Elizabeth Smith pleads guilty to manslaughter in dispute over belongings
Photo:
RNZ / Simon Rogers
An Auckland accountant previously charged with the murder of a man after driving her vehicle into him during a dispute, has pleaded guilty to manslaughter.
Elizabeth Lynn Smith pleaded guilty before Justice Downs at the High Court in Auckland on Wednesday, after the Crown reduced the charge to manslaughter this week following a period of discussions.
Smith and the victim Dean Fifield had previously lived together and were involved in an ongoing dispute over items Smith had claimed ownership over but were stored at Fifield's house, an agreed summary of facts stated.
On 13 June 2024 Smith went to Fifield's house in West Auckland to recover property, with two associates who were there to help her.
Smith and her associates got involved in a dispute with Fifield over the items in the driveway of the house.
Smith's associates later reversed out of the driveway and stopped on the roadside, while Smith's car remained in the driveway facing the road.
At one point, Fifield followed the associate's vehicle on foot and "began punching the associate's stationery vehicle with his closed fist, causing damage to the windscreen," according to the summary of facts.
Subsequently, Smith drove her vehicle directly into Fifield, which propelled him onto the bonnet before falling under the front of Smith's vehicle.
Smith continued to drive a short distance with Mr Fifield underneath her vehicle.
He was pronounced dead at the scene by attending paramedics.
Smith is set to be sentenced in August.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
Lawyer censured for slapping one colleague's bottom, touching another's back
By Al Williams, Open Justice reporter of File photo. Photo: 123rf A lawyer who slapped a junior male colleague on the bottom and touched a female colleague's lower back during a social function has been censured. The lawyer, a partner at an unnamed firm, urged a New Zealand Law Society standards committee to consider his behaviour in context, stating that more freedom should be allowed for conduct at an out-of-office social function than during the usual working day. However, the committee found his conduct was disrespectful and discourteous towards the employees, who were both junior to him. According to a recently released decision, the behaviour occurred in the context of socialising by some staff members after a team function arranged by their firm. The partner generally accepted that some of his behaviour was inappropriate, that he had blurred professional boundaries, and had consumed excess alcohol that night. However, he did not see that as a breach of professional standards or an abuse of power towards either colleague. According to the standards committee's decision, the lawyer submitted that slapping the male employee on the bottom was "paying [him] respect" and "blokey", and that he was behaving as a friend rather than a partner in the firm. "The committee sees absolutely no circumstance in which physical contact of this type towards any colleague could be described as respectful behaviour. "The committee also considers this behaviour risks perpetuating a workplace culture that the profession is at pains to transform in relation to interactions between colleagues." The lawyer accepted that he placed his hand on the female employee's lower back as she passed through a door. In his view, doing so was "an innocuous courtesy", and he intended "nothing sexual or sinister" by it. The committee did not ascribe any sexual intent to the lawyer's actions, but found it was clear that the female employee was uncomfortable at the time and afterwards. The committee considered that physical touch on the lower back carried an element of intimacy and overfamiliarity that may reasonably have been interpreted as inappropriate by her or a reasonable observer. While there were some contexts in which this would be acceptable to both parties involved, it was likely to be perceived as flirtatious and inappropriate in others, the decision said. The lawyer's evidence was that she approached him to show him a team photograph on her phone, and he assumed her reason for doing so was for him to comment on it. Referring to the photo, the lawyer commented that the woman was "beautiful" and said that, in that context, it was not intended to be disrespectful or discourteous. The committee accepted that the woman was anticipating a comment on the group photo, but not that she was inviting a comment on her own appearance to the exclusion of others (when there was nothing to draw attention to her over any other team member in the photo). The lawyer's contention that his comment was respectful and courteous in the context was not accepted. The committee considered it was more likely than not that the lawyer's judgement about what was appropriate was impaired. "When coupled with his admitted blurring of professional boundaries, his consumption of alcohol meant he was not well placed to exercise the judgement required of him." While the committee did not identify a specific abuse of any power imbalance, it said that didn't mean an imbalance did not exist "by virtue of their roles as partner and junior members of staff". The committee considered that the team's social function, including ongoing socialising that occurred after the formal portion of the function, was a professional, collegial occasion. It found that the lawyer's conduct across the three incidents demonstrated conduct towards both employees that was disrespectful and discourteous. It was generally conduct "that would be regarded by lawyers of good standing as being unacceptable and unprofessional". Due to mitigating factors present in the case, the committee said it did not consider it necessary to impose any penalty. This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald.
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
Defence to explore potential plea deal in murder trial over brothers killed in Mexico
By Carrington Clarke , ABC Callum, left, and Jake Robinson with their family dog. Photo: Instagram/Supplied Lawyers for the four people charged in connection with the alleged murder of Australian brothers Callum and Jake Robinson have asked for another court delay, to give them more time to discuss a potential plea deal with prosecutors. Judge Oscar Padilla agreed to grant them until a new hearing date on 13 November, but he said this would be the last delay in the case and warned all the lawyers that they would be fined if they were not prepared for the next hearing. Three men - Jesús Gerardo, also known as "El Kekas"; Irineo Francisco and Ángel Jesús - all face charges of aggravated homicide, aggravated robbery, violent robbery and grand theft auto over the killing of the Australian brothers and their American travelling companion, Carter Rhoad, in April last year. Jesús Gerardo is also charged with forced disappearance. The prosecution said a fourth suspect, Ari Gisell, was facing charges of inciting a violent robbery, but was not charged with murder. The defendants' surnames have been withheld for legal reasons. It was Ari Gisell's lawyer who asked the judge for a delay to allow time for discussions to take place with the prosecution regarding a potential plea deal. His motion was then supported by the other defence lawyers. The lawyer said the prosecutor's office was seeking a 32-year sentence for his client, but he believed eight years would be more appropriate given the crime she was accused of. Ari Gisell was romantically involved with one of the other defendants at the time. Photo: Supplied / ABC None of the suspects has entered a plea to any of the charges at this point. Prosecutor Raúl Gerardo Cobo Montejano told the ABC that if the accused pleaded guilty, it was possible they would receive a reduced sentence. The legal manoeuvrer was a surprise to the families of the victims, who were watching proceedings via video link. The judge asked an advocate who was attending proceedings on behalf of "indirect victims" to talk to them privately about what had occurred in court. Last week's hearing was postponed to allow time for both sides to consider arguments about whether to combine El Kekas's forced disappearance charge with the other charges. But there seems to be a dispute within the prosecution's office about exactly what transpired in April. A rescue worker descends into a waterhole where human remains were found near La Bocana Beach in Ensenada, Mexico, on 3 May, 2024. Photo: AFP/ Guillermo Arias The lead prosecutor in the homicide case told the judge he did not agree with the theory that the victims were first kidnapped or detained before being killed, as his colleague had contended. The judge expressed exasperation that there was not a consistent theory from the prosecution office at this point in the case. Irineo Francisco has links to the Sinaloa cartel, according to court documents. Photo: Supplied / ABC The judge has allowed the forced disappearance charge to be rolled in with the other charges, but it is unclear which will be the working theory when the case resumes. Jake and Callum Robinson, and their American friend Carter Rhoad, were found dead after disappearing during a camping trip in Mexico's remote north-west in April last year. They had travelled south to surf while Jake, a 31-year-old doctor from Perth, was visiting Callum, 32, who was living in California after moving to the US to play lacrosse. Both Callum (left) and Jake Robinson are keen surfers. Photo: Supplied / Instagram The defendants' surnames have been withheld for legal reasons. Last week, the ABC revealed that two of the accused, Jesús Gerardo and Irineo Francisco, had suspected links to the Sinaloa cartel. Local authorities had previously said there was no evidence linking the killings to cartels, despite their frequent violent activity in the region. Jesús Gerardo. Photo: Supplied / ABC / Mexican police A court document said the men were transferred from the local Ensenada jail to the maximum-security El Hongo complex last August, after prison authorities raised concerns about their alleged cartel links. The Sinaloa cartel, which was once led by the high-profile crime boss El Chapo, is considered one of Mexico's most brutal. - ABC
RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
Drug farmer built 'shanty' on Waikato swampland to harvest cannabis plots
By Belinda Feek, Open Justice reporter of Huntly men Jason Evans and Jayson Woods were charged after police discovered their cannabis growing operation on the shores of Lake Waahi in Huntly. Photo: Google Maps A drug farmer built a makeshift structure on the edge of a Waikato lake so he could row out and check on his cannabis plots, which he claims were at some point worth more than $200,000. In March 2021, Jason Edward Evans, 46, spent about eight weeks building the "shanty", which sat on the shores of Lake Waahi in Huntly. He and co-offender, champion New Zealand powerlifter Jayson George Woods, then used wooden pallets to get access around the cannabis plots on the swamplands surrounding the lake. Hamilton District Court recently heard that after building the structure, Evans lived in it for at least three weeks while he tended to his crop, harvesting the plants and setting up drying racks. Parts of the area were only accessible via boat. Then, in February 2022, police discovered about 1000 cannabis plants in six different spots in the lake area, describing the cultivation as a "large-scale commercial cannabis" operation. The discovery led police to Evans and Woods. When searching Evans' home in April that year, officers also found 15 x 500ml bottles of cannabis oil, $2480 cash, ammunition, 1kg of cannabis cabbage, 10 vials of steroids, and bottles of Jungle Juice and Rush. Jungle Juice and Rush are leather cleaning products but they can also be misused for other purposes. Evans told police he had harvested more than $200,000 worth of cannabis plants from his lakeside plots and that the cannabis oil and steroids were for his personal use. Aggravating Evans' situation, he was later busted with methamphetamine, cocaine, a firearm and prohibited firearm magazines this year, while on bail for the earlier offending. He was caught with those items when a firefighter was looking for a missing cat under a bed after a suspicious fire at Evans' Huntly property. The firefighter noticed a .22 rifle under the bed and reported it to police. The rifle was loaded with six rounds of ammunition, and, as it can hold 25 cartridges, is classified as a prohibited magazine. In a black bag, officers found 1.3g of cocaine, 172mg of meth, a meth pipe, Evans' passport, driver's licence, bank cards, medication and his phone. In his garage, they discovered a lathe surrounded by more ammunition, including a Ruger magazine, silencer and other firearms parts. After the earlier cannabis discovery, police also searched Woods' Huntly home and found 216 vials of prescription-only steroids and more than 300 unidentified pills. Officers also found a "small fully functional indoor cannabis grow room" in his garage, which had 18 seedlings, lights, power ballast, a timer and a mobile air con unit. A packet of unopened bullets and $4250 were also seized. Woods, 33, accepted there were "a couple of ounces of weed" at his house and said the steroids were his. According to court documents, he said he took them "because he is a New Zealand powerlifter". At Evans' recent sentencing, his counsel, Jasper Rhodes, said in explaining the 1000-plant discovery that it was grown in the wild and only about half of it would be "usable head". "It can only be harvested once a year because of the weather," he said, before stating that it was different from a hydroponic set-up in which all plants could be harvested. Judge Arthur Tompkins pointed out that, despite that, Evans had told police he had harvested more than $200,000 worth of cannabis. Rhodes said Evans was "primarily growing for personal use". He submitted that the operation was a "one-off, unsophisticated" situation with Evans "going in and out" to the hut by kayak. "This little hut [had] no glass, no windows, no walls, basically a shanty in the middle of the bush, compared with a person who is growing in hydroponic set-ups purely for personal gain with more plants." However, Rhodes accepted the drug offending Evans committed while on bail was an aggravating feature. He said Evans had the weapons and ammunition because he'd been the victim of attempted burglaries, break-ins and a violent home invasion in which he "almost died". As for the fire, that was investigated as arson, he said. "Without suggesting he was right to have a gun, he was right that he thought he was under threat," Rhodes said. "He had a reason, not a legitimate reason," the judge replied. Rhodes pushed for an end sentence of around 18 months, which would mean his client could walk out of prison, on time served, in about a month. But, on numerous charges, including cultivation of cannabis, possession of class A, B and C drugs, unlawful possession of firearms, prohibited magazines and ammunition, Judge Tompkins jailed Evans for two years and three months. Woods was sentenced earlier to 11 months' home detention on charges including cannabis cultivation for his involvement. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
