Charity hits out at 'fundamentally inaccurate' warnings about draft Mental Health Bill
The draft bill was published last year to much concern from psychiatrists and will be discussed at the first sitting of the Oireachtas Health Committee on Wednesday.
The Irish Medical Organisation (IMO) is expected to criticise criteria for involuntary admission, timing of patients' psychosocial assessment, and care plan regulations.
Professor Matthew Sadlier, a psychiatrist and chair of the IMO consultants committee, is due to say: 'Effectively, where a patient is found to lack capacity to consent to treatment, the bill would lead to a situation where rather than treating patients, consultants will be required to make an application to the High Court to get permission to do so.'
He is expected to warn that patients with serious mental illness could be denied 'the right to timely and often life-saving medical treatment'.
He is also due to discuss the practicalities of the proposals and is expected to say, while around 760 psychiatrists are needed, Ireland only has 570 approved posts, with almost 30% unfilled or filled on a temporary basis.
However SHINE CEO, Nicola Byrne, has raised concerns about 'deeply stigmatising language and worrying predictions' used in discussions over the last few months.
'Claims that the bill abandons individuals with severe mental illness or removes the ability to intervene when someone is unwell and lacks the capacity to understand their situation or the need for help are fundamentally inaccurate,' she said.
"This legislation aims to provide a clearer, more rights-respecting framework for involuntary mental healthcare.'
She defended the proposed admission criteria, saying: 'The legislation is designed to intervene when a mental disorder presents specific risks or urgent treatment needs.'
There are already 'significant safeguards' in the Bill, she argued.
'What is too often missing from these discussions is the reality that the vast majority of people living with psychosis or schizophrenia are not in crisis, they are studying, working, parenting, volunteering, and contributing to their communities like anyone else,' she said.
Read More
Suzanne Crowe: People with severe mental illness will be failed by proposed new law
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
25-07-2025
- Irish Examiner
Delaying alcohol warning labels prioritises profiteering over health, says Irish Medical Organisation
The Government's decision to delay the roll-out of warning labels on alcohol ignores health in favour of corporate interests and profiteering, the president of the Irish Medical Organisation (IMO) has warned. As Ireland continues to experience worsening rates of liver disease, alcohol-related cancers, and foetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD), the planned roll-out of alcohol health information labelling has been delayed until 2028 at the earliest. The decision to delay the introduction of health warnings was approved this week by the Cabinet amid concerns the plan would undermine Irish trade competitiveness internationally. The labels, which warn of the health-related risks of alcohol and its link with cancer, had been due to come into effect in May 2026. President of the IMO, Dr Anne Dee, a consultant in public health, described the move as a 'serious threat to public health'. 'It will result in preventable incidences of cancer, increased incidences of liver disease, and harm to children because of a refusal to fully enact a bill signed into law seven years ago.' Labelling provisions under the Public Health (Alcohol) Act 2018 are a critical tool in reducing alcohol-related harm, she added. An estimated 4.8% of babies born in Ireland suffer from FASD, which represents the third-highest incidence rate of the disorder in the world. 'This is about giving people the basic information that alcohol causes cancer, liver damage, and harm during pregnancy,' Dr Dee added. 'These are irrefutable facts. There is no excuse for keeping them off the label. The longer this Government delays, the more irreversible damage is done.' Dr Dee also criticised what she described as "the influence of vested interests in opposing the measure". 'We welcome the fact that the Government recently reiterated its refusal to meet with representatives of the tobacco industry in keeping with Ireland's obligations under international frameworks that recognise health-harming industries. But why is the alcohol industry, which produces a substance that results in the deaths of up to 1,500 people in Ireland every year, treated differently?' Lack of courage She called on the Government to implement all measures in the Public Health (Alcohol) Act, adding: "This delay shows a lack of courage and clarity when it comes to confronting the alcohol industry's influence, and an inability to act on the commercial determinants of health.' The Government decision to delay the introduction of alcohol health warnings comes against the backdrop of fears for Irish business from US trade tariffs proposed by Donald Trump. Ibec organisation Drinks Ireland welcomed the move and said it provided 'much-needed relief' for drinks producers in Ireland.
Irish Examiner
15-07-2025
- Irish Examiner
Advocates call for 'key changes' to Mental Health Bill to protect the 'rights and dignity' of patients
It is not too late to make changes to the Mental Health Bill and offer better dignity to people with mental illnesses, advocates and legal experts have urged. The bill has now concluded final stages in the Dáil and goes before the Seanad in the autumn. Minister of state for mental health Mary Butler described the bill as the 'most comprehensive overhaul of mental health laws in 20 years'. She said it provided for the regulation of community mental health services — including Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services — by the Mental Health Commission among other reforms. Human rights lawyer and lecturer in international disability law at the Centre for Disability Law and Policy in Galway, Janos Fiala-Butora, is one of many raising concerns. A key issue is the criteria for involuntary admission to psychiatric units, he said. 'Psychiatric patients differ from other patients in one important way. If other patients reject the treatment offered, doctors cannot enforce it on them against their will. They have to offer alternatives and make an effort to convince them,' he said. They do not have to do that in the field of mental health, because involuntary treatment is readily available. That is a huge power, which must be wielded responsibly. He described the debate on the bill in recent months as 'quite disappointing' in an article for the online journal Mad in Ireland. Having represented dozens of patients and interviewed hundreds, he said abolishing involuntary treatment was preferable, but acknowledged the lack of alternatives for patients in crisis. He argued it was 'unfair to doctors' to expect them to police this approach. 'Pretending that all psychiatric patients who are rejecting treatment are doing so because they lack capacity will not get us closer to discussing what the proper contours of that power should be,' he cautioned. Social Democrat TD and psychologist Liam Quaide raised concerns about how the bill was rushed through the Dáil, with many last-minute amendments. He warned rejection of amendments on a right to an independent advocate or an independent complaints mechanism was worrying for patients. An amendment to bring in a reference to chemical restraints was also rejected. 'This is a deeply troubling omission as the practice of administering powerful, temporarily disabling sedatives is common in psychiatric settings [and] has serious implications for bodily autonomy and personal liberty,' he said. He also highlighted 'significant changes' to provisions around involuntary treatment. Many of these concerns were echoed by Mental Health Reform, which set out recommendations on seven issues. It also noted limited Dáil scrutiny with concern. It warned of 'particularly troubling' consequences from changes, including widened criteria for involuntary treatment and allowing for involuntary treatment to begin without a capacity assessment. A doubling of time allowed for involuntary treatment from 21 to 42 days was introduced, it said, 'at a late stage'. Independent advocacy and complaints are 'essential to uphold the rights and dignity' of people in vulnerable situations and should be included, it said. It welcomed a reduction in time to review the bill from 10 to five years. Overall, however, it urged that "there is still an opportunity to introduce key changes that would significantly strengthen the bill".
Irish Independent
04-07-2025
- Irish Independent
Cork would need 80 more GPs under free universal access
The report on general practitioner supply and demand found that with increased universal access, people would visit their GP around 4.2 times per year, up from the current number of 3.6 visits, while a GP's average workload would go up from 29 consultations per day to 33. Nationally, universal access to free GP care would require around 500 extra GPs, the report found. In County Cork the additional requirement would be 82 whole-time equivalent (WTE) GPs. The report found that the daily number of complexity-adjusted GP consultations in West Cork is slightly higher than a recommended benchmark, which the authors attributed to a higher proportion of residents aged 70 and older in the region. The complexity-adjusted figure reflects that some demographic groups such as older people have longer consultation times and are more likely to require home visits. The report also found that parts of Cork have doctors with a relatively higher General Medical Services (GMS) contract age and so there is potentially an older GP population. The GMS contract governs services provided to medical card and GP visit card holders. "Around Tipperary, Cork, Monaghan, and Donegal where young people are moving out, so are young GPs. This is being counteracted by young GPs selecting into neighbouring areas," the report states. Areas in Cork with younger GMS contract-holders include Bandon and Mallow. The central part of Cork city has a relatively low uptake of the GMS contract among GPs, despite being an area with a relatively high cardholding population, the report found, while in East Cork the uptake of the Chronic Disease Management (CDM) contract is high, reflecting a large older population. In 2023 the total number of GPs in the country was 3,928 or one WTE GP per 1,973 people. Nationally, just over 20% of GPs work in a single-doctor practices and another 20% work in practices with two doctors. Thirteen per cent of GPs reported working at least 48 hours per week. The Irish Medical Organisation (IMO) has warned that Ireland's GP numbers are "critically low" and will be not improve without significant systemic change. The organisation, which represents doctors in Ireland, argues that there is a lack of supports to encourage doctors to enter or stay in General Practice.
