![[Marcel Fratzscher] EU must revive multilateralism](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F04%2F27%2Fnews-p.v1.20250427.aa7457ee98384407879feda37d80cf64_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[Marcel Fratzscher] EU must revive multilateralism
US President Donald Trump's misguided trade war against the rest of the world could mark the beginning of the end for both his political dominance and his 'Make America Great Again' movement -- but only if Germany and Europe can coordinate a powerful international response.
The European Commission and the outgoing German government's biggest mistake was to signal a willingness to concede to Trump's demands, potentially turning his economic blunder into a political victory. It should be clear by now that appeasing Trump will only hasten the collapse of the multilateral trading system and further undermine democratic governance worldwide.
The European Union's response will be pivotal in determining whether the Trump administration (which is intent on dismantling the multilateral trading order) or China (which seeks to preserve it) will prevail. European leaders face a clear choice: stand for multilateralism and align with China or side with Trump's MAGA-fied United States. There is no third option.
Germany and Europe cannot remain neutral in this conflict. Giving in to Trump's demands by pursuing a bilateral trade agreement would be tantamount to endorsing the end of multilateralism.
The EU's ongoing failure to push back against Trump's policies reflects shocking shortsightedness and political naivete. While the direct economic impact of Trump's tariffs on Europe will likely be limited, the long-term consequences -- especially for Germany's export-driven economic model -- could be dire. Yielding to Trump would threaten the very foundation of German prosperity, which depends more than that of any other European country on open global trade grounded in non-discrimination, fairness, and competition.
So, how should Germany and the EU respond to Trump's tariffs? The incoming German government -- together with France, the United Kingdom and other European partners -- must defend multilateralism by aligning with China and imposing reciprocal tariffs on American goods.
In future negotiations with the US, European leaders must also insist on two key conditions. First, they should call for a renewed commitment to multilateralism as the foundation of the global trade system. That includes not only rolling back tariffs and other trade barriers to pre-crisis levels, but also revitalizing multilateral institutions like the World Trade Organization, which the US has systematically undermined by blocking the appointment of new judges to its appellate body.
Importantly, the focus should not be limited to the WTO. Other multilateral institutions such as the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank must also be empowered to play a more active role, particularly in representing and protecting the interests of the weakest economies in the Global South.
Second, Europe should push for fair competition and common rules, especially when it comes to regulating US-based tech giants. These companies pay little to no tax and routinely violate EU laws and regulations concerning data protection, ethical standards and market competition.
The recent US court ruling that Google has indeed built an illegal monopoly in search underscores the urgency of the issue. As German Finance Minister Jorg Kukies recently observed, European countries are increasingly reliant on services provided by US tech giants. If the EU fails to act now, this harmful dependence will continue to deepen, making Europe even more vulnerable to Trump-style political and commercial blackmail.
Reviving multilateralism will also require meaningful concessions and reforms from China, the EU and Germany to help correct global imbalances. Through massive subsidies and other forms of support for domestic firms, China has repeatedly undermined multilateral rules to gain unfair advantages. But Germany also must reduce its own gigantic current account surpluses, which are largely driven by domestic regulations and other structural barriers that make it harder for foreign companies to enter its market.
Given that addressing these distortions could offer considerable benefits to American companies, there is good reason to believe that such a balanced trade agreement might appeal to Trump and encourage him to change course.
Despite its economic costs, Trump's global tariff war offers Europe a chance to establish itself as a mediator and defender of multilateralism in an increasingly multipolar world. It is high time that Europe stood up for its values and coordinated a unified response with partners like China, Canada, Mexico, the UK and Japan.
By provoking a confrontation with all the world's major economies at once, Trump has made a serious strategic miscalculation. Pushing back may cost Europe in the short term, but allowing Trump to prevail and dismantle the multilateral trading system would be far more damaging -- both to the EU economy and to democracy itself.
Marcel Fratzscher, a former senior manager at the European Central Bank, is President of the think tank DIW Berlin and Professor of Macroeconomics and Finance at Humboldt University of Berlin. The views expressed here are the writer's own. -- Ed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
9 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump sends military force to Los Angeles over immigration protests
LOS ANGELES -- US President Donald Trump ordered National Guard troops to Los Angeles, a rare deployment expected Sunday against the state governor's wishes after sometimes-violent protests against immigration enforcement raids. Trump took federal control of California's state military to push soldiers into the country's second-biggest city, a decision deemed "purposefully inflammatory" by California Governor Gavin Newsom and of a kind not seen for decades according to US media. The development came after two days of confrontations during which federal agents fired flash-bang grenades and tear gas toward crowds angry at the arrests of dozens of migrants in a city with a large Latino population. "It's up to us to stand up for our people," said a Los Angeles resident whose parents are immigrants, declining to give her name. "Whether we get hurt, whether they gas us, whatever they're throwing at us. They're never going to stop us. All we have left is our voice," she told Agence France-Presse as emergency services lights flashed in the distance. An AFP photographer saw fires and fireworks light up the streets during clashes, while a protester holding a Mexican flag stood in front of a burnt-out car that had been sprayed with a slogan against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. "President Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, blaming what she called California's "feckless" Democratic leaders. "The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs." Trump congratulated the National Guard for "a job well done" shortly before midnight on Saturday in a post on Truth Social. However, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said on social media platform X the troops had not yet been deployed, while AFP journalists have so far not seen them on the ground. Trump took a swipe at Bass and Newsom, saying in his post they were "unable to handle the task," drawing a comparison with deadly fires that hit the city in January. 'Purposefully inflammatory' The National Guard -- a reserve military -- is frequently used in natural disasters, such as in the aftermath of the LA fires, and occasionally in instances of civil unrest, but almost always with the consent of local politicians. California's governor objected to the president's decision, saying it was "purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions." Federal authorities "want a spectacle. Don't give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully," Newsom said on X. Trump's Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened to involve nearby regular military forces. "If violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized -- they are on high alert," he wrote on social media. Law professor Jessica Levinson said Hegseth's intervention appeared symbolic because of the general legal restriction on the use of the US military as a domestic policing force in the absence of an insurrection. "The National Guard will be able to do (no) more than provide logistical (and) personnel support," she said. Trump has delivered on a promise to crack down hard on the entry and presence of undocumented migrants -- who he has likened to "monsters" and "animals" -- since taking office in January. The Department for Homeland Security said ICE operations in Los Angeles this week had resulted in the arrest of "118 aliens, including five gang members." Saturday's standoff took place in the suburb of Paramount, where demonstrators converged on a reported federal facility that the local mayor said was being used as a staging post by agents. Masked and armed immigration agents carried out high-profile workplace raids in separate parts of Los Angeles on Friday, attracting angry crowds and setting off hours-long standoffs. Fernando Delgado, a 24-year-old resident, said the raids were "injustices" and those detained were "human beings just like any." "We're Spanish, we help the community, we help by doing the labor that people don't want to do," he told AFP. Mayor Bass acknowledged that some city residents were "feeling fear" following the federal immigration enforcement actions. "Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable," she said on X. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said multiple arrests had been made following Friday's clashes.


Korea Herald
9 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday
WASHINGTON -- US President Donald Trump's order banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States goes into effect at 12:01 a.m. EST on Monday, a move the president promulgated to protect the country from "foreign terrorists." The countries affected by the latest travel ban are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries -- Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - will be partially restricted. Trump, a Republican, said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited last Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt is not part of the travel ban. The travel ban forms part of Trump's policy to restrict immigration into the United States and is reminiscent of a similar move in his first term when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations. Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned expressed dismay and disbelief. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to US citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the US a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the US. Afghans who worked for the US or US-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the US expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Democratic US lawmakers also voiced concern about the policies. "Trump's travel ban on citizens from over 12 countries is draconian and unconstitutional," said US Representative Ro Khanna on social media late on Thursday. "People have a right to seek asylum." (Reuters)


Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
With G7 on horizon, Lee Jae-myung races to fill key posts at home
President Lee Jae-myung is set to enter his second week in office focused on filling key Cabinet posts and secretariat appointments, as he gears up for his diplomatic debut at the Group of Seven summit in Canada. Lee took the oath of office on Wednesday, immediately after the election victory and without a transition period, as his conservative predecessor, Yoon Suk Yeol, was impeached in mid-December last year for his brief imposition of martial law and removed from office in April. The new president is now tasked with addressing the fallout from the monthslong leadership void in South Korea while Washington's deadline on the pause of US President Donald Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs is about a month away. There are speculations that Lee's in-person meeting with US President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba could materialize on the occasion of Lee's visit to Canada. Earlier this week, both Seoul and Washington confirmed that Lee had held phone talks with his US counterpart Friday night Seoul time. A day after the 20-minute phone call, Lee's spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said in a briefing Saturday that Lee has "made the decision to attend" the Group of Seven summit scheduled on June 15-17 in Canada. Lee's office has yet to unveil Lee's itinerary for the summit. Regarding Lee's potential meeting with Trump, an official from the presidential office said it was "faithfully preparing" for the meeting. The official added that phone talks with world leaders, such as Chinese President Xi Jinping, were also being arranged. Lee would become the first South Korean president to attend the G7 summit in two years, after his disgraced predecessor Yoon attended one in Hiroshima, Japan, in 2023. The surprising announcement over Lee's G7 summit attendance came a few weeks after Lee, then-presidential candidate of the liberal Democratic Party of Korea, said in a news conference on May 18 that he believed South Korea had not received an invitation for the summit. At the same news conference, Lee said that he prioritizes domestic issues over his presence at the NATO summit scheduled for June 24-26 in the Netherlands, unless the event "specifically addresses current issues" of concern. On his first day in office, the first executive order Lee issued was to establish a body for the emergency economic review to address the faltering national economy. Meanwhile, Lee's office on Sunday announced more of Lee's secretary nominations, signaling a boost to resolve a social division and igniting a reform drive targeting the prosecution. Woo Sang-ho, a former four-term lawmaker, was nominated presidential secretary for political affairs. Woo has also formerly served in key leadership roles in the major liberal party, and is deemed a right fit for the position to revive bipartisanship and resolve social conflict in South Korea, given his lifelong experience in politics, Chief of Staff Kang Hoon-sik said in a briefing Sunday. Former prosecutor Oh Kwang-soo was named presidential secretary for civil affairs. Kang said Oh has a "deep understanding of Lee's initiatives to reform South Korea's prosecution." Referring to multiple criminal cases for which Lee was indicted, the presidential office said Lee had fallen victim to politically motivated prosecution, which often sought to remove political opponents of then-President Yoon. Also, Lee Kyu-youn, a career journalist and former CEO of JTBC, was picked as presidential secretary for public relations and communication. This follows the announcement of Lee's nominations of key figures in his first week of presidency, including prime minister nominee Rep. Kim Min-seok, Chief of Staff Kang, National Security Adviser Wi Sung-lac, Director of National Policy Kim Yong-beom, and others. While the two more senior presidential secretary seats remain vacant as of press time, alongside deputy director posts at the presidential National Security Office, the presidential office was "still reviewing" future nominations, according to an official who asked for anonymity. Another official of the presidential office said that Lee's future nominations for Cabinet ministers will not come into shape in the near future. The official said, "The prime minister nominee is now preparing for the parliament's confirmation hearing. We need to wait and see how the hearing proceeds." The official also hinted at introducing the national system in the future, which would allow ordinary people to recommend public official nominations, as promised during Lee's presidential campaign.