logo
With death clock gone, Khamenei's prophecy lies shattered

With death clock gone, Khamenei's prophecy lies shattered

Time of India23-06-2025
Israel conducted on Monday a high-profile airstrike on Tehran, targeting not only military and intelligence assets but also one of the most potent ideological symbols of the Islamic Republic -- the
digital countdown clock
in Palestine Square. Installed in 2017, the clock was based on Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's ominous 2015 prophecy that Israel 'will not exist in 25 years.' Its destruction carries enormous symbolic weight, not only erasing a defiant message embedded in Tehran's skyline but also underlining Israel's growing assertiveness amid escalating confrontation.
The origin and ideology behind the doomsday clock
The digital clock, unveiled during Quds Day in June 2017, was more than a timekeeping device. It was propaganda incarnate, counting down the days to Israel's predicted demise in 2040. Displaying its message in Persian, Arabic and English, the clock tower loomed over Palestine Square, a location already soaked in political symbolism. Its placement and message were calculated to consolidate
Iran
's self-image as the epicenter of the anti-Israel activities.
For Iran's hardliners, the clock functioned as a perpetual reminder of their ideological mission -- the eventual eradication of Israel. It was also designed to project ideological resolve to domestic and foreign audiences alike. To supporters, it was a declaration of strategic patience and religious destiny. To Israel, it was a provocation, an unwavering threat that one day Iran's ambitions would be realized.
Read More
|
Israel is not yet willing to touch Iran's most sensitive nerve
In July 2021, widespread blackouts across Iran briefly halted the countdown. Though the disruption was due to electricity shortages caused by drought, heatwaves, and crumbling infrastructure, the symbolic impact was immediate. Iranian critics mocked the state's inability to keep its ideological machinery running, while international observers noted the irony that a regime proclaiming the fall of Israel couldn't keep a propaganda clock running. This moment offered a rare window into Iran's fragility. Even as the regime pushed grand ideological visions, it struggled with basic services, facing economic strain from sanctions and internal mismanagement. The clock's failure, however brief, diminished its aura of invincibility and suggested a gap between Tehran's ambitions and its capabilities.
Live Events
Read More
|
Fordow underground enrichment site attacked again, says Iranian media, a day after US strikes
An ominous symbol is gone but the threat remains
Today's Israeli airstrike marks a critical turning point, not just in military escalation, but in the symbolic war between the two nations. Alongside hits on the notorious Evin Prison and IRGC headquarters, Israel deliberately targeted the countdown clock in Palestine Square. This act was not accidental. It was a surgical erasure of a regime's ideological fixture, timed precisely to deliver maximum symbolic impact.
The destruction of the clock represented a reversal of narratives. For years, Iran had used the clock as a visual countdown toward Israel's destruction. By physically erasing it, Israel flipped the script, demonstrating that it no longer accepted Iran's psychological warfare and that it possessed both the will and the precision to eliminate even the most guarded symbols of ideological aggression.
The clock's destruction coincides with a series of crippling blows to Iran's nuclear ambitions and strategic infrastructure. American B-2 bombers have destroyed Iran's key nuclear site, Fordow, using bunker-buster bombs, which amounts to the de-nuclearisation of Iran. The development marks a significant rollback of Iranian power. For the first time in years, Israel appears to be dictating the tempo of conflict, not reacting to Iran's moves, but preemptively shaping the battlefield. The destruction of ideological symbols like the countdown clock underlines this momentum.
However, it would be premature to declare Israel free of existential threat. Iran still retains a vast missile arsenal and asymmetric tools such as drones, cyber capabilities and maritime threats in the Strait of Hormuz. Even a weakened Iran can inflict significant damage through its regional proxies or unconventional attacks. Ideologically, while the clock is gone, the doctrine behind it remains embedded in the regime's DNA.
Perhaps the most important shift lies in the realm of psychological warfare. The countdown clock's presence gave Iran a persistent advantage in setting the ideological narrative. Its disappearance, bombed into oblivion by an Israeli strike, reverses that advantage. It suggests that Tehran's grand timelines and theological certainties are no longer sacred or untouchable.
Symbolically, this act represents Israel's defiance not just of physical threats, but of the very idea that its destruction is inevitable. It delivers a message to the Iranian regime and its allies that history will not unfold on their terms. By destroying the clock, Israel has shattered Khamenei's prophecy, not only for the people of Tehran, but for a global audience witnessing the symbolic end of the 2040 vision. Bombing of the countdown clock is the culmination of a sustained campaign by Israel and the US to neutralize both the physical and ideological engines of Iran's aggression. While military threats remain and Iran's ambitions are far from extinguished, the destruction of the clock marks a powerful shift in psychological momentum.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China's Foreign Minister 'heartened' by stability in borders, says Beijing attaches 'great importance' to PM Modi's visit
China's Foreign Minister 'heartened' by stability in borders, says Beijing attaches 'great importance' to PM Modi's visit

Hans India

time2 hours ago

  • Hans India

China's Foreign Minister 'heartened' by stability in borders, says Beijing attaches 'great importance' to PM Modi's visit

New Delhi: Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Tuesday said he is "heartened" to see the stabilisation of India-China ties and peace along the borders, stressing that Beijing attaches "great importance" to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's upcoming visit to China for the SCO Summit. Speaking at Hyderabad House in New Delhi during the latest round of Special Representatives (SR) dialogue on the boundary question with NSA Ajit Doval, Wang Yi said the setbacks in India-China ties in recent years were "not in the interest of the people of both countries". "I am very pleased to meet you again in New Delhi for this round of talks between the special representatives of China and India on the boundary question. The setbacks we experienced in the past few years were not in the interests of the people of our two countries. And then in October last year, President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Modi had an important meeting in Kazan. That meeting pointed the direction for the development of our bilateral relations and provided impetus for the proper settlement of the boundary question," Wang Yi said in his opening remarks, delivered in Mandarin and translated into English. Recalling the last round of SR-level talks, Wang Yi said China was encouraged by the progress. "We had a very good 23rd round at the end of last year. We reached a new and important consensus on managing disagreements, stabilising the borders, and moving toward a settlement. We are heartened to see the stability that is now restored," he noted. Appreciating NSA Doval's role as India's Special Representative, the Chinese Foreign Minister said the relationship now faces "an important opportunity of improvement and growth". He also emphasised that PM Modi's visit next month would contribute to the success of the SCO Summit in Tianjin. "The Chinese side attaches great importance to the Prime Minister's visit to China to attend the SCO summit at our invitation. We believe that the Indian side will also make a contribution to a successful summit in Tianjin. History and reality prove once again that a healthy and stable China-India relationship serves the fundamental and long-term interests of both of our countries. It is also what developing countries all want to see," Wang Yi said. Calling for stronger bilateral engagement, the Chinese Foreign Minister urged both sides to "follow the strategic guidance of our leaders, increase mutual trust through communication, expand common interests through cooperation, and properly settle border issues." He added that China is ready to work with India to "build more consensus and identify the direction, the specific goals of the next round of boundary consultations going forward, and create more conditions for the improvement and further growth of our bilateral relations."

India ‘denies change' in position on Taiwan after Jaishankar-Wang Yi meet
India ‘denies change' in position on Taiwan after Jaishankar-Wang Yi meet

The Print

time3 hours ago

  • The Print

India ‘denies change' in position on Taiwan after Jaishankar-Wang Yi meet

'There is no change in our position on Taiwan. We stressed that like the rest of the world, India has a relationship with Taiwan that focuses on economic, technology and cultural ties. We intend to continue it,' a government source told ThePrint. The Chinese readout Monday of the two foreign ministers' meeting ascribed the following quote, that has been translated into English, to Jaishankar: 'The relationship between India and China remains stable, cooperative and forward-looking, which is in line with the interests of both countries. Taiwan is a part of China.' New Delhi: The Indian government has denied any change in its position with regards to Taiwan, after the Chinese readout of the meeting between S. Jaishankar and Wang Yi, mentioned that the Indian external affairs minister described the island country as a part of China. Though India has acknowledged the 'One-China Policy' in the past, which asserts that Taiwan is a part of China, it has maintained, in recent years, economic linkages with the self-governing territory that has remained outside the ambit of Beijing since the end of the Chinese civil war in 1949. Last year, Taiwan President Lai-Ching te had congratulated Prime Minister Narendra Modi on his electoral victory after the general elections. Modi had responded to the greetings, while adding that New Delhi hopes for closer ties with Taiwan, which led to a strong protest from Beijing. At the time in June 2024, Mao Ning, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, rejected Lai Ching-te's position as the 'President' of Taiwan, and further urged New Delhi to resist Taipei's 'political calculations.' India was one of the first countries to recognise the foundation of the People's Republic of China (PRC) led by the Communist Party on 30 December, 1949, ahead of other countries including the UK and the US. Chinese President Xi Jinping has indicated that the reunification of Taiwan with China is one of the key priorities of his government. In recent years the People's Liberation Army (PLA) has increased its activities surrounding Taiwan, including conducting war games. Only 12 countries in the world maintain ties with Taiwan. The US does not officially recognise Taiwan, but maintains a policy of 'strategic ambiguity' by declaring that it is against any 'forceful' change in the status quo. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is in India for a three-day visit that began Monday. He met with Jaishankar Monday evening and will meet National Security Adviser Ajit Doval Tuesday morning for the twenty-fourth meeting of the Special Representative mechanism. Wang is also expected to call on PM Modi later Tuesday evening before departing Wednesday morning. Jaishankar, at the meeting with Wang, had highlighted that the two countries faced a 'difficult period' and now seek to move forward with ties. Modi is expected to visit China at the end of the month for the Heads of States Summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) in the city of Tianjin. Wang assured Jaishankar that China will take steps to address the exports of fertilisers, tunnel boring machines and rare earth elements to India that have come under strain over the last year. This was a part of the concerns raised by the Indian external affairs minister during the meeting. The thaw in ties between New Delhi and Beijing comes at a time when ties between India and the US have hit a rough patch. US President Donald Trump has targeted India for its continued purchase of Russian oil, imposing tariffs of up to 50 percent on Indian goods. Ties between India and China have seen an uptick in engagement at different levels of government in the last ten months. Diplomatic relations cratered following the military clashes in Galwan during the summer months of 2020. However, on 21 October 2024, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri announced that India and China had reached an agreement for the disengagement at the friction points across the Line of Actual Control (LAC). This agreement paved the way for a meeting between Modi and Xi on 23 October 2024 on the margins of the BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia. Since then both New Delhi and Beijing have introduced confidence building measures including the resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar yatra and the issuance of tourist visas to Chinese citizens. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: India in talks with China for resumption of trade via 3 border passes ahead of Modi's SCO visit

War or peace? For oil markets, the Ukraine outcome is insignificant
War or peace? For oil markets, the Ukraine outcome is insignificant

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

War or peace? For oil markets, the Ukraine outcome is insignificant

U.S. President Donald Trump 's high-stakes diplomacy to resolve the war in Ukraine is unlikely to jolt oil and gas markets, no matter the outcome. Russia has faced multiple rounds of western sanctions and restrictions since its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, which have dealt severe blows to the country's giant oil and gas industry, sapping Moscow of vital revenue and reshaping global energy markets. Russian gas now accounts for just 18% of European imports, down from 45% in 2021, while the bloc's oil imports from Russia have fallen to 3% from around 30% over that time. The European Union plans to fully phase out Russian energy by 2027. Meanwhile, India has increased its share of Russian crude to 38% of total imports from 16% in 2021, according to Kpler. China and Turkey have also notably ramped up their Russian oil purchases. The war in Ukraine has left over a million dead or wounded, so its conclusion would be welcomed by many. Energy markets, however, are not apt to register much of a reaction unless there is a full ceasefire along with the lifting of all U.S. and European sanctions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo And that is long shot. Given the more probable set of scenarios, oil and gas markets are unlikely to be rattled by the fallout from either last Friday's disappointing summit between Trump and Russian President Valdimir Putin or the U.S. president's meeting with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders on Monday. UNLIKELY PEACE Full peace in Ukraine remains highly improbable. Trump's apparent support for a comprehensive settlement, rather than a ceasefire, has widened the gap between America, Ukraine and Europe. At the same time, his suggestion of U.S. post-settlement security guarantees for Ukraine is likely to face resistance from Moscow. Live Events In other words, don't bet on a full normalization of relations between Russia and the West any time soon. Trump might pressure Zelenskiy into accepting a temporary or partial halt in fighting. But even then, Europe is unlikely to resume Russian energy imports while Putin remains in power. Before 2022, Europe accounted for nearly half of Russia's 4.7 million barrels per day of oil exports and 75% of its gas exports, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The Trump administration could attempt to ease some sanctions unilaterally, but this could face opposition in Congress, including from Republicans, unless a broad peace deal is reached. BREAKDOWN Perhaps the more likely scenario - Trump failing to broker a deal - also shouldn't have a major impact on energy markets. The U.S. could tighten sanctions, particularly by targeting buyers of Russian energy, as Trump has already threatened. But the U.S. president said on Friday that he would delay so-called "secondary sanctions" on China due to what he described as "successful" talks with Putin. Of course, India already faces secondary tariffs over its Russian oil purchases. Earlier this month, Trump announced a 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing the country's continued oil imports from Russia. The new tariff, effective August 27, will bring total tariffs on Indian imports to 50%. But even though Indian buyers already appear to be reducing their Russian oil purchases, the impact on global supplies has been minimal as China has increased its intake of Russian crude. Ultimately, China matters far more in this story, and it's unlikely to significantly curb its Russian oil imports, not least because it considers its relationship with Moscow to be strategic. Chinese and Russian oil producers, refiners and traders have already built a sprawling network of tankers and insurers to circumvent Western sanctions on Venezuela, Iran, and Russia. Additionally, U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods already average 55%, according to the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Additional tariffs could raise costs for U.S. consumers, and Beijing could retaliate, potentially by withholding rare earths or other critical minerals, all outcomes Trump would want to avoid - and Beijing knows this. In short, Trump appears to have little stomach for the potential consequences, and even if he were to tighten sanctions, this likely wouldn't materially affect China's ability to import oil. CUSHIONED MARKETS Crucially, oil and gas markets appear to be entering a period of oversupply, meaning any possible disruption in Russian volumes can easily be offset. The IEA expects oil supply to exceed demand by 1.76 million barrels per day in 2025 and by 3 million bpd in 2026, driven by rising output from OPEC+ and the Americas. Global liquefied natural gas (LNG) markets are also expanding rapidly, with new supply coming online in the coming years across the U.S., Qatar, Canada, and elsewhere. LNG capacity is projected to grow from 500 million tons per year in 2024 to 800 mtpa by 2030, according to the International Energy Agency. While Trump's foreign policy remains unpredictable, a few things seem clear. He can't, as he once claimed, end the Ukraine war in one day, and what he can do is unlikely to have much of an impact on oil and gas markets. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. The author is a columnist for Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store