When will universal credit and PIP benefit payments increase?
Benefits payments will receive a welcome boost on 6 April, as they increase at the start of the financial year.
Several benefit payments, including universal credit, will be increased to combat the rising cost of living and inflation.
Here's what you need to know about the increases, how much they are, and when they will be paid.
Housing benefit
Housing benefit is being replaced by universal credit, which will contain the housing element for renters with private landlords.
While the standard rate of universal credit is going up, housing benefit rates will be locked in at the current rate until 2026, according to government plans.
The Local Housing Allowance (LHA), which calculates housing benefit for private renters, has been frozen since 2020.
Research from the homelessness charity Crisis and the campaign group Health Equals indicated that just 2.5% of private rented homes were affordable for renters on housing benefit last year, The Guardian reported.
Council tax support
Some people are eligible for support and deductions from their council tax bill — including the single-person discount for those living alone.
Each threshold for support differs from council to council. Check your council's website for details.
Tax credits
All tax credits, including working tax credit and child tax credit, will permanently stop on 5 April 2025 as part of the transition to universal credit.
These tax credits will now be paid as part of the universal credit payment. Recipients will have received a migration notice and must apply for universal credit before the date specified on the notice to avoid any payment gaps.
Universal Credit
Universal credit will rise slightly in April by 1.7%, meaning that claimants will get a small boost to their monthly income.
The rate for a single person aged 25 or over will rise from £92 a week in 2025/26, and to £106 a week by 2029‑30.
For the basic, standard allowance of universal credit, that works out as follows:
Single under 25: £311.68 a month to £316.98 a month
Single 25 or over: £393.45 a month to £400.14 a month
Joint claimants both under 25: £489.23 a month to £497.55 a month
Joint claimants, one or both 25 or over: £617.60 a month to £628.10 a month
PIP
After concerns that PIP would be frozen for claimants in the next financial year, the government confirmed in March that PIP payments will also rise by 1.7%, matching September's inflation figure.
The standard daily living rate will rise from £72.65 to £73.90, and the enhanced rate from £108.55 to £110.40 per week.
For the mobility component, the standard rate will increase from £28.70 per week to £29.20 per week.
The upper mobility rate, the enhanced rate, will increase from £75.75 per week to £77.05 per week.
ESA
Like other working-age benefits, ESA will also rise by 1.7%.
A single person's weekly rate will rise from £218.15 to £227.10, and a couple's weekly rate will rise from £332.95 to £346.60.
State pension
Unlike other benefits, the state pension will increase by 4.1%.
This is in line with the triple lock guarantee, which means state pension increases by an amount equal to the highest among three different measures— inflation, the average wage increase and 2.5%.
For the full new state pension — for those reaching state pension age after April 2016 — the weekly rate will be £230.25, coming in at £11,973 annually.
This amounts to an increase of £472 a year.
For those reaching state pension age before April 2016, the new weekly rate is £176.45 a week, accounting for £9,175 a year — an increase of £363 a year.
However, concerns have been raised that those on the full new station pension will have to pay tax on it from April 2026 as it will pass the income tax threshold, which currently stands at £12,570.
Carer's Allowance
If you care for another person for at least 35 hours a week, you can claim carer's allowance.
This benefit is rising from £81.90 a week to £83.30.
For many benefits, the new rates will take effect from 7 April.
However, for some universal credit claimants, increased rates will take effect around June. This is because the new rate won't be paid until the first assessment period that begins on or after 7 April.
What's worth bearing in mind is that you don't need to do anything — your benefit payments will automatically increase.
The rise in benefits payments are linked to September's inflation figures — which some have argued is unfair.
Universal credit is normally increased every April in line with the previous September's consumer price index inflation rate.
The consumer price index measures change over time in the prices paid for a basket of goods and services, like food, clothing and housing.
In September, this rate dropped to 1.7%, below the Bank of England's target rate of 2% for the first time since April 2021.
While this might have been welcome news for shoppers hoping for a drop in food prices, it was bad news for benefits recipients.
Even if inflation rose the next month — in October, it reached 2.3% — the benefit increase would still be based on the September rate.
Currently, the latest inflation figures sit at 2.8%, down from 3% in January.
At the time of the announcement, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation warned that the increase would "barely touch the sides".
The charity's senior policy advisor Iain Porter told Yahoo News: 'The consequence of today's rate of inflation is that April's uprating will be worth just a few pounds to most people.
'The basic rate of universal credit is so insufficient it fails to protect families from hardship, and this increase will barely touch the sides.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story
UnitedHealthcare is suing British newspaper The Guardian for defamation, alleging that the outlet falsely accused them of enticing nursing homes to enroll in a special program that works to restrict medical expenses for elderly patients. "The Guardian knowingly published false and misleading claims about our Institutional Special Needs Program, forcing us to take action to protect the clinician-patient relationship that is crucial for delivering high-quality care. The Guardian refused to engage with the truth and chose instead to print its predetermined narrative," UnitedHealthcare told Fox News Digital in a statement. The Guardian article, published May 21, claimed that UnitedHealthcare is pursuing cost-cutting tactics that jeopardize the health of nursing home patients. The article claims that the health insurance giant provides what amounts to secret bonuses to enroll in a program that stations medical staff that reports directly to UnitedHealthcare, and in practice works to reduce hospitalizations for patients, some of whom allegedly may urgently need the care. Unitedhealthcare Ceo Murder Suspect Luigi Mangione Indicted In New York The article also claims UnitedHealthcare financially entices nursing homes to join their "Institutional Special Needs" program, and allegedly illegally had nursing homes share confidential patient data with the insurer so that it could skirt federal law and market programs to patients – some of whom lack the capacity to make financial decisions on their own – and families. The Guardian also alleged that UnitedHealthcare leaned on nursing home staff to convince patients to sign DNR's, even if they had expressed a desire for all medical options to be used to save their life. "A recent article published by The Guardian presents a narrative built largely on anecdotes rather than facts. It is unfortunate that the article misrepresents a program that, in reality, improves health outcomes for seniors through on-site clinical care, personalized treatment plans, and enhanced coordination among caregivers. We stand firmly behind the integrity of our programs, which consistently receive high satisfaction ratings from our members," UnitedHealthcare said in a statement in response to the article in May. Read On The Fox News App The lawsuit alleged that The Guardian used a "heavily cropped screenshot" of an internal UnitedHealthcare email which they claim, when seen in full, contradicts their reporting. The suit also accuses The Guardian of "gratuitously" linking its report to the assassination of their former CEO Brian Thompson. Unitedhealth Shares Slide As Criminal Probe Report Adds To Investor Fears "The Guardian knew these accusations were false, but published them anyway," the lawsuit stated. The Guardian told Fox News Digital it stood by its reporting. "The Guardian stands by its deeply-sourced, independent reporting, which is based on thousands of corporate and patient records, publicly filed lawsuits, declarations submitted to federal and state agencies, and interviews with more than 20 current and former UnitedHealth employees – as well as statements and information provided by UnitedHealth itself over several weeks. It's outrageous that in response to factual reporting on the practice of secretly paying nursing homes to reduce hospitalizations for vulnerable patients, UnitedHealth is resorting to wildly misleading claims and intimidation tactics via the courts," a representative from The Guardian said. Click To Get The Fox News App When asked by Fox News Digital for clarification regarding the "heavily cropped screenshot," a representative for The Guardian said the image was in fact a "visual illustration" and the so-called missing information was provided "in an on-record comment and a denial from UnitedHealth" in the proceeding paragraph. The Guardian rep also claimed that UnitedHealthcare never asked the press outlet to alter the article source: UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Nintendo Switch 2 launch survives Trump tariffs, but holiday prices remain uncertain
NEW YORK, June 6 — Nintendo enthusiasts across the United States are rejoicing as they unbox the newly launched Nintendo Switch 2 consoles, dodging a potential price hike caused by former US President Donald Trump's erratic trade tariff policies. As reported by The Guardian, the console hit shelves yesterday as scheduled, but the journey to its release was fraught with delays and uncertainties stemming from Trump's tariffs on imports. Priced at US$450 (RM2,070) at launch, the Switch 2 was initially threatened by tariffs as high as 46 per cent on imports from Vietnam, where most of its production is based. According to the report this uncertainty forced Nintendo to delay pre-orders initially scheduled for early April, causing widespread frustration among gamers. Pre-orders eventually resumed on April 24, and the console sold out quickly. 'What saved Nintendo in this case was that Trump chickened out,' Robert Johnson, an international economist from the University of Notre Dame, told The Guardian. He referred to Trump's decision to issue a 90-day pause on tariffs to allow for negotiations with affected countries. This window allowed Nintendo to proceed with the console's June 5 release without additional costs being passed on to consumers. However, industry experts told The Guardian that the reprieve might be short-lived. If negotiations fail and the tariffs are reinstated, the Switch 2 could face price increases during the holiday season, a critical period for console sales. 'It takes a long time and significant capital outlays to bring new production facilities online. Producers really like to operate in a stable environment. The current trade environment is the exact opposite of that,' Johnson was quoted as saying. Nintendo's strategic shift to manufacture in Vietnam—a move made during Trump's first term to sidestep earlier tariffs on Chinese imports—has now left it vulnerable to the latest trade policies. Sony and Microsoft, expected to release their next-generation consoles in 2027, are likely to encounter similar challenges. Despite this, Nintendo has managed to ship an estimated 746,000 Switch 2 units to the US ahead of potential tariff hikes, ensuring that these units are exempt from additional import duties. Accessories, however, are not immune. The company has confirmed that certain peripherals will see price adjustments. According to CNBC, docks used for connecting the Switch to a full-size screen now cost US$10 more, while controller straps have seen a US$1 increase. Johnson also speculated to The Guardian that the company may consider raising the console's price later this year if tariffs resume. 'I find it difficult to imagine that the Trump administration will want thousands of stories written during the holiday season about how Trump ruined Christmas,' Johnson said, noting the political ramifications of such a move. As The Guardian highlighted, while hardware costs remain a concern, Nintendo's revenue model relies heavily on software and online subscriptions, which are unaffected by tariffs. 'In the end, Nintendo wants to sell consoles to get people to buy games and accessories,' Johnson said. 'As a result, it may be willing to hold down the price of consoles.'


Fox News
3 days ago
- Fox News
UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story
UnitedHealthcare is suing British newspaper The Guardian for defamation, alleging that the outlet falsely accused them of enticing nursing homes to enroll in a special program that works to restrict medical expenses for elderly patients. "The Guardian knowingly published false and misleading claims about our Institutional Special Needs Program, forcing us to take action to protect the clinician-patient relationship that is crucial for delivering high-quality care. The Guardian refused to engage with the truth and chose instead to print its predetermined narrative," UnitedHealthcare told Fox News Digital in a statement. The Guardian article, published May 21, claimed that UnitedHealthcare is pursuing cost-cutting tactics that jeopardize the health of nursing home patients. The article claims that the health insurance giant provides what amounts to secret bonuses to enroll in a program that stations medical staff that reports directly to UnitedHealthcare, and in practice works to reduce hospitalizations for patients, some of whom allegedly may urgently need the care. The article also claims UnitedHealthcare financially entices nursing homes to join their "Institutional Special Needs" program, and allegedly illegally had nursing homes share confidential patient data with the insurer so that it could skirt federal law and market programs to patients – some of whom lack the capacity to make financial decisions on their own – and families. The Guardian also alleged that UnitedHealthcare leaned on nursing home staff to convince patients to sign DNR's, even if they had expressed a desire for all medical options to be used to save their life. "A recent article published by The Guardian presents a narrative built largely on anecdotes rather than facts. It is unfortunate that the article misrepresents a program that, in reality, improves health outcomes for seniors through on-site clinical care, personalized treatment plans, and enhanced coordination among caregivers. We stand firmly behind the integrity of our programs, which consistently receive high satisfaction ratings from our members," UnitedHealthcare said in a statement in response to the article in May. The lawsuit alleged that The Guardian used a "heavily cropped screenshot" of an internal UnitedHealthcare email which they claim, when seen in full, contradicts their reporting. The suit also accuses The Guardian of "gratuitously" linking its report to the assassination of their former CEO Brian Thompson. "The Guardian knew these accusations were false, but published them anyway," the lawsuit stated. The Guardian told Fox News Digital it stood by its reporting. "The Guardian stands by its deeply-sourced, independent reporting, which is based on thousands of corporate and patient records, publicly filed lawsuits, declarations submitted to federal and state agencies, and interviews with more than 20 current and former UnitedHealth employees – as well as statements and information provided by UnitedHealth itself over several weeks. It's outrageous that in response to factual reporting on the practice of secretly paying nursing homes to reduce hospitalizations for vulnerable patients, UnitedHealth is resorting to wildly misleading claims and intimidation tactics via the courts," a representative from The Guardian said. When asked by Fox News Digital for clarification regarding the "heavily cropped screenshot," a representative for The Guardian said the image was in fact a "visual illustration" and the so-called missing information was provided "in an on-record comment and a denial from UnitedHealth" in the proceeding paragraph. The Guardian rep also claimed that UnitedHealthcare never asked the press outlet to alter the image.