Speculation Swirls After Deadly Fire at Massachusetts Assisted Living Facility
Officials released the names of most of the victims, who ranged in age from 61 to 86. At area hospitals, more patients were released. The Bristol County District Attorney's Office said in a statement late Monday that the fire investigation was ongoing, 'but the cause does not appear to be suspicious at this time.'
Some survivors of the fire, and some others familiar with the property, Gabriel House, said that some residents had smoked in their rooms, although smoking indoors was not permitted. And one former employee who worked there for more than a year said she never saw the staff perform fire drills or practice emergency evacuations, despite a population that included many older patients with mobility limitations who used walkers, wheelchairs or scooters to get around.
'No fire drills, no practice, no tests,' said Jenn Marley, a certified nursing assistant who said she worked at Gabriel House in 2018 and 2019, and left the job of her own accord. 'All they said when I was hired was, There's an evacuation plan posted on the wall.'
'Those poor souls who passed away,' she added.
The owner of the assisted living facility, Dennis Etzkorn, did not respond to requests for comment. In a statement provided to The Boston Globe, he pledged to 'continue to cooperate with the authorities and provide them with any information they may need throughout the investigative process regarding the cause and origin of this fire.'
The fire at Gabriel House — home to 70 people, many of them disabled or suffering health problems — broke out around 9:30 p.m. on Sunday. As thick smoke filled the building, some residents smashed windows in their rooms and cried out for help. Police and firefighters carried some residents from the building, as nurses from a hospital across the street ran to ferry them to safety in wheelchairs.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Phone scam alert: Middlesex Sheriff's Office reports 59 complaints in June alone
The Middlesex Sheriff's Office is warning residents about a significant uptick in scam calls. The office's Inner Perimeter Security team said it received 59 complaints of scammers posing as officers or deputies during June, marking the highest number of such reports in a single month, according to a community announcement. One individual reported losing more than $1,700. These scams are persistent and widespread, with fraudsters often threatening arrest for failing to pay taxes or fines, missing jury duty or not participating in court hearings, according to the announcement. They may also target professionals by threatening to revoke licenses. Scammers typically pressure their targets to pay fines immediately using cryptocurrency, gift cards or wire transfers, according to the announcement. They often use real officers' names, spoof law enforcement phone numbers or direct victims to law enforcement addresses to lend authenticity to their fraud. Waltham rewind: Sheriff Peter Koutoujian on his dad's Uncle Sam outfit 'If you receive one of these messages, please know that no legitimate law enforcement agency will ever threaten arrest over the phone, via text or email, or demand you pay a fine using one of these means,' said Middlesex Sheriff Peter J. Koutoujian, in a statement. 'These are tell-tale signs of a scam. If you receive one of these calls or messages, disconnect right away, don't click on any links and never provide any personal or financial information.' Besides notifying law enforcement, individuals can report these scams to the Federal Trade Commission at according to the announcement. The FTC received more than 5,900 reports of government imposter scams from Massachusetts residents in 2024, resulting in more than $9.5 million in losses. In the first quarter of 2025, the FTC has already received 1,530 such reports, with residents losing nearly $2.5 million. This story was created by reporter Beth McDermott, bmcdermott1@ with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at This article originally appeared on MetroWest Daily News: Scammers posing as deputies? Middlesex County residents urged beware
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Arson investigation launched after Boston flat fire
An arson investigation has been launched following a fire in Boston. Lincolnshire Fire and Rescue crews were called to a fire on Sutton Terrace on Tuesday, July 15 at around 10.30am. The fire caused damage to the ground floor flat in the Haven Village area of Boston and is believed to have been started deliberately. A Lincolnshire Police spokesman said: "We are investigating a fire at a ground floor flat at Haven Village in Boston. It continued: "Thankfully there were no reports of injuries. The cause of the fire is still unknown, and we continue to work with specialist fire investigators to progress our inquiries. READ MORE: CCTV appeal after assault outside Chinese takeaway in Ingoldmells READ MORE: Lincolnshire woman identified as body found in river, police confirm "We are currently treating the fire as arson until new information comes to light. If you witnessed any suspicious activity at the time, or if you have any other information that can help with our investigation, please get in touch." Anyone with information is asked to call 101 and quote incident 172 of Tuesday, July 15. A spokesperson for Lincolnshire Fire and Rescue added: "Three Lincolnshire Fire and Rescue crews from Boston and Kirton responded to reports of a domestic fire on Sutton Terrace on 15 July at 1030. "Firefighters used two breathing apparatus and one hose reel in to extinguish. While there was damage to the flat, thankfully nobody was injured. "Our fire investigators have examined the scene, and the cause has now been determined as deliberate ignition. We have shared our findings with Lincolnshire Police, who are appealing for information to aid their investigations.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Federal agents describe unusual run-up to arrests of Pro-Palestinian academics
Four veteran Homeland Security agents who helped execute the Trump administration's arrests of pro-Palestinian foreign academics for deportation testified Tuesday that the orders they received were both highly unusual and described by senior officials as urgent. 'Somebody at a higher level than the people I was speaking to had an interest in him,' said agent Darren McCormack, who oversaw the arrest of recent Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil in March. 'There were a lot of hands in the fishbowl,' recalled agent Brian Cunningham, who supervised officials involved in arresting Tufts University student Rümeysa Öztürk about two weeks later. The agents appeared as witnesses for the government at an ongoing trial in Boston on a lawsuit claiming the Trump administration is implementing an 'ideological deportation policy' that targets non-citizens in violation of the First Amendment's free speech guarantees. Each of the arrests discussed Tuesday took place based on determinations by Secretary of State Marco Rubio that the presence of the foreign academics in the U.S. undermined U.S. foreign policy interests. They included Khalil, Öztürk, Georgetown University researcher Badar Khan Suri and Columbia University student Mohsen Mahdawi. Subsequent to their arrests, all four were ordered released from custody by federal judges who found Rubio's orders appeared to have violated their constitutional rights. The agents said they couldn't recall similar requests in the past and that, prior to President Donald Trump's return to the White House in January, their division — Homeland Security Investigations — rarely took part in immigration enforcement. 'It was not something that I had much experience with, if any,' said Cunningham, an assistant special agent in charge in Boston. 'Most of my career as an agent and as a supervisor has been in enforcement of drug laws, drug smuggling, money laundering. … That's changed recently.' 'We had a meeting shortly after the inauguration, several meetings actually, that impressed upon us that Title 8 [immigration enforcement] was going to be prioritized,' Cunningham said, adding that deportations are typically handled by another Department of Homeland Security component, Enforcement and Removal Operations. Cunningham said the request he received regarding Öztürk was so unusual that he contacted a Homeland Security lawyer to confirm its legality. 'I can't recall a time that it's come top-down like this with a visa revocation, under my purview anyway,' he said. 'I did contact our legal counsel to make sure that we're on solid legal ground….The operation kind of developed pretty quickly.' Cunningham said that the background information he received on Öztürk included an op-ed she co-wrote in the Tufts student newspaper last year supporting divestment from Israel. The agent said he skimmed the op-ed and didn't see anything obviously criminal in it. 'I didn't see anything in the op-ed that suggested she'd committed a crime,' Cunningham said. McCormack, the agent involved in Khalil's arrest, said department leadership instructed his office to surveil Khalil and 'establish a pattern of life' for his apprehension. The requests prompted McCormack to consult with William Joyce, the head of ICE's Enforcement and Removal Operations field office in New York, which typically handles deportation-related matters. 'We historically in recent times had not enforced those laws,' said McCormack, a deputy special agent in charge in New York. 'I wanted to confirm there was a legal basis for arrest.' Asked why the usual personnel didn't handle the arrest, which eventually took place in a hallway of Khalil's Manhattan apartment building, McCormack was stumped. 'I'm not sure why. … I wondered why HSI was effecting this arrest and not ERO,' he said. 'I still don't know.' The agents said the arrests followed standard procedures: They handcuffed the academics and ushered them into unmarked vehicles. All four agents said they were never informed that the academics were being targeted for deportation due to their pro-Palestinian views, their criticism of Israel or for their political views — the central claim in the lawsuit. The agents said they carried out the arrests because the academics' visas or green cards had been revoked and because of Rubio's determination that their presence was at odds with U.S. foreign policy. There was no testimony Tuesday on the basis for Rubio's decisions. Testimony from a top State Department official who could shed light on that subject, John Armstrong, is on hold due to a temporary stay an appeals court issued in a dispute about the confidentiality of documents detailing the investigations into the academics. The HSI agents did testify about some agents' use of masks when making arrests, a practice that has drawn outrage from some immigrant rights advocates. They said that before the Covid pandemic masking was uncommon, although it took place occasionally when undercover agents were asked to help with more routine operations. Now, agents mask more often out of fear of doxxing on social media, the officials said. HSI policy doesn't require or forbid masks, they said. 'In the age of camera phones and the ability of people to identify those agents, people want to protect themselves if they're members of this community or they live here,' Cunningham said. Cunningham said it was 'common practice' for agents to identify themselves when making an arrest and he assumes it was done when Öztürk was arrested, although he conceded he wasn't there. 'I don't know what was said to her,' he said. The trial, taking place before U.S. District Judge William Young without a jury, is expected to resume Thursday.
