Wilmar's record payout of S$928m marks Indonesia's deepening crackdown on palm oil graft
[JAKARTA] The Indonesian authorities' seizure of 11.8 trillion rupiah (S$928 million) from agri-giant Wilmar Group is not only the country's largest asset confiscation, but also unprecedented for the company voluntarily handing the amount over in cash – a move legal experts say enables prosecutors to sidestep the complexities of liquidating seized property.
The move throws a spotlight on Jakarta's stepped-up efforts to root out graft in the palm oil sector, following allegations of misconduct during a severe shortage of cooking oil in late 2021 to early 2022, which exposed governance lapses in one of Indonesia's most vital industries.
Harli Siregar, the spokesperson for the Attorney-General's Office (AGO), told The Business Times: 'This was the largest seizure of funds in the history of ongoing cases.'
The sum, representing nearly two-thirds of Wilmar's net income last year, was handed over at the authorities' request as a gesture of the company's 'good faith and innocence' in the ongoing case.
Abdul Fickar Hadjar, a criminal law specialist at Trisakti University, said the confiscated funds could strengthen the prosecution's appeal against the ruling by a lower court in March, which had acquitted Wilmar and two other palm oil companies.
He said: 'This makes it easier for prosecutors to present additional evidence in the Supreme Court appeal. Seized assets are typically in the form of valuables like property or goods, which are more difficult to use as evidence because they usually need to be auctioned off first.'
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business
Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The Wilmar case, still unfolding amid Indonesia's broader push to reform its palm oil industry, is now before the country's Supreme Court, which will review the lower court's judgment on points of law.
Palm oil purge
In 2023, Indonesia, the world's largest producer and exporter of palm oil, set up a task force to enhance governance in the industry and to boost state revenue.
The AGO said it has handed over to the state some 217,000 hectares of palm oil plantation land – assets seized from corruption cases over the last seven years.
The last major seizure was made in a high-profile case involving tycoon Surya Darmadi, the owner of the Duta Palma Group, who was convicted of corruption over illegal changes in land use in Riau province between 2003 and 2022. He was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
Last September, his appeal was thrown out by the Supreme Court, which upheld the jail sentence. Three months later, the AGO confiscated around five trillion rupiah in cash from the tycoon.
Largest haul
At a briefing held at the AGO's premises on Tuesday (Jun 17), members of the press were shown towering stacks of 100,000 rupiah banknotes confiscated in the Wilmar case. Observers deemed the striking display as a vivid testament to the scale of the corruption scandal.
At a press briefing on Tuesday, Indonesia's Attorney-General's Office put on show trillions of rupiah in seized assets from the corruption case involving Wilmar Group and export permits for crude palm oil products. PHOTO: ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S OFFICE, JAKARTA
Siregar said that the funds identified as state losses could be used to support the revitalisation of Indonesia's palm oil industry.
In its statement, however, Wilmar said the funds were a security deposit ahead of the Supreme Court ruling on the 2022 palm oil export case, in which five Wilmar subsidiaries were accused of misconduct during the cooking oil crunch in the country.
The company stated that the deposit will be refunded if the Supreme Court upholds the lower court's decision, but may be partially or fully forfeited if the ruling is overturned.
Although the lower court had ruled in favour of Wilmar and two other palm oil traders in March, that verdict is now under fire, given the AGO's appeal against it, and the controversy that arose from judges having been accused of accepting bribes to rule in favour of the accused.
Hadjar from Trisakti University said that while repaying state losses does not negate potential criminal liability, Wilmar's willingness to provide the security deposit could be viewed as a mitigating factor, depending on how the Supreme Court assesses the case.
He also added that the company's move to surrender the funds may help the company manage the potential economic fallout.
Sustainability in question
The ongoing corruption case involving Wilmar Group's Indonesian units could pose a significant challenge to the company's reputation as a global sustainability leader in the palm oil industry.
Observers say the case underscores the complex challenges multinational companies face in maintaining consistent governance and ethical standards across different jurisdictions – a crucial concern for investors and stakeholders who are increasingly prioritising sustainability and corporate responsibility.
Professor Lawrence Loh, director of the Centre for Governance and Sustainability at the NUS Business School, said Wilmar has long positioned itself at the forefront of sustainable palm oil production.
He warned that the case could hurt its reputation, especially among clients in markets such as Europe which are sensitive to environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, as well as in the increasingly ESG-conscious Asian markets of China and India.
'The case primarily affects the governance aspect, as it involves (allegations of) lapses in business integrity and ethics,' he said.
'While cooperating with the authorities and returning funds may mitigate the ESG impact, they do not eliminate the underlying concerns about governance weaknesses. Rebuilding the company's reputation will be its most critical priority,' he added.
In a statement on Tuesday, Wilmar Group said its five subsidiaries maintain that all their actions were carried out in good faith and without corrupt intent.
On Wednesday, the shares of the group's Singapore-listed entity, Wilmar International, fell S$0.08 or 2.7 per cent to S$2.93, with 19 million shares traded.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Indonesian minister who says '98 mass rape a rumour faces flak from netizens
Indonesia's Cultural Affairs Minister Fadli Zon claimed there has never been any evidence to support the mass rape allegations. PHOTO: REUTERS – Indonesia's Cultural Affairs Minister Fadli Zon, already under fire for his initiative to rewrite Indonesian history, is facing a renewed public backlash for downplaying the well-documented mass rapes of Indonesians of Chinese descent during the May 1998 protests and riots that led to the fall of then-president Suharto. In a June 11 podcast, Mr Fadli dismissed the rapes as mere rumours, claiming there has never been any evidence to support the allegations, comments that have triggered painful memories of the deadly chaos that engulfed Jakarta and elsewhere. Criticism has lit up social media, with responses coming from prominent human rights activists to a former police general. 'Has Fadli Zon never read about the mass rapes in the 1998 riots or does he actually know of the incidents but chooses to be in denial?' X social media user @bangjerrrr from Indonesia wrote. The controversy also raises questions about the political motivations for Mr Fadli's remarks and the project to revise Indonesian history, with the aim of the latter to produce a book that is the nation's 'official history'. There are also concerns that it is an attempt to downplay politically sensitive episodes in the nation's past. The 1998 events have also dogged President Prabowo Subianto for years. He is a former Commandant General of Kopassus (Special Forces Command) and has been accused of involvement in abducting activists and orchestrating the 1998 riots, accusations he has repeatedly denied . He is also Mr Suharto's former son-in-law. Mr Prabowo married Ms Siti Hediati Hariyadi, a daughter of Mr Suharto, in 1983. They divorced in 1998. Mr Usman Hamid, executive director of Amnesty International Indonesia, cited findings from a government-commissioned fact-finding team that confirmed the mass rapes happened, noting the team's report prompted then-president B.J. Habibie to acknowledge and express regret in his first speech before Parliament in August 1998. Mr Usman called Mr Fadli's remarks 'a fatal mistake' and 'an arrogant denial against a fact the mass rapes occurred', arguing that such facts cannot be categorised as rumours because it was confirmed by a report from an authoritative party. 'The report was done by a joint fact-finding task force consisting of various ministries including defence ministry, justice affairs ministry and the attorney-general's office that was formed by then-president Habibie,' Mr Usman said, referring to the Tim Gabungan Pencari Fakta task force (TGPF). The task force recorded 52 cases of rape, 14 cases of rape and assault, 10 cases of attacks and sexual assault, and 9 cases of sexual abuse. But it stressed that this does not represent the full number of actual victims because the report was based on the testimonies of the victims who were willing to come forward between May and July 3, 1998. 'The majority of the rape cases were gang rapes... And most of the rapes were done while other people were watching,' the report says. Former national police chief Oegroseno, who uses one name, also condemned the minister. 'Fadli Zon, if you don't know the situation on the ground in 1998, you shouldn't talk too much. The people who were victims feel hurt by your statement,' the retired three-star police general wrote in an Instagram post on June 17. In his Aug 14, 1998, speech that cited the report, Mr Habibie said: 'The looting and burning of shopping centres and residential homes were even accompanied by acts of violence and sexual abuse against women, particularly those from the ethnic Chinese community. 'All of these irresponsible criminal acts are very shameful and have tarnished our reputation as a civilised and religious nation; we condemn such barbarity,' he added. Mr Fadli was a noted student activist who opposed Mr Suharto's authoritarianism and played a key role in organising street rallies at the time. Scores of Mr Prabowo's inner circle -- those who supported his presidential campaigns and currently serving in the Cabinet -- come from among the 1998 pro-reform student leaders, who boldly went against Mr Suharto. Political analysts Burhanuddin Muhtadi and Adi Prayitno, quoted by local media, have considered Mr Prabowo's recruitment pro-reform activists as a political strategy to try to convince voters he has reformed, and to expand constituency base. Other 1998 pro-reform activists include Mr Budiman Sudjatmiko, who is head of the poverty eradication agency, Immanuel Mr Ebenezer Gerungan, who is deputy manpower minister, and Mr Nezar Patria, who is deputy communications and digital affairs minister. Mr Nezar was reported to be among the abductees who managed to return home in 1998. Responding to the mounting criticism, Mr Fadli said on June 16: 'Various criminal acts occurred amid the May 13-14, 1998 riots, including acts of sexual violence, however, with regard to mass rapes, caution is needed as data on the incident has never been conclusive.' Mr Fadli said that he does not interfere in the rewriting of Indonesian history, stressing that he entirely has left it to the historians to do this and to complete the rewriting project. Chinese descendant Indonesian Pauline Irawati, 55, a retiree, sees Mr Fadli's motive as an attempted cover-up for Mr Prabowo. 'What Fadli Zon said is otherwise incomprehensible,' she told The Straits Times. Mr Prabowo's alleged role in human rights violations in 1998, East Timor and elsewhere has dogged his political career. Mr Prabowo was once banned by the US for rights violations. Ms Pauline remembers the violent gangs that hunted the Chinese in 1998. She managed to evade the mobs on May 14 as she took a 2½-hour journey from her colleague's home in Karawaci, a Jakarta satellite town, to her home in Cengkareng, West Jakarta. Her office sent staff home early the day before and she, the only Chinese in the office, decided to spend the night at a colleague's home near the office, before making the trip home in a public minivan. 'On the way home, we were stopped a few times by mobs who asked, 'Are there Chinese on board?' I was the only Chinese there. I kept my head down to avoid being noticed,' Ms Pauline recalled, adding that other passengers protected her by always saying there were no Chinese on board. While Mr Fadli has promised he will not interfere in the work of historians revising the nation's history, Mr Bambang Wuryanto, an MP from the opposition Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P), isn't so sure. He said in Parliament on June 17 that subjectivity in the history rewriting project initiated by Mr Fadli, a senior politician of the ruling party Gerindra, would definitely play in the process. Parliament's education and culture committee member Bonnie Triyana said on June 18 that Parliament will invite Mr Fadli to a House hearing to give explanation about the history rewriting project. 'Don't rewrite history using a power-driven approach, and don't be selective and partial based on political interest. If that's so, It's better to stop the programme altogether,' he said . Wahyudi Soeriaatmadja has been Indonesia correspondent at The Straits Times since 2008, and is based in Jakarta. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
Wilmar's record payout of S$928m marks Indonesia's deepening crackdown on palm oil graft
[JAKARTA] The Indonesian authorities' seizure of 11.8 trillion rupiah (S$928 million) from agri-giant Wilmar Group is not only the country's largest asset confiscation, but also unprecedented for the company voluntarily handing the amount over in cash – a move legal experts say enables prosecutors to sidestep the complexities of liquidating seized property. The move throws a spotlight on Jakarta's stepped-up efforts to root out graft in the palm oil sector, following allegations of misconduct during a severe shortage of cooking oil in late 2021 to early 2022, which exposed governance lapses in one of Indonesia's most vital industries. Harli Siregar, the spokesperson for the Attorney-General's Office (AGO), told The Business Times: 'This was the largest seizure of funds in the history of ongoing cases.' The sum, representing nearly two-thirds of Wilmar's net income last year, was handed over at the authorities' request as a gesture of the company's 'good faith and innocence' in the ongoing case. Abdul Fickar Hadjar, a criminal law specialist at Trisakti University, said the confiscated funds could strengthen the prosecution's appeal against the ruling by a lower court in March, which had acquitted Wilmar and two other palm oil companies. He said: 'This makes it easier for prosecutors to present additional evidence in the Supreme Court appeal. Seized assets are typically in the form of valuables like property or goods, which are more difficult to use as evidence because they usually need to be auctioned off first.' A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The Wilmar case, still unfolding amid Indonesia's broader push to reform its palm oil industry, is now before the country's Supreme Court, which will review the lower court's judgment on points of law. Palm oil purge In 2023, Indonesia, the world's largest producer and exporter of palm oil, set up a task force to enhance governance in the industry and to boost state revenue. The AGO said it has handed over to the state some 217,000 hectares of palm oil plantation land – assets seized from corruption cases over the last seven years. The last major seizure was made in a high-profile case involving tycoon Surya Darmadi, the owner of the Duta Palma Group, who was convicted of corruption over illegal changes in land use in Riau province between 2003 and 2022. He was sentenced to 15 years in prison. Last September, his appeal was thrown out by the Supreme Court, which upheld the jail sentence. Three months later, the AGO confiscated around five trillion rupiah in cash from the tycoon. Largest haul At a briefing held at the AGO's premises on Tuesday (Jun 17), members of the press were shown towering stacks of 100,000 rupiah banknotes confiscated in the Wilmar case. Observers deemed the striking display as a vivid testament to the scale of the corruption scandal. At a press briefing on Tuesday, Indonesia's Attorney-General's Office put on show trillions of rupiah in seized assets from the corruption case involving Wilmar Group and export permits for crude palm oil products. PHOTO: ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S OFFICE, JAKARTA Siregar said that the funds identified as state losses could be used to support the revitalisation of Indonesia's palm oil industry. In its statement, however, Wilmar said the funds were a security deposit ahead of the Supreme Court ruling on the 2022 palm oil export case, in which five Wilmar subsidiaries were accused of misconduct during the cooking oil crunch in the country. The company stated that the deposit will be refunded if the Supreme Court upholds the lower court's decision, but may be partially or fully forfeited if the ruling is overturned. Although the lower court had ruled in favour of Wilmar and two other palm oil traders in March, that verdict is now under fire, given the AGO's appeal against it, and the controversy that arose from judges having been accused of accepting bribes to rule in favour of the accused. Hadjar from Trisakti University said that while repaying state losses does not negate potential criminal liability, Wilmar's willingness to provide the security deposit could be viewed as a mitigating factor, depending on how the Supreme Court assesses the case. He also added that the company's move to surrender the funds may help the company manage the potential economic fallout. Sustainability in question The ongoing corruption case involving Wilmar Group's Indonesian units could pose a significant challenge to the company's reputation as a global sustainability leader in the palm oil industry. Observers say the case underscores the complex challenges multinational companies face in maintaining consistent governance and ethical standards across different jurisdictions – a crucial concern for investors and stakeholders who are increasingly prioritising sustainability and corporate responsibility. Professor Lawrence Loh, director of the Centre for Governance and Sustainability at the NUS Business School, said Wilmar has long positioned itself at the forefront of sustainable palm oil production. He warned that the case could hurt its reputation, especially among clients in markets such as Europe which are sensitive to environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, as well as in the increasingly ESG-conscious Asian markets of China and India. 'The case primarily affects the governance aspect, as it involves (allegations of) lapses in business integrity and ethics,' he said. 'While cooperating with the authorities and returning funds may mitigate the ESG impact, they do not eliminate the underlying concerns about governance weaknesses. Rebuilding the company's reputation will be its most critical priority,' he added. In a statement on Tuesday, Wilmar Group said its five subsidiaries maintain that all their actions were carried out in good faith and without corrupt intent. On Wednesday, the shares of the group's Singapore-listed entity, Wilmar International, fell S$0.08 or 2.7 per cent to S$2.93, with 19 million shares traded.
Business Times
7 hours ago
- Business Times
Inside Wilmar's graft probe: How a cooking oil crisis led to a multitrillion rupiah corruption scandal
[SINGAPORE] Indonesian authorities in May seized 11.8 trillion rupiah (S$928 million) from global palm oil company Wilmar as part of an ongoing corruption case involving allegations of bribery to obtain palm oil export permits in 2022. The company, founded by Singaporean tycoon Kuok Khoon Hong, stands accused of earning unauthorised profits by evading state-imposed export controls that sought to curb a cooking oil crisis and domestic palm oil shortage that rocked Indonesia in 2021 and 2022. Wilmar was initially acquitted by a lower court in March, but the case is back in the limelight as the Indonesian Supreme Court reviews the earlier ruling. The Business Times traces the events that led up to Wilmar's corruption probe and its multitrillion rupiah asset seizure. Jan 18, 2022: Indonesian officials announce that palm oil exporters will be required to obtain permits for exports and to declare how much palm oil they plan to sell domestically. Jan 19, 2022: A cap limiting cooking oil prices to 14,000 rupiah per litre takes effect. The move is part of government efforts to curb the rise in domestic cooking oil prices, which had shot up as much as 40 per cent from a year earlier, in line with a global palm oil price surge. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Jan 24, 2022: The requirement that palm oil exporters obtain export permits kicks in. Apr 19, 2022: The Indonesian Attorney-General's Office (AGO) names four suspects in a corruption case linked to the issuance of palm oil export permits. One suspect is a government official from the Trade Ministry. The others are executives from three palm oil producers – North Sumatra-based Permata Hijau Group, Musim Mas Group, and Wilmar's subsidiary, Wilmar Nabati Indonesia. Apr 28, 2022: Indonesia bans the export of crude palm oil (CPO) and all its derivative products – including cooking oil – to shore up domestic supplies and ease costs, as soaring global CPO prices spur producers to export the commodity instead of selling it at home. May 23, 2022: The ban is lifted after considering improvements in local palm oil supply and prices, Indonesian authorities say. Mar 19, 2025: Four judges acquit Wilmar Group and the two other companies of charges of misconduct in obtaining export permits in 2022. Apr 12, 2025: The Indonesian AGO accuses the judges behind the acquittal of receiving bribes to clear the companies of all charges. Apr 13, 2025: Three of the judges behind the acquittal are arrested, following the earlier arrest of the fourth judge, who allegedly received 60 billion rupiah to arrange a favourable verdict for the companies. The three judges are said to have received US$1.07 million in bribes. Apr 14, 2025: Wilmar maintains its innocence, stating that its actions to increase the supply of palm oil were intended to help the government improve domestic supply and lower prices. Jun 17, 2025: The corruption case undergoes a review by the Supreme Court, which will determine if the earlier lower court ruling will stand, says the AGO, which appealed the acquittal. The AGO says the 11.8 trillion rupiah that Indonesian authorities seized from five Wilmar subsidiaries in late May is compensation for state losses arising from the graft case. Wilmar says the seized assets are a security deposit that will be returned if the Supreme Court upholds the lower court's ruling; should it rule otherwise, the sum may be forfeited in part or in whole.
