Iran and Europeans hold 'frank' nuclear talks with UN sanctions looming
Before the meeting in Istanbul, Iran also pushed back on suggestions of extending the United Nations resolution that ratifies a 2015 deal, nearing expiry, that was designed to curb its nuclear programme.
Delegations from the European Union and so-called E3 group of France, Britain and Germany met Iranian counterparts for about four hours at Iran's consulate for talks that the U.N. nuclear watchdog said could provide an opening to resume inspections in Iran.
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said afterward that both sides had presented specific ideas on sanctions relief and the nuclear issue.
"While seriously criticising their stances regarding the recent war of aggression against our people, we explained our principled positions, including on the so-called snapback mechanism," he said.
"It was agreed that consultations on this matter will continue."
The European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to the 2015 deal - from which the U.S. withdrew in 2018 - which lifted sanctions on Iran in return for restrictions on its nuclear programme.
A deadline of Oct. 18 is fast approaching when the resolution governing that deal expires.
At that point, all U.N. sanctions on Iran will be lifted unless the "snapback" mechanism is triggered at least 30 days before. This would automatically reimpose those sanctions, which target sectors from hydrocarbons to banking and defence.
To give time for this to happen, the E3 have set a deadline of the end of August to revive diplomacy. Diplomats say they want Iran to take concrete steps to convince them to extend the deadline by up to six months.
Iran would need to make commitments on key issues including eventual talks with Washington, full cooperation with the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and accounting for 400 kg (880 pounds) of near-weapons-grade highly enriched uranium, whose whereabouts are unknown since last month's strikes.
Before the talks, an Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson had said Tehran considered talk of extending U.N. Security Council Resolution 2231 to be "meaningless and baseless".
IAEA head Rafael Grossi said he was optimistic that nuclear inspection visits might be able to restart this year and that it was important to discuss the technical details now.
"We need to agree on where to go, how to do it. We need to listen to Iran in terms of what they consider should be the precautions to be taken," he told reporters in Singapore.
The United States held five rounds of talks with Iran prior to its airstrikes in June, which U.S. President Donald Trump said had "obliterated" a programme that Washington and its ally Israel say is aimed at acquiring a nuclear bomb.
However, NBC News has cited current and former U.S. officials as saying a subsequent U.S. assessment found that while the strikes destroyed most of one of three targeted nuclear sites, the other two were not as badly damaged.
Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon and says its nuclear programme is meant solely for civilian purposes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
What could happen if Trump, Putin and Zelensky meet?
The stakes are high for Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and Volodymyr Zelensky ahead of a planned summit next week – but they don't all have the same amount to lose, an expert has warned. All three men could be about to meet in the same room for the first time, in an effort to finally bring to an end years of bloodshed in Ukraine. If that long-awaited moment does arrive, one of the leaders will come to the table at a significant disadvantage, according to British Foreign Policy Group think tank director Evie Aspinall. News of the planned meeting emerged out of the blue yesterday, following a meeting between Trump and European leaders. The US President revealed his plans to sit down with Putin next week ahead of a trilateral where they would be joined by Zelensky. A Kremlin spokesperson later confirmed the initial meeting would indeed take place at a so-far-undisclosed location, though a question mark hovers over the latter event. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Aspinall said Trump is 'feeling relatively confident about the situation' after weeks of trumpeting his role in stopping conflicts between Israel and Iran, India and Pakistan, and several other regions around the world. She told Metro: 'I think in his mind, he's managed to bring Putin to the table, and he's going to use it as an opportunity to really cement himself as this deal maker and as someone that is able to secure peace in the world. 'And so what he wants, really, is a ceasefire. He wants an end to the war in Ukraine. His intent is fairly straightforward. He wants to see the war end, and he wants to be seen as the man that makes that possible.' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ultimately, the summit is 'as much as anything, an image thing' for Trump, she argued, as it would also mean disentangling the US from a global conflict. Putin, meanwhile, is 'making huge progress militarily' in Ukraine and is able to use the meeting to secure two big objectives – demonstrating to Trump he is 'reasonable' enough to negotiate, and buying time on the battlefield. Aspinall said: 'Putin will be building up his resources so that he is in the best position possible for when a ceasefire or full negotiation then happens. 'He wants to use this as an opportunity to show that he's on Trump's side.' The US President may have appeared to sharpen his stance against his Russian counterpart in recent weeks, notably hitting India with punitive tariffs for buying Russia's oil. But Aspinall explained it's likely a shrewd move from Putin to sit down for talks at this point in time. She said: 'I think Putin is playing quite well for the Russians. By coming to negotiating table, he's managed to get Trump to wait, step back from the threats of sanctions for now. 'What he'll be hoping is that he presents himself as reasonable in these meetings, and then Trump doesn't go on with the sanctions that are supposed to hit imminently.' For Zelensky, the summit will be much more of a high-wire act with far more risky results. Aspinall said: 'I think there is possible progress. The problem with the progress is it will be on Putin's terms, rather than Zelensky's terms. 'I think there is a world in which you see Trump and Putin come out saying, 'This is a deal that would work,' and then you have Europe and Ukraine pushing back very heavily on that, and a negotiation over that deal.' The Ukrainian President's best bet might be to challenge Putin's position as the 'reasonable actor' in the negotiations by pressing hard on the Russian leader's red lines – such as agreeing to Ukraine joining Nato. This could 'push Putin into a corner', suggested Aspinall, which might be Zelensky's best chance at leverage. More Trending But she was clear Ukraine has more to lose in a likely deal. Russia could be flexible on territory swaps, and offer them in exchange for Putin's bigger prizes: blocking Ukrainian Nato membership, shrinking the size of its military, and forcing elections that would 'inevitably be biased by Russian disinformation'. Aspinall said: 'the Territory part is the part that they will probably be softer on, as a way for Trump to come out and say, we're not giving Putin everything. We've got the territory back, for example. 'But Putin can sell it as you know, we no longer have an aggressor on our doorstep. We have a supporter and ally of Russia on our doorstep.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Tourists 'blinded and poisoned' after drinking fake alcohol at Putin's favourite resort MORE: South Park's latest savage Donald Trump takedown sparks bizarre reaction from White House MORE: Trump's $15,000 travel deposit makes America 'the land of the fee'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Ralph Lauren lifts revenue view, warning on margin pressure weighs on shares
Aug 7 (Reuters) - Ralph Lauren (RL.N), opens new tab raised its annual revenue forecast on Thursday on higher demand for its Polo shirts and cable-knit sweaters in North America, but said tariff pressure on its margins will ramp up in the back half of the year. CEO Patrice Louvet said the company remains cautious about the global operating environment in the back half. Shares of the company were down 6%. "We need to really see how consumers respond to the start of the fall holiday season in what will be an uncertain and potentially inflationary environment," he said. Ralph Lauren, which sells its popular Polo Bear sweater for up to $398 on its website, has relied on its loyal, high-income customers to fuel sales and profit growth. The company's strategy to ramp up marketing spend and product innovation, as well as reduce promotions have helped it gain market share in its core categories such as knitwear and handbags. "Our high potential categories, including women's apparel, outerwear and handbags, continue to be accelerators for our business," Louvet said. He said highlights include the Cable-Knit jersey and Polo Bear sweaters, linen shirts, dresses, the Cotton Canvas city jacket, and a handbag collection launched earlier this spring called "Polo Play." The company's strong quarter underlines consumer preference for accessible luxury brands, similar to Tapestry (TPR.N), opens new tab, which has seen solid demand for its Coach handbags. Tapestry will report quarterly earnings next week. Ralph Lauren's upbeat forecast, however, is in contrast to bigger European rivals such as Gucci-owner Kering ( opens new tab and Dior-parent LVMH ( opens new tab, which have seen a sales slowdown. The company expects fiscal 2026 revenue to rise low- to mid-single digits from last year, compared with its prior target of a low-single digits increase. Operating margin is forecast to expand roughly 40-60 basis points after adjusting for currency fluctuations, up from its prior forecast of a modest growth. Its net revenue in the first quarter came in at $1.72 billion, exceeding expectations of $1.66 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. On an adjusted basis, it earned $3.77 per share, above estimates of $3.50, aided by a 14% jump in average unit retail in its direct-to-consumer channel.
BreakingNews.ie
5 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
No evidence of price gouging in supermarkets
The consumer watchdog has said there is no evidence of price gouging in the grocery sector. The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission said it conducted fresh analysis of food prices due to widespread commentary on the cost of living. Advertisement However, it found the price increases are generally below the European average, and it sees no evidence for an in-depth study of the grocery sector. 'Food price increases have generally remained below the European average, which coincides with increasing competition in Ireland,' it said. "The data available on profit margins does not indicate that margins are notably high when compared to international comparators." Social Democrats TD Jennifer Whitmore said the report is worrying. Advertisement Ireland 'Significant' rise in use of prescription pain med... Read More Ms Whitmore told Newstalk: "If you go to anyone who is going to the supermarket or buying anything at the moment, they know how expensive things are and how difficult it is to keep the household budget. "There is clearly a problem here. The fact that the consumer commission hasn't been able to identify exactly what that problem is, or indeed make any recommendations in order to address it, I think that is concerning." 'Not all of the large supermarket chains publish their Irish profits,' she added. 'It is wholly unsatisfactory for the consumer regulator to be denied information that is necessary for it to do its job — and it is outrageous that the Government has not acted to force large supermarket chains to publish their profits.'
