Israeli defense systems malfunction and bomb themselves during Iranian attack
In one of the most dramatic events caught on camera, a missile from Israel's own Arrow-3 (Hetz-3) anti-missile system strikes and destroys a defensive launcher in the Negev Desert. According to reports, a technical issue or an inaccurate automatic response most likely caused the failure.
Additionally, according to sources, Israel's multi-layered air defense system was confused after Iranian air-to-air missiles broke through. A rare and alarming failure occurred when some Israeli defense platforms unintentionally engaged with one another in a strange and chaotic sequence.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps released Statement No. 6 as part of Operation True Promise 3, claiming to have carried out its most devastating wave to date. This incident came after that. According to the IRGC, the strike targeted Israeli command and control facilities using cyber and sophisticated warfare technologies.
According to reports, the Iranian missile strike killed at least four Israelis and injured or unaccounted for hundreds more. The Israeli government has so far maintained severe media censorship and made no official response, despite more footage showing widespread disorder in areas including Tel Aviv, Haifa, West Jerusalem, and Eilat.
Israel's renowned Iron Dome and other defense systems have come under fire both domestically and internationally as a result of the leaked video, which has raised questions about their dependability in the face of increasingly accurate and well-planned strikes. If such attacks persist, analysts caution, this may indicate a possible change in the military and strategic balance of the area.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Bawaba
a day ago
- Al Bawaba
Will Netanyahu fire the IDF chief over Gaza strategy standoff?
ALBAWABA- Tensions continue to escalate at the top of Israel's leadership as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pushes for a complete military takeover of the Gaza Strip, a move strongly opposed by IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir. According to Haaretz, citing Israeli officials, Netanyahu is unlikely to dismiss Zamir, despite earlier threats, and may instead settle for a limited military operation to project toughness amid political pressure. The disagreement surfaced after reports revealed that Netanyahu told senior security officials that Zamir should resign if he could not support the proposed operation. In response, Zamir presented alternative plans focused on encirclement and targeted strikes, seeking to avoid the risks of a prolonged occupation. While Netanyahu seeks cabinet approval for his aggressive plan, aimed at dismantling Hamas and rescuing hostages, military officials warn that such a move would endanger troops and civilians alike. Critics inside the government believe that the talk of wholly occupying Gaza is a political tactic to pressure Hamas, not a concrete plan. Far-right ministers like Itamar Ben Gvir have publicly demanded that Zamir pledge unconditional loyalty to cabinet decisions, regardless of personal objections. Yet, Defense Minister Israel Katz defended the Chief of Staff's right to voice his opinion, stating that the army will ultimately implement the leadership's final decision. Meanwhile, on the ground, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza continues to deepen. According to Gaza's Health Ministry, 20 Palestinians died overnight after a food truck overturned on desperate civilians in central Gaza, allegedly forced to use unsafe roads by Israeli forces. Eighteen others were killed by Israeli fire since dawn, and fresh evacuation orders have been issued for multiple neighborhoods in eastern Gaza City. As the war nears its two-year mark, questions loom over Israel's strategic direction, internal leadership rifts, and growing international condemnation, raising the stakes for both Netanyahu's government and Gaza's besieged population.
Roya News
a day ago
- Roya News
Lebanon tasks army with setting plan to restrict arms to state
Lebanon's government on Tuesday tasked the army with developing a plan to restrict arms to the state by year end, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said, an unprecedented move that paves the way for disarming Hezbollah. After a nearly six-hour cabinet session headed by President Joseph Aoun on disarming the Iran-backed group, Salam said the government "tasked the Lebanese army with setting an implementation plan to restrict weapons" to the army and other state forces "before the end of this year". The plan is to be presented to the cabinet by the end of August for discussion and approval, he told a press conference after the marathon session. A November ceasefire deal that sought to end more than a year of hostilities including two months of all-out war between 'Israel' and Hezbollah stated that Lebanese government authorities such as the army, security forces and local police are "the exclusive bearers of weapons in Lebanon". Salam said the cabinet would continue discussions this week on a proposal from US envoy Tom Barrack that includes a timetable for disarming Hezbollah. Information Minister Paul Morcos said that the cabinet "set a deadline of the end of the year to consolidate arms in the hands of the Lebanese state". He said Hezbollah-affiliated Health Minister Rakan Nassereldine and Environment Minister Tamara Elzein, who is affiliated with its ally the Amal movement, "withdrew from the session because they did not agree with the cabinet decision". Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem had said a short time earlier, as the cabinet was in session, that "any timetable presented for implementation under... Israeli aggression cannot be agreed to".
Jordan News
2 days ago
- Jordan News
Over Two-Thirds of Jordanians Are Optimistic About the Country's Direction – Citizens' Priorities Revealed
A recent public opinion survey conducted by the Center for Strategic Studies at the University of Jordan revealed that 72% of Jordanians believe the country is moving in a positive direction, while 26% think it is heading in a negative one. اضافة اعلان The survey also identified the top priorities for Jordanians. Unemployment and job creation for youth ranked as the most pressing issue, selected by 49% of respondents. This was followed by general economic reform (11%), improving public services such as healthcare and education (11%), and addressing rising prices and cost of living (11%). When asked about the government's recent decision to dissolve municipal and governorate councils and appoint interim committees until elections, 58% supported the move, while 29% opposed it. Regarding participation in upcoming local elections, 44% of respondents said they would definitely vote, 14% said they were likely to vote, and 40% said they probably would not. The survey also asked about the recent government decision to reduce taxes on certain types of passenger vehicles. 72% of respondents had heard of this decision, and 52% of those believe it benefits citizens, while 24% believe it benefits the government more. Additionally, 79% believe the decision will encourage people to purchase new cars, whereas 16% disagreed. On the political front, 97% of Jordanians believe security in the country is stable, with 57% saying it is very stable and 40% saying it is somewhat stable. Only 2% said it was unstable. In contrast, 57% believe the political situation in the region is unstable, including 10% who said it is very unstable. Meanwhile, 43% think the region is stable, with 10% saying it is very stable. When asked about the Palestinian cause, 73% of Jordanians believe it remains a top priority for the Arab world, especially in light of recent developments. In relation to the Iran-Israel conflict, 70% support the ceasefire between the two sides. 58% believe the recent attacks negatively impacted regional security, while 36% felt they had no impact. A significant majority—91%—think Jordan should strengthen its defense system in preparation for potential escalation. Only 5% disagree. On the use of sirens in Jordan during the Iran-Israel conflict, 55% said the sirens had no impact on them or their families, 43% said they caused worry and fear, and 2% said they were simply annoying. 62% reported following official safety instructions when hearing the sirens, while 38% did not. In terms of war-related preparedness, 12% of respondents said they took specific precautions, while 88% did not. Additionally, 89% reported seeing Iranian rockets, drones, or air defense responses with their own eyes, while 11% said they did not. Back on domestic issues, 63% of Jordanians said they rely primarily on social media for news and information about local events, making it the top source. Television came second at 27%, while friends and family made up 5%. Concerning recent amendments to the enforcement law regarding debtor imprisonment, 66% of respondents had heard of the changes, while 34% had not. Of those aware, 58% supported the amendments—24% strongly, 26% moderately, and 8% slightly—while 41% opposed them. When asked about social safety, 86% said they feel very or moderately safe in their communities, whereas 10% do not feel safe. Regarding the spread of drugs in society, 55% believe drugs are highly prevalent, 24% said moderately prevalent, 11% said slightly prevalent, and 5% said not prevalent at all. Respondents identified young adults aged 18–25 as the most affected age group, followed by teenagers aged 13–17 (25%), then adults aged 26–35 (13%), while 16% believe all age groups are equally affected. On the recent alcohol poisoning incident, 39% blamed regulatory authorities, 33% held the manufacturing company responsible, 20% blamed the individuals who consumed the drinks, and 5% felt all parties shared responsibility. Regarding the government's response to the incident, 60% believed the actions taken were quick and appropriate, while 27% found them delayed or inadequate. Finally, 93% of respondents expressed confidence in regulatory institutions to prevent similar incidents in the future. Specifically, 93% trust the Public Security Directorate, 73% trust the Ministry of Health, and 71% trust the Food and Drug Administration.
