
Stop waiting for things to get cheaper. Be grateful they won't
Economists, politicos and pundits wrong-headedly sweat 'sticky' services prices and rising wages, especially after January's consumer prices index (CPI) pick-up saw inflation return to 3pc. Consumers lament sky-high food prices that refuse to fall and everyone regards April's minimum wage and employer National Insurance contribution rise as a ticking timebomb.
Yes, inflation has hammered households since 2021. Horrid, full stop. Prices at the end of January were an eye-watering 24.8pc above those recorded in December 2019. (Don't forget CPI understates many people's experience). Wretched indeed.
A military war ending doesn't mean the destruction the war caused is somehow reversed, it only means no new destruction. Ditto with inflation.
Prices and inflation are different. Inflation is the speed of changing prices, now 3pc year-on-year, based on CPI. But while the rate of inflation can fall, prices tend not to. Select categories may, but falling prices – deflation – well, developed nations don't do that. Why?
Significant deflation means depression, which is a far deadlier war. Reversing CPI's post-pandemic rise means approximating 1929-33's deflation or the early 1920s' post-First World War downturn.
Do you really want that? Didn't think so.
Winning the inflation war was never about dropping prices, just slowing the rise.
Like its global peers, the Bank of England (BoE) actively wants 2pc annual inflation as it helps reduce the real value of existing debt repayment a lot – about £56bn per year, or half the size of the annual deficit. Whitehall wins; you lose.
Yet any time the rate tops 3pc, Andrew Bailey must write to Rachel Reeves explaining it. According to BoE forecasts, the governor will have to whip out his pen later in 2025, with inflation set to peak at 3.7pc.
You'll recall this is tame compared to CPI's 11.1pc peak from October 2022. What's more, forecasts are squishy and measures are notoriously inexact (usually wrong) and were so even before the Office for National Statistics' (ONS) problems when Labour Force Survey response rates came to light.
Still, spare a thought for Bailey when he writes that letter. No evidence exists – none, zero, zip – proving the BoE or any central bank can fine-tune inflation or any other measure precisely, or that the indexes are even accurately reflective.
You know that yourself, given how the energy price cap jacked up CPI and everyone's living costs. Contrary to sales pitches from Ed Miliband and Theresa May, it didn't cap prices, it raised them, forcing suppliers out of business as wholesale gas prices rose, squashing competition and turning the ceiling into a target that lagged market prices.
In 2022, that meant huge household cost increases when the cap reset. In 2023, it meant household costs stayed high months after oil and gas prices fell, keeping Britain's CPI far above America's.
Other factors pushing January's CPI higher are similarly beyond the BoE's control. Bailey didn't slap VAT on private school fees or lift the bus fare cap.
The BoE can't manage olive harvests and other factors raising the price of cooking fats, nor can it set postal rates or make global airfares fall. But in terms of inflation's main fuel – and the one factor the BoE can influence – the 'war' is indeed over.
Inflation is simply too much money chasing too few goods and services, recorded with a time lag. In different terms, this is the money supply growth rate exceeding GDP growth rate, the one factor always caused by the BoE that it never, ever takes responsibility for, despite all that letter writing.
During 2020's Covid chaos, the BoE bizarrely ballooned money supply. The flagship M4 gauge topped 10pc year-on-year for 12 straight months, peaking at 15.3pc in February 2021. Soon, prices galloped. The madness was global. US M4 peaked above 30pc.
Eventually, the BoE slowed down. Now it grows a healthy 4.4pc, on par with or below much of the 2010s, when inflation habitually undershot the BoE's target. Subtract from this about 2pc annual GDP growth and you will see inflation sits around 2pc, Bailey's target.
Fretting wage growth and April's tax rise? Don't. Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman proved long ago wage growth follows inflation. It heals the wounds, it doesn't cause them.
Market forecasting requires seeing something big that others don't. Energy spent fighting a previous war astride an army of 'experts' doesn't even attempt that.
The inflation war has ended. Be patient. The truth is the FTSE has told you this for months as it kept hitting new highs. Trust it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Burghley Capital: BoE Rate Cut Signals Cautious Policy Path
LONDON, United Kingdom, August 13, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Burghley Capital, opens new tab positions the Bank of England's latest interest rate decision within the broader context of monetary policy recalibration, noting the complex trade-off between inflation control and growth stability. The Monetary Policy Committee votes by a narrow 5–4 margin to reduce the Bank Rate from 4.25% to 4.00%, a move requiring a second ballot not used since 1997. Sterling appreciates to $1.35 per £1, while short-dated gilt yields edge higher and equity markets close lower, reflecting a rebalancing of expectations for the remainder of the year. Division within the committee highlights differing assessments of the economic outlook Four members support holding rates at 4.25% due to concerns over slowing disinflation and the risk of inflation expectations embedding into wage dynamics. Four others favour a 0.25 percentage point cut, citing evidence of sustained underlying disinflation, while one member initially calls for a 0.50 percentage point cut before aligning with the quarter-point reduction in the final vote. The outcome underscores what Burghley Capital describes as a deliberate, step-by-step policy stance that avoids premature easing. Household impacts are uneven For borrowers on tracker mortgages, a typical outstanding balance of £140,000 (approximately $189,000) translates into monthly repayments falling by about £28.97 (around $39.11). However, 7.1 million of the UK's 8.4 million residential mortgages are fixed-rate, meaning most borrowers will not see immediate payment relief. Burghley Capital's analysis notes that the near-term boost to household spending is therefore likely to be modest. Inflation remains the key constraint on further easing Consumer price inflation reaches 3.6% year-on-year in June 2025, up from 3.4% in May. Food prices rise 4.5% year-on-year, the highest since February 2024, while services inflation stays elevated at 4.7%, reflecting persistent domestic cost pressures. Labour market conditions show early signs of cooling, with unemployment at 4.7% for the three months to May 2025 and the vacancy-to-unemployment ratio slipping below its equilibrium level. Markets respond with a measured repricing of assets The pound strengthens 0.4% against the U.S. dollar to $1.35 and 0.6% against the euro. Two-year gilt yields increase by 6 basis points to 3.887%, reflecting reduced expectations for rapid easing. The FTSE 100 ends lower. According to Burghley Capital's analysis, these moves indicate that while investors see the Bank's decision as measured, they remain cautious about the prospect of further cuts in 2025. Current market consensus anticipates no further adjustments until early 2026 Burghley Capital projects the Bank Rate settling at approximately 3.75% in the first quarter of next year, conditional on continued disinflation and stable employment data. The firm's analysis also highlights a growing divergence between the Bank of England and the European Central Bank, which has enacted eight rate cuts since June 2024, reducing deposit rates by around 50% from their peak. This divergence has potential currency and asset allocation implications for institutional investors. Economic growth indicators present a mixed picture UK GDP is forecast to expand by 1.25% in 2025, up from earlier 1% projections, but quarterly momentum slows sharply from 0.7% in Q1 to 0.1% in Q2. Corporate insolvencies rise 13% between the first and second quarters, while small business confidence remains in negative territory. Burghley Capital's analysis suggests that such conditions favour quality balance sheets, resilient cash flows, and prudent leverage strategies in both public and private markets. Conclusion Burghley Capital concludes that the Bank's cautious, data-dependent approach will remain the dominant feature of UK monetary policy into 2026. The firm notes that rate-sensitive assets, selective credit opportunities, and currency-aware strategies could benefit from this environment, provided investors maintain flexibility and a disciplined approach to capital allocation. About Burghley Capital Founded in 2017, Burghley Capital Pte. Ltd. (UEN: 201731389D) is a Singapore-based global investment management firm specialising in long-only asset management strategies. The firm delivers institutional-grade research, tailored portfolio design, and advisory services to both institutional and private investors. By combining rigorous analytical methods with disciplined investment practices, Burghley Capital seeks to deliver consistent returns and long-term portfolio resilience. For more information, visit opens new tab or our resources page at opens new tab. Media Contact Martin ### SOURCE: Burghley Capital Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire


The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Boosting productivity will be main priority of autumn budget, Reeves says
Rachel Reeves has promised to use her autumn budget to prioritise fixing Britain's dismal record on productivity as she sought to downplay mounting tax speculation with a focus on economic growth. Setting out her priorities for the budget for the first time, the chancellor said tackling the efficiency of the economy through higher investment and a fresh assault on planning rules would form the backbone of her tax and spending plans. Writing exclusively for the Guardian, she said: 'If Labour's first year in power was about fixing the foundations, then the second year is about building a stronger economy for a renewed Britain.' However, Reeves pushed back against what she called 'speculation' over tax increases being explored by the Treasury to close a yawning gap in the public finances that is estimated to reach more than £40bn. 'The months and weeks before any budget are filled with people speculating about – or claiming to know – what tax and spend decisions I will take or what the Office for Budget Responsibility [OBR] will conclude,' she said. 'This budget is no different – I get that. I will set out the decisions I take in the responsible manner.' The chancellor's comments come as the government braces for gloomy official figures that are expected to show the economy narrowly avoided flatlining in the second quarter. With Labour under mounting pressure over its management of the economy, City forecasters predict that Thursday morning's update from the Office for National Statistics will find that GDP rose by 0.1% in the three months to June. The UK outpaced its G7 peers in the first quarter with growth of 0.7%. However, experts have blamed tax increases announced by Reeves in her first budget, last October, and Donald Trump's trade war for a marked hit to activity. The chancellor, aiming to shrug off the anaemic performance, argued the government was taking steps to break a 'cycle of low growth' in which Britain had become trapped under Conservative governments. Laying out one of the central themes of her budget, which could be held in November, Reeves said the government would aim to boost the productive capacity of the economy by allocating investment for infrastructure projects and ripping up planning rules. 'If renewal is our mission and productivity is our challenge, then investment and reform are our tools,' she said. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Earlier on Wednesday, the Guardian revealed that Keir Starmer was preparing to revive plans for the Northern Powerhouse Rail project, which would improve transport connections between the main cities of northern England. Reeves has ordered Treasury officials to draw up proposals for slashing additional red tape in the UK's planning system to speed up large infrastructure projects. 'We are providing that investment and unblocking the barriers to it too,' she said. Successive chancellors have pushed to solve what economists refer to as a 'productivity puzzle' that has contributed to the UK's sluggish growth since the 2008 financial crisis. Productivity growth is considered one of the key determinants for raising living standards and wages over the long term. However, progress to drive up the measure of output per hour of work has stalled in recent years. The chancellor's renewed focus comes as the Treasury braces for a potentially devastating downgrade in productivity forecasts from the OBR, which could blow a £20bn hole in the chancellor's tax and spending plans. With the shortfall made worse by a weak growth outlook, higher debt interest payments, and a series of U-turns on welfare cuts, Reeves and the prime minister are laying the groundwork for tax rises and changes from September, before the autumn budget. The Guardian revealed on Tuesday that the Treasury was looking at ways to raise more money from inheritance tax to reduce the deficit. Labour MPs have been pushing the idea of a wealth tax, but changes to inheritance tax thresholds could be similarly controversial. Sarah Coles, the head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said it was 'hardly surprising' that inheritance tax was 'back in the frame'. It is among a limited suite of taxes that can be changed, despite the government's commitment to not increase the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT. 'The system is so fiendishly complex that there are an enormous number of rules, and therefore tweaks, that the government could consider,' Coles added.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Boosting productivity will be main priority of my autumn budget, Reeves says
Rachel Reeves has promised to use her autumn budget to prioritise fixing Britain's dismal record on productivity as she sought to downplay mounting tax speculation with a focus on economic growth. Setting out her priorities for the budget for the first time, the chancellor said tackling the efficiency of the economy through higher investment and a fresh assault on planning rules would form the backbone of her tax and spending plans. Writing exclusively for the Guardian, she said: 'If Labour's first year in power was about fixing the foundations, then the second year is about building a stronger economy for a renewed Britain.' However, Reeves pushed back against what she called 'speculation' over tax increases being explored by the Treasury to close a yawning gap in the public finances that is estimated to reach more than £40bn. 'The months and weeks before any budget are filled with people speculating about – or claiming to know – what tax and spend decisions I will take or what the Office for Budget Responsibility [OBR] will conclude. 'This budget is no different – I get that. I will set out the decisions I take in the responsible manner,' she said. The chancellor's comments come as the government braces for gloomy official figures that are expected to show the economy narrowly avoided flatlining in the second quarter. With Labour under mounting pressure over its management of the economy, City forecasters predict the update from the Office for National Statistics on Thursday morning will confirm that GDP rose by just 0.1% in the three months to June. The UK had outpaced all of its G7 peers in the first quarter with growth of 0.7%. However, experts have blamed tax increases announced by Reeves in her first budget, last October, and Donald Trump's trade war for a marked hit to activity. The chancellor, aiming to shrug off the anaemic performance, argued that the government was taking steps to break a 'cycle of low growth' in which Britain had become trapped under Conservative governments. Laying out one of the central themes of her budget, which could be held in November, Reeves said the government would aim to boost the productive capacity of the economy by allocating investment for infrastructure projects and ripping up planning rules. 'If renewal is our mission and productivity is our challenge, then investment and reform are our tools,' she said. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Earlier on Wednesday, the Guardian revealed that Keir Starmer was preparing to formally revive plans for the Northern Powerhouse Rail project, which would improve transport connections between the main cities of northern England. Reeves has also ordered Treasury officials to draw up proposals for slashing additional red tape in the UK's planning system to speed up large infrastructure projects. 'We are providing that investment and unblocking the barriers to it too,' she said. Successive chancellors have pushed to solve what economists refer to as a 'productivity puzzle' that has contributed to the UK's sluggish growth since the 2008 financial crisis. Productivity growth is considered one of the key determinants for raising living standards and wages over the long term. However, progress to drive up the measure of output per hour of work has stalled in recent years. The chancellor's renewed focus comes as the Treasury braces for a potentially devastating downgrade in productivity forecasts from the OBR, which could blow a £20bn hole in the chancellor's tax and spending plans. With the shortfall made worse by a weak growth outlook, higher debt interest payments, and a series of U-turns on welfare cuts, Reeves and the prime minister are preparing to roll the pitch for tax rises and reforms from September, before the autumn budget. The Guardian revealed on Tuesday that the Treasury was looking at ways to raise more money from inheritance tax to reduce the deficit. Labour MPs have been pushing the idea of a wealth tax, but changes to inheritance tax thresholds could be similarly controversial. Sarah Coles, the head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said it was 'hardly surprising' that inheritance tax was 'back in the frame'. It is among a limited suite of taxes that can be changed, despite the government's commitment to not increase the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT. 'The system is so fiendishly complex that there are an enormous number of rules, and therefore tweaks, that the government could consider,' Coles added.