Think tank accused of ‘retaliatory action' after staffer complaint about high-profile director
Emilie Dye, who until recently worked as a marketing and research analyst at the right-leaning Centre for Independent Studies, has lodged applications with the Fair Work Commission alleging Switzer rubbed her leg, told her she had a 'great arse' and described himself as 'a very sexual guy' on a night out.
In response to detailed questions from this masthead, Switzer 'categorically denied' the allegations and said he had 'already decided' to quit as the head of the think tank before Dye's complaint.
'Following an intensive and debilitating time of being diagnosed with cancer and enduring chemotherapy, I had already decided to relinquish my post and had advised a number of people within the organisation of my intent,' he said.
Fair Work applications allege both that Switzer sexually harassed Dye, and that the think tank engaged in 'retaliatory' action against her after she refused to sign a confidentiality agreement over the incident.
This masthead does not suggest the allegations against Switzer are true, just that they have been lodged with both the CIS and the Fair Work Commission. They are yet to be formally investigated.
The Fair Work applications follow a detailed internal complaint lodged with the CIS the night after the alleged incident at Alfie's Steakhouse in Sydney's CBD in March.
The complaint prompted an apology from CIS chairman Nicholas Moore, and Switzer resigned as executive director less than a month later.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Courier-Mail
4 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Royal butler's role in Depp-Heard Queensland dog smuggling revealed
Don't miss out on the headlines from Books. Followed categories will be added to My News. A celebrity fixer drawn into the infamous Australian antics of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard was a former butler to the Queen who prides himself on his discretion, it has emerged. A new book documenting the Hollywood stars' tempestuous relationship reveals that British citizen Ben King, who worked as Depp's butler and house manager, began work at Buckingham Palace as a 20-year-old. He also worked for Nelson Mandela and Andrew Lloyd Webber before being hired as Depp's right-hand man, according to Hollywood Vampires: Johnny Depp, Amber Heard and the Celebrity Exploitation Machine. And King had a central role in the hullabaloo over the A-list couple's smuggled dogs. The comical scandal blew up – drawing in government ministers and making headlines around the world – after it came to light that Heard illegally brought their two teacup Yorkies, Pistol and Boo, into Australia in 2015. Back in California … Johnny Depp and Amber Heard at a film premiere in Westwood in November 2015, after their stay in Australia earlier in the year. 'Clean and elegant with impeccable manners' … Ben King testifies in Fairfax County Circuit Court in April 2022, after Johnny Depp sued his ex-wife Amber Heard for libel. Described in the book as clean and elegant with impeccable manners, King and the drug-addicted Depp seemed an improbable pairing, but the butler employed the same approach he took with the late Queen Elizabeth. 'Trust and discretion are the two things required for the job,' he told the book's authors, journalists Kelly Loudenberg and Makiko Wholey. Yet it seems discretion was sorely lacking when King took the dogs to Queensland grooming parlour, Happy Dogz, while Depp was living in the state and filming the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise Dead Men Tell No Tales in 2015. STREAM FREE ON TUBI: DEPP/HEARD DOCUMENTARIES Requesting the salon trim back the dogs' hair and style their faces, King revealed to the staff that Pistol and Boo belonged to none other than Johnny Depp. Thrilled to be grooming two celebrity pets, the salon owner promptly posted the pictures of the dogs to Facebook, alerting Barnaby Joyce, then Minister of Agriculture. Doggy debacle … Boo and Pistol at the Gold Coast mansion rented by Depp from motorcycle champion Mick Doohan. Credit: Nine News In the doghouse … Amber Heard, accompanied by Johnny Depp, arrives at the Southport Magistrates Court in April 2016 to face two counts of breaching Australia's quarantine laws. She paid a fine but escaped conviction after pleading guilty and expressing remorse. While Joyce ordered the dogs be taken back to the US immediately or they'd be euthanised, King was frantic with fear that he'd lose his job, according to Hollywood Vampires. Depp reportedly told his butler not to worry and one of his team smuggled the Yorkies back to the US inside a hatbox placed on the actor's private jet. The fascinating relationship between the Hollywood stars and their entourage is laid bare in the book, which reveals how Depp demanded his team procure drugs for him and how they were left to clean up after he and Heard all but destroyed a rented Gold Coast mansion during a vicious argument. An extra hotel room was always rented in case a fight broke out between the couple and they needed to be sent to their own corners. Depp was already in an agitated state before Heard arrived Down Under to join him and texted his assistant Nathan Holmes asking for drugs. He said he'd been sober from booze for nine months but he was still taking ecstasy, according to the book. Ben King's former boss, Queen Elizabeth II. British music royalty Andrew Lloyd Webber. Holmes reportedly told his boss that 'the guy', a film crew member, could only carry two grams because if caught he faced two years in an Australia prison. Depp apparently exploded: 'Any ONE of ANY of you guys start to lecture me … I just do not want to hear it … No stupid bullshit about sappy bollocks.' It was Holmes and King who were faced with cleaning up after the couple's vicious row which led Depp to losing the top of his finger. The pair had to restore the damage to the house, estimated to be up to $300,000, without its owner, Aussie motorcycling champion Mick Doohan, learning about the drama. As part of the operation, King found a woman in the countryside to make a perfect copy of an antique lampshade on which Depp had painted 'Good Luck and Be Careful at the Top'. He also found someone to replace the chunk of marble that had come off the bar in the games room. New details … Hollywood Vampires will be published in Australia on August 12. Hollywood Vampires: Johnny Depp, Amber Heard and the Celebrity Exploitation Machine, by Kelly Loudenberg and Makiko Wholey, will be published in Australia by HarperCollins on August 12. Want to go further into the Depp/Heard story? Watch for free on Tubi: Documentary – Depp vs Heard: All the Line Docu-series – Surviving Amber Heard Dramatisation – Hot Take: The Depp/Heard Trial PLUS Star Couple's Night of Aussie Mayhem: Exclusive extract on Sunday. Originally published as Manager who looked after Johnny Depp, Amber Heard, their smuggled dogs and their trashed mansion was former royal man
The Advertiser
5 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'Disgusting act': how scammers are now preying on the vulnerable
Online scammers have sunk to a new low, targeting bereaved loved ones around the country to make a quick buck at their expense. The funeral notices of recently departed Australians are being reproduced across social media with fraudulent links, asking loved ones to pay to livestream the service, but it's all a phishing scam. It comes as new report from Trend Micro found one in four surveyed had fallen victim to an online scam while two-thirds had been targeted by scammers. "It's a disgusting low act," said Paul Brooks of Burke and Douglas Funerals. Read more from The Senior: The Tamworth funeral home has been targeted by cyber criminals on several occasions over the past 18 months, though the true financial damage is unknown. Mr Brooks said there isn't much they can do except warn people that Australian funeral homes will never charge viewers to watch a livestream link. "As soon as we reported it or messaged them [the scam poster], it immediately changed to another funeral home down on the Victorian border," he said. "People don't care how they scam people out of money. Look, who knows, it might not even be someone in Australia." In 2024 reported losses to scammers equated to $2.03billion with 494,732 scam reports made that year, as revealed in data from Scamwatch, ReportCyber, the Australian Financial Crimes Exchange. During that year, the data showed 10,355 suspected Facebook scam URLs to Meta (parent of Facebook and Instagram) for further investigation. A spokesperson from the National Anti-Scam Centre (an arm of the ACCC) told The Senior they have received reports of the funeral scams, which are similar involving fake livestream links to sporting events. "These are phishing scams and the methodology is the same in both scenarios," they said. "Entering credit card details results in attempted charges being made against the card, though the site may inform the user that the credit card details were invalid or failed. "Some scam streaming sites push you to subscribe with your credit card but don't deliver the content and/or fail to cancel your subscription when asked." Both Mr Brooks and the ACCC advised people to contact the funeral home directly for a live streaming link and research the organisation or person you're dealing with before giving and money or personal information. "It's a really sad time for people and it's loaded up with emotion ... and all of a sudden they're [the family are] then stressing about all their loved ones and friends who potentially could be scammed. It's not what they need," Mr Brooks said. "Ultimately, you'll never be charged to to watch a live stream for a funeral," Mr Brooks said. If you see a scam, or are the victim of foul play, you are encouraged to report it to authorities via: Online scammers have sunk to a new low, targeting bereaved loved ones around the country to make a quick buck at their expense. The funeral notices of recently departed Australians are being reproduced across social media with fraudulent links, asking loved ones to pay to livestream the service, but it's all a phishing scam. It comes as new report from Trend Micro found one in four surveyed had fallen victim to an online scam while two-thirds had been targeted by scammers. "It's a disgusting low act," said Paul Brooks of Burke and Douglas Funerals. Read more from The Senior: The Tamworth funeral home has been targeted by cyber criminals on several occasions over the past 18 months, though the true financial damage is unknown. Mr Brooks said there isn't much they can do except warn people that Australian funeral homes will never charge viewers to watch a livestream link. "As soon as we reported it or messaged them [the scam poster], it immediately changed to another funeral home down on the Victorian border," he said. "People don't care how they scam people out of money. Look, who knows, it might not even be someone in Australia." In 2024 reported losses to scammers equated to $2.03billion with 494,732 scam reports made that year, as revealed in data from Scamwatch, ReportCyber, the Australian Financial Crimes Exchange. During that year, the data showed 10,355 suspected Facebook scam URLs to Meta (parent of Facebook and Instagram) for further investigation. A spokesperson from the National Anti-Scam Centre (an arm of the ACCC) told The Senior they have received reports of the funeral scams, which are similar involving fake livestream links to sporting events. "These are phishing scams and the methodology is the same in both scenarios," they said. "Entering credit card details results in attempted charges being made against the card, though the site may inform the user that the credit card details were invalid or failed. "Some scam streaming sites push you to subscribe with your credit card but don't deliver the content and/or fail to cancel your subscription when asked." Both Mr Brooks and the ACCC advised people to contact the funeral home directly for a live streaming link and research the organisation or person you're dealing with before giving and money or personal information. "It's a really sad time for people and it's loaded up with emotion ... and all of a sudden they're [the family are] then stressing about all their loved ones and friends who potentially could be scammed. It's not what they need," Mr Brooks said. "Ultimately, you'll never be charged to to watch a live stream for a funeral," Mr Brooks said. If you see a scam, or are the victim of foul play, you are encouraged to report it to authorities via: Online scammers have sunk to a new low, targeting bereaved loved ones around the country to make a quick buck at their expense. The funeral notices of recently departed Australians are being reproduced across social media with fraudulent links, asking loved ones to pay to livestream the service, but it's all a phishing scam. It comes as new report from Trend Micro found one in four surveyed had fallen victim to an online scam while two-thirds had been targeted by scammers. "It's a disgusting low act," said Paul Brooks of Burke and Douglas Funerals. Read more from The Senior: The Tamworth funeral home has been targeted by cyber criminals on several occasions over the past 18 months, though the true financial damage is unknown. Mr Brooks said there isn't much they can do except warn people that Australian funeral homes will never charge viewers to watch a livestream link. "As soon as we reported it or messaged them [the scam poster], it immediately changed to another funeral home down on the Victorian border," he said. "People don't care how they scam people out of money. Look, who knows, it might not even be someone in Australia." In 2024 reported losses to scammers equated to $2.03billion with 494,732 scam reports made that year, as revealed in data from Scamwatch, ReportCyber, the Australian Financial Crimes Exchange. During that year, the data showed 10,355 suspected Facebook scam URLs to Meta (parent of Facebook and Instagram) for further investigation. A spokesperson from the National Anti-Scam Centre (an arm of the ACCC) told The Senior they have received reports of the funeral scams, which are similar involving fake livestream links to sporting events. "These are phishing scams and the methodology is the same in both scenarios," they said. "Entering credit card details results in attempted charges being made against the card, though the site may inform the user that the credit card details were invalid or failed. "Some scam streaming sites push you to subscribe with your credit card but don't deliver the content and/or fail to cancel your subscription when asked." Both Mr Brooks and the ACCC advised people to contact the funeral home directly for a live streaming link and research the organisation or person you're dealing with before giving and money or personal information. "It's a really sad time for people and it's loaded up with emotion ... and all of a sudden they're [the family are] then stressing about all their loved ones and friends who potentially could be scammed. It's not what they need," Mr Brooks said. "Ultimately, you'll never be charged to to watch a live stream for a funeral," Mr Brooks said. If you see a scam, or are the victim of foul play, you are encouraged to report it to authorities via: Online scammers have sunk to a new low, targeting bereaved loved ones around the country to make a quick buck at their expense. The funeral notices of recently departed Australians are being reproduced across social media with fraudulent links, asking loved ones to pay to livestream the service, but it's all a phishing scam. It comes as new report from Trend Micro found one in four surveyed had fallen victim to an online scam while two-thirds had been targeted by scammers. "It's a disgusting low act," said Paul Brooks of Burke and Douglas Funerals. Read more from The Senior: The Tamworth funeral home has been targeted by cyber criminals on several occasions over the past 18 months, though the true financial damage is unknown. Mr Brooks said there isn't much they can do except warn people that Australian funeral homes will never charge viewers to watch a livestream link. "As soon as we reported it or messaged them [the scam poster], it immediately changed to another funeral home down on the Victorian border," he said. "People don't care how they scam people out of money. Look, who knows, it might not even be someone in Australia." In 2024 reported losses to scammers equated to $2.03billion with 494,732 scam reports made that year, as revealed in data from Scamwatch, ReportCyber, the Australian Financial Crimes Exchange. During that year, the data showed 10,355 suspected Facebook scam URLs to Meta (parent of Facebook and Instagram) for further investigation. A spokesperson from the National Anti-Scam Centre (an arm of the ACCC) told The Senior they have received reports of the funeral scams, which are similar involving fake livestream links to sporting events. "These are phishing scams and the methodology is the same in both scenarios," they said. "Entering credit card details results in attempted charges being made against the card, though the site may inform the user that the credit card details were invalid or failed. "Some scam streaming sites push you to subscribe with your credit card but don't deliver the content and/or fail to cancel your subscription when asked." Both Mr Brooks and the ACCC advised people to contact the funeral home directly for a live streaming link and research the organisation or person you're dealing with before giving and money or personal information. "It's a really sad time for people and it's loaded up with emotion ... and all of a sudden they're [the family are] then stressing about all their loved ones and friends who potentially could be scammed. It's not what they need," Mr Brooks said. "Ultimately, you'll never be charged to to watch a live stream for a funeral," Mr Brooks said. If you see a scam, or are the victim of foul play, you are encouraged to report it to authorities via:
Sydney Morning Herald
11 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Complete vindication': Nine wins defamation fight against high-profile surgeon
Grieve said it was an important moment for investigative journalism and recognition of the courageous patients who had spoken out against their doctor. 'This judgment is a complete vindication of the brave patients who had the courage to speak out and an indictment on the doctor who went to war with the people he has a duty to protect,' she said. 'This is an important moment for investigative journalism, and I'm proud of everyone who has worked so hard to defend this important public interest investigation.' Nine, through Collins, had argued Al Muderis had been incapable of admitting his errors and had left patients 'devastated'. 'Our submission is that a surgeon who would treat people so callously, so appallingly … is not a surgeon who deserves a glittering reputation,' Collins said. '[Al Muderis] is a surgeon whose malpractices and unethical conduct have left patients devastated and worse off than before they saw him; is a surgeon who has operated negligently; is a surgeon who has delivered substandard care, leaving patients to fend for themselves; is a surgeon who has not properly cared for his patients; is a surgeon who has made promises that he's not delivered on; is a surgeon whose conduct at times has been appalling and beneath contempt.' Al Muderis' lawyer, Sue Chrysanthou, SC, had argued that Nine had unreasonably painted the surgeon as a 'Dr Frankenstein'. The case was one of the first major tests of the public interest defence for reporting, which allows media companies to argue they reasonably believed their journalism was published in the public interest. Abraham concluded Nine had 'established that the beliefs they held were objectively reasonable' in reaching her conclusion. Loading The surgeon previously called for the identities of confidential sources relied upon by Grieve to be unmasked, but he failed after a judge concluded revealing the sources did not outweigh the public interest in protecting their identities. Abraham said she considered the evidence of 22 patients, who were presented to the court as case studies for osseointegration performed by Al Muderis between 2013 and the publication of the stories. The evidence of four more orthopaedic patients factored into Abraham's reasoning. 'Although [Nine] accepted Dr Al Muderis is, to many, an Australian hero who has devoted much of his life's work to helping amputees walk again, they contended their investigation revealed there is a significant cohort of patients who are unhappy and negatively impacted by Dr Al Muderis' services,' Abraham said. Nine chief executive Matt Stanton said the decision was 'vindication of our reporting and reinforces Nine's longstanding commitment to investigative journalism'. 'Nine welcomes today's judgment by the Federal Court to dismiss Munjed Al Muderis's claims of defamation. The court has confirmed the stories published by The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and aired on 60 Minutes have been successfully defended. Nine's victory today on the basis of public interest is a significant moment in Australian defamation case law,' Stanton said. Leah Mooney was not an osseointegration patient, but she was called to give evidence by Nine in late 2023 about two surgeries Al Muderis had performed on her in Sydney. Al Muderis had left a broken drill bit in her leg in the 2011 operations, triggering a chronic bone infection and then a years-long lawsuit and battles with regulators. On Friday, she celebrated the ruling against Al Muderis with her husband, Tim, saying it was 'a long time coming'. Loading 'It's a feeling of relief and happiness. It's been a long battle and to now think, 'My god, I'm at the end of it,'' Leah said. University of Sydney media law professor David Rolph said the 'comprehensive victory' for the newspapers showed the new public interest defence can succeed, where notoriously flimsy other defences fail in defamation. 'The old statutory qualified privilege defence was notorious in NSW, for many decades, for being unsuccessful and very difficult for media companies to rely on,' Rolph said.
