Malegaon verdict: Owaisi questions BJP's 'hypocrisy' on terrorism, asks if Centre, Maha govt will...
Malegaon verdict: AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi on Thursday questioned the 'hypocrisy' of the BJP government on terrorism over the acquittal of all the seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case, and hoped the Centre will challenge the verdict in the Supreme Court.
The seven accused who were acquitted by a special court in Mumbai include former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit. The September 2008 blasts near a mosque in the Maharashtra town killed six persons and injured 101.
Speaking to reporters in the Parliament complex, Owaisi said, 'Will the Modi government and the Maharashtra government challenge the verdict in Supreme Court? Or will they continue their hypocrisy on terrorism?'
He said the acquittal, coming 17 years after the blasts, raises serious questions about the investigation.
'First, the Mumbai ATS under Hemant Karkare probed the case, and then it went to the NIA. The investigation was deeply flawed. Despite the NIA saying military-grade RDX was used, no accountability has been fixed as to where that RDX came from,' he said.
Owaisi also referred to earlier blasts, including the 2006 Malegaon attack and the Samjhauta Express bombing, arguing that justice has been denied across multiple cases.
'Who carried out the Samjhauta blast? Who was behind Mecca Masjid, Ajmer, and Mumbai train blasts? Even in the 2006 Malegaon case, Muslims were arrested and brutally tortured. They were later discharged. So who really did it,' he asked.
The AIMIM chief also criticised the 'double standards' in terrorism cases, saying, 'There cannot be two approaches to terrorism. There has been no closure for the families of the victims, whether it's Malegaon, Samjhauta, Mumbai, or Mecca Masjid.'
He also recalled how in 2015, special prosecutor Rohini Salian alleged pressure to go soft on the accused in the Malegaon blasts case.
'In 2017, the NIA reintroduced Pragya Thakur's name in the chargesheet. So, who will be held accountable for this mess,' he asked.
Targeting the BJP's stand against saffron terror claims, Owaisi said, 'Was the person who killed Mahatma Gandhi Chinese? Who assassinated Rajiv Gandhi? Who killed Indira Gandhi?'
Demanding the government to explain if it intends to appeal the acquittal, Owaisi said, 'If the real culprits are roaming free, the country has the right to know who bombed Malegaon in 2008?'
(Only the headline has been reworked by India.com staff. Copy comes from an agency feed)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC orders nationwide clean-up of ₹1.6L-cr regulatory assets
The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed electricity regulatory commissions (RCs) across the country to prepare a detailed roadmap for liquidating existing regulatory assets (RAs) within the next three years. The court also instructed the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) to ensure strict compliance with this directive by registering a suo motu petition. The court directed that if any new RA is created, it must be liquidated within three years, with the existing regulatory assets cleared within four years starting from April 1, 2024, as per Rule 23 of the Electricity Rules. (HT Archive) The direction came in response to a petition filed by Delhi's three major power distribution companies -- BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd, BSES Yamuna Power Ltd, and Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd -- challenging the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission's (DERC) approach to electricity tariff determination. The companies argued that DERC's tariff policies over the years led to a massive accumulation of regulatory assets, which as of March 31, 2024, stood at ₹27,200.37 crore across the three discoms, including carrying costs. While examining the issue, the bench of justices PS Narasimha and Sandeep Mehta widened the scope of the case, noted that the problem of increased RA was not a phenomenon limited to Delhi. For instance, Tamil Nadu reported an estimated RA of ₹89,375 crore as of FY 2021–22, while Rajasthan's cumulative RA had crossed ₹47,000 crore by FY 2024–25. In contrast, the electricity regulatory commissions of Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Sikkim, Telangana, and Uttar Pradesh stated that they had never created RAs. The Maharashtra commission confirmed it had not created any regulatory assets since March 2020, in compliance with the National Tariff Policy, 2016, and the Electricity (Amendment) Rules, 2024. The court directed that if any new RA is created, it must be liquidated within three years, with the existing regulatory assets cleared within four years starting from April 1, 2024, as per Rule 23 of the Electricity Rules. Rule 23 prescribes that regulatory assets should not exceed 3% of the Annual Revenue Requirement (ARR). The bench held that each RC must prepare a trajectory and roadmap for the liquidation of its regulatory assets, including provisions to deal with carrying costs. It further ordered a thorough audit to determine why discoms were allowed to accumulate RAs without recovery for extended periods. To monitor and enforce these measures, APTEL was directed to invoke its powers under Section 121 of the Electricity Act and issue orders, instructions, or directions to ensure that the RCs fulfill their duties regarding regulatory assets. APTEL must also register a suo motu petition and continue monitoring until the liquidation timelines conclude. The judgment underlined that while increasing electricity tariffs is a tool to bridge revenue gaps, it may impose a sudden 'tariff shock' on consumers. To avoid this, commissions may opt to recover part of the gap immediately and create a regulatory asset for the remainder—recoverable in subsequent years. However, this should not become a long-term practice. 'The financial health and commercial viability of distribution companies must be ensured by the regulatory commissions,' the bench said. It emphasized that tariffs must be cost-reflective, and that revenue gaps between approved ARR and projected revenue should only arise in exceptional circumstances. Highlighting the consequences of unchecked RA accumulation, the court said, 'Disproportionate increase and long pending regulatory assets depict a regulatory failure. It has serious consequences on all stakeholders, and the ultimate burden is only on the consumer.' The court found that while RCs are meant to be independent authorities having functional autonomy, their decisions give a clear impression of a lack of ability to take 'firm' decisions. 'Instead of taking strong decisions on the basis of the statutory mandate, we see instances where the Regulatory Commissions manage and manoeuvre to arrive at a tariff by creating regulatory assets over and above all permissible limits. This is where the problem lies,' the court observed. The bench reminded the RCs to call for ARR, ensure that tariffs are determined, and that truing up is conducted in a timely manner, by exercising suo motu powers if necessary. 'Ineffective and inefficient functioning of the Regulatory Commissions, coupled with acting under dictation can lead to regulatory failure. The commissions are accountable for their decisions, and they are subject to judicial review,' the bench said.
Hindustan Times
39 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Ganga has come to wash your feet': Uttar Pradesh minister's remark sparks controversy
Amid the flood situation in several parts of the state, Uttar Pradesh fisheries minister Sanjay Nishad's remark during a visit to a flood-hit village in Kanpur Dehat district's Bhognipur tehsil has triggered strong public and political reactions. Sanjay Nishad is the Uttar Pradesh minister for fisheries and the founder-president of the Nishad Party. (FLE PHOTO) 'Ganga maiya comes to wash the feet of her sons. Just her darshan ensures direct passage to heaven,' Nishad was filmed telling residents when people raised concern over the floods. Sanjay Nishad is also the founder-president of the Nishad Party, an alliance partner of the BJP government in the state. He made the remark on Monday. The video has since gone viral, sparking criticism over the perceived insensitivity of the comment, especially in a region where people have lost homes, livestock and crops to the floodwaters. Locals, however, were quick to point out that Bhognipur is situated near the Yamuna river, not the Ganga. 'At the very least, a minister should know which river is flowing here,' one villager was heard saying. In another clip from the same visit, BJP district president Renuka Sachan, who accompanied the minister, purportedly told an elderly woman that it was her 'good fortune' that 'Yamuna maiya' came to give her darshan. The woman sharply replied, 'Then why don't you stay here and enjoy it every day?' Her reply too was widely shared on social media platforms. Reacting to Nishad's remark, UP Congress president Ajay Rai said, 'Mother Ganga is respected by all, including Hindus and Muslims. This statement has just made fun of the people's faith.' Much of central and eastern Uttar Pradesh has been affected by a flood-like situation due to the rising level of major rivers, including the Ganga and the Yamuna. In Bhognipur, many villages remain submerged, farmlands have been inundated and livestock swept away. Several residents have taken shelter on higher ground or temporary relief camps. In response, the state government has activated its emergency response strategy and formed 'Team 11' of ministers, assigning specific responsibilities to them. Ministers and legislators have also been asked to monitor relief efforts on the ground. Nishad's remarks have drawn sharp criticism from the Opposition parties. Samajwadi Party youth wing national president Dr Imran said: 'This government's ministers and officers have become completely insensitive. While people are suffering immensely, such careless remarks are being made instead of providing real help.' Congress Mahanagar president Sandeep Shukla said the comments were 'like rubbing salt into the wounds.' 'People are waiting for relief that hasn't reached them, and instead the minister is giving sermons. Rather than holding those responsible accountable, he is offering mythology in place of action,' Shukla said. Nishad later told a news agency that the remark was made in a lighter vein. 'I was on a visit to a flood-hit area of Nishads where while interacting with them I said that for seeking salvation, people from far away places come to take the holy dip in Ganga and here Ganga 'maiya' was right at their doorstep,' the minister said. 'We Nishads worship rivers, our source of life and livelihoods. So the remark has its own context,' the minister said. Earlier, videos of an Uttar Pradesh police sub-inspector worshipping the Ganga waters at his doorstep in Prayagraj and swimming in the flood waters had gone viral.
India Today
39 minutes ago
- India Today
East Bengal backs Mamata Banerjee's Bengali language drive during football match
In a show of solidarity with the Bengali language movement initiated by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, supporters of East Bengal Football Club have taken to the playground to express their protest. The movement allegedly began in response to reports of migrant labourers from Bengal facing torture in BJP-ruled the banner it was written in Bengali which raised the question, "Bharat Swadhin kortey sedin porechilam Faansi, Mayer bhasa bolchi boley aajkey Bangladeshi?" (We were hanged that day to bring India's independence. Are we now Bangladeshis because we speak our mother tongue?)advertisementDuring the Durand Cup league match between East Bengal FC and Namdhari FC at Vivekananda Yuva Bharati Krirangan on Wednesday, banners supporting the Bengali language movement were prominently displayed by East Bengal supporters. This is not the first time the club's fans have used their platform to voice their opinions on social and political issues. Earlier, they had also shown their support against the NRC (National Register of Citizens) by displaying protest banners during a PROTESTS BY EAST BENGAL SUPPORTERS East Bengal supporters have a history of using their platform to voice their opinions on social and political issues. In the past, they have organised protests and displayed banners on various issues, showcasing their passion and commitment to causes they care about. The recent display of banners in support of the Bengali language movement is a testament to OF THE BENGALI LANGUAGE MOVEMENT The Bengali language movement has gained momentum in recent times, particularly after reports emerged of migrant labourers from Bengal facing harassment and torture in other states. The movement seeks to promote and protect the rights of Bengali-speaking people, especially those who are marginalised and vulnerable.- EndsMust Watch
