
Trump order demands US medicine industry cuts prices
US President Donald Trump has signed a wide-reaching executive order directing drug makers to lower the prices of their medicines to align with what other countries pay that analysts and legal experts say could be difficult to implement.
The order gives drug makers price targets in the next 30 days, and will take further action to lower prices if those companies do not make "significant progress" towards those goals within six months of the order being signed.
Trump told a press conference that the government would impose tariffs on companies if the prices in the US did not match those in other countries and said he was seeking cuts of between 59 per cent and 90 per cent.
"Everybody should equalise. Everybody should pay the same price," Trump said.
Investors were sceptical about the order's implementation, and shares -which had been down overnight on the threat of "most favoured nation" pricing - recovered and rose in early morning trade on Monday.
The United States pays the highest prices for prescription drugs, often nearly three times more than other developed countries.
Trump tried in his first term to bring the United States in line with other countries but was blocked by the courts.
Trump's drug pricing proposal comes as the president has sought to fulfil a campaign promise of tackling inflation and lowering prices for a host of everyday items, from eggs to petrol.
Trump said his order on drug prices was partly a result of a conversation with an unnamed friend who told the president he got a weight loss injection for $US88 ($A138) in London and that the same injection in the US cost $US1300.
If drug makers do not meet the government's expectations, it will use rule making to bring drug prices to international levels and consider a range of other measures, including importing medicines from other developed countries and implementing export restrictions, a copy of the order showed.
Trade groups representing biotech and pharmaceutical decried the move.
"Importing foreign prices from socialist countries would be a bad deal for American patients and workers. It would mean less treatments and cures and would jeopardise the hundreds of billions our member companies are planning to invest in America," PhRMA CEO Stephen Ubl said in a statement.
Ubl said the real reasons for high drug prices are other "countries not paying their fair share and middlemen driving up prices for US patients".
The order also directs the US Federal Trade Commission to consider aggressive enforcement against what the government calls anti-competitive practices by drug makers.
"We're all familiar with some of the places where pharmaceutical companies push the limits to prevent competition that would lower their prices," one White House official said, pointing to patent protections and deals drug makers make with generic companies to hold off on cheaper copies.
The executive order is likely to face legal challenges, particularly for exceeding limits set by US law, including on imports of drugs from abroad, health policy lawyer Paul Kim said.
"The order's suggestion of broader or direct-to-consumer importation stretches well beyond what the statute allows," Kim said.
The FTC has a long history of antitrust enforcement actions against pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies.
"President Donald Trump campaigned on lowering drug costs and today he's doing just that. Americans are tired of getting ripped off. The Federal Trade Commission will be a proud partner in this new effort," FTC spokesman Joe Simonson said.
The executive order differed from what drug makers had been expecting.
Four lobbyist sources told Reuters they were expecting an executive order that called for "most favoured nation" pricing on a subset of Medicare drugs.
"Implementing something like this is pretty challenging. He tried to do this before and it was stopped by the courts," said Evan Seigerman, analyst at BMO Capital Markets.
The White House officials did not specify any targets.
Trump's order also directs the government to consider facilitating direct-to-consumer purchasing programs that would sell drugs at the prices other countries pay.
It also orders the Secretary of Commerce and other agency heads to review and consider actions regarding the export of pharmaceutical drugs or ingredients that may contribute to price differences.
US President Donald Trump has signed a wide-reaching executive order directing drug makers to lower the prices of their medicines to align with what other countries pay that analysts and legal experts say could be difficult to implement.
The order gives drug makers price targets in the next 30 days, and will take further action to lower prices if those companies do not make "significant progress" towards those goals within six months of the order being signed.
Trump told a press conference that the government would impose tariffs on companies if the prices in the US did not match those in other countries and said he was seeking cuts of between 59 per cent and 90 per cent.
"Everybody should equalise. Everybody should pay the same price," Trump said.
Investors were sceptical about the order's implementation, and shares -which had been down overnight on the threat of "most favoured nation" pricing - recovered and rose in early morning trade on Monday.
The United States pays the highest prices for prescription drugs, often nearly three times more than other developed countries.
Trump tried in his first term to bring the United States in line with other countries but was blocked by the courts.
Trump's drug pricing proposal comes as the president has sought to fulfil a campaign promise of tackling inflation and lowering prices for a host of everyday items, from eggs to petrol.
Trump said his order on drug prices was partly a result of a conversation with an unnamed friend who told the president he got a weight loss injection for $US88 ($A138) in London and that the same injection in the US cost $US1300.
If drug makers do not meet the government's expectations, it will use rule making to bring drug prices to international levels and consider a range of other measures, including importing medicines from other developed countries and implementing export restrictions, a copy of the order showed.
Trade groups representing biotech and pharmaceutical decried the move.
"Importing foreign prices from socialist countries would be a bad deal for American patients and workers. It would mean less treatments and cures and would jeopardise the hundreds of billions our member companies are planning to invest in America," PhRMA CEO Stephen Ubl said in a statement.
Ubl said the real reasons for high drug prices are other "countries not paying their fair share and middlemen driving up prices for US patients".
The order also directs the US Federal Trade Commission to consider aggressive enforcement against what the government calls anti-competitive practices by drug makers.
"We're all familiar with some of the places where pharmaceutical companies push the limits to prevent competition that would lower their prices," one White House official said, pointing to patent protections and deals drug makers make with generic companies to hold off on cheaper copies.
The executive order is likely to face legal challenges, particularly for exceeding limits set by US law, including on imports of drugs from abroad, health policy lawyer Paul Kim said.
"The order's suggestion of broader or direct-to-consumer importation stretches well beyond what the statute allows," Kim said.
The FTC has a long history of antitrust enforcement actions against pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies.
"President Donald Trump campaigned on lowering drug costs and today he's doing just that. Americans are tired of getting ripped off. The Federal Trade Commission will be a proud partner in this new effort," FTC spokesman Joe Simonson said.
The executive order differed from what drug makers had been expecting.
Four lobbyist sources told Reuters they were expecting an executive order that called for "most favoured nation" pricing on a subset of Medicare drugs.
"Implementing something like this is pretty challenging. He tried to do this before and it was stopped by the courts," said Evan Seigerman, analyst at BMO Capital Markets.
The White House officials did not specify any targets.
Trump's order also directs the government to consider facilitating direct-to-consumer purchasing programs that would sell drugs at the prices other countries pay.
It also orders the Secretary of Commerce and other agency heads to review and consider actions regarding the export of pharmaceutical drugs or ingredients that may contribute to price differences.
US President Donald Trump has signed a wide-reaching executive order directing drug makers to lower the prices of their medicines to align with what other countries pay that analysts and legal experts say could be difficult to implement.
The order gives drug makers price targets in the next 30 days, and will take further action to lower prices if those companies do not make "significant progress" towards those goals within six months of the order being signed.
Trump told a press conference that the government would impose tariffs on companies if the prices in the US did not match those in other countries and said he was seeking cuts of between 59 per cent and 90 per cent.
"Everybody should equalise. Everybody should pay the same price," Trump said.
Investors were sceptical about the order's implementation, and shares -which had been down overnight on the threat of "most favoured nation" pricing - recovered and rose in early morning trade on Monday.
The United States pays the highest prices for prescription drugs, often nearly three times more than other developed countries.
Trump tried in his first term to bring the United States in line with other countries but was blocked by the courts.
Trump's drug pricing proposal comes as the president has sought to fulfil a campaign promise of tackling inflation and lowering prices for a host of everyday items, from eggs to petrol.
Trump said his order on drug prices was partly a result of a conversation with an unnamed friend who told the president he got a weight loss injection for $US88 ($A138) in London and that the same injection in the US cost $US1300.
If drug makers do not meet the government's expectations, it will use rule making to bring drug prices to international levels and consider a range of other measures, including importing medicines from other developed countries and implementing export restrictions, a copy of the order showed.
Trade groups representing biotech and pharmaceutical decried the move.
"Importing foreign prices from socialist countries would be a bad deal for American patients and workers. It would mean less treatments and cures and would jeopardise the hundreds of billions our member companies are planning to invest in America," PhRMA CEO Stephen Ubl said in a statement.
Ubl said the real reasons for high drug prices are other "countries not paying their fair share and middlemen driving up prices for US patients".
The order also directs the US Federal Trade Commission to consider aggressive enforcement against what the government calls anti-competitive practices by drug makers.
"We're all familiar with some of the places where pharmaceutical companies push the limits to prevent competition that would lower their prices," one White House official said, pointing to patent protections and deals drug makers make with generic companies to hold off on cheaper copies.
The executive order is likely to face legal challenges, particularly for exceeding limits set by US law, including on imports of drugs from abroad, health policy lawyer Paul Kim said.
"The order's suggestion of broader or direct-to-consumer importation stretches well beyond what the statute allows," Kim said.
The FTC has a long history of antitrust enforcement actions against pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies.
"President Donald Trump campaigned on lowering drug costs and today he's doing just that. Americans are tired of getting ripped off. The Federal Trade Commission will be a proud partner in this new effort," FTC spokesman Joe Simonson said.
The executive order differed from what drug makers had been expecting.
Four lobbyist sources told Reuters they were expecting an executive order that called for "most favoured nation" pricing on a subset of Medicare drugs.
"Implementing something like this is pretty challenging. He tried to do this before and it was stopped by the courts," said Evan Seigerman, analyst at BMO Capital Markets.
The White House officials did not specify any targets.
Trump's order also directs the government to consider facilitating direct-to-consumer purchasing programs that would sell drugs at the prices other countries pay.
It also orders the Secretary of Commerce and other agency heads to review and consider actions regarding the export of pharmaceutical drugs or ingredients that may contribute to price differences.
US President Donald Trump has signed a wide-reaching executive order directing drug makers to lower the prices of their medicines to align with what other countries pay that analysts and legal experts say could be difficult to implement.
The order gives drug makers price targets in the next 30 days, and will take further action to lower prices if those companies do not make "significant progress" towards those goals within six months of the order being signed.
Trump told a press conference that the government would impose tariffs on companies if the prices in the US did not match those in other countries and said he was seeking cuts of between 59 per cent and 90 per cent.
"Everybody should equalise. Everybody should pay the same price," Trump said.
Investors were sceptical about the order's implementation, and shares -which had been down overnight on the threat of "most favoured nation" pricing - recovered and rose in early morning trade on Monday.
The United States pays the highest prices for prescription drugs, often nearly three times more than other developed countries.
Trump tried in his first term to bring the United States in line with other countries but was blocked by the courts.
Trump's drug pricing proposal comes as the president has sought to fulfil a campaign promise of tackling inflation and lowering prices for a host of everyday items, from eggs to petrol.
Trump said his order on drug prices was partly a result of a conversation with an unnamed friend who told the president he got a weight loss injection for $US88 ($A138) in London and that the same injection in the US cost $US1300.
If drug makers do not meet the government's expectations, it will use rule making to bring drug prices to international levels and consider a range of other measures, including importing medicines from other developed countries and implementing export restrictions, a copy of the order showed.
Trade groups representing biotech and pharmaceutical decried the move.
"Importing foreign prices from socialist countries would be a bad deal for American patients and workers. It would mean less treatments and cures and would jeopardise the hundreds of billions our member companies are planning to invest in America," PhRMA CEO Stephen Ubl said in a statement.
Ubl said the real reasons for high drug prices are other "countries not paying their fair share and middlemen driving up prices for US patients".
The order also directs the US Federal Trade Commission to consider aggressive enforcement against what the government calls anti-competitive practices by drug makers.
"We're all familiar with some of the places where pharmaceutical companies push the limits to prevent competition that would lower their prices," one White House official said, pointing to patent protections and deals drug makers make with generic companies to hold off on cheaper copies.
The executive order is likely to face legal challenges, particularly for exceeding limits set by US law, including on imports of drugs from abroad, health policy lawyer Paul Kim said.
"The order's suggestion of broader or direct-to-consumer importation stretches well beyond what the statute allows," Kim said.
The FTC has a long history of antitrust enforcement actions against pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies.
"President Donald Trump campaigned on lowering drug costs and today he's doing just that. Americans are tired of getting ripped off. The Federal Trade Commission will be a proud partner in this new effort," FTC spokesman Joe Simonson said.
The executive order differed from what drug makers had been expecting.
Four lobbyist sources told Reuters they were expecting an executive order that called for "most favoured nation" pricing on a subset of Medicare drugs.
"Implementing something like this is pretty challenging. He tried to do this before and it was stopped by the courts," said Evan Seigerman, analyst at BMO Capital Markets.
The White House officials did not specify any targets.
Trump's order also directs the government to consider facilitating direct-to-consumer purchasing programs that would sell drugs at the prices other countries pay.
It also orders the Secretary of Commerce and other agency heads to review and consider actions regarding the export of pharmaceutical drugs or ingredients that may contribute to price differences.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
China has its own ‘strategic agenda' when it comes to their trade war with the US
ASPI Senior Analyst in Defence Strategy Malcolm Davis claims the phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping has 'not at all' cooled tensions between the leaders amid their tariff war. 'No matter what the Trump administration says to China … China has its own strategic agenda,' Mr Davis told Sky News Australia. 'Trump very well may go to Beijing ... but at the end of the day, Chinese are still going to make their moves in the Indo-Pacific.'

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
What's driving China's hunger for Aussie beef as exports soar
Grain-fed beef exports to China have ballooned more than 40 per cent this year – and it's not only because of the Asian superpower's trade war with the US. Australia has broken records in the beef export industry so far in 2025, up 15 per cent year-on-year, to reach more than 567,000 tonnes by May. Among the biggest movers has been grain-fed exports to Greater China – which includes Taiwan and Hong Kong – rising 41 per cent to 57,000 tonnes alone. Overall beef exports to Greater China are up 30 per cent this year, rising to 117,000 tonnes in the latest data. These figures reveal how Australian beef exporters have been a big winner of Beijing and Washington's ongoing trade war sparked by Donald Trump's tariff regime. Meat & Livestock Australia general manager of markets Andrew Cox explained the uptick in trade to China had also coincided with a repairing of the political relationship between the two countries in recent years. China only lifted the last of its unofficial trade sanctions on Australian products like meat, wine and barley in December last year, which stemmed from tensions between Beijing and the previous federal government. 'And then of course, more recently, there's been some increased demand because our key competitor in that premium space in China, the US, has been effectively shut-out due to the trade relationship between China and the US.' China previously imported AU$2.5 billion worth of American meat but those products have virtually disappeared from supermarket shelves since Mr Trump's 'Liberation Day' as both countries hit each other with tariffs above 100 per cent. The growing middle class China's growing middle class and rising incomes have seen beef become a more popular source of protein – particularly premium cuts like wagyu – than it was historically. A snapshot collated by Meat & Livestock Australia shows 74 per cent of affluent Chinese consumers believe Australian beef is 'the most delicious', while it also scored highly for freshness and safety. Mr Cox, who has been in the industry for 20 years, said he remembered when Chinese trade figures were a 'rounding error' on the export database. 'Now they're the world's biggest beef importer and it's got more runway to grow,' he said. 'We've seen urbanisation, an emerging and growing middle class numbering in the hundreds of millions. And they have a demand for quality and safe protein.' Tammi Jonas, a farmer and spokeswoman for the Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance, predicted China to hoover up Aussie beef after the tariffs were announced in April. 'China has just turned immediately and said, 'Yep, that looks great. We'll have more Australian beef',' she told this week. Ms Jonas, however, has also warned of the potential for beef prices in Australian grocery stores to go up as exporters send more stock overseas. 'China buys a full range of everything from cheaper cuts to the more expensive ones,' she said. 'They have a rapidly growing middle class, so they demand more of the premium beef than historically they did. 'And Japan is the same, they both like a lot of the premium cuts from here. 'So that's direct competition with premium cuts in Australian supermarkets.' Tariffs and US trade The US President, in his April 2 speech, singled out an unbalanced beef trade as justification for slapping a blanket 10 per cent tariff on all Australian-made products. 'They won't take any of our beef. They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and, you know, I don't blame them, but we're doing the same thing right now, starting at midnight tonight,' Mr Trump said. Despite this, US importers have taken in 167,000 tonnes of Australian beef in 2025 – with its 32 per cent growth outstripping that of China. Australia's meat exports to the US totalled around $4 billion in 2024, while America has been dealing with drought conditions that have squeezed domestic cattle supply. It was revealed on Friday that the Australian government was considering relaxing biosecurity laws to allow more American beef into the country as part of tariff negotiations. Beef from the US was banned in 2003 after the breakout of mad cow disease, and since 2019 there have been strict conditions for meat products to enter Australia. The move has seen some pushback from farmers, with National Farmers Federation president David Jochinke telling the Sydney Morning Herald that protecting biosecurity was paramount for the industry. 'Let's be abundantly clear, our biosecurity isn't a bargaining chip,' he said. 'We have the world's best standards, backed by science, and that's how it needs to stay.' Cattle Australia chief executive Chris Parker on Friday said US beef producers have had access to Australian markets since 2019, provided they could show animals were born raised and slaughtered in the US. 'Our position is that the US needs to be able to demonstrate it can either trace cattle born in Mexico and Canada, or has systems that are equivalent to Australia's traceability, before imports of meat could occur from non-US cattle,' Dr Parker said. 'Cattle Australia is in ongoing communication with the Federal Government regarding this issue and the vital importance that our science-based biosecurity system is not compromised as part of trade discussions with any country.' Domestic prices So far beef prices has remained steady for farmers, as demand from importers means strong paydays along the supply chain, Ms Jonas said. 'The big exporters (in Australia) are rubbing their hands and just filling that market rapidly,' she said. 'And the more that market opens up, the more pressure it puts on domestic pricing. 'So supermarket beef, like we like we said several months ago, supermarkets beef is definitely going to keep going up in price.' Mr Cox said predicting prices was like weather forecasting but added that Australia already exported 75 per cent of the beef produced here. 'For the Australian farmer to be sustainable for that cultural sector, we need customers all around the world,' he said. 'We produce more food than we eat domestically and we're highly reliant on export markets.'

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
What the Trump-Musk Feud Means for SpaceX and NASA
The U.S. government relies on SpaceX to support NASA and other agencies, and the company has received more $20 billion in federal contracts for it. As Musk and Trump threaten to cut ties, here's what that would mean for the U.S.'s space ambitions.