Comebacks and controversy at Glastonbury 2025: Lewis Capaldi's emotional return, Bob Vylan's 'vile' chant... and surprise sets from Pulp and Lorde dominate the weekend - here are the BIGGEST moments so far
Glastonbury kicked off its 2025 line-up with the emotional return of Lewis Capaldi and a surprise set from Lorde, who had been rumoured to be a secret booking for the festival.
But the pair aren't the only unlisted stars who could make an appearance at Worthy Farm this weekend.
Click above to watch the video in full.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
My boyfriend is 27 years older than me - people say our relationship is disgusting and I'm only in it for money but they're just jealous
A young woman who is dating a man twice her age has hit back at people criticising her relationship. Sass, 27, from London took to social media to reveal the romance with her 'silver fox' boyfriend, who is 54. The self-described 'spoiled girlfriend' enjoys a luxury lifestyle with her much older boyfriend, regularly jetting off for sun-soaked holidays and skiing holidays together. Sass often shares scenes of her glamorous life on TikTok, where she has 3,500 followers, but more recently she's been criticised for dating someone so much older. The content creator recently opened up about their romance online, posting a picture of the two snuggled together alongside a caption revealing their years of birth - 1970 and 1997 respectively. People in the comments have blasted what they described as their 'disgusting' relationship and urged her to choose 'self-respect over money'. But Sass said she couldn't be happier and has defended her boyfriend, describing him as 'highly educated, emotionally intelligent, financially secure, a great personality.' Hitting back at the hate comments, Sass said their relationship was 'supportive and happy' despite the 27 year age gap. 'His family are lovely! If you know us as individuals, us as a couple makes sense. Those we know in real life understand, are supportive and happy for us,' she said. Responding to hateful comments, she said she 'doesn't date younger like the majority of women'. She said the negative comments were 'unfortunate' but insisted she wasn't letting them get in the way of their blossoming romance. 'It is unfortunate but I'm having fun. I'm not letting them get to me because they literally don't know anything about me or my partner,' she said. Her family don't mind the relationship - though she said she would date her 'silver fox' regardless of their input. 'My family are chill and even if they weren't, it's me that has to live with my decisions. I'm happy with my life,' she said. Sass's partner supplies her with a steady stream of gifts, recently unboxing a brand new pair of of Louboutin's worth several thousand pounds. The couple enjoy five-star holidays, staying only at the most expensive hotels and dining on Michelin star menus. However, some didn't see the happy side of their romance, accusing Sass of 'using him for money' while others denied the pair were truly in love. One wrote: 'It's better to date a man that's a bit older but a 27 year gap though? Come on, it's a lifestyle choice - you can just admit you want a soft life provided to you.' A second remarked: 'My dad was born in 1977 and me in 1994 if they're old enough to be your parent it's not right sorry.' 'Nah, it's about money,' another wrote while a fourth told her to seek 'self-respect over money'. In one tongue-in-cheek 'get ready with me' video, Sass helped cut her boyfriend's hair and said, 'contrary to popular belief, I'm the one that groomed him'. However, others urged them to 'ignore the haters', sharing their similar stories of dating older men. One wrote: 'Trust me girl, you are in winning strike, people think younger woman go for older men for money, there is more wisdom to an older man, and not to mention the way they treat their younger woman is the exact way a real woman want to be treated.' She said the negative comments were 'unfortunate' but insisted she wasn't letting them get in the way of their blossoming romance A second said: 'I don't even know why people are mad. It's giving financial security.' Another remarked: 'People are projecting in the comment section. Two grown adults with mental capacity to make decisions. meaning, the both know what they want and if they're happy with each are you to judge them. 'Just because you wouldn't be in such age gap relationship doesn't mean the rest of the world wouldn't.' And things appear to going well for the couple, with Sass light-heartedly telling her followers to 'expect your invites soon' - appearing to refer to a potential wedding.
Spectator
16 minutes ago
- Spectator
The bluster and waffle of George Freeman
Retromania is well and truly upon us. Neil Young just headlined Glastonbury. Noel Edmonds is back on the telly. And a Tory MP has been turned over by a Sunday newspaper in a cash-for-questions scandal. Tonight we're gonna party like it's 1997. The humiliated party this time around is George Freeman, a former science minister in Rishi Sunak's government. He left frontline politics before frontline politics had the chance to leave him – and he was last heard from moaning in 2024 that he was unable to afford a £2,000-a-month mortgage on his £118,000 ministerial salary. After that, he found a side-hustle that better answered his needs – advising an environmental monitoring company called GHGSat, which paid him £5,000 a month for just eight hours of work between last April and March this year. When he took the job, he quite properly consulted Acoba, the regulator that presides over the ethics of private-sector appointments for former ministers and civil servants. GHGSat have said that they 'retained George Foreman MP for a brief period' and that their agreement with him 'did not include any lobbying activities'. Since Foreman remains a trade envoy and a member of the Science and Technology Committee, Acoba quite properly went out of its way to warn him that given 'this is a company that is interested in government policy and decisions relating to the civil space sector and emissions… there are risks associated with your influence and network of contacts gained whilst in ministerial office'. Acoba says Foreman specifically assured it that he had 'made it clear to the company that [he would] not lobby government on its behalf'. Anyway, now he's in the soup because the Sunday Times has established that while he was in this company's employment he appears to have tabled several written questions in relation to the areas of GHGSat's commercial interests, in consultation with – and in some cases adopting the exact language of – the company's senior executives. (It's merely the icing on the cake that he appears to have further contravened ethics rules by using his parliamentary offices to host meetings related to his outside commercial interests.) Foreman asked his staffer to tick 'any 'interest declaration' box if there is one', when he tabled the questions, which tells parliament that an MP has asked a question relating to one of their registered interests. The facts appear to be undisputed. He took money from this company. He was specifically warned against using his position in parliament to the company's advantage, and he gave undertakings not to. He then went on not only to table several parliamentary questions the answers to which may have been to the potential commercial advantage of this company, but leaked emails show he asked the company's managing director in writing for advice on 'what to ask about'. It's not just that all this is what the young folk like to call a bad look. It's the pious inanity of his response that really hoists the old eyebrows. No doubt under the advice of some spin-doctor telling him to 'get out in front of the story', he made great show of referring himself to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. His statement to the Sunday Times when all this came to light was as follows: As a longstanding advocate of important new technologies, companies and industries, working cross-party through APPGs [All-Party Parliamentary Groups] and the select committee, I regularly ask experts for clarification on technical points and terminology, and deeply respect and try to assiduously follow the code of conduct for MPs and the need to act always in the public interest. Throughout my 15 years in parliament (and government) I have always understood the need to be transparent in the work I have done for and with commercial clients and charities and am always willing to answer any criticism. I don't believe I have done anything wrong but I am immediately referring myself to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and will accept his judgment in due course. We can ignore most of that long feather-puffing opening sentence and all the long feather-puffing second one. And at the third, we can laugh aloud with great merriment: here is such a stickler for the rules, such a deep and assiduous respecter of the need for full transparency, that he voluntarily hands himself in to the Commissioner for Standards the moment that his emails are leaked to the Sunday Times. I imagine transposing the same situation to my own home The nub of all that bluster and waffle appears to be that his defence to the charge of asking questions on behalf of the company is that he was asking questions on his own behalf and simply consulting the company to help him get the technical language right. These things he was asking about were just things that he, personally, happened to be interested in – or at least thought would serve the public good – and it is the merest coincidence that they are also things that the company which paid him £60,000-odd could stand to profit from. Perhaps, indeed, this defence stands up. Even parliament is not without its Candide-like innocents. But it seems to me that if he really was all that determined not only to behave with exemplary probity, but to make sure that not a whiff of an ethical lapse should attend him, it might have occurred to him to mention the whole thing to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards beforehand. Just, y'know, to know where he stood on the whole thing. I imagine transposing the same situation to my own home. Let us say I discover (not at all an implausible situation) that the box of chocs I have deposited in the fridge for the teacher's end-of-term present – and which I specifically told the children not to help themselves to – has vanished. I imagine confronting my daughter. 'Did you eat the chocolates I told you not to eat?' 'Certainly not. I should say that as a long-term champion of secondary education and our hardworking teachers, I have from time to time found it appropriate to make sure that no educators are in danger of eating potentially poisoned chocolate.' 'There's chocolate wrappers on the floor of your room, and an empty chocolate box in your bin.' 'I have striven, throughout my career as a child and now young adult, at all times assiduously to obey parental instructions, and I have no recollection of knowingly doing anything to contravene them. Filial duty has always been my watchword, and my conscience is clear. But in keeping with my determination to uphold the very highest standards in domestic life, I'm voluntarily referring myself to the independent ombudsman and will accept his judgment in due course.' 'What are you talking about? There's literally a smudge of chocolate on your chin.' 'I don't think it would be appropriate to pre-empt the findings of the inquiry, do you?' 'I'm stopping your pocket money for a week.' 'Actually, I think you'll need to raise my pocket money to help pay for the independent investigation into the matter. I have always been a firm believer in going through the appropriate procedures.' Anyway, we'll await the judgment in due course and lay in some chocs to munch for when the time comes.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘I was chewed up and spat out – fighters deserve better': Danny Roberts on starting fresh after post-UFC pain
Being a professional fighter does not guarantee the lavish lifestyle many may portray it to. For British ex- UFC star Danny Roberts, he knows this all too well. 'I was a kid that came from a tough upbringing, a lot of adversity and abuse.' The Croydon-raised brawler grew up without a father figure and came into the sport not to build a personal brand or take over the world, but to provide a certain life and be 'the man that he didn't have' for his children. Roberts, 37, spent close to eight years fighting under the UFC banner. In that time he had 14 bouts, one of which in 2022 came against current welterweight champion Jack Della Maddalena. But it's since his departure that things have come into perspective on the MMA industry as a whole. 'Hot Chocolate' has not fought since his final UFC outing, a wild clash against Jonny Parsons in his home city in July 2023. His eventual cut in January of this year was far from the perfect end, with the UFC toying with his future to leave his source of income in limbo for over a year. 'My last fight in the UFC, I got fight of the night,' he told The Independent. 'Then I got told I was to have another fight, but it got to the point where a year had passed by. If I would have turned around and just left then, I could have probably been back where I needed to be a lot sooner. But that is what it is. 'As far as the UFC is concerned, I had an absolutely phenomenal time. It's part of my life that I'm never ever going to forget. But there is definitely a lot of ups and downs and a lot of things that could be better for the athletes – look after the athletes better and have their best interests in mind, because we're at the bottom of the food chain. It's like crabs in a bucket. 'Everyone's fighting to get to the top, and if you're not at the top, you ain't got s***. That's not good enough. We're talking about the premiership organisation of the world. The 20 years of your f****** life you give to be a part of that, training every day and being away from friends, family, relationships to be able to do what you can do. It's not very stable – it's like the one per cent of the one per cent.' Close to two years out of the cage, it looked like he would be making his return in the fledgling GFL, which was fronted by major names including Tony Ferguson, Alexander Gustaffson and Uriah Faber. However, the star-studded promotion collapsed before it even began, cancelling its inaugural two events, the first of which included Roberts's planned clash against Neiman Gracie. 'This is one of the things all fighters have issues with,' he said. 'There is no governing body, there is no one that can look after our best interests, so it's very hard. We get used, we get chewed up, we get spat out, and the only thing that we have is to look after ourselves. 'As fighters we're very hopeful, very ambitious, very driven, so you go and give us some sort of magic in front of us, our eyes light up. The GFL was that. It looked like it was legit.' Roberts has since found stability in the PFL and is set to make his promotional debut on 5 July, assuming the villain role as he main events against undefeated hometown hero Patrick Habirora in Brussels, Belgium. 'Creating the upset is something I relish,' he says, repeatedly expressing his gratitude to the company for the opportunity. However, he has not lost sight of the wider issues with MMA, an industry where inequality and poor communication with its 'pawns' are rife. To Roberts, unionisation would be a way to combat these problems. 'There should be,' he says when asked if the sport should have a union. 'Can you look at any other sport in the world [that doesn't have unionisation]? This isn't me trying to badmouth, I'm just speaking the gospel truth about it. 'We put our livelihoods on the line and miles on the clock. We do irreversible damage to our bodies. Yes, it's obviously our choice to do that, but it's one of the hardest ways to go and earn a paycheck, and whether you've got to be tapped in the head or just delusional to do that, we should still be valued. 'We're athletes also. We're doing what we need to do to be able to get the best for our families, and I've experienced – within a few months of leaving UFC – scraping around to find pennies to pay bills. When that comes as a realisation, it's not good.' Problems with the fighting world he may have, but Roberts is not yet ready to step away from the cage for good. 'My heart and my head are still very much in this game.' Retirement is not on his mind as he embarks on his latest career chapter in PFL, seeking to 'shoot for the stars and succeed'. But with 15 years on his professional fighting stopwatch, Roberts is fully aware that outside of the cage, the room for improvement is endless.
