
Once Bollywood's highest paid child star, started working at age 4, was abused by her mother, passed away at only 51. Nobody from Bollywood attended her funeral
A Scandal That Split the Family
A Child's Desperation to Escape
An Early Decline in Stardom
Bitterness Toward the Past
Moments of Recognition Amid Hardship
The Unfulfilled Second Act
A Quiet, Lonely End
A Life That Echoes a Larger Tragedy
Salma Baig, later known by her screen name Naaz , was born in Mumbai in 1944. According to multiple film archives, she quickly became one of Hindi cinema's most sought-after child actors, earning the highest pay in her category. While fame came early, it also brought profound personal turmoil. As chronicled in Stardust magazine, Naaz's career and childhood were shaped—and scarred—by her mother's exploitation. The young actress's father, Mirza Dawood Baig, was a struggling story writer whose inconsistent income left the family in financial hardship. Naaz was pushed onto the stage at the tender age of four, earning around a hundred rupees per performance, a sum that became the family's main source of survival.Naaz initially enjoyed dancing, unaware that she was gradually being turned into the sole breadwinner of the household. The same Stardust interview records her recollection of how quickly her passion was transformed into an unrelenting obligation, stripping her of the carefree childhood other children took for granted.Naaz openly stated in Stardust that her resentment was not directed toward her ailing father, but toward her mother, whose ambitions became all-consuming. She recalled her mother's refusal of Raj Kapoor's generous offer to send her to school in Switzerland, instead choosing to keep Naaz working continuously. Offers from major studios were accepted without question, ensuring there was no break in her shooting schedule.Naaz described her home life as devoid of affection or basic care. Even after working exhausting four-shift days, she would return to parents embroiled in their own disputes, indifferent to her needs. She repeatedly mentioned in interviews that she went to bed hungry countless times, without even a glass of milk, despite the fact that her earnings supported the entire household.As per Naaz's account to Stardust, when her career as a child star began to flourish, her mother entered a relationship with a cameraman and forced her husband out of the family home. For two years, Naaz had no contact with her father and no knowledge of his whereabouts. During this period, she appeared in acclaimed films such as Boot Polish—produced by RK Studios—which earned her a special honor at the Cannes Film Festival, and Devdas, alongside leading stars of the time, including Dilip Kumar and Nargis She worked with a host of Bollywood icons, from Raj Kapoor to Asha Parekh. However, these professional successes stood in stark contrast to the emotional isolation she experienced behind the scenes.The depth of Naaz's despair emerged in her recollections of two separate suicide attempts during childhood, both prevented by her ayah (nanny). In her words to Stardust, she had learned from her nanny's stories that people sometimes ended their lives by jumping into a well. Feeling suffocated by her circumstances, she ran toward the well on two occasions, only to be stopped each time by her caretaker.Her mother's reaction to the first attempt was not compassion but rage. Instead of consoling her, she slapped Naaz and berated her. This response deepened Naaz's hopelessness, leaving her convinced that her suffering was invisible to the one person who should have protected her.Like many child actors, Naaz struggled to transition into adult roles. She shifted her focus to voice dubbing for South Indian actresses in Hindi films, including Sridevi, as reported in industry profiles. However, tensions arose when Naaz began dubbing for other leading ladies, prompting Sridevi to cut professional ties with her. Despite the setback, Naaz persisted, lending her voice to numerous performers and working in television programming, including special broadcasts for Bombay Doordarshan.Her husband, actor Subbiraj—who was distantly related to the Kapoor family—was also active in dubbing work. Naaz often accompanied him on stage shows such as Kalyanji-Anandji musical events, both in India and abroad. She told Stardust that she still hoped for one more big opportunity to reclaim the fame she once had, believing that her talent had been underestimated.In interviews, Naaz was candid about her unresolved resentment toward her mother and the man she had an affair with, accusing them of using her earnings for their personal gain. She revealed that the man married off all three of his daughters with the money she had earned through grueling workdays. This financial and emotional exploitation left her with no savings and no stability, despite decades in the industry.While her personal life was turbulent, Naaz's work in Boot Polish remained a career highlight. According to film historian records, her portrayal of a resilient street child captured the hearts of audiences and critics alike, and the Cannes recognition brought international attention. Yet, even these accolades could not alter the trajectory of her personal circumstances, as her mother continued to control her income and deny her education.Her chance to study or develop outside the film industry was repeatedly blocked, reinforcing the cycle that kept her financially tied to her family's survival.Naaz admitted in her Stardust conversation that, even after 30 years in the business, she was financially and professionally in the same place she had been at the start. She expressed hope that one day she might be recognized again, this time for her skill rather than her childhood fame. Unfortunately, that break never came.While she remained active in smaller projects and continued dubbing, the glory days of working alongside Bollywood's biggest names were long gone. Her later life was far from the security or recognition that many might have assumed a former child star would enjoy.Naaz's final years were marked by declining health. According to her husband's account, she was a habitual tobacco chewer, a practice that contributed to her chronic liver disease. Her condition worsened until she slipped into a coma, passing away in 1995 at the age of 51.In a poignant detail shared by filmmaker and journalist Khalid Mohammed in The Daily Eye, not a single member of the film fraternity attended her funeral. The woman who had once shared the screen with cinema legends was laid to rest without the presence of the industry that had once celebrated her.Naaz's story is not just a personal tragedy—it mirrors the fate of many child actors in Indian cinema whose early fame is built on the exploitation of their innocence and talent. Her career, documented in sources like Stardust and The Daily Eye, reveals the stark gap between public perception and private suffering. While audiences saw her as a smiling, spirited performer, behind the scenes she endured neglect, emotional abuse, and relentless pressure to provide for a family that gave little in return.Her journey—from a bright star in Boot Polish to a lonely figure in the dubbing studio—remains one of Bollywood's most sobering cautionary tales.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
27 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Salman Khan's Sikandar director says not having 'complete command' led to movie's poor performance
Synopsis Salman Khan's Sikandar, released during Eid 2025, failed to meet box office expectations despite high anticipation. Director AR Murugadoss has attributed the film's underperformance to execution challenges, citing the emotional story's complexity and his lack of familiarity with original Hindi content. While comparing it to his earlier success Ghajini, Murugadoss acknowledged that working outside his comfort zone affected the final product. AR Murugadoss Opens Up on the Challenges Behind Salman Khan's Sikandar Salman Khan's Sikandar, released during Eid 2025, was anticipated as a major comeback for the superstar. However, the film failed to resonate with audiences and critics alike, emerging as one of Khan's lowest-performing projects in recent years. Now, director AR Murugadoss has taken responsibility for the film's underwhelming performance, pointing to execution issues as the main reason behind the box office an interview with Velaipechu Voice, Murugadoss explained that the film's core story was deeply emotional but ultimately fell short in its execution. The narrative revolves around Sanjay Rajkot, also known as Sikandar, a principled king whose wife, Sai Shree (played by Rashmika Mandanna), passes away unexpectedly. Her organs are donated to three individuals, prompting Sikandar to track them down and address the unfinished matters in their lives, while forming connections with an entire village in the process. Murugadoss said the story sought to explore universal human emotions, particularly the way people often fail to value relationships until it is too late. Despite the compelling premise, he admitted that translating it effectively onto screen proved director drew a comparison between Sikandar and his earlier Bollywood success, Ghajini (2008), starring Aamir Khan. He noted that Ghajini was a remake of his own Tamil film and that his prior experience gave him complete control over the material. In contrast, Sikandar was an original Hindi project for him, which made the adaptation process more difficult. He said, 'I could pull off Ghajini because it was a remake, not an original script. I had already done it before, so I had complete command. With Sikandar, that wasn't the case." Murugadoss acknowledged that this gap in familiarity contributed to the film's lack of also referenced language as a barrier that may have influenced the movie's execution, underscoring the challenges faced when working outside his comfort on a reported budget of Rs 200 crore, Sikandar earned approximately Rs 184–185 crore worldwide, falling short of expectations. The film's ensemble cast included notable actors such as Sathyaraj, Kajal Aggarwal, Prateik Babbar, and Sharman Joshi, yet critics and audiences cited a weak narrative and underdeveloped execution as key reasons for its the setback, Murugadoss remains open to returning to Hindi cinema. He indicated that he would continue to explore projects in Bollywood, provided he feels confident about connecting with the audience.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Salman Khan's Sikandar director says not having 'complete command' led to movie's poor performance
Salman Khan's Sikandar, released during Eid 2025, was anticipated as a major comeback for the superstar. However, the film failed to resonate with audiences and critics alike, emerging as one of Khan's lowest-performing projects in recent years. Now, director AR Murugadoss has taken responsibility for the film's underwhelming performance, pointing to execution issues as the main reason behind the box office disappointment. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency In an interview with Velaipechu Voice, Murugadoss explained that the film's core story was deeply emotional but ultimately fell short in its execution. The narrative revolves around Sanjay Rajkot, also known as Sikandar, a principled king whose wife, Sai Shree (played by Rashmika Mandanna), passes away unexpectedly. Her organs are donated to three individuals, prompting Sikandar to track them down and address the unfinished matters in their lives, while forming connections with an entire village in the process. Murugadoss said the story sought to explore universal human emotions, particularly the way people often fail to value relationships until it is too late. Despite the compelling premise, he admitted that translating it effectively onto screen proved challenging. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50! Lulutox Undo Learning From Ghajini The director drew a comparison between Sikandar and his earlier Bollywood success, Ghajini (2008), starring Aamir Khan. He noted that Ghajini was a remake of his own Tamil film and that his prior experience gave him complete control over the material. In contrast, Sikandar was an original Hindi project for him, which made the adaptation process more difficult. He said, 'I could pull off Ghajini because it was a remake, not an original script. I had already done it before, so I had complete command. With Sikandar, that wasn't the case." Murugadoss acknowledged that this gap in familiarity contributed to the film's lack of impact. He also referenced language as a barrier that may have influenced the movie's execution, underscoring the challenges faced when working outside his comfort zone. Box Office Performance and Future Plans Made on a reported budget of Rs 200 crore, Sikandar earned approximately Rs 184–185 crore worldwide, falling short of expectations. The film's ensemble cast included notable actors such as Sathyaraj, Kajal Aggarwal, Prateik Babbar, and Sharman Joshi, yet critics and audiences cited a weak narrative and underdeveloped execution as key reasons for its failure. Despite the setback, Murugadoss remains open to returning to Hindi cinema . He indicated that he would continue to explore projects in Bollywood, provided he feels confident about connecting with the audience.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Director AR Murugadoss breaks his long silence on failure of Salman Khan's Sikandar, 'I did not have the same...'
Superstar Salman Khan starrer, Sikandar, faced a disappointing response at the box office despite high expectations. Directed by the renowned filmmaker AR Murugadoss, the movie failed to connect with the audience and was declared a commercial failure. The film's underperformance has left both the makers and fans disheartened. Now after long silence, AR Murugadoss has shared his take on the failure of Sikandar. What did AR Murugadoss say? In an interview given to Valai Pechu Voice, director AR Murugadoss openly acknowledged that the film did not meet the standards he aimed for. He said, 'Actually, the original story is very emotional. It is the story of a king who cannot understand his wife properly. We all are like that, whether it is with our mother, friend, or wife, we often do not value relationships. When someone leaves us forever, only then do we realize our mistake.' He further added, 'In the film, when Sanjay loses his wife, her organs are donated to three different people. He then searches for them, trying to make up for what he couldn't do for her. In the process, he befriends an entire village. The story was emotional, but I couldn't present it properly.' What did AR Murugadoss say on the comparison with Ghajini? Comparing it with his superhit film Ghajini, Murugadoss said, 'Ghajini was a remake. I had already worked on that story, I knew the formula. But 'Sikandar' was an original script and I did not have the same control over it.' He also clarified that he does not want to distance himself from Hindi cinema in the future, but he will work only when he gets creative freedom and comfort zone. More about Sikandar Salman Khan's Sikandar, released on March 30, 2025, featured a star-studded cast including Rashmika Mandanna, Sathyaraj, Kajal Aggarwal, and Sharman Joshi. Despite the ensemble and high expectations, the film underperformed at the box office. It opened with ₹26 crore on its first day and Rs 29 crore on Eid, but collections declined sharply thereafter. By Day 10, the domestic net collection stood at Rs 105.62 crore, with a worldwide gross of approximately Rs 187.84 crore. Given its substantial production budget of Rs 200 crore, Sikandar was considered a commercial disappointment.