakshadweep witnessed a dramatic decline of nearly 90% over the past decade. Alarmingly, only 2.17% of India's population has qualifications suitable for Skill Level 4 jobs. Even at the state level, disparities are stark: Chandigarh leads with 11.21%, whereas states like Bihar (0.45%) and Jharkhand (0.70%) lag significantly. Upskilling Holds Economic Promise According to the report, moving workers from intermediate to advanced skill levels could increase wages by up to 149%, offering a major boost to household incomes and national GDP. But this transformation demands greater investment in higher education-currently, India allocates only 3.06% of its budget to the sector. The estimated funding gap stands at Rs 88,000 crore.
The Hindu
13 hours ago
- The Hindu
Are gig workers a part of India's labour data?
The 2025 Union Budget took several measures to formally 'recognise' gig and platform workers, and extended various social protection schemes to this growing workforce. Despite this recognition, the revised Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), 2025 does not include substantive changes to account for the diverse forms of gig and platform work. Gaps in labour classification Gig workers were first incorporated into the legal framework through the Code on Social Security, 2020. Under Chapter I, Section 2(35), a gig worker is defined as 'a person who participates in a work arrangement and earns from such activities outside of a traditional employer-employee relationship.' Platform work, as defined in the Code, is 'a work arrangement outside of a traditional employer-employee relationship in which organisations or individuals use an online platform to access other organisations or individuals to solve specific problems or to provide specific services or any such other activities which may be notified by the Central Government, in exchange for payment.' While this definition separates gig workers from both formal and informal categories, it doesn't clearly define who a gig worker is or the nature of gig work. According to NITI Aayog's 2022 report 'India's Booming Gig and Platform Economy,' the gig workforce is expected to reach 23.5 million by 2029-30. Despite such projections and efforts to define gig work, India's primary labour statistics source, the PLFS, continues to subsume gig work under vague categories such as 'self-employed', 'own-account workers', or 'casual labour'. This statistical invisibility has direct consequences. Clause 141 of the Code on Social Security, 2020, 'seeks to provide that the Central Government shall establish a Social Security Fund for social security and welfare of the unorganised workers, gig workers and platform workers.' Similarly, the National Social Security Board, constituted under Section 6 of the Code on Social Security, 2020, is tasked with framing and overseeing welfare schemes for gig and platform workers. Such welfare boards and policymakers rely on the PLFS for 'evidence-based policy,' but the absence of a distinct category for gig and platform workers undermines its very intent. When classification itself is unclear in primary datasets, access to schemes becomes uneven and exclusionary. How the PLFS falls short In response to a Rajya Sabha query on whether the government had updated PLFS methodology to capture the rise of gig work, the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation stated, 'No updation in the PLFS Schedule has been undertaken with the objective of specifically identifying persons engaged in the gig economy. However, all market activities i.e. activities performed for pay or profit which result in production of goods and services for exchange are included under the domain of economic activity considered in PLFS. The activity situation of a person who is found to be working or being engaged in economic activity during a specified reference period is associated with employment in PLFS. Hence, even the persons engaged in 'gig economy' for pay & profit are covered in PLFS.' Though gig work is technically included under economic activity, without a specific category or classification, the survey fails to offer visibility into the unique nature of digital labour, characterised by multiple job roles, dependence on algorithms, lack of formal contract and absence of safety metrics. In the survey, while the question on the type of job contract provides an option for 'no written job contract', it doesn't capture the hybrid nature of work. Unlike traditional self-employment, gig work is shaped by platform algorithms, performed across multiple apps and are mostly task-based rather than time-bound. Workers have no stable contracts, and often rely on digital reach. Many lack access to benefits or protections available to formal workers, and don't fully own their work processes, making the 'self-employed' label misleading. Employment uncertainties, income volatility and algorithm governance remain invisible within PLFS classification. A food delivery person working across platforms like Swiggy, Zomato, for instance, will be flattened into a category that does not reflect entirely on their employment conditions or social security needs. Recognition without representation Recent policy efforts like the e-Shram registration, the issuance of digital ID cards, and health coverage under the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana indicate the state's recognition of the gig and platform workforce. But unless statistical systems like the PLFS evolve, the data meant to support and monitor these interventions cannot be considered inclusive. The 2025 PLFS revision introduced some important updates: a larger sample size, monthly estimates, and better rural representation. However, it still does not address the issues of how gig work is defined and understood. For inclusive policy making, India must update PLFS classification codes or introduce survey modules that distinctly capture gig work. Durga Narayan is a policy researcher affiliated with the Indian Institute for Human Settlements (IIHS) and the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), Mumbai.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
Employment push: New job scheme must be supported by structural reforms
The widespread skill mismatch and the low penetration of technical and vocational education have further compounded the problem Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai Listen to This Article The Union Cabinet on Tuesday approved the employment-linked incentive (ELI) scheme, first announced in the 2024-25 Union Budget. The scheme reflects an acknowledgement that India's economic growth must translate into gainful job opportunities. According to the latest monthly bulletin of the Periodic Labour Force Survey, the female labour force participation rate was 33.2 per cent, far below the global average, while the youth unemployment rate (aged 15-29) was 15 per cent, compared with the overall unemployment rate of 5.6 per cent. Besides, most people are engaged in the informal sector, which is low-paying. The ELI scheme, aimed at improving formal
