Australia probes $1 billion Nauru-China business deal
Nauru last week announced it had signed a US$650 million (A$1.02 billion) economic development agreement with the China Rural Revitilisation and Development Corporation.
Australian Minister for Pacific Island Affairs Pat Conroy said officials were looking into whether that deal complied with a recent security pact between Canberra and Nauru.
'(Australia) is engaging with the government of Nauru about whether it activates parts of our treaty,' Conroy told reporters.
'That is a really important treaty for us — that helps position us as a security partner of choice with Nauru.'
Australia and Nauru announced a landmark security treaty in December last year, advancing Canberra's aim of blunting China's growing regional influence.
Under the deal, Nauru must seek Australia's agreement before it signs any bilateral accords on maritime security, defence and policing.
Nauru also agreed to consult Australia if other parties look to strike agreements granting them access to critical infrastructure such as ports and airfields or its banking sector.
In return, Nauru receives tens of millions of dollars to prop up its government budget and bolster its stretched police force.
Nauru last year surprised many Pacific watchers when it abruptly severed diplomatic links with Taiwan in favour of Beijing.
Nauru's Foreign Affairs Minister Lionel Aingimea travelled to Beijing to sign the business deal last week.
The China Rural Revitilisation and Development Corporation agreed to invest in key sectors such as agriculture and fisheries, according to a Nauru government release.
Nauru, population 12,500, is one of the world's smallest countries with a mainland measuring just 20 square kilometres (7.7 square miles).
It is considered especially vulnerable to climate change.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
12 minutes ago
- ABC News
Federal Court judges question logic of Bruce Lehrmann's legal argument in appeal against defamation ruling
Bruce Lehrmann's bid to overturn a finding that he raped his former colleague Brittany Higgins has not started smoothly, with Federal Court judges questioning the logic of his grounds of appeal. The former Liberal staffer's defamation claim against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson failed, after Justice Michael Lee found last year, on the balance of probabilities, Mr Lehrmann had raped Ms Higgins at Parliament House in Canberra in 2019. Follow our live blog for the latest updates from the courtroom. Mr Lehrmann has now returned to the Federal Court to seek to overturn that finding, represented by his solicitor, Zali Burrows. Mr Lehrmann is being represented solely by Ms Burrows, because the court heard he was unable to afford his preferred barrister, Sydney silk Guy Reynolds. "Mr Lehrmann couldn't afford Mr Reynolds, which we really wanted, so we apologise in advance," Ms Burrows told the court. Ms Burrows conceded she was "not as prepared" as the opposing council but said "I'm just going to try and do the best I can". This morning, in spelling out the first of four grounds of appeal, Ms Burrows said Mr Lehrmann was denied procedural fairness. "The primary judge found that the rape occurred in a particular way that wasn't put to Mr Lehrmann in defence," she told the court. "He was taken by surprise as to the nature of the rape … it was pleaded as a violent rape, when His Honour [Justice Lee] found it was a non-violent rape." In response, Justice Craig Colvin, one of three judges presiding over the appeal, said, "I'm not sure that that's a concept that I understand". Justice Wigney also weighed in, pointing out that Mr Lehrmann had consistently maintained his innocence and that no sexual intercourse took place. He said it would not have made sense for Mr Lehrmann to have faced questions about the nature of an act he was denying. "He would have maintained that there was no violence, because there was no sexual intercourse," Justice Wigney said. "How could he have been questioned about the particulars?" Justice Colvin voiced his confusion. Mr Lehrmann's appeal raises questions about how the court considered the meaning of rape to the ordinary, reasonable person. Ms Burrows relied on her written submissions, which urged the court to discern a difference between the seriousness of a rape that is violent with one that is non-violent. In responding, Network Ten's lawyer Dr Matthew Collins said that argument was "obviously rooted in historical misconceptions", and that there was no coherent basis for distinguishing between the rape of a woman who is "cognitively impaired" and unable to resist, and one who is conscious. He said either scenario was a "horrid violation of bodily autonomy" and that effectively "all rape is violent". Another ground of appeal is that Mr Lehrmann was entitled to more damages than the $20,000 Justice Lee had flagged, if he had been successful in the original case. Ms Burrows said her client had "pretty much become the national joke", arguing the level of damages was insufficient. "As I've previously submitted to the court, he's probably Australia's most hated man," she said. Dr Collins disputed Ms Burrows's claims that the manner of the rape was erroneously linked to the damages Mr Lehrmann should have received, if he had won. He argued, whether or not Ms Higgins verbally refused consent, Mr Lehrmann still raped a woman he knew was "seriously intoxicated" and left her alone in the office of a federal minister. Although Ms Higgins did not name her alleged rapist in the interview with The Project, Mr Lehrmann said he was identifiable, and therefore defamed. A criminal trial over the allegation collapsed in 2022 because of juror misconduct and the charge against Mr Lehrmann was later dropped.
SBS Australia
12 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Australia to hold national roundtable to boost productivity
According to the Reserve Bank, productivity refers to the amount of output produced using limited resources or input. The roundtable is being held because Australia's productivity growth has been low in recent decades. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said that now is the right time to discuss the issue and explore ways to improve the country's productivity. LISTEN TO SBS Filipino 07:35 Filipino 📢 Where to Catch SBS Filipino
ABC News
12 minutes ago
- ABC News
ANU rules out further forced redundancies
The Australian National University (ANU) says future savings in its ongoing restructure will not involve forced job cuts. But forced redundancies will still happen in areas where the university has already announced a savings plan. This includes the College of Arts and Social Sciences and the School of Music. The university says it will save $60 million through salary reductions, with $40 million to go. It is part of a broader target of saving $250 million. ANU vice-chancellor Genevieve Bell says future announcements will not feature forced job losses. "We have used the tools that were most appropriate for the circumstances we were in," she said. ACT Secretary of the National Tertiary Education Union Dr Lachlan Clohesy has described the university's announcement that it will stop forced job cuts as "vindication". "Today's announcement isn't just business as usual. It's clearly come about because of the campaigning…of ANU staff, students and the broader community." He says while stopping forced redundancies is welcome, he's concerned about possible future cuts. "ANU said no forced redundancies as part of 'Renew A-N-U'…but that's potentially ambiguous — we're calling on the Vice Chancellor to rule out forced redundancies in 20-26 in total."
