logo
Revealed: How the troublesome Wallis Simpson and King Edward VIII caused chaos for the royals for decades

Revealed: How the troublesome Wallis Simpson and King Edward VIII caused chaos for the royals for decades

Daily Mail​19-06-2025
Wallis Simpson, the woman who became Duchess of Windsor after King Edward VIII abdicated the throne to marry her, was born in a small town in Pennsylvania 129 years ago today.
Despite her humble beginnings, Wallis would go on to play a notorious role in the greatest royal controversy of the 20th century.
However, the abdication crisis in December 1936 was just the start of the chaos the troublesome American and the former King would continue to cause for the royal family for years to come.
In his gripping book The Windsors at War - which documents the fallout between King Edward VIII and George VI - Alexander Larman revealed that the Duke and Duchess of Windsor clashed with the firm over numerous issues.
One of the largest areas of contention was about whether Wallis would be allowed to adopt the title of Her Royal Highness as was customary.
But, just a few days before their wedding in June 1937, a letter arrived from King George VI which said Wallis would become Duchess of Windsor but would be denied the title of HRH. Edward described the letter as a 'nice wedding present'.
The decision broke convention and British law - which saw wives take the status and rank of their husband unless she is higher - and therefore restrictions were imposed on Edward's royal rank.
His justification was that upon abdicating the throne Edward lost all royal rank and status. King Edward himself retained the HRH styling but it was decided that his wife or any future children shall not inherit the title.
In their anger at what they viewed as a snubbing, Wallis and Edward hurled childish insults at the King and Queen who they referred to as 'Mr and Mrs Temple' while the young Princess Elizabeth was known as 'Shirley Temple' - a reference to the 1930s child star.
Money was a particularly sore spot in the relationship between the Crown and the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.
According to Larman, access to the royal purse strings was conditional on Edward and Wallis not returning to Britain without permission.
'If the duke chose to disregard his brother's request [to not return to Britain] - which all agreed was most unlikely - his wallet would have suffered the consequences,' Larman wrote.
Nevertheless, Edward demanded a date for when he could return to England for a visit.
Writing to then-Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain the Duke of Windsor said: 'I never intended, nor would I ever have agreed, to renounce my native land or my right to return to it for all time.
'I should have thought that my record as Prince of Wales and as King was sufficient to convince anyone that I am a man of my word and that there was no necessity to impose financial sanctions on me.'
King George VI's wariness to allow his brother to return home was vindicated when during an interview with the American Daily Herald newspaper Edward said he would be happy to return to Britain as 'president of the English republic, should the Labour Party wish it'.
While this was taking by the government of the day to just be troublemaking, as Larman notes, the popularity of the Windsors in Britain meant that his return could have 'confused public opinion about who was the "real" monarch'.
With his comments about leading a republic, any return to Britain risked Edward and Wallis running a shadow government. What made their concerns all the more worrying was the political views the couple's shared.
In 1937, shortly after his abdication, Edward and Wallis visited Germany on an unofficial visit where he met Adolf Hitler and greeted him with a full Nazi salute – according to biographer Frances Donaldson in her book King Edward VIII.
After the 'wonderful time' spent with the Führer at his mountain retreat, known as the Eagle's Nest, in Bavaria, Edward wrote a thank you letter. It read: 'To the Führer and [Chancellor], the Duchess of Windsor and I would like to thank you sincerely.
'Our trip through Germany has made a great impression on us. Many thanks to you for the wonderful time that we had with you at the [mountainside retreat] Obersalzberg.'
A month before World War Two broke out, the Duke of Windsor recorded a message to the British public – although the BBC refused to air it.
Reportedly, he urged Britain to do all it could to 'come to terms with Nazi Germany,' according to A.N. Wilson, author of Hitler: A Short Biography.
Wallis was also known for her Nazi sympathies. So much so that the American was tracked by the FBI who in a report wrote that 'the Duchess of Windsor was exceedingly pro-German in her sympathies and connections.'
Unsurprisingly, when war broke out the British Government were wary of the Duke and Duchess and it was decided that they would be sent to the Bahamas for the duration of the war.
Here Edward took up the post as governor of the Bahamas.
King George also harboured the suspicions against his brother. During the so-called 'Phoney War' of 1939 – the eight-month period between war being declared and fighting beginning – the King gave Edward a military appointment in France with strict instructions that he 'not be shown secret documents'.
So it served a purpose to put a literal ocean between the couple and the United Kingdom as a precaution.
However, despite being over 4,000 miles away, they still caused controversy at home.
Wallis was blasted by the press for a spending spree in the United States at a time when Brits endured rationing and constant bombings.
Edward also reportedly told a journalist at the time that 'it would be a tragic thing for the world if Hitler was overthrown'.
At the end of the war, King George and the government's suspicions were vindicated when American diplomats uncovered files buried in the forest near Marburg Castle, including around 60 documents that appeared to contain correspondence between the Duke of Windsor and Nazi Germany.
Wallis was known for her Nazi sympathies and was tracked by the FBI who in a report wrote that 'the Duchess of Windsor was exceedingly pro-German in her sympathies and connections'
Now known as the Marburg, or Windsor, Files the documents contain details of a Nazi-devised plan to gain control of Britain, overthrow the monarchy and reinstate the Duke as King.
It is clearly stated that Edward was seen as a better ally than his brother King George, with the Duke urging the Nazis to bomb Britain 'to make England ready for peace'.
In the event of a successful invasion, the alleged plan was for Edward to rule a German-occupied Britain as a puppet monarch for Hitler.
A cable from the German ambassador in Lisbon to Berlin reads: '[The Duke of Windsor] is convinced that if he had remained on the throne, war would have been avoided, and he characterizes himself as a firm supporter of a peaceful arrangement with Germany.
'The Duke definitely believes that continued severe bombing would make England ready for peace.'
After Edward's tenure as governor ended in 1945, the couple led the life of the idle rich, attending parties in France and America, also going on lavish holidays with close friends.
Though she lacked the status of an actual queen, it was the kind of high life that American Duchess had always sought.
But when the Duke died aged 77 in 1972, Wallis was left alone, bereft of the man who had worshipped her.
The Queen, with whom she had minimal contact in the decades since her husband's abdication, hosted her at Buckingham Palace when she arrived for his funeral.
The two had previously met when Queen Elizabeth and her husband Prince Philip visited the Duke in Paris in his final days.
It was a sign of the Queen's willingness to put differences to one side for the sake of the greater good.
When Wallis died over a decade later, her funeral service at Windsor's St George's Chapel was attended by senior royals including the Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother. Her name was not mentioned during the service.
The service lasted for less than half an hour and was stripped of nearly all the pomp and ceremony that usually marks a royal death.
Other members of the 100-strong guest list included the then Prince Charles and his wife Princess Diana, along with Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Labour leader Neil Kinnock.
On her coffin was a single wreath of white, orange and yellow lillies left by the Queen.
Wallis was buried next to her husband at the Royal Burial Ground, Frogmore. The burial was attended by only the Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Charles and Princess Diana and eight of Wallis's aides and friends.
The Queen Mother, who had once called Wallis the 'lowest of the low', did not attend the burial, after being asked to stay away by the Queen.
However, there was one alleged flicker of emotion that perhaps signalled how, despite all that happened, feelings could be complicated.
According to Princess Diana, the Queen shed a tear as the Duchess was laid to rest. She claimed it was the only time she had seen the monarch weep.
The laying to rest of the the Duchess of Windsor marked the final chapter in a marriage that had captivated and scandalised in equal measure.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Living pillars' to be installed on Derby city centre lamp-posts
'Living pillars' to be installed on Derby city centre lamp-posts

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

'Living pillars' to be installed on Derby city centre lamp-posts

A number of lamp-posts in Derby are to have vertical planters installed to help create a "greener" city planters, described as "living pillars", will be attached to 15 existing lamp-posts and signage of the pillars is solar-powered, able to collect rain water - making them self-sufficient - and will be planted with pollinator-friendly plants and flowers, Derby City Council said. Work to install the pillars is currently under way and will be completed later this summer. Carmel Swan, the authority's cabinet member for sustainability, said: "Living pillars will be a brilliant addition to the work we've been doing over the past few months to bring more life into our city centre."We're serious about our commitment to creating a greener, healthier city that supports our residents, and the installation of these pillars is another step towards achieving this."A number of bee-friendly bus stops and "pocket parks" were introduced across the city in 2024. The pillars have been designed by Scotscape, an urban landscaping company that focuses on improving biodiversity in cities, and are funded by Bauer Media Outdoor's Community Innovation Fund. According to the council, the pillars will also help to guide people to "key destinations and attractions" in Derby.

Seven things to do with your leftover chip-shop chips
Seven things to do with your leftover chip-shop chips

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Seven things to do with your leftover chip-shop chips

So you've had a lovely evening at the beach, with a glass of something cold and huge portions of fresh fish and chips – but what do you do with the leftovers? Specifically, if you can wrangle them away from the seagulls, the chips. There's nothing like a bag of chip-shop chips eaten outdoors, and although many may claim that there can never be leftovers of such a treat, reality begs to differ. And here's where, for cooks, it gets interesting. Because chip-shop chips have myriad possibilities, to the extent that the topic once went viral when historian Lucy Worsley shared a kitchen tip from a follower on social media. 'I have received a kitchen tip that would be HUGE IF TRUE,' she wrote. 'Can you really put leftover chip-shop chips in the freezer then use them as oven chips?' The intriguing post notched up huge numbers of likes and comments, with many respondents stating that instead of binning their greasy leftovers they enjoyed them second time round, finding reheated chips 'even tastier and more crispy' than when fresh from the chippy. 'Yes! Yes! Yes! I do it all the time,' wrote one chip-lover, 'and they're much better than frozen packet chips.' Recommendations for the best way to store and reheat the cold fries were varied. Dry frying is a popular method for renewing former glory. 'They'll fluff up like new,' said one of Worsley's followers. The air fryer, however, was undoubtedly the preferred method for most commenters. 'Store them in Tupperware in the fridge, cook them in an air fryer the next day,' advised one with another promise that they'll be 'better than when they came from the chip shop'. Tempted? Here's the lowdown on how to revitalise your old chips. Skip to: How to store leftover chip-shop chips The best ways to reheat Seven uses for yesterday's fries How to store leftover chip-shop chips If planning to eat them the next day, just chill the chips overnight. If not, freeze the chips in a bag. There is no need to freeze them flat on a tray first. Their oil coating doesn't freeze solid so they won't clump together. The best ways to reheat Leftover chips reheat nicely in the oven from both chilled and frozen. Spread them out on a baking tray in a single layer and roast at 200C/180C fan/gas mark 6. You'll need to judge how long to cook them depending on their thickness and how well done they were in the first place. I find the lighter-coloured, larger chips warm up best, becoming crispy, rather than too hard or dark. I get the quickest and crispiest results using my energy-efficient air fryer, but am unimpressed with microwaved fries, which turn out floppy and soggy. A large non-stick frying pan also works well, as long as they fit in a single layer. No need to add extra oil, just cook over a medium-high heat turning regularly until crisp. Seven uses for yesterday's fries Chip butty Reheat your chips in the oven or air fryer until piping hot. Give them a fresh toss with a little salt – and vinegar – if you like. Stuff between two slices bread (white is best, generously buttered) and serve immediately with your preferred sauce for dipping. Battered chips Toss in flour then dip them into a batter made from self-raising flour and sparkling water. Heat 2cm vegetable oil in a frying pan and cook for 3-4 minutes. Hash In a hot pan, fry some diced chorizo until crispy. Add a sliced onion and cook until soft, then stir in a red pepper and a chopped chilli. Cook for about 5 minutes. Chop up the leftover chips and mix them through the hash. Cook for a few minutes more, until everything is piping hot. Serve with a fried egg and a sprinkle of coriander. Tortilla Stir into beaten egg. Add herbs, onions or cheese. Cook over a low heat, turning until golden and set. Dirty fries Spread the chips out in a baking dish and sprinkle with paprika. Spoon over chopped tomatoes, grated cheese, sliced red onion and chillies. Bake at 200C/180C fan/gas mark 6 until bubbling. Alternatively, just melted cheese will do nicely. Poutine Reheat then cover with gravy. Scatter with diced curd cheese or mozzarella. Chaffles Take a handful of leftover chips and press them into a waffle iron. Cook over a low heat until golden and crisp. Serve savoury – with ketchup or your favourite sauce – or go sweet with a drizzle of maple syrup.

The Midults: My girlfriend is always undermining me
The Midults: My girlfriend is always undermining me

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

The Midults: My girlfriend is always undermining me

Dear A&E, I've been with my girlfriend for two years and we've always got on really well as a couple in social situations, backing each other up and taking one another's side. Lately, though, I've found her starting to undermine me in little ways when we're out with friends – disputing my account of things that happened; contradicting me on little details; always needing to have the last word. I'm not naturally argumentative but it's starting to really bother me. She's really lovely and cosy in private. Should I talk to her, and what should I say? – Downcast Dear Downcast, Some happy, lifelong marriages involve one partner loudly and aggressively criticising the other in public. 'That story is so boring,' she squawks. 'Are you still talking??' he sneers. For many of us – as observers – this is both baffling and extremely unpleasant to be around but, hey, the heart wants what the heart wants and it's a dynamic that works for them. It is not, however, a dynamic that is working for you. At the moment it only bothers you but who's to say that, further down the line, it won't distress you. If you do not like this dynamic then you should address it as it is unlikely to go away by itself. Unfortunately, these things, left unchecked, will have a habit of either bedding in or intensifying and that has the potential to make you very unhappy. Unhappy people who actively avoid confrontation risk withdrawing, proving their point – or demonstrating their hurt – through action (or inaction), which could start to meaningfully alienate you from each other. Scary, right? If you bring this up, you might start a huge row or hear something you don't want to hear. It's only when you begin to understand what's happening, you can work out what to do. At the moment you are a bit hurt and a bit baffled – understandable but rendering you powerless. It is often at this stage of the relationship that you need to find courage. It is important to feel able to talk to the person you are with about what is going in between you. We know that sounds as though we're stating the bleeding obvious but it can feel frightening. Or exhausting. And lots of us duck it where possible. Be brave, Downcast. It will give the relationship the best chance of growing or, failing that, it will give you the best chance of growing. Right at the beginning of love affairs, we tend to find it sweet when our new and adored person gets things wrong. Or we don't even see it. Later, we may start to find it annoying but, hopefully, we make a decision – based on the bigger scheme of things – to right-size our responses; to look beyond. This is not denial. It is love. There is a chance that she may not know she is behaving in this way; that she had some kind of combative/judgmental elements to her early life. A fighty or one-upmanship-y childhood. Even a puritanical education may have nudged her towards becoming a kind of fact-checker. It doesn't really matter if an amusing anecdote is 'right', does it? The listener doesn't care whether it was Whitstable or Brixham; whether it was raining or snowing. How much does it matter to her that she is right? Would she rather be right or happy? You have various courses of action open to you. You could tell her that it is deeply uncomfortable for everyone when she does this – but that is actively shaming and makes it about the audience rather than your connection. 'Everyone thinks so…' is always a bastard thing to say unless it's around a compliment. You could try a bit of a shock approach and respond in the moment, in public, by saying something like 'I find it very difficult when you talk to me like that.' However, seeing as you have established, in your letter, that this is a kind of performative feistiness that rises in her only when you are among other people, that could cause trouble. We would think that a quiet moment, when you are alone and all is calm, might be a productive time to say something like, 'When you criticise me in public – which I feel is happening more often – what are you trying to tell me? I find it difficult, in the moment but, if there is something you need me to know, I would really like to hear it now. I don't love those public moments, which hurt my feelings, but I do love you and I'd like to understand why it happens and also look at my part in it.' What a man, Downcast! We obviously have no idea how this will go. But for both your own personal development and the future of this romance, it feels crucial that you are able to have the conversation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store