logo
CBSE schools in Hyderabad in a bind over ‘teach in mother tongue' rule

CBSE schools in Hyderabad in a bind over ‘teach in mother tongue' rule

Time of India28-05-2025
Hyderabad: The Central Board of Secondary Education's (CBSE) latest diktat on teaching young students in the mother tongue until class 2 has left many top schools scrambling, as managements now need Telugu-speaking teachers to comply with the rule.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
At many top schools, according to principals, over 40% of their staff are non-Telugu teachers.
According to the new rule, which is part of the National Education Policy (NEP), a student should be taught in their mother tongue or in the state language until class 2. The new rule would come into force from the 2025-26 academic year, which starts in June.
'Teachers are going to be the major problem to implement this. Either we conduct Telugu classes for teachers or hire assistant teachers to help them translate the subject,' Delhi School, Kompally, academic director Simi Nagi said.
She said in many schools, at least 40% were non-Telugu-speaking teachers . 'When it comes to top schools, hardly 10% of the teachers will be locals,' Simi Nagi, who is also part of Hyderabad Sahodaya Schools Complex, which has all CBSE schools as members, added.
Principals pointed out that making Telugu, which is also the state language the medium of instruction, would not be easy as both students and teachers were from across the country.
'Not just Telangana, any state that has people with transferable jobs, it is not going to be easy to implement this, as students keep moving from one state to another. In fact, many teachers who joined in the last decade or so, despite being locals, do not have a strong hold on the language, as their medium of instruction back in school was English," Hyderabad Public School, Ramanthapur, principal S Narasimha Reddy said.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Seconding Reddy, Ch Rekha Rao from Oxford School said that in the era of globalisation, this was a step in the wrong direction. 'For young children, it is advisable to communicate in one language to help them grasp quickly. Introducing them to too many languages will confuse them. It makes more sense to have the medium of instruction as English only,' she added.
Some of the school managements, however, welcomed the move and said that a direction like this would help students studying in state syllabus schools. 'In our schools, the majority know Telugu. Students will definitely understand better if the subject is taught in their mother tongue. Once they have a strong foundation in the younger classes, they will understand subjects easily in higher classes as well,' Shekhar Rao Y of the Telangana Recognised Schools' Management Association said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran slams Donald Trump over sanction on 6 Indian companies: ‘Coercive, discriminatory actions violate…'
Iran slams Donald Trump over sanction on 6 Indian companies: ‘Coercive, discriminatory actions violate…'

Mint

time25 minutes ago

  • Mint

Iran slams Donald Trump over sanction on 6 Indian companies: ‘Coercive, discriminatory actions violate…'

The Iran Embassy in India has slammed the Donald Trump administration over its decision to sanction six Indian companies for trading with Iran, calling it a 'coercive' and 'discriminatory' action to 'dictate its will on independent nations' 'The United States continues to weaponize the economy and use #sanctions as tools to dictate its will on independent nations such as Iran and India and impede their growth and development,' the Iranian Embassy said in a post on X. 'These coercive discriminatory actions violate the principles of international law and national sovereignty, representing a modern form of economic imperialism. Resisting such policies is a stand for a more powerful emerging non Western-led multilateral world order and a stronger Global South,' it added. (This is a developing story. Check back for updates)

US weaponising economy: Tehran slams Trump's sanction move to ‘dictate' his will on Iran, India
US weaponising economy: Tehran slams Trump's sanction move to ‘dictate' his will on Iran, India

First Post

time25 minutes ago

  • First Post

US weaponising economy: Tehran slams Trump's sanction move to ‘dictate' his will on Iran, India

After the United States sanctioned more than 50 entities and persons over the trade of Iranian oil, including six Indian companies, Iran has accused the Donald Trump administration of weaponising the economy and using sanctions as a tool to impose the American will on other nations. read more After the United States announced the latest round of sanctions on the trade of Iranian oil, Iran on Thursday accused the Donald Trump administration of weaponising the economy and using sanctions as a tool to impose the American will on other nations. The Trump administration on Wednesday sanctioned more than 50 entities and persons for the trade of Iranian oil. The entities and persons sanctioned are part of the vast shipping empire controlled by Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani, the son of Ali Shamkhani, a top political advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, the US Department of Treasury said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Hossein has leveraged corruption through his father's political influence at the highest levels of the Iranian regime to build and operate a massive fleet of tankers and containerships and this network transports oil and petroleum products from Iran and Russia, as well as other cargo, to buyers around the world, generating tens of billions of dollars in profit, the Treasury Department further said. There were at least six Indian entities or persons among those sanctioned by the United States. Notably, the sanctions, including on Indian entities and persons, came on the same day Trump slapped India with 25 per cent tariff and threatened with additional penalties over the trade with Russia. 'Modern form of economic imperialism' With the latest round of the sanctions, the United States has continued to weaponise the economy and use sanctions as tools to dictate its will on independent nations such as Iran and India and impede their growth and development, the Iranian embassy in India said in a statement on X. The United States has slapped wide-ranging sanctions on Iran over the regime' nuclear programme. While those sanctions were lifted after Iran signed the nuclear deal in 2015, Trump withdrew the United States from the deal in 2018 and pivoted to a 'maximum pressure' strategy wherein he maximised sanctions on Iran with the intention to bring the nation to the negotiating table. The Iranian statement further said, 'These coercive discriminatory actions violate the principles of international law and national sovereignty, representing a modern form of economic imperialism. Resisting such policies is a stand for a more powerful emerging non Western-led multilateral world order and a stronger Global South.'

SC stays Nainital HC order linking English proficiency to election duty, reignites Hindi vs English debate
SC stays Nainital HC order linking English proficiency to election duty, reignites Hindi vs English debate

New Indian Express

time29 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

SC stays Nainital HC order linking English proficiency to election duty, reignites Hindi vs English debate

DEHRADUN: The Supreme Court has intervened in a contentious national debate, staying a controversial Nainital High Court order that questioned the suitability of an official who could not speak English for election duties. This judicial intervention has reignited a vocal discussion across India about the dominance of English over Hindi in public life, prompting a critical examination of language proficiency as a prerequisite for effective governance in a multi-lingual nation. At the heart of this renewed discussion are strong voices challenging the premise of the High Court's directive. "This is nothing but a colonial hangover," asserted social activist Anup Nautiyal, squarely labelling the notion that only English should be spoken. He passionately argued, "We need to move beyond this English-Hindi dichotomy and the perception that 'only English will be spoken'. As the world flattens, knowledge is also democratising. It is not a preserve of a certain community only." Adding a crucial perspective, senior educationist and former DAV College, Dehradun Principal, Dr Devendra Bhasin, emphasised, "It is essential for everyone to respect Hindi. The development of a country happens by adopting its own language in practice; we have the examples of China and Japan." Senior journalist Kiran Kant highlighted the practical realities within the state, stating unequivocally, "In our state, 90% of PCS officers are Hindi medium educated. If we don't speak Hindi in our own country, where will we speak it?" The High Court decision, which drew national censure, had emerged from a petition concerning alleged irregularities in voter lists for the Budhlakot Gram Panchayat in Nainital. The petitioner claimed that non-residents, including individuals from Odisha, were improperly enrolled. During proceedings on July 18, the High Court specifically sought answers from the Chief Secretary and State Election Commission on a pivotal question: "Can an officer who is unable to speak English effectively control election duties?"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store