iOS 26 Image Playground vs Android 16 Pixel Studio: I found the best AI image generator, and it's not even close
With the iOS 26 beta, I've been testing out the updated version of Image Playground to see all the new changes — but more importantly — if the upgrades are enough to make it better than Pixel Studio. Using an iPhone 16 Pro Max and Pixel 9 Pro XL for this test, running iOS 26 and Android 16 respectively, I provided both image generators with the same prompts as before to see what they produce this time around.
In this iOS 26 Image Playground vs. Android 16 Pixel Studio face-off, I'll be grading them in each of the categories below to make it clear which one is better. Here are the results.
For this first test, I gave both image generators the following prompt: a cat wearing a crown, sitting on a throne made of yarn.
In iOS 26, there are a total of four style options to choose from when — so I ended up choosing Sketch because it's also one of the options available with Pixel Studio.
I have to say, Apple definitely delivers a much better result this time because there's more detail and realism to the image it generated. Everything I gave in the prompt is generated accurately, including the throne made out of yarn, which it didn't do at all with my previous testing. I'm also drawn to the cat's face, which has way more detail as well.
Meanwhile, Pixel Studio continues to accurately produce my descriptions. I would even argue that there's a smidge more detail with the cat overall and how it really makes it so that the throne is completely made up out of yarn. The only thing missing here is just some color, but the sketch option in Pixel Studio doesn't apply any unless I explicitly say it. I'm really torn about this one, so I'm calling it a tie.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Winner: tie
Next up, I asked Image Playground and Pixel Studio to generate 'a majestic lion with a flowing mane, perched atop a towering rock overlooking a vast savanna.'
Compared to what it did previously under iOS 18.2, this updated version of Image Playground adds more realism to the shot — and I really like it. I opted to go with the animation style, which makes it way more convincing.
But despite the improvement, the models that Google is using with Pixel Studio are still better. I chose the freestyle option again because the depiction is more realistic. I really love the glow produced by the setting sub behind the lion, as well as how it generates the better landscape.
Winner: Pixel Studio
Image Playground had trouble with this prompt the last time, but it's no problem with this upgraded iOS 26 version. I gave them the prompt for 'a city floating in the clouds, connected by bridges made of rainbows.'
Apple gets it right with a city floating in the clouds, but I don't see the bridges made of rainbows. There's a rainbow for sure, but it's not exactly what I requested with the prompt.
Pixel Studio again produces a very realistic shot of the cloud city, including what appears to be bridges made up of rainbows. The only thing it doesn't represent well is an actual city floating in the clouds. It looks more like it's surrounded by clouds. Still, I'm giving this one to Pixel Studio.
Winner: Pixel Studio
For my next test I tried the following prompt: "a robot made of flowers, watering other flowers in a garden."
With iOS 26, Apple adds new style options with Image Playground that generate images with ChatGPT instead of Apple Intelligence. However, I notice that it takes much longer for it to produce images. I'm talking about over 30 seconds, whereas it would take about 5 seconds with Apple Intelligence.
I chose the anime style option and for the most part it accurately generates my prompt. Although, the robot doesn't look as convincing.
With the Pixel Studio's generation, I also chose the anime style — and it looks way more authentic in my opinion, down to how it actually looks more like a robot. I also like the small details all around the shot, like the differently colored flowers covering the bot.
Winner: Pixel Studio
Going with something more familiar with my next prompt, I do recall how Image Playground had trouble with this one: teenage mutant ninja turtle fighting a one eyed giant rat. I will mention that this time I didn't have to modify the prompt at all one bit.
Whether it's because Apple doesn't want to infringe on copyrights for teenage mutant ninja turtles, it generates a really weird looking turtle. True, it's supposed to be a mutant, but it's terrifying. Plus, it looks more like it's buddying up with the rat rather than fighting it — and the rat has a normal pair of eyes. So yeah, it's not accurate at all.
What's interesting about them is that I stuck with the sketch style option with both image generators. Pixel Studio is simply amazing and accurate with its photo. Not only does it get the teenage mutant ninja turtle correctly, but there's a ton of detail. While the rat technically has three eyes instead of one, at least it looks like they're about to brawl.
Winner: Pixel Studio
For my last prompt, I asked them to generate a 'sporty red car at the beach with a volleyball net in the background.' I went with the sketch style again because it's one of the few identical options available with Pixel Studio and Image Playground. Apple got this prompt right the last time and it does it again here.
While the car itself could be a bit more sporty, it is in red and there's a volleyball net in the background. I don't know why the pole on the left doubles as a palm tree, but it might be added to enhance the look of the scene being on a beach.
I still prefer Pixel Studio's image because of the realism of the shots. The car in question looks awfully like a Porsche, complete with the red paint job I requested — while the volleyball net in the background completes the scene at the beach.
Winner: Pixel Studio
Even though it's not technically a unanimous win, Pixel Studio still proves Google is still ahead when it comes to generating images from scratch. Not only does it produce them with accuracy, but the level of detail is remarkable. Plus, it helps that there's a variety of styles to choose from and how quickly it takes to produce them.
Apple's moving in the right direction, by ditching the cartoony generations I saw Image Playground produced when it launched last fall with iOS 18.2. I will say that the level of detail has improved dramatically with this iOS 26 iteration, but there's still room for improvement. Perhaps Apple might reveal yet another boost for Image Playground with its rumored iPhone 17 event next month?
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oracle Taps Google's Gemini AI Models To Supercharge Cloud Services
Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) and Alphabet's (NASDAQ:GOOGL) (NASDAQ:GOOG) Google Cloud on Thursday announced that they have deepened their partnership by integrating Google's most advanced AI models, starting with Gemini 2.5, into the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Generative AI service. The move lets Oracle customers build AI agents for multimodal understanding, advanced coding, productivity automation, research, and more directly within their Oracle environments. Oracle will expand access to Google's full Gemini lineup via Vertex AI, including video, image, speech, music generation models, and industry-specific solutions like include embedding Gemini options into Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications, enhancing workflows across finance, HR, supply chain, sales, service, and marketing. Customers can use existing Oracle Universal Credits to deploy Gemini models. Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian said the integration makes it easier for Oracle clients to deploy powerful AI agents that support developers and streamline data integration. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure president Clay Magouyrk emphasized the partnership's focus on delivering secure, cost-effective, enterprise-ready AI to drive innovation and meet business goals. Oracle stock gained 47% year-to-date, backed by the AI frenzy as Big Tech giants remain invested in their AI endeavours. ORCL Price Action: Oracle stock is trading higher by 0.63% to $246.50 premarket at last check Friday. Photo by Sundry Photography via Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? ALPHABET (GOOGL): Free Stock Analysis Report ORACLE (ORCL): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Oracle Taps Google's Gemini AI Models To Supercharge Cloud Services originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Android Authority
14 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Find Hub is the next Google app to get an Expressive coat of paint (APK teardown)
Andy Walker / Android Authority TL;DR We've conducted a teardown of Google's Find Hub app and discovered a variety of visual changes. These tweaks are broadly in line with Google's push to adopt the Material 3 Expressive style. Google's Find Hub is your one-stop shop for tracking your devices, accessories, and even loved ones. Now, it looks like Google is bringing some Material 3 Expressive changes to this app as well. We conducted a teardown of the latest version of the Find Hub app (version 3.1.399-3) and managed to enable a variety of visual changes. These tweaks are all in line with Google's Material 3 Expressive style. You can view the screens below. Current New Current New Current New Current New For starters, the Device details page (screens one and two) now shows a centered image of your device. We also have larger, bolder headers, while the factory reset button is now encased in that distinctive pill-shaped box. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. The contact info page (screens three and four) has seen the biggest changes. Google has ditched the 'Contact info' header in favor of 'Enter phone number and a message.' Furthermore, the device image and displayed email address have been removed, while the message box is much larger. Find Hub's map view has also undergone some changes, as we can see in the second row of images. The bottom sheet no longer shows pictures of your devices. However, the map view now shows your device images on the map itself instead of a generic device image. The settings and refresh buttons in the bottom sheet have also been tweaked and are now circular buttons. In any event, this isn't a groundbreaking design overhaul by any means. But it does suggest that Google is putting plenty of effort into ensuring that its Material 3 Expressive design covers as many of its apps as possible. That's welcome news for those of us who remember Google's relatively slow progress when it came to dark mode. This tweaked design isn't the only thing we found in Find Hub this week. It looks like you can soon add a home screen shortcut for specific people who are sharing their location with you. That's handy if you want a quick way to track a child or another loved one without wading through the app. We also recently got a better idea of how satellite-based location sharing will work. ⚠️ An APK teardown helps predict features that may arrive on a service in the future based on work-in-progress code. However, it is possible that such predicted features may not make it to a public release. Follow
Tom's Guide
41 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
I put the AirPods Max vs Nothing Headphone (1) through an 8-round face-off — here's the winner
Nothing's first pair of headphones impressed in build and features, but they were ultimately let down by their poor out-of-box sound. Still, they're a full $250 less than the AirPods Max — and does that make a difference between the two? The AirPods Max are the cream of the Apple crop, with loads of features and a futuristic design. But how does this aging titan hold up against the new Odysseus and his golden sheepskin? Lets find out. Comparing the Nothing Headphone (1) to the AirPods Max might seem like a tall order and perhaps not the fairest comparison, but you'd be surprised how well the two square up to one another. From a metal build and some interesting features, the $250 price difference might seem like a difficult one to justify. After all, the Nothing Headphone (1) is the latest upstart in the headphone space. They're aimed squarely over the bow of the best wireless headphones, like the Sony WH-1000XM6, Bose QuietComfort Headphones, and, of course, the AirPods Max. Nothing has packed them full of features, like spatial audio and impressive ANC: But is it enough to make a dent in Apple's aluminum defense? The AirPods Max have been around for a while now, but their USB-C refresh did bring an extra feature in wired USB-C hi-res listening. They're a venerable ANC titan, still going blow for blow with the current flagships — but how do they stack up against the brand new Nothing Headphone (1)? Nothing Headphone (1) AirPods Max Price $299/£299/AU$549 $549 / £499 / AU$899 Colors Black; Silver Blue; Purple; Midnight; Starlight; Orange Size Not specified Not specified Weight 11 ounces 13.6 ounces Battery life (rated) Up to 80 hours Up to 20 hours Connectivity Bluetooth 5.3 with SBC, AAC and LDAC support Bluetooth 5.0 with SBC, AAC Special features Adaptive ANC, Ambient Sound Mode, Bluetooth multipoint, customizable sound, quick charge, passive mode, Spatial Audio ANC, spatial audio, audio sharing, Siri There's only one way this is going to go — if you don't want to spend loads of money on your noise-canceling headphones, you're going to buy the Nothing Headphone (1). They cost $299, a price which brings them lower than even the AirPods Max's closest rivals. Despite that lower price, they still offer loads of excellent features and some flagship specs. Food for thought. The AirPods Max, on the other hand, cost $250 more than the Nothing headphone (1). For $549 you get superior build quality and better sound, (spoiler alert), but it's a massive price gap. Despite the occasional discount over deals events for Apple's headphones, the winner here is the Nothing Headphone (1). The Nothing Headphone (1) don't feel like something that costs $300 — they feel a lot more premium than you might expect. First of all, there's the standout design, which uses Nothing's signature see-through style for a unique pair of headphones indeed. Underneath a clear panel there's a slick cassette motif, which I think looks really cool. The rest of the earcup is made out of metal for a super premium feel, and some reassuring heft. The headband is slightly more of a letdown with a very thin layer of padding along the top, which can impact a pressure point across the top of your head. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The earcup foam isn't quite up to task either, and for glasses wearers and those with piercings, they press in all the wrong places. They're not completely uncomfortable, but there are some issues that Nothing needs to work on for the next pair. Thankfully, the protective case is excellent — and far better than Apple's. It's thin, compact, and nice and hard. I had no qualms about slipping it into a bag, knowing that the headphones would rest safely inside. Despite some design weirdness in places, the AirPods Max are a lovely-looking and feeling pair of headphones. Those aluminum earcups are fantastic in the hand, and the mesh headband looks amazing. They're unique, but they're not too "out-there" — a well-balanced design that exudes luxury. You know where the money went the moment you put them on your head. Despite some design weirdness in places, the AirPods Max are a lovely-looking and feeling pair of headphones. Although weighty, they're still comfortable — or at least, they are straight out of box. Their deep eacups give plenty of space for your ears, and the headband and clamping force are both well judged. But, and it is unfortunately a big but, they don't quite stand up to extended use. My Lightning pair that I've had for a longer time have suffered loosening in the headband material, making them slightly more uncomfortable. That's something to bear in mind, but we also don't know how the Nothing Headphone (1) stand up to years of use and abuse. Where the AirPods really fall down, though, is their 'protective' case — mostly because it's not either of those things. It covers the earcups with a kind of felt-lined suede stuff, and only really protects the aluminum surface of the earcups. The headband is completely open to the elements — like your keys in your bag. Not excellent. Still, the AirPods Max are more comfortable and feature a nicer build and overall design than the Nothing Headphone (1), even if their case is awful. This round is. draw as a result. Both sets of headphones feature my favorite kind of controls — physical buttons and knobs. The Nothing Headphone (1), for example, have a volume wheel, a skip and pause 'paddle', and a physical on and off switch. They're rounded off with a button that you can assign different functions — conjuring an AI assistant, for example. They are excellent controls with great tactility. They can get a little confusing, however, given that each button has so many features. Multiple presses and holdings can muddy the control waters, making them slightly less intuitive than those found on the AirPods Max. The AirPods Max have by the most intuitive control system of any pair of headphones ever. There's a button to turn the ANC on and off, and a volume dial that controls playback. The dial is a little like the digital crown on Apple Watches, but larger. There's a subtle click when turned inside the headphones, but it's a nice sound as opposed to Nothing's more invasive and 'clicky' feedback sounds. Even years later I'm yet to see controls better than the AirPods Max — which is why they take the win here. I wish this one was harder, but alas, it's not. The AirPods Max are a much better sounding pair of headphones than the Nothing Headphone (1), and it's not even close. Nothing's Headphone (1) have significant audio foibles to their sound profile, with a sonic darkness that's impossible to ignore. It makes music sound less intimate, and yet also much narrower in scope. It leaves dynamics to the wayside. and makes for a disapointing listen if you care about sound. Even though KEF, my personal HiFi brand of choice, had a hand in their tuning, I found little to rave about with the Nothing Headphone (1). That's a big shame in my eyes, considering the massive steps that Nothing has made in it's solid earbud line. Highs are at least detailed and there's some control to the deepest bass notes, but a pervasive lower mid section makes them an unengaging listen overall. The AirPods Max, on the other hand, are a much nicer thing to listen to. They've got an incredibly wide soundstage, making the music sound like it's coming from all around you — and that's before the spatial audio feature has come into effect. They're incredibly well detailed, giving some great clarity to drum cymbals and other high-frequency sounds. Bass is well controlled and impactful, and the mids are well represented. They're a more balanced listen than the Nothing Headphone (1), seemingly more well tuned from factory. The AirPods Max sound good without work — the Nothing need significant work in an EQ to sound ok. Then there's the Spatial Audio of the AirPods Max. It's more restricted in that it only works with some streaming services — Apple Music, mainly — but it's a true Dolby Atmos product. That means good surround, and excellent head tracked spatial audio for your. music. The Nothing Headphone (1) use their own spatial audio 'thing'. It's not very good, and thins out the music for a more spacious-sounding mix. Leave it turned off. Thanks to much better sound and superior spatial audio, the AirPods Max take this victory. In order to stand up to the more expensive competition, the Nothing Headphone (1) have been packed full of features. Not all of them are good — spatial audio, ahem — but there are plenty of them straight out of the box. You'll find them all in the Nothing X app, which is a solid way of controlling a headphone's features. Everything is well laid out for both Apple and Android users, with all the features easily found without too much tapping around in menus. The EQ adjustment is the most useful feature given the sound issues, which is something the AirPods Max don't have. Not that the latter need it, however. There are multiple ANC levels as well, although as with every other ANC system, I just leave it at max and be done with it. I've never seen the need for 'less ANC' when I want to block out my environment. Battery gains are minimal when you do engage lower ANC modes, I discovered. Bluetooth 5.3 is very up to date, as is codec support for LDAC. Not that you'll notice the difference in sound quality. Wired mode is useful, though, especially if your work laptop doesn't have Bluetooth enabled. The AirPods Max don't have quite as many features, but those that exist work better than the Nothing Headphone (1). The aformentioned superior spatial audio is a big one, of course, but so too is one of the best things about AirPods in general. The interoperability between Apple devices is very much a winner for Apple users, as the headphones instantly switch from iPhone to MacBook to iPad without any problems at all. There's no app, per se, but Apple users can control the AirPods Max through the settings menu of their iOS, iPadOS or macOS device. It's well integrated, but Android and Windows users are left out in the cold. With no sandwich. For this section, it's another draw – both have comparable features, but Nothing's don't work as well and the AirPods don't mesh with non-Apple devices. Nothing has done a stellar job with the Nothing Headphone (1) — their noise canceling is very good. It silences offices with no problem at all, and public transport becomes instantly more tolerable. It's remarkable just how good it is, considering the price, and if you can put up with their sub-par audio performance, it makes them well worth picking up for the price. But the AirPods Max are just better. They block out more noise, and the transparency mode is more natural-sounding. Bose still does a better job overall, but the AirPods Max are no ANC slouch. They take the win here handily. This is another quick and dirty section, although it's not going to Apple's way this time. The AirPods Max battery is... bad. 20 hours of battery life is almost to be pitied when compared to pretty much any pair of ANC headphones you can buy in 2025, and woeful when stacked up to the Nothing Headphone (1). Turn the ANC off, and you get 80 hours of battery out of the Nothing Headphone (1). That's excellent — although turn the ANC on and you'll find 35 hours of staying power. That's still better than the AirPods Max, so they take the win in this section. The Nothing Headphone (1) are not a bad pair of headphones, but they are (as you could probably expect) completely outclassed by the Airpods Max. That's not to say things didn't get close along the way — there where more draws here than Apple might have liked, especially when you take into consideration that $250 price difference. Unfortunately for Nothing, the Headphone (1) just can't compete where it matters – sound, comfort, and ANC. It does make me very excited for the next version of the Nothing Headphone however. The valiant fight the first model put up certainly makes for a more interesting battle should those issues be ironed out — AirPods Max 2, it's all on you now. If we ever see you. Nothing Headphone (1) AirPods Max Price and value (5) 4 2 Design (15) 14 14 Controls (10) 8 9 Sound quality (25) 15 24 Active noise cancelation (20) 17 19 Call quality (10) 6 9 Connectivity (5) 5 5 Battery life (10) 9 4 Total Score (100) 78 82 Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
