Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri to visit Washington, DC from May 27 to 29
Foreign Secretary
Vikram Misri
will visit Washington, DC from May 27 to 29, to hold talks with senior officials of the US administration.
The visit aims to build on the momentum from Prime Minister
Narendra Modi
's February 2025 visit to the United States, which saw the launch of a wide-ranging
strategic initiative
, the
India-US COMPACT
(Catalysing Opportunities for Military Partnership, Accelerated Commerce & Technology) for the 21st Century.
As part of this broader strategic push, both sides have pledged to double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. Speaking at a press conference earlier this year with US President Donald Trump, the prime minister had noted the shared ambition to strengthen trade and economic cooperation, noting that 'our teams will work on concluding very soon, a mutually beneficial trade agreement.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Manufacturing Excellence with OMEA Award by ansoim & Manufacturing Today
ansoim
Learn More
Undo
A US official had earlier indicated optimism that a trade deal could be reached this year, according to a Reuters report. Pesident Trump, during his remarks in February, had also said that the two countries are close to a trade pact in the aftermath of Trump's reciprocal tariffs.
Live Events
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Unleashes Biden 'Clone' Bombshell; Outrage Erupts Over ‘Execution' Claim
Donald Trump has reignited controversy with a shocking late-night post on Truth Social, implying that Joe Biden was "executed" in 2020 and replaced by engineered lookalikes. The post contained no context, just a link to a bizarre claim filled with phrases like 'soulless robots' and 'bio-engineered doubles.' While Trump didn't explain further, the internet exploded with divided reactions, critics slammed him as a conspiracy theorist, while loyal supporters echoed the wild claim. The uproar comes days after Trump publicly called Biden 'vicious' and 'not very bright,' urging Americans not to feel sorry for him. Meanwhile, Biden faces a deeply personal battle after being diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. His team has confirmed it's serious, but treatable through hormone therapy.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
NRI goes viral for saying Indian's live a better life than people abroad
Credit: X India is fast emerging as a major player in the world on the economic map. Behind this staggering achievement is an incredible shift in the manner in which life at ground level is lived in the nation. One such video on X, starring a man in his 30s who has experienced life both within India and overseas, presents a valid case: India, in several senses, provides a cheaper, more convenient, and service-oriented lifestyle compared to several developed countries. He brings to the fore the convenience of availability of services such as domestic assistance, low-priced cable TV, daily newspaper delivery, and speed-of-light grocery apps—features which are deemed luxuries in nations such as the U.S. and Canada because of their exorbitant prices and shortage of manpower. These are not uncommon in India—they're a norm in the daily life of its dynamic urban cities, made possible by an energetic service economy, technology, and people able to quickly adapt to innovation. The 10-minute grocery delivery mobile apps, which are currently still being tested in Western nations, already mainstream among the cities in India, illustrating how India tends to skip conventional development milestones with intelligent solutions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ready to Live in 3 & 4 BHK from ₹4.65 Cr* in Sec 22 Ambience Creacions, Gurugram Learn More Undo This fellow on X (@sathyashrii) highlighted how India has silently constructed a life of convenience and ease, from receiving a newspaper at your doorstep every morning to having a plethora of food delivery and logistics services available, many faster and more convenient than their counterparts in richer countries. Even in fields such as healthcare, India presents benefits that few Americans expect. In India, meeting with doctors, getting diagnostic tests, and accessing medicines is generally faster and much cheaper. An appointment with a specialist that may take weeks to get and cost hundreds of dollars in America can usually be scheduled the same day in India—at a small fraction of the cost. Most of the leading hospitals provide world-class treatment, and India is also becoming a medical tourism destination, with people from all over the world seeking quality treatment at less than half the price in the West. In contrast to nations where convenience is extremely costly, India offers the services cheaply and in volume, making everyday life in ways that surprise the majority in the West. It's not merely about price—it's also about innovation, adaptability, and a culture geared toward smart living. India recently emerged as the fourth-largest economy in the world, surpassing Japan, with a GDP of $4 trillion. This outstanding feat, backed by International Monetary Fund statistics and relayed by India's G20 Sherpa BVR Subrahmanyam, makes India poised to surpass Germany soon as well. For a nation once seen in terms of promise, India is today fulfilling that promise. This is not merely about statistics, though—it's about the lived experience of more than a billion individuals whose standard of living is consistently better. As India ascends the world economic ladder, it is setting an example of how growth can be combined with innovation, affordability, and daily convenience. Its success saga is not just being scripted in boardrooms and policy documents but is being played out in living rooms, hospitals, kitchens, and neighborhoods—where technology and tradition come together to design an exceptionally efficient and rewarding lifestyle. In a world where several developed nations are grappling with increasing expenses, congested infrastructure, and slower delivery of services, India is a place where contemporary life isn't merely accessible, but usually smoother. The future, it appears, is here already—and it is India.
Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Framing the narrative war against Pakistan
Nobody ever really wins the war of narratives. Each side tells its own story — shaped by perceived triumphs, real or imagined — and believes in the glory of its version. No one cares what the other side claims, unless one side was materially and visibly vanquished in a physical fight. That rarely happens. Sample this: As India began striking terror infrastructure across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7, Pakistan claimed it had shot down six Indian aircraft. India denied it. In fact, New Delhi refused to confirm any losses until last week, when the Chief of Defence Staff tacitly acknowledged that a jet (maybe more, unspecified) had been downed, but that 'the tactical mistake was remedied, and the plan reimplemented' — an implicit way of saying: 'It matters not what we lost, as long as we ultimately won.' The standoff ended in a ceasefire, with each side walking away convinced it had the better of the exchange. India believes it called out Pakistan's nuclear bluff; Pakistan insists it gave as good as it got — claims that remain unverifiable in the fog of war. Meanwhile, Pakistan says little about the pounding its airbases received in the Indian response. So steeped in denial is the country's military establishment that its Army Chief has assumed the rank of Field Marshal — an honorific that reveals more about narrative vanity than battlefield reality. For its part, Delhi is convinced it humbled Pakistan. Islamabad, however, couldn't disagree more. 'We have shattered India's illusion of superiority,' says Pakistan's PM. 'New Delhi has been taught a lesson in respecting the sovereignty of its neighbours.' Even Washington had its version of events. President Trump triumphantly claimed that he convinced both countries to back off. 'I talked trade with them,' he said. India denies it. Pakistan agrees. Who's telling the truth? Hard to say. Perhaps none of them care. Each sticks to its own version. Last week, seven multi-party Indian delegations visited global capitals to explain Delhi's position. Many in the West are sympathetic to India's position — its long-standing concerns about cross-border terrorism and Pakistan's duplicity in dealing with extremist groups. They recognise the provocations India faces and the public pressure on Delhi to respond. Even so, some take India's account with a pinch of salt. Yes, Pakistan was complicit in the Pahalgam terror attack — but why didn't India go after the real perpetrators? Why not share intelligence? Why the secrecy, the social media bans, the coyness in accepting losses, and the reluctance to engage with the international media? Back home, a few seem interested. Most people are content with the version of events presented to them. Perhaps that's the point of a good narrative — to remove the burden of inquiry, so the prevailing storyline is accepted, repeated, and quietly folded into national pride. And therein lies the rub. Narratives are, by their very nature, misleading. They mix fact, half-truth, and convenient fiction to produce a favourable picture. In the end, they mostly convince only the teller. You can believe deterrence has been restored — but it means little if your adversary doesn't agree. The deeper challenge lies in coming to terms with Pakistan's strategic culture. As Christine Fair, Professor at Georgetown University and a keen Pakistan watcher, has long argued, the Pakistan Army operates with an insurgent mindset. It wins simply by not losing. It thrives on confrontation and political relevance. That makes it almost immune to traditional deterrence logic. This is what India must keep in mind. The next time there's a provocation from Pakistan — and there might well be another — New Delhi would do well to resist the urge for political signalling. It's this compulsive need to cater to public opinion and control the narrative that often gets us into trouble. Showing resolve is tricky because it casts restraint as weakness and risks turning action into theatre. The smarter course is to hold fire, stay alert, and choose response over optics. For that, it's important to retain the element of surprise. In the days following the start of the operation, Pakistan's military claimed it had anticipated an Indian strike and was lying in wait. While the details remain unclear, Islamabad suggested it had adopted a restrained posture until Indian aircraft reportedly struck what it described as civilian targets, after which Pakistani forces retaliated by targeting Indian jets. Whether this sequence played out exactly as claimed is open to question. It's also unclear if not targeting the Pakistan military in the opening salvo was a strategic misstep. Yet the broader point stands: Military action, meant more as political messaging, is a risky undertaking. Combat aimed mainly at signalling, not effect, is almost always a mistake. It's worth bearing in mind that in conflicts like the four-day engagement in May, narrative dominance is an illusion. The real contest is not about who speaks loudest, but who adapts, who endures, and who denies the adversary what it wants most: Relevance. The writer is a retired naval officer and strategic affairs commentator based in New Delhi
