logo
The Pebble E-Paper Smartwatch Is Back. Just Don't Call It Pebble

The Pebble E-Paper Smartwatch Is Back. Just Don't Call It Pebble

WIRED18-03-2025
Mar 18, 2025 12:00 PM Pebble's founder is back with a company called Core Devices and two familiar smartwatches—Core 2 Duo and Core Time 2—but this time he's only making roughly 10,000 units of each. Photograph: Core; Getty Images
If you buy something using links in our stories, we may earn a commission. This helps support our journalism. Learn more. Please also consider subscribing to WIRED
Nearly a decade after its demise, smartwatch maker Pebble is back—sort of. Today, the company's founder, Eric Migicovsky, has unveiled new hardware running open source PebbleOS. However, since Google owns the Pebble trademark, these are not Pebble smartwatches. Instead, say hello to the first watches from a new brand called Core Devices: Core 2 Duo and Core Time 2.
For a brief history lesson, Pebble skyrocketed to fame in 2012 through a wildly successful Kickstarter campaign. The company's smartwatches had e-paper displays and arrived ahead of the first Apple Watch, offering wearers the ability to see notifications, create custom watch faces, and even access an app store—all with battery life that lasted a week despite an always-on screen.
But the company scaled too quickly and then didn't meet its sales targets, eventually deciding to sell to Fitbit. A few years later, Google bought Fitbit, which meant it owned Pebble's assets.
The original Pebble smartwatches didn't die off—Fitbit kept the lights on for some time, and thanks to Pebble's cult-like fanbase, a coalition of developers and enthusiasts helped launch the Rebble project to replace Pebble's web services when Fitbit eventually shut everything down, so that core functions of the watches kept working.
But what's enabled Migicovsky to introduce new hardware running PebbleOS is Google's decision to release the source code in January. 'I asked politely if they would open source the operating system, and they very graciously did,' Migicovsky tells WIRED. 'We wouldn't be able to do what we're doing now if Google hadn't done that, so we're super appreciative.' New Leaf
That brings us to Migicovsky's new brand—Core Devices—a nod to the Pebble Core, the screen-less wearable that never shipped. This is a very small operation that consists of Migicovsky, another full-time employee, and a few contractors—he says he's taking things a bit more cautiously this time around. That's why there will only be roughly 10,000 units available for the Core 2 Duo and a little more of the Core Time 2—preorders are live today if you want to reserve one.
'I'm intentionally trying to build something that's sustainable, rather than a fast-growing do-or-die company," Migicovsky says. "We're taking small risks, we're doing a couple of products, one at a time—and cautiously, carefully building this company to be sustainable. If we can do our jobs, build these watches and make people happy, we'll build more. There's always more time."
Core 2 Duo Photograph: Core
The first to arrive this July is the Core 2 Duo, which shares many characteristics with the Pebble 2 from 2016. This $149 wearable has a 1.26-inch monochrome e-paper display embedded into a polycarbonate frame that comes in black or white. Like the original, it has a microphone, is IPX8 water resistant, and features step and sleep tracking.
So what's new? Battery life has been beefed up significantly from 7 days to 30. There's a newer Bluetooth chip inside, a barometer and compass, a quieter and stronger motor for better vibration alerts, and more reliable buttons (the old buttons had a history of degrading over time). Migicovsky says the new pushers should offer up to a 30 percent longer lifetime in testing.
Core Time 2 Photograph: Core
Next is the Core Time 2, which resembles the Pebble Time 2 that never shipped. It has a few enhancements over the Duo, such as a larger 1.5-inch 64-color e-paper screen, an aluminum frame and buttons, and a heart-rate monitor. It also has a touchscreen. While the operating system is not built for touch interactions, this capability will initially let you hop into apps by tapping on a 'complication' on the watch's face. Over time, the touchscreen interactions will expand. These upgrades mean a higher $225 price, and it won't ship until December. Classic Pebble
Like the Pebbles of old, Core's smartwatches buzz when notifications arrive, have customizable watch faces, show the time on an always-on display, can control music playback via physical buttons, and offer rudimentary health tracking. They can access more than 10,000 PebbleOS apps and watch faces published through the Rebble Foundation.
Some apps may try to access web services that aren't available, and watch faces for the Core Time 2 will have a border until developers update them to take advantage of the larger display. Migicovsky says there will be a companion app for Android and iOS, and an updated software development kit for developers who want to create new apps.
Core Time 2 (left) and Core 2 Duo (right) Photograph: Core
One new app Migicovsky is toying with is a ChatGPT app that lets you push one of the buttons to activate the AI assistant. The new built-in speaker will let you hear answers without having to pull out your connected smartphone, which powers the whole experience.
Even with capabilities like this, these watches are not designed to have all the features you might find on an Apple Watch. 'This is not for everyone," Migicovsky says. "Most people like the Apple Watch. Most people are happy with the Apple Watch. This is for the people who aren't. This is for the people who don't feel like they're well served by the status quo.'
Furthering this view that the Cores are not for everyone, in Migicovsky's blog post announcing the two watches, there's a section that nudges people to avoid Core's latest if they want a fitness watch, a full-featured smartwatch, or even a device that is super polished. Migicovsky says some features may not be ready at launch, there could be delays, and the whole project could also not last as long as expected.
'We're not predicating our entire lives on the success of this,' Migicovsky says. "We'll move on and build other products if people don't want these." Perhaps this more measured approach will mean Migicovsky's latest won't befall the same fate as Pebble, or perhaps not—early-adopting consumers will again have to run the risk of buying in to a product that could die before its time.
Migicovsky is at least trying to mitigate this risk, though, as you can preorder the Core 2 Duo and Core Time 2 now to secure your unit—but if you get cold feet and change your mind, you can get a full refund if you cancel before your watch ships.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

iOS 26 Image Playground vs Android 16 Pixel Studio: I found the best AI image generator, and it's not even close
iOS 26 Image Playground vs Android 16 Pixel Studio: I found the best AI image generator, and it's not even close

Tom's Guide

time28 minutes ago

  • Tom's Guide

iOS 26 Image Playground vs Android 16 Pixel Studio: I found the best AI image generator, and it's not even close

Late last fall, I put Apple's just released Image Playground with iOS 18.2 to the test against Pixel Studio to see which AI image generator was better. Let's just say that it was a one-sided win for Google that proved its AI-assisted image generator on its Pixel 9 phones is way better, both in how they look and their accuracy. With the iOS 26 beta, I've been testing out the updated version of Image Playground to see all the new changes — but more importantly — if the upgrades are enough to make it better than Pixel Studio. Using an iPhone 16 Pro Max and Pixel 9 Pro XL for this test, running iOS 26 and Android 16 respectively, I provided both image generators with the same prompts as before to see what they produce this time around. In this iOS 26 Image Playground vs. Android 16 Pixel Studio face-off, I'll be grading them in each of the categories below to make it clear which one is better. Here are the results. For this first test, I gave both image generators the following prompt: a cat wearing a crown, sitting on a throne made of yarn. In iOS 26, there are a total of four style options to choose from when — so I ended up choosing Sketch because it's also one of the options available with Pixel Studio. I have to say, Apple definitely delivers a much better result this time because there's more detail and realism to the image it generated. Everything I gave in the prompt is generated accurately, including the throne made out of yarn, which it didn't do at all with my previous testing. I'm also drawn to the cat's face, which has way more detail as well. Meanwhile, Pixel Studio continues to accurately produce my descriptions. I would even argue that there's a smidge more detail with the cat overall and how it really makes it so that the throne is completely made up out of yarn. The only thing missing here is just some color, but the sketch option in Pixel Studio doesn't apply any unless I explicitly say it. I'm really torn about this one, so I'm calling it a tie. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Winner: tie Next up, I asked Image Playground and Pixel Studio to generate 'a majestic lion with a flowing mane, perched atop a towering rock overlooking a vast savanna.' Compared to what it did previously under iOS 18.2, this updated version of Image Playground adds more realism to the shot — and I really like it. I opted to go with the animation style, which makes it way more convincing. But despite the improvement, the models that Google is using with Pixel Studio are still better. I chose the freestyle option again because the depiction is more realistic. I really love the glow produced by the setting sub behind the lion, as well as how it generates the better landscape. Winner: Pixel Studio Image Playground had trouble with this prompt the last time, but it's no problem with this upgraded iOS 26 version. I gave them the prompt for 'a city floating in the clouds, connected by bridges made of rainbows.' Apple gets it right with a city floating in the clouds, but I don't see the bridges made of rainbows. There's a rainbow for sure, but it's not exactly what I requested with the prompt. Pixel Studio again produces a very realistic shot of the cloud city, including what appears to be bridges made up of rainbows. The only thing it doesn't represent well is an actual city floating in the clouds. It looks more like it's surrounded by clouds. Still, I'm giving this one to Pixel Studio. Winner: Pixel Studio For my next test I tried the following prompt: "a robot made of flowers, watering other flowers in a garden." With iOS 26, Apple adds new style options with Image Playground that generate images with ChatGPT instead of Apple Intelligence. However, I notice that it takes much longer for it to produce images. I'm talking about over 30 seconds, whereas it would take about 5 seconds with Apple Intelligence. I chose the anime style option and for the most part it accurately generates my prompt. Although, the robot doesn't look as convincing. With the Pixel Studio's generation, I also chose the anime style — and it looks way more authentic in my opinion, down to how it actually looks more like a robot. I also like the small details all around the shot, like the differently colored flowers covering the bot. Winner: Pixel Studio Going with something more familiar with my next prompt, I do recall how Image Playground had trouble with this one: teenage mutant ninja turtle fighting a one eyed giant rat. I will mention that this time I didn't have to modify the prompt at all one bit. Whether it's because Apple doesn't want to infringe on copyrights for teenage mutant ninja turtles, it generates a really weird looking turtle. True, it's supposed to be a mutant, but it's terrifying. Plus, it looks more like it's buddying up with the rat rather than fighting it — and the rat has a normal pair of eyes. So yeah, it's not accurate at all. What's interesting about them is that I stuck with the sketch style option with both image generators. Pixel Studio is simply amazing and accurate with its photo. Not only does it get the teenage mutant ninja turtle correctly, but there's a ton of detail. While the rat technically has three eyes instead of one, at least it looks like they're about to brawl. Winner: Pixel Studio For my last prompt, I asked them to generate a 'sporty red car at the beach with a volleyball net in the background.' I went with the sketch style again because it's one of the few identical options available with Pixel Studio and Image Playground. Apple got this prompt right the last time and it does it again here. While the car itself could be a bit more sporty, it is in red and there's a volleyball net in the background. I don't know why the pole on the left doubles as a palm tree, but it might be added to enhance the look of the scene being on a beach. I still prefer Pixel Studio's image because of the realism of the shots. The car in question looks awfully like a Porsche, complete with the red paint job I requested — while the volleyball net in the background completes the scene at the beach. Winner: Pixel Studio Even though it's not technically a unanimous win, Pixel Studio still proves Google is still ahead when it comes to generating images from scratch. Not only does it produce them with accuracy, but the level of detail is remarkable. Plus, it helps that there's a variety of styles to choose from and how quickly it takes to produce them. Apple's moving in the right direction, by ditching the cartoony generations I saw Image Playground produced when it launched last fall with iOS 18.2. I will say that the level of detail has improved dramatically with this iOS 26 iteration, but there's still room for improvement. Perhaps Apple might reveal yet another boost for Image Playground with its rumored iPhone 17 event next month? Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Is Perplexity the next Google?
Is Perplexity the next Google?

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Perplexity the next Google?

Perplexity shocked both Silicon Valley and Wall Street this week after the Wall Street Journal reported on the AI startup's unsolicited $34.5 billion all-cash offer to buy Chrome, the world's most popular web browser. The move comes just weeks after Perplexity launched its own AI-powered Comet browser, and as a federal judge considers whether Google must divest Chrome after the tech giant lost a landmark antitrust case brought by the Department of Justice. Comet, which Perplexity tells Fortune will become available for all Perplexity Pro users starting Wednesday, has several advantages over Chrome. Unlike Google's web browser, where most AI features arrive via add-ons or extensions, Comet's AI assistant is always present, staying in the top-right corner of your browser window. It can summarize content instantly, compare information across tabs (a huge time-saver for shopping), automate workflows (booking meetings, sending emails, etc.), remind you about events, and much more. Chrome only recently added limited AI features like Gemini, the Google Lens sidebar, and 'tab compare,' but these remain add-ons and do not offer end-to-end automation or context tracking like Comet's agentic AI. Comet feels poised to transform browsing as we know it into more of a conversational experience, where you interact with your browser to move as fast as your brain allows. But Perplexity's blockbuster move this week raises an important question: If Perplexity absorbs Chrome, could it become the next Google? Perplexity's play? Going beyond 'search' Thomas Grange, cofounder and chief innovation officer at AI-search optimization platform Botify, says 'There won't be a 'next Google.'' 'The game has changed,' he tells Fortune. 'What's emerging from the blend of AI search and traditional browsers isn't just a faster search engine, it's an entirely new hyper-personalized, context-aware, and conversational way of finding information.' Grange says the promise of AI search engines is having AI agents act on behalf of users, interacting with other agents and transforming web browsing into something much more efficient and automated. Perplexity's Comet browser, which debuted last month and is rolling out to all Pro users starting this week, exemplifies this shift. Unlike traditional browsers, Comet puts an AI answer engine at the heart of its interface, allowing users to ask questions and get direct answers rather than having to wade through a list of links. Above all, the assistant can act on behalf of users—aiming to make browsing less about navigation and more about productivity. Usha Haley, Wichita State University professor and Barton Distinguished Chair in International Business, says Perplexity's bid for Chrome 'looks far less audacious once you try Comet.' 'A persistent AI assistant that can operate on any web page changes the web from a place to navigate to one that works for you. Adding Chrome's massive user base and browser dominance could give Perplexity a once-in-a-generation leap in distribution,' she tells Fortune. But, she notes, 'the next Google presents a very high bar.' But while Perplexity can buy part of Google's ecosystem (Chrome), scaling to Google's level of infrastructure, reach, and trust will be extremely challenging. 'AI-powered browsers do well at some limited tasks. But the road from wow demo to everyday habit is long and winding,' she says. Redefining how we use the internet Joshua McKenty, former NASA architect and CEO of cybersecurity company Polyguard, tells Fortune: 'The acquisition of Chrome by any player, but especially by a major AI player, is extremely significant. 'Chrome represents one of the most powerful sources of new training data in existence—especially if it is decoupled from the Google login experience,' he adds. 'The browser is the only scraping method that can travel behind every log-in and every firewall to index … literally everything.' Of course, not everyone is convinced Perplexity will become the next Google—or that it would even be allowed to have Chrome. Ari Paparo, a former Google executive, tells Fortune, 'We need to understand that the DOJ and the courts are not going to blindly empower a new monopoly just to replace the one they are breaking up. 'AI is both hungry for the data a web browser accesses, but also becomes more useful to the consumer as it has the context of what they are doing,' Paparo says. 'Whether it is Perplexity, OpenAI, or one of the legacy tech giants that ends up as an owner of Chrome, it will be a huge change in the ecosystem.' Haley also highlights privacy and reliability as key challenges as scale, reliability, and user trust are critical for any challenger of Google to move beyond a 'wow demo' moment. But Eric Vaughan, CEO of the AI-focused enterprise-software company IgniteTech, says Perplexity can win by 'eliminating the concept of search entirely.' 'The real disruption here is less about improving search results and more about bypassing websites altogether,' he tells Fortune. For Perplexity, owning Chrome, should regulators allow it to happen, would mean immediate access to billions of daily users, copious behavioral data, and the distribution muscle to push itself to the forefront of the AI race. What happens next? Perplexity, which is backed by Nvidia and SoftBank, among others, says funding is available, but its offer for Chrome undoubtedly faces major regulatory, financial, and technical hurdles. To be blunt, Perplexity's offer for Chrome is a long shot. (For one thing, Google parent Alphabet isn't willingly selling.) The San Francisco–based startup has only a tiny fraction of the number of users that Google has, and an infinitesimal share of its revenue. What's more, rivals in the AI space are working on their own AI web browsers. Microsoft's Edge browser now has Copilot Mode, which, like Perplexity's Comet, can see and analyze open tabs, execute autonomous tasks such as booking reservations, respond to voice commands, summarize content in real time, and more—but notably, it's free and tightly integrated with Microsoft's ecosystem. OpenAI, the leader in AI, is close to releasing its own AI-powered browser, designed to keep user interactions within a ChatGPT-like interface and leveraging its 500 million weekly active users to challenge Chrome's dominance. But Perplexity's original AI-based search tool has already been credited by many in tech with pressuring its rivals like Google to upgrade and rethink their own approach to search. Whether or not a Perplexity-Chrome tie-up actually happens, the emergence of AI-powered browsers has set the stage for profound industry change. Barry Lowenthal, president of AI-powered ads company Inuvo, says, 'Google has been the default search engine for so long it is practically a reflex, but AI-powered search tools like Perplexity are changing that equation. 'If Chrome joins the mix, the potential reach and usability skyrocket,' he tells Fortune. 'But becoming the next Google is not just about technology, it is about winning trust, habit, and scale. That is a long game, and right now Perplexity is just starting to play it.' For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio

These displays are banned in US, and here's how it affects Pixel 10 and iPhone 17
These displays are banned in US, and here's how it affects Pixel 10 and iPhone 17

Android Authority

timean hour ago

  • Android Authority

These displays are banned in US, and here's how it affects Pixel 10 and iPhone 17

Joe Maring / Android Authority TL;DR The International Trade Commission has decided to ban BOE's OLED screens from the US. However, a display expert says companies like Apple and Google can still sell devices with BOE screens in the US. The ruling could adversely affect the repair market, though. The International Trade Commission (ITC) recently ruled that it would ban display maker BOE's OLED screens from the US market. The ban, which isn't final, could see BOE banned from the country for almost 15 years. But what does this mean for smartphone makers like Apple, Google, and others that use BOE displays? Display analyst Ross Young noted on Twitter that the ban could have 'little impact' on brands like Apple and Google as they'd still be able to sell their phones in the US. Check out the tweet below. Unfortunately, Young adds that this ban would hurt the repair market. That's bad news for consumers, as it means they might not have recourse in the event of a broken phone screen. Even if you can get your display fixed in the first place, a limited supply of replacement screens could theoretically lead to much higher screen repair costs. This could be particularly problematic for upcoming phone releases, as manufacturers and repair agents might not have the chance to stockpile replacement screens. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. We also asked OnePlus earlier this week about the ramifications of a BOE ban in the US. However, the company refused to comment on the matter. If Young's claims hold true, though, then OnePlus doesn't necessarily have to worry about OnePlus 15 sales. Either way, this preliminary display ban might not affect sales of smartphones with BOE screens. So I don't anticipate sales issues with the Pixel 10 series or iPhone 17 range. But you should probably invest in a durable case and a screen protector. Follow

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store