
What is a colonoscopy and should I get one?
Rates of the disease have dropped overall in recent decades, but in those under 50, rates have increased significantly.
'Individuals born in the 1980s are about twice as likely to get colorectal cancer as those born in the 1960s, and individuals born in the 1990s are about three times as likely,' says Dr Zachariah Foda, assistant professor of medicine and oncology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Experts don't know the reasons behind this increase, but medical guidelines have shifted to address it. In 2021, the recommended age to start colorectal cancer screening in the US – either by colonoscopy or at-home testing – was lowered from 50 to 45. In the UK, screening is currently offered starting at age 52, and will soon be offered to those aged 50.
Colorectal cancer is preventable and 'highly treatable' if detected early, according to the National Cancer Institute. But fewer than 20% of those aged 45 to 49 are keeping up with screenings, compared with 72% of those aged 50 to 75. Experts say some people don't know they should be getting screened, and others are nervous about what colonoscopies entail.
Here's what you need to know about colonoscopies and colorectal cancer screening.
'A colonoscopy is an endoscopic procedure, meaning we use a camera at the end of a long tube to examine the colon and rectum,' explains Foda. The colon itself is about 70cm long, he says.
Patients are first put under sedation or anesthesia. Doctors then insert the scope into their rectum, and examine the lining of the colon for any abnormalities, like masses or small bumps called polyps. These polyps are usually removed during the procedure.
'The closest analogy is, you have a mole on your skin and it's growing or discolored, and doctors remove it,' says Michael Sapienza, CEO of the Colorectal Cancer Alliance, a colorectal cancer advocacy group in the US.
If a mass is too big to remove during the colonoscopy, the doctor will take a sample to biopsy and test for cancer.
A colonoscopy is an outpatient procedure, meaning you can go home the same day. The procedure itself usually takes about 20 to 30 minutes, but with pre- and post-procedure care, the whole process can last two to three hours, says Dr Andres Carrion, a gastroenterologist at GastroMed Miami.
One of the most common concerns about colonoscopies is that they are painful, says Carrion. But 'intravenous sedatives make the procedure easy, and there is no pain or discomfort', he explains.
Colonoscopy preparation starts about a week before the procedure. Patients are instructed to eat a 'low residue' diet for that week, which means avoiding foods that can make it difficult for doctors to get a good look at the lining of the colon.
'These are things that the body takes a while to get rid of, like seeds, nuts, leafy greens and high fiber things,' says Foda.
The day before the procedure, patients are restricted to a clear liquid diet – no solid foods. And the night before, they take laxatives to fully clear the colon. This can result in spending quite a bit of time on the toilet.
'Hopefully you have some good reading or a movie you can watch on your phone,' says Sapienza.
Colonoscopies are generally extremely safe, but as with any medical procedure, there are risks.
According to the Cleveland Clinic, these include an adverse reaction to the sedative or anaesthetic used, dehydration from the preparation process, slight bleeding after a polyp is removed or mass biopsied, some abdominal pain, infection and a perforated bowel.
This last risk is serious, but rare. One review found that there were four bowel perforations for every 10,000 colonoscopies performed.
Sign up to Well Actually
Practical advice, expert insights and answers to your questions about how to live a good life
after newsletter promotion
Those at an average risk of colorectal cancer – meaning no family history of the disease and no prior history of colon polyps – should get regular screenings from ages 45 to 75, says Carrion.
Above the age of 75, screening needs are determined on a case-by-case basis. Depending on a person's health and medical history, doctors may decide that colonoscopies could do more harm than good.
For those with a first-degree family member – meaning a parent, sibling or child – diagnosed with colorectal cancer, Carrion says screening should start 10 years before the age at which your relative was diagnosed. For example, if your mother was diagnosed with colon cancer when she was 45, you should start getting screened at 35.
Certain medical histories also put individuals at a higher risk for colorectal cancer, says Foda. This includes those who have previously had cancer and have received chemotherapy, those with inflammatory bowel disease, as well as those with Lynch syndrome (a condition that increases an individual's risk for many kinds of cancer) and polyposis (a condition characterized by a large number of polyps in the colon).
Colonoscopies are not the only way to screen for colorectal cancer. For those at an average risk of the disease, there are also non-invasive at-home tests like Cologuard and the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), says Sapienza.
For both tests, a patient will receive the necessary testing material in the mail or from a doctor. They will then have to mail in a personal fecal sample. The FIT analyzes whether there is blood in the stool. The Cologuard test looks for both blood in the stool and abnormal DNA that could point to polyps or masses in the colon.
The frequency for each person depends on a number of factors including the type of test performed and medical history.
If a colonoscopy is completely clear, you can usually wait 10 years before your next procedure, says Sapienza, but check with your doctor.
Current guidance recommends that FIT tests be repeated every year, and Cologuard every three years, says Sapienza. If the test is negative, no further analysis is required. If either test comes back positive, you will have to have a colonoscopy. This does not mean the at-home tests are not effective at detecting the disease alone, says Foda. 'They should be viewed as part of the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening.'
In addition to regular screenings, be familiar with possible symptoms of colorectal cancer, says Sapienza. This is especially important for those under 45, who might not be eligible yet for screenings.
These symptoms include blood in the stool, especially dark blood; a change in bowel habits; anemia; involuntary weight loss; and/or ongoing stomach discomfort.
If you start to present with any of these symptoms, talk to your primary care doctor or gastroenterologist, and ask for a colonoscopy, he says.
'We need to make sure that people are aware of these symptoms,' says Sapienza. 'This is a disease where screening saves lives.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘Severe' staff shortages at US veterans' hospitals, watchdog finds
The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is experiencing 'severe' staff shortages at all its hospitals, with the number of shortages increasing by 50% this fiscal year, according to a new report from the agency's independent watchdog. The report, released on Tuesday, came a day after the Guardian revealed the department had lost thousands of healthcare professionals deemed 'core' to the system under Donald Trump, without which, the agency said, 'mission-critical work cannot be completed'. The inspector general found 94% of VA facilities faced a 'severe' shortage of doctors, while 79% faced a severe shortage of nurses. Psychology was 'the most frequently reported clinical occupational staffing shortage'. A majority of VA facilities also reported severe shortages of police officers, who keep veteran patients and staff safe. The VA operates the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States, serving 9 million veterans annually. The report is required under two laws, one signed by Trump in 2017, which require the agency's inspector general annually to determine the extent of staffing shortages within each medical center. In a statement, Congressman Mark Takano of California, the ranking Democrat on the House committee on veterans' affairs, said the report 'confirms our fears' that shortages of medical staff were leading to 'decreased access and choice for veterans'. The VA press secretary, Peter Kasperowicz, told the Guardian the congressionally mandated watchdog report was 'not a reliable indicator of staffing shortages' and that it was 'completely subjective, not standardized and unreliable'. The report is based on a survey of VA medical centers in April. Since then, a Guardian review of agency staffing records found, the VA has continued to lose doctors, nurses, psychologists, social workers and other frontline medical professionals. Kasperowicz did not dispute the fact that the agency had lost thousands of 'mission-critical' healthcare workers under Trump – including after the watchdog's survey period concluded. The VA is in the midst of a department-wide reduction of 30,000 workers, which the secretary of veterans affairs, Doug Collins, said could be accomplished by September through a combination of attrition, a hiring freeze and deferred resignation program. The staff cuts, Collins said, would not affect patient care, but were 'centered on reducing bureaucracy and improving services to veterans'. In May, the Guardian reported that staff losses at the VA had led to unit closures, reduced hours of operations and exam backlogs across the hospital system.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Distracting the public': group of health professionals call for RFK Jr to be removed
A grassroots organization of health professionals has released a report outlining major health challenges in the US and calling for the removal of Robert F Kennedy Jr from the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The report from Defend Public Health, a new organization of about 3,000 health professionals and allies, is an attempt to get ahead of misinformation and lack of information from health officials. In an effort to keep making progress in public health, Defend Public Health's report was slated to coincide with that of the anticipated second US report to 'make America healthy again' (Maha). The first Maha report was released in May, and a second report was expected this week – but amid turmoil at the health agencies, it has reportedly been delayed for several weeks. 'The Maha report is essentially a distraction from the real causes of poor health,' said Elizabeth Jacobs, professor emerita at the University of Arizona and a founding member of Defend Public Health. 'This administration does not want to address things like poverty and education and access to healthcare. Instead, they're distracting the public with information on solutions to problems that don't actually exist. When the foundation of your policy is not evidence-based, it will collapse.' The Defend Public Health report diverges from the previous Maha focus on issues such as processed foods and environmental chemicals, but it covers familiar ground in public health. The group highlights the importance of food safety, security and access to food, including through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), and improved opportunities for physical activity. They seek to ensure equitable access to vaccines; expand access to healthcare, including comprehensive sexual and reproductive healthcare access; and build strategies for clean air. The report also recommends fully funding scientific research and public health systems; combatting scientific misinformation, including from the US government; and strengthening pandemic preparedness. They call for reductions in gun violence, now the number one cause of death for children. And their last recommendation is to remove Robert F Kennedy Jr, secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), from office, calling his removal 'the single most important step toward improving the health of Americans'. The recommendations are exactly what the US needs to address to become healthier, said Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association (APHA). If you 'look at the things that actually kill people, from the 10 leading causes of death, that is indeed the right list'. The US spends twice as much on healthcare as the next industrialized country, despite having poorer health outcomes, Benjamin pointed out. 'The fracturing of our healthcare system undermines the accessibility of healthcare,' Benjamin said before noting that the US also spends less than other countries on the social determinants of health and social supports, and invests less in primary care and prevention. Such gaps are getting worse under the second Trump administration, with huge cuts to Medicaid, affordable housing and nutrition programs like Snap. 'If they're serious about making America healthy again, I would suggest that we first begin by feeding children,' Jacobs said. 'When, for example, RFK Jr is talking about food dyes, I don't think that that is anywhere near as important as the fact that 13 million children in the United States do not know where their next meal is coming from.' Scientific misinformation is an 'existential threat' to Americans, and the US government is a 'major source' of misinformation and disinformation now, Jacobs said. The first Maha report 'contains misinformation and uses references that don't even exist', she noted. The Defend Public Health report has a tongue-in-cheek note that it was 'created by real human experts relying on real rigorous data'. Jacobs recommended working with social media companies, 'one of the biggest amplifiers of misinformation', to address the spread of harmful information. Educating children on how to evaluate the quality and accuracy of information is also important, she said. But one of the biggest purveyors of health misinformation is Kennedy himself. 'Everything that he is doing is horrifying,' Jacobs said. 'There is a saying in public health, 'saving lives a million at a time', and he is doing the opposite of that.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion She called him a 'genuine threat' who was 'devastating' public health. 'He has no knowledge, training or experience in any type of science. He's never done an experiment, he's never written a paper, he's never gotten a grant to study anything. He has no understanding of the underlying causes of poor health in the United States,' Jacobs said. Defend Public Health launched in November, after Trump's re-election because, as Jacobs said, 'it was very clear to us that public health specifically was going to be under attack. 'We knew that it was going to be a tough fight. I don't think that any of us knew how bad this was going to get, how quickly. But we are doing everything in our power to support our fellow researchers, public health workers, anybody that we can, and also continue to get accurate information out to the public,' Jacobs said. The group joins other established health organizations as well as other newcomers like the Vaccine Integrity Project to serve as reliable sources of information. There's a long history of groups like these providing outside perspectives on official recommendations, Benjamin said. But the federal government is uniquely positioned to speak to the health of all Americans. 'Pediatricians certainly have the nation's trust around vaccines for kids, but there's a big debate about at what point does a kid become an adolescent, become an adult? At what point do they go into the adult health system?' he said. That creates confusion around which advice a patient should follow. The same may be true of a patient who becomes pregnant, or someone who may fall under the purview of multiple health organizations. It's not always easy to know who belongs in which group. 'We have to be careful that each of these private sector organizations align our recommendations, so that we don't further confuse the public,' Benjamin said. Yet, Benjamin continued, 'as the federal government withdraws in its responsibility to protect the public, groups like ours will become more influential in filling that void until we can get the federal government again to step up into that place as a trusted adviser.' Benjamin and Jacobs – and other experts in these groups – hope that the federal government will once again become a source of reliable information. 'We really wanted to start building a framework so that we're ready when we have the opportunity to start putting some of our policy recommendations in place,' Jacobs said. 'There is just rampant chaos right now around public health and science related to this administration, and we have got to stand firm and keep bringing the conversation back to the actual causes of poor health among Americans. I can't control what the government is going to decide to do. What we can do is continue to provide accurate information to the public.'


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
UK cases of mosquito-borne chikungunya virus more than double
There has been a significant increase in the number of UK cases of a mosquito-borne virus that can cause sudden fever and joint pain and is normally only found in Africa and southern UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) says more than 70 cases of the chikungunya virus were reported in the first six months of this year, more than double than in the same period last year – all of them linked to while rarely fatal, can leave people experiencing joint pain for UKHSA is warning travellers to take precautions against mosquito bites. In most cases, people recover fully within a couple of weeks, but for some, pain can persist for months or even years. In very rare cases it can be fatal. While the 73 infections seen in the UK in the first six months of this year is not a huge number, it is more than double the 27 cases over the same period last year. An outbreak of the virus is under way in the Indian Ocean region, and almost all of the infections were linked to travel in India, Sri Lanka and Mauritius. Chikungunya is spread by two types of mosquito, neither of which are present in the UK, so there is no risk on onward infection. But Dr Philip Veal, Consultant in Public Health at UKHSA, says it is a warning to travellers to make sure they take precautions against mosquito bites."Chikungunya can be a nasty disease and we're seeing a worrying increase in cases among travellers returning to the UK. "It is essential to take precautions against mosquito bites when travelling. "Simple steps, such as using insect repellent, covering up your skin and sleeping under insecticide-treated bed nets can greatly reduce the risk. "Before you travel, check the Travel Health Pro Website for the latest advice on your destination. "A chikungunya vaccine may also be considered for those travelling to higher-risk regions." The same report also says the first ever UK cases of Oropouche virus, normally only found in Central and South America and the Caribbean, have also been detected in travellers returning from Brazil. This virus is predominantly spread by midge bites rather than mosquitos, with the main type of midge involved in transmission not found in Europe or the include high fever, chills, headache, joint pain and muscle UKHSA warns of a rise in Oropouche virus infections globally since 2024, and says pregnant travellers should take particular care following some concerns about the impact the virus can cause during pregnancy.