Taliban investigating death threats against United Nations' Afghan female staff, report says
In its latest update on the human rights situation in Afghanistan, the U.N. mission to the country said that dozens of female national staff were subjected to explicit death threats in May.
The threats come against a backdrop of severe restrictions placed on women since the Taliban seized power in Afghanistan in 2021.
The U.N. report said the threats came from unidentified individuals related to their work with the U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, or UNAMA, other agencies, funds, and programs, 'requiring the U.N. to implement interim measures to protect their safety.'
It said that the Taliban told the U.N. mission that their personnel were not responsible for the threats. An Interior Ministry investigation is underway, the report added.
The Interior Ministry spokesman, Abdul Mateen Qani, said no such threats had been made. 'This is completely incorrect,' Mr. Qani said. 'The ministry has an independent department for this, and we have a strategic plan for protection and security so there is no threat to them in any area, nor can anyone threaten them, nor is there any threat to them,' he said.
Mr. Qani did not answer questions about an investigation.
The Taliban barred Afghan women from working at domestic and foreign non-governmental organisations in December 2022, extending this ban to the U.N. six months later, and then threatening to shut down agencies and groups still employing women. Some women have nonetheless stayed on in key sectors, such as health care and urgent humanitarian assistance, where aid agencies say the needs are great.
Humanitarian agencies say the Taliban have hampered or interfered with their operations, allegations denied by authorities.
The U.N. report is the first official confirmation of death threats against Afghan women working in the sector. The report also highlighted other areas affecting women's personal freedoms and safety.
In Herat, inspectors from the Vice and Virtue Ministry began requiring women to wear a chador, a full-body cloak covering the head. Dozens of women deemed 'not in compliance' were barred from entering markets or using public transportation. Several women were detained until relatives brought them a chador, the report said.
In Uruzgan, women were arrested for wearing a hijab — a headscarf — rather than a burqa covering the entire body and face.
Women have also been denied access to public areas, in line with laws banning them from such spaces. In Ghor province, police forced several families to leave a recreational area. They warned the families against visiting outdoor picnic sites with women.
In Herat, Vice and Virtue inspectors stopped family groups with women and girls from accessing an open recreational area, only allowing all-male groups.
Nobody from the Vice and Virtue Ministry was immediately available to comment on the Ghor, Herat and Uruzgan incidents, which the U.N. said happened in May.
In Kandahar, the Public Health Department instructed female health care workers to be accompanied to work by male guardians with an identification card proving that they were related to the woman by blood or marriage.
It wasn't immediately clear if the card is specific to Kandahar or will be rolled out across Afghanistan.
'The process to apply for a mahram (male guardian) identification card is reportedly cumbersome and can take up to several weeks as it requires the de facto Department for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice and a member of the local community (e.g. malik, imam or village elder) to verify the relationship,' the U.N. report said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
5 hours ago
- News18
Pakistan Suspends Rail Services In Balochistan After Militants Derail Train In IED Blast
Last Updated: Sunday's bombing comes just months after BLA fighters hijacked a train in the same district, killing 21 hostages before security forces intervened Pakistan on Monday suspended all train services to and from the southwestern province of Balochistan for four days after separatist militants blew up a section of railway track, causing a passenger train to derail. The incident took place on Sunday near Spezand Railway Station, around 25 kilometres from Quetta, the provincial capital. According to railway authorities, the Jaffer Express was travelling from Quetta to Peshawar when a bomb exploded under the track, derailing six of its carriages. The train had around 350 passengers on board. No one was injured in the attack. Railways spokesperson Ikram Ullah said engineers are currently working to repair the damaged section of the track. Ullah confirmed that the suspension of services is a precautionary measure to ensure the safety of passengers and staff. The banned Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the bombing. In a statement, the group said it had deliberately targeted the train. The BLA has been involved in numerous attacks in the region and has long demanded independence for Balochistan, accusing the central government of exploiting the province's natural resources. Sunday's bombing comes just months after BLA fighters hijacked a train in the same district, killing 21 hostages before security forces intervened, killing 33 militants. The latest attack has raised fresh concerns over security in the lead-up to Pakistan's 78th Independence Day on 14 August. Meanwhile, in a separate development, authorities imposed curfews in parts of Bajaur district in the country's northwest, near the Afghan border. Local official Shahid Khan said the measure was taken to prepare for a possible security operation against the Pakistani Taliban, also known as Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). The TTP, although separate, maintains close ties with the Afghan Taliban and has recently become active in the region again. Balochistan and Bajaur remain two of the most troubled areas in Pakistan, frequently targeted by insurgents and militants. (With inputs from AP) view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
6 hours ago
- News18
Iran Sends Top Nuclear Scientists Into Hiding As Israel Compiles List Of Future Targets
Last Updated: Iran has hidden its nuclear scientists after a conflict with Israel killed 14 top experts. Israel targeted individuals involved in uranium enrichment. Iran has moved its remaining nuclear scientists into hiding following a 12-day conflict with Israel in June that reportedly claimed lives of at least 14 of Tehran's top atomic experts, according to a report in The Telegraph. More than 15 senior scientists have been relocated from their homes and universities to secure locations in Tehran or along the northern coast, The Telegraph reported, citing a a senior Iranian official. The move comes in response to Israeli airstrikes that targeted individuals allegedly involved in Iran's uranium enrichment efforts, which Israel claims are part of a nuclear weapons programme. Among those killed were prominent figures like Fereidoun Abbasi, former head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, and Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi, head of Islamic Azad University. Universities linked to the scientists were also reportedly struck during the conflict. Israeli intelligence experts have warned that surviving scientists remain in danger. According to the report, Israel has compiled a list of around 100 Iranian scientists considered potential future targets. In response, Iran has replaced academic staff linked to its nuclear programme with individuals who have no known ties to it. The crackdown extends beyond academia. Tehran recently executed nuclear scientist Rouzbeh Vadi on charges of spying for Israel's Mossad spy agency and aiding the attacks. The deadly conflict majorly targeted Iran's senior military leaders, nuclear experts, and critical nuclear facilities, prompting Iran to respond strongly with missile and drone attacks on Israel. The regime has since launched a crackdown on spies, arresting hundreds and expelling over a million Afghan refugees suspected of being Israeli informants. Iran has executed at least eight individuals this year for allegedly spying for Israel. view comments First Published: August 11, 2025, 16:12 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
How Humanitarian Aid Feeds War Machines
Volunteers arrange parcels as trucks loaded with humanitarian aid await entry to the Gaza Strip, Aug. 6. The pictures are heartbreaking: convoys of United Nations-marked trucks inching toward bomb-scarred cities, desperate children clamoring for supplies. These images seem to prove that the international system is, at the very least, trying to help. Yet in every conflict I have studied—Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Ethiopia and Gaza—the same trucks double as cash machines for warlords, militias and authoritarian regimes. Aid diversion is a widespread problem in humanitarian operations. Unless the U.S. and other donors rewrite the rules so that aid can't be separated from accountability, they will keep subsidizing the conflicts they abhor. Somalia shows how thoroughly diversion can be built into routine. Three clan cartels win most World Food Program transport contracts, skim 30% to 50% of the cargo, and then split the spoils with those who transport the food and those who control the displacement camps. Based on U.N. reports and monitors, my coauthor and I estimate in our study that barely one-eighth of donated food reaches intended households. In Syria, former President Bashar al-Assad insisted that all aid be converted at a government-set rate to roughly half the market price, enabling the regime to pocket at least $60 million in 2020 alone, while blocking aid from reaching the opposition by designating it as 'unsafe.' In Ethiopia, U.S. Agency for International Development workers discovered that their implementing partner, the U.N.'s World Food Program, was aware of industrial-scale theft by the Ethiopian military but failed to stop it. Large quantities of wheat were diverted to private mills to make flour for the army. Gaza presents the longest-running case of diverted aid. The U.N. Relief and Works Agency, with a $2.48 billion annual budget in 2024 and 13,000 local staff, effectively provides most public services in Gaza. That frees Hamas to use its resources for tunnels and rockets. In regions under its control, it taxes incoming aid and places loyalists on the payroll. A donor freeze after evidence that Unrwa personnel joined the Oct. 7, 2023, attack lasted only months; services resumed with no vetting reforms because, donors said, 'there is no alternative.' Diversion persists for several reasons. First, the moral considerations are difficult: When officials weigh 'people will die tomorrow' against 'fighters will grow stronger next month,' tomorrow always wins. Second, people give priority to institutional survival: The humanitarian sector employs some 570,000 people and until 2025 spent about $35 billion a year, and agencies that refuse armed groups' terms lose access, budgets and jobs. Third, adversaries are able to adapt: Warlords remain in place while aid workers rotate; they open businesses posing as nongovernmental organizations and bill the U.N. for delivering cargo. Add fear of donor backlash and the result is a continuing lack of accountability. Those who break the rules hold more leverage than those sworn to enforce them. But accountability is still within reach if donors step up and put pressure on humanitarian organizations. When donors finally cut funds because they find the scale of diversions unacceptable, even hard-line actors bend. When Washington paused food aid to Ethiopia in 2023, diversion plunged, and the government grudgingly accepted QR-coded tracking. The U.S., the European Union and Gulf states combined supply more than 70% of global humanitarian budgets. Together, they could enforce five conditions on every grantee: • Require nondiversion benchmarks. All access fees, escorts and local taxes must be disclosed in advance; one missed benchmark triggers a 12-month funding pause. • Integrate security. Grantees may hire donor-vetted guards or accept U.N. peacekeeper escorts; private deals with militias void the grant. • Build in insurance for whistle-blowers. Two percent of every grant pays for external audits and the legal defense of whistle-blowers. • Create sunset clauses. Missions longer than 10 years shut down unless donors unanimously extend them after a public review. • Fund innovation. Create dedicated funding streams for fintech tracking, QR-coded commodities and other tools that make diversion more difficult. None of this requires rewriting international law. It's simply about enabling donors to use the one lever they control: money. Every diverted dollar undermines U.S. counterterrorism goals, fuels migration pressure on Europe, and forces Gulf monarchies to spend twice—first on aid, then on arms. Conditional funding flips those incentives. Regimes that want to look legitimate on the global stage must choose: guns or food, not both. Boosting accountability would also blunt the common critique that Washington preaches good governance while financing bad actors through humanitarian back doors. Critics say pausing aid is immoral, as civilians would starve. This risk is real but not as definite as how it is often presented. Typically, there isn't enough data to infer the effect that a pause will have. The June 2023 Ethiopia pause triggered dire warnings of widespread famine. While some people no doubt suffered, the warnings didn't materialize. Acute food insecurity and child malnutrition went down in 2023 compared with 2022. In Yemen, food-security analyses during the suspension were limited to southern Yemen, where the pause in aid didn't occur. Acute food insecurity did rise in these areas, which were unaffected by the halt but where multiple other forces were at work: currency collapse, wage arrears, siege tactics. Against the immediate risk of human suffering, donors must consider that allowing aid diversion could extend that risk for years. A cross-country analysis of 621 leaders in 123 countries from 1960 to 1999 showed that large, unconditional aid inflows help autocrats survive. World Bank data show that unconditional aid correlates with higher corruption and weaker rule of law. Nothing obligates donors to bankroll the fighters causing the suffering. Setting conditions on aid to prevent diversion aligns humanitarian spending with humanitarian intent. Climate shocks, urban sieges and pricier grain will likely push humanitarian budgets beyond $50 billion within a decade. Without reform, much of that money will feed armies before children. Worse, each scandal makes future interventions politically toxic, putting civilians in real need at risk of not receiving help. The choice is stark: tighten the taps now or watch the well run dry. Ms. Barak-Corren is a law professor and the Haim H. Cohn Chair in Human Rights at Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
